Abstract
Many surveys have suggested that U.S. public library usage correlates with socioeconomic status and race; persons identifying as Non-Hispanic White, highly-educated, and affluent claim to use library services at a rate greater than those not belonging to these groups. These findings suggests that the dominant model of library service—a brick and mortar localized service point—interfaces poorly with marginalized and disenfranchised persons. This paper combines Public Library Survey and American Community Survey data for 49 U.S. states to explore the relationship between socioeconomic variables and public library usage. Using Bayesian hierarchical modeling, this paper finds corroboration for these surveys at the “community-level,” i.e., communities with higher socioeconomic status and more Non-Hispanic Whiteness are associated with greater levels of library activity. It also finds, using propensity score matching, that local funding is strongly associated with library activity, underscoring the importance of funding advocacy. The analysis suggests that U.S. library administrators who aim to reach marginalized and disenfranchised persons might want to consider service models alternate to the dominant brick and mortar model.
References
Aptekar, S. (2019). The public library as resistive space in the neoliberal city. City & Community, 18(4), 1203-1219.10.1111/cico.12417Search in Google Scholar
Berelson, B. (1949). The library’s public: A report of the Public Library Inquiry. New York: Columbia University Press.10.7312/bere93730Search in Google Scholar
Campbell, B. (2008). Preface: Why working together. Community-Led Libraries Toolkit. https://www.vpl.ca/sites/vpl/public/Community-Led-Libraries-Toolkit.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
“Community-Led Library Service” (n.d.). https://saskatoonlibrary.ca/servicemodelSearch in Google Scholar
Davis, H. (2009, Jan 14). A look at recessions and their impact on librarianship. In the Library with the Lead Pipe. https://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2009/a-look-at-recessions-and-their-impact-on-librarianship/Search in Google Scholar
Ettarh, F. (2018). Vocational awe and librarianship: The lies we tell ourselves. In the Library with the Lead Pipe. https://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2018/vocational-awe/Search in Google Scholar
Finch, M. J. (2021, May 4). Learning from our statistics. Public Libraries Online. http://publiclibrariesonline.org/2021/05/learning-from-our-statistics/Search in Google Scholar
Geiger, A. (2017, June). Millennials are the most likely generation of Americans to use public libraries. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/06/21/millennials-are-the-most-likely-generation-of-americans-to-use-public-libraries/Search in Google Scholar
Guild, C. M. (2019). Social reproduction theory in the academic library: Understanding the implications of socially reproductive labor as labor. Public Services Quarterly, 15(3), 263-271.10.1080/15228959.2019.1629859Search in Google Scholar
Hofman, J. M., Goldstein, D. G., & Hullman, J. (2020). How visualizing inferential uncertainty can mislead readers about treatment effects in scientific results. CHI ‘20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1-12. https://osf.io/2um5d/10.1145/3313831.3376454Search in Google Scholar
Horrigan, J. B. (2015). Chapter 1: Who uses libraries and what they do at their libraries. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2015/09/15/who-uses-libraries-and-what-they-do-at-their-libraries/Search in Google Scholar
Horrigan, J. B. (2016). Chapter 3: A portrait of those who have never been to libraries. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2016/09/09/a-portrait-of-those-who-have-never-been-to-libraries/Search in Google Scholar
The Institute of Museum and Library Services (2017). Public libraries in the United States Fiscal Year 2014. Washington, DC: The Institute. https://www.imls.gov/sites/default/files/publications/documents/plsfy2014.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Japzon, A. C., & Gong, H. (2005). A neighborhood analysis of public library use in New York City. The Library Quarterly, 75(4), 446-63.10.1086/502786Search in Google Scholar
Kronus, C. L. (1973). Patterns of adult library use: A regression and path analysis. Adult Education Quarterly, 23(2), 115-131.10.1177/074171367302300203Search in Google Scholar
Meyer, J. (2018). Poverty and public library usage in Iowa. Public Library Quarterly, 37(1), 53-60.10.1080/01616846.2017.1312193Search in Google Scholar
Mostad-Jensen, A. (2009). The impact of economic recessions on libraries: A past, present, and future view from Minnesota. LIBREAS. Library Ideas, 14. https://libreas.eu/ausgabe14/007mos.htmSearch in Google Scholar
Pateman, J. (2000). Public libraries and social class. http://eprints.rclis.org/6284/1/vol3wp3.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Pateman, J. (2011). Public libraries, social class and social justice. Information, Society and Justice 4(2), 57-70. http://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/114/1/InformationSocietyAndJustice_v4n2_p57-70.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
The public library and the people: A national survey done for the Public Library Inquiry. (1948). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.Search in Google Scholar
Pundsack, K. (2019). Flatter, focused, and community-led -- Public library staffing continues to evolve. Public Libraries Online. http://publiclibrariesonline.org/2019/07/flatter-focused-and-community-led-public-library-staffing-continues-to-evolve/Search in Google Scholar
Raber, N. D. (1992). The Public Library Inquiry and the search for professional legitimacy (Publication No. 9301471) [Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.Search in Google Scholar
Rainie, L. (2016, April). Library users and learning. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/04/07/library-users-and-learningSearch in Google Scholar
Schmidt, J., & Hale, J. (2017). Little free libraries®: Interrogating the impact of the branded book exchange. Journal of Radical Librarianship, 3, 14-41. https://journal.radicallibrarianship.org/index.php/journal/article/view/17/32Search in Google Scholar
Sin, S.-C., J. & Kim, K. S. (2008). Use and non-use of public libraries in the information age: A logistic regression analysis of household characteristics and library service variables. Library & Information Science Research, 30, 207-215.10.1016/j.lisr.2007.11.008Search in Google Scholar
Stenström, C., & Haycock, K. (2015). Public library advocacy: An evidence-based perspective on sustainable funding. Public Libraries Online. http://publiclibrariesonline.org/2015/09/public-library-advocacy-an-evidence-based-perspective-on-sustainable-funding/Search in Google Scholar
Swan, D. W., Grimes, J., Owens, T., Miller, K., Arroyo, J., Craig, T., Dorinski, S., Freeman, M., Isaac, N., . . . P.& Scotto, J. (2014). Public libraries in the United States survey: Fiscal year 2011 (IMLS-2014-PLS-01). Washington, DC: Institute of Museum and Library Services. https://www.imls.gov/sites/default/files/publications/documents/pls2011.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
© 2022 Michael Carlozzi, published by De Gruyter
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
