Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access March 7, 2022

The critical incident negotiation process of public librarians in Aotearoa New Zealand

Cameron M. Pierson
From the journal Open Information Science

Abstract

This paper reports findings from interviews with practicing public librarians in Aotearoa New Zealand. It details respondent understanding of influences on perception and behaviour, and critical incidents as they relate to librarian professional identity. In-depth semi-structed interviews were conducted with forty practicing public librarians. Interviews were analysed with an inductive approach. Findings report on sample tendencies of dominant influences on practitioners’ perception and behaviour, impacting professional identity development over time. Dominant influences are respondent understanding of the strongest aspect they understand to influence their professional identity for both their individual perception of their professional identity and social factors influencing their professional behaviour. Findings also report on the identity negotiation process prompted by critical incidents, whose criticality is reliant on individual perception of incident in relation to professional identity. This process outlines affective response to the critical incident as a gateway to identity negotiations, leading to a discovery and/or growth of an identity facet, which will either affirm or undermine identity understanding. This process may be iterative, as meaning ascribed to the incident may change over time. Three theoretical propositions are presented articulating the role of dominant influences and critical incidents on identity negotiations of public librarian professional identity.

References

Angelides, P. (2010). The development of an efficient technique for collecting and analyzing qualitative data: the analysis of critical incidents. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 14(3), 429-442. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839011002905810.1080/09518390110029058Search in Google Scholar

Australian Library and Information Association. (2021). Professional Pathways. https://www.alia.org.au/Web/Careers/Becoming-an-Information-Professional/Professional-Pathways/Web/Careers/Professional-Pathway/Professional-Pathways.aspx?hkey=7493bd74-c566-48c5-800c-2ada17b5b26bSearch in Google Scholar

Bushing, M. C. (1995). The professionalization of rural librarians: Role modeling, networking and continuing education [Doctoral dissertation, Montana State University].Search in Google Scholar

Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing Gounded Theory. Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Duckett, K. (2001). Bringing professional knowledge and identity into a grassroots library development project: A case study of world library partnership volunteers in South Africa [Master Thesis, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill].Search in Google Scholar

Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 5, 327-358.10.1037/h0061470Search in Google Scholar

Fraser-Arnott, M. (2017a). Identifying as a librarian: When LIS graduates in non-library roles use the title “librarian”. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 41(3), 186-210. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/686189Search in Google Scholar

Fraser-Arnott, M. (2017b). Personalizing professionalism: The professional identity experiences of LIS graduates in non-library roles. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 51(2), 431-439. https://doi.org/10.1177/096100061770906210.1177/0961000617709062Search in Google Scholar

Frye, J. M. (2018). Assimilation or humiliation? An analysis of professional identities after critical events in the workplace. School Library Research, 21, 1-27. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1182161.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Hicks, D. (2014). The construction of librarians’ professional identities: a discourse analysis. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 38(4), 251-270. https://doi.org/10.1353/ils.2014.001710.1353/ils.2014.0017Search in Google Scholar

Hicks, D. (2016a). Advocating for librarianship: The discourses of advocacy and service in the professional identities of librarians. Library Trends, 64(3), 615-640. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2016.000710.1353/lib.2016.0007Search in Google Scholar

Hicks, D. (2016b). Person or place: rhetorical construction of librarian and library by the information profession community. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 40(4), 318-331.10.29173/cais949Search in Google Scholar

Holley, R. P. (2016). Library culture and the MLIS: The bonds that unite librarianship. The Bottom Line, 29(3), 207-217. https://doi.org/10.1108/BL-05-2016-002310.1108/BL-05-2016-0023Search in Google Scholar

Hussey, L., & Campbell-Meier, J. (2016). Developing professional identity in LIS? Education for Information, 32(4), 343-357. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-16098110.3233/EFI-160981Search in Google Scholar

