Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 3.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access February 26, 2015

Other-initiated repair in Siwu

Mark Dingemanse EMAIL logo
From the journal Open Linguistics

Abstract

This article describes the interactional patterns and linguistic structures associated with other-initiated repair in Siwu, a Kwa language spoken in eastern Ghana. Other-initiated repair is the set of techniques used by people to deal with problems in speaking, hearing and understanding. Formats for repair initiation in Siwu exploit language-specific resources like question words and noun class morphology. At the same time, the basic structure of the system bears a strong similarity to other-initiated repair in other languages. Practices described for Siwu thus are potentially of broader relevance to the study of other-initiated repair. This article documents how different prosodic realisations of repair initiators may index social actions and features of the speech event; how two distinct roles of repetition in repair initiators are kept apart by features of turn design; and what kinds of items can be treated as ‘dispensable’ in resayings. By charting how other-initiated repair uses local linguistic resources and yet is shaped by interactional needs that transcend particular languages, this study contributes to the growing field of pragmatic typology: the study of systems of language use and the principles that shape them.

References

Benjamin, Trevor. 2012. “When Problems Pass Us By: Using ‘You Mean’ to Help Locate the Source of Trouble.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 45 (1): 82–109. doi:10.1080/08351813.2012.646742. 10.1080/08351813.2012.646742Search in Google Scholar

Clark, Herbert H., and Susan E. Brennan. 1991. Grounding in communication. In Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, ed by. Lauren B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, and S. D. Teasley, 13:127–149. Washington: APA Books. 10.1037/10096-006Search in Google Scholar

Clark, Herbert H., and Edward Schaefer. 1987. “Collaborating on contributions to conversations.” Language and Cognitive Processes 2 (1): 19–41. doi:10.1080/01690968708406350. 10.1080/01690968708406350Search in Google Scholar

Contini-Morava, Ellen. 1996. “Things” in a noun-class language. Semantic functions of agreement in Swahili. In Toward a calculus of meaning. Studies in markedness, distinctive features and deixis, ed by. Edna Andrews and Yishai Tobin, 251–290. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sfsl.43.16conSearch in Google Scholar

Cysouw, M. 2004. Interrogative words: an exercise in lexical typology. Presentation presented at the Bantu grammar: description and theory workshop, February 13. Search in Google Scholar

Dingemanse, Mark. 2011. The Meaning and Use of Ideophones in Siwu. PhD dissertation, Nijmegen: Radboud University. http://thesis.ideophone.org/. Search in Google Scholar

Dingemanse, Mark, Joe Blythe, and Tyko Dirksmeyer. 2014. “Formats for other-initiation of repair across languages: An exercise in pragmatic typology.” Studies in Language 38 (1): 5–43. doi:10.1075/sl.38.1.01din. 10.1075/sl.38.1.01dinSearch in Google Scholar

Dingemanse, Mark, Francisco Torreira, and N. J. Enfield. 2013. “Is ‘Huh?’ a universal word? Conversational infrastructure and the convergent evolution of linguistic items.” PLOS ONE. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078273. 10.1371/journal.pone.0078273Search in Google Scholar

Drew, Paul. 1997. “‘Open’ class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of trouble in conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 28: 69–101. 10.1016/S0378-2166(97)89759-7Search in Google Scholar

Egbert, Maria. forthcoming. Selection principles for other-initiated repair turn formats - an answer from positioned questions. In Finding the universal in the particular: Festschrift for Emanuel A. Schegloff on his 70th birthday, ed by. John Heritage, Gene H. Lerner, and Geoffrey Raymond. Blackwell. Search in Google Scholar

Enfield, N. J. 2009. The Anatomy of Meaning: Speech, Gesture, and Composite Utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511576737Search in Google Scholar

Enfield, N. J., Mark Dingemanse, Julija Baranova, Joe Blythe, Penelope Brown, Tyko Dirksmeyer, Paul Drew, et al. 2013. Huh? What? – A first survey in 21 languages. In Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, ed by. Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond, and Jack Sidnell, 343–380. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511757464.012Search in Google Scholar