Hutchins, H. M., & Rainbolt, H. (2017). What triggers imposter phenomenon among academic faculty? A critical incident study exploring antecedents, coping, and development opportunities. Human Resource Development International, 20(3), 194-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2016.124820510.1080/13678868.2016.1248205Search in Google Scholar

Lawler, S. (2014). Identity: Sociological Perspectives (2nd ed.). Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar

Library and Information Association of New Zealand Aotearoa. (2022). Professional Registration: New Registrations. https://lianza.org.nz/professional-development/professional-registration/new-registrations/Search in Google Scholar

Linton, A. M. (2016). Emerging roles for librarians in the medical school curriculum and the impact on professional identity. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 35(4), 414-433. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2016.122075810.1080/02763869.2016.1220758Search in Google Scholar

Luo, L., & Wildemuth, B. M. (2017). Semistructured interviews. In B. M. Wildemuth (Ed.), Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library sceicne (2nd ed., pp. 248-257). Libraries Unlimited.Search in Google Scholar

Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Myers, M. D. (2013). Qualitative research in business and management. Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Pierson, C. M., Goulding, A., & Campbell-Meier, J. (2019). An integrated understanding of librarian professional identity. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 68(4/5), 413-430. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-01-2019-000810.1108/GKMC-01-2019-0008Search in Google Scholar

Pierson, C. M., Goulding, A., & Campbell-Meier, J. (2020). Metaphors and critical incidents: Introduction to a methodological approach derived from expressions of librarian professional identity. Information Research, 25(2). http://informationr.net/ir/25-2/paper859.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Preer, J. L. (2004). “This year-Richmond!”: The 1936 meeting of the American Library Association. Libraries & Culture, 39(2), 137-160.10.1353/lac.2004.0038Search in Google Scholar

Preer, J. L. (2006). “Louder please”: Using historical research to foster professional identity in LIS students. Libraries & the Cultural Record, 41(4), 487-496.10.1353/lac.2006.0064Search in Google Scholar

Sare, L., & Bales, S. E. (2014). Professional identity: A grounded theory study of veteran academic librarians. Library Review, 63(8/9), 574-589. https://doi.org/10.1108/LR-02-2014-002010.1108/LR-02-2014-0020Search in Google Scholar

Sare, L., Bales, S. E., & Neville, B. (2012). New academic librarians and their perceptions of the profession. portal : Libraries and the Academy, 12(2), 179-203. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2012.001710.1353/pla.2012.0017Search in Google Scholar

Sundin, O., & Hedman, J. (2009). Professions and occupational identities. In K. E. Fisher, S. Erdelez, & L. E. F. McKechnie (Eds.), Theories of information behavior (pp. 293-297). Information Today, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Sundin, O., & Johannisson, J. (2005). Pragmatism, neo-pragmatism and sociocultural theory: Communicative participation as a perspective in LIS. Journal of Documentation, 61(1), 23-43. https://doi.org/10.1108/0022041051057799810.1108/00220410510577998Search in Google Scholar

Trede, F., Macklin, R., & Bridges, D. (2012). Professional identity development: A review of the higher education literature. Studies in Higher Education, 37(3), 365-384. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.52123710.1080/03075079.2010.521237Search in Google Scholar

Whyte, W. H. (1956/2002). The Organization Man. University of Pennsylvania Press.10.9783/9780812209266Search in Google Scholar

Wilkins-Jordan, M., & Hussey, L. (2014). Looking at the socialization of LIS students through a pop culture lens. Library Philosophy and Practice, Article 1079. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1079Search in Google Scholar

Wise, S. (2012). Working to think otherwise: Tracing ethos in information professional’s reflections on learning and practice. Australian Academic and Research Libraries, 43(3), 169-188.10.1080/00048623.2012.10722276Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, B. M. (2009). Qualitative analysis of content. In B. M. Wildemuth (Ed.), Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science (pp. 308-319). Libraries Unlimited.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-09-17
Accepted: 2022-02-02
Published Online: 2022-03-07

© 2022 Cameron M. Pierson, published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Scroll Up Arrow