Enfield, N. J., Paul Drew, and Julija Baranova. forthcoming. “Non-minimal sequences of other-initiation of repair: a cross-linguistic study.” Search in Google Scholar

Enfield, N. J., Tanya Stivers, and Stephen C. Levinson. 2010. “Question-response sequences in conversation across ten languages: An introduction.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (10): 2615–2619. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.001. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.001Search in Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas, and David Wilkins. 2000. “In the Mind’s Ear: The Semantic Extensions of Perception Verbs in Australian Languages.” Language 76 (3): 546–592. doi:10.2307/417135. 10.2307/417135Search in Google Scholar

Ford, Kevin, and Robert K. Iddah. 1973. A Grammar of Siwu. Ms. Legon, Ghana. Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1964. “The Neglected Situation.” American Anthropologist 66 (6): 133–136. 10.1525/aa.1964.66.suppl_3.02a00090Search in Google Scholar

Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2004. The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511616983Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. 1971. “Language in a Social Perspective.” Educational Review 23 (3): 165–188. doi:10.1080/0013191710230302. 10.1080/0013191710230302Search in Google Scholar

Hayashi, Makoto, Geoffrey Raymond, and Jack Sidnell, eds. 2013. Conversational Repair and Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511757464Search in Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail. 1972. Side sequences. In Studies in Social Interaction, ed by. David N. Sudnow, 294–338. New York: MacMillan/The Free Press. Search in Google Scholar

———. 2004. Glossary of transcript symbols with an Introduction. In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation, ed by. G.H. Lerner, 43–59. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Search in Google Scholar

Karcevski, Serge. 1941. “Introduction à l’étude de l’interjection.” Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 1: 57–75. Search in Google Scholar

Kendon, Adam. 1990. Conducting interaction: patterns of behavior in focused encounters. CUP Archive. Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Kyu-hyun. 1999. “Other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation: Types and functions.” Discourse and Cognition 6: 141–168. Search in Google Scholar

Kitzinger, Celia. 2013. Repair. In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed by. Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 229–256. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 10.1002/9781118325001.ch12Search in Google Scholar

Lerner, Gene H. 2003. “Selecting next speaker: The context-sensitive operation of a context-free organization.” Language in Society 32 (02): 177–201. doi:10.1017/S004740450332202X. 10.1017/S004740450332202XSearch in Google Scholar

Local, J. K., J. Kelly, and W. H. G. Wells. 2008. “Towards a phonology of conversation: turn-taking in Tyneside English.” Journal of Linguistics 22 (02): 411. doi:10.1017/S0022226700010859. 10.1017/S0022226700010859Search in Google Scholar

Moerman, Michael. 1977. “The Preference for Self-Correction in a Tai Conversational Corpus.” Language 53 (4): 872–882. 10.2307/412915Search in Google Scholar

Obeng, Samuel Gyasi. 1992. “A phonetic description of some repair sequences in Akan conversation.” Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 12 (1): 59–80. doi:10.1515/text.1.1992.12.1.59. 10.1515/text.1.1992.12.1.59Search in Google Scholar

———. 1999. Conversational Strategies in Akan: Prosodic Features and Discourse Categories. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe. Search in Google Scholar

Ochs, Elinor, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, eds. 1996. Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620874Search in Google Scholar

Ohala, John J. 1984. “An ethological perspective on common cross-language utilization of F0 of voice.” Phonetica 41 (1): 1–16. 10.1159/000261706Search in Google Scholar

Robinson, Jeffrey D. 2006. “Managing Trouble Responsibility and Relationships During Conversational Repair.” Communication Monographs 73: 137–161. doi:10.1080/03637750600581206. 10.1080/03637750600581206Search in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on conversation. 2 vols. London: Blackwell. Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1987. Between macro and micro: Contexts and other connections. In The micro-macro link, ed by. Jeffrey C. Alexander, Bernhard Giesen, Richard Munch, and Neil J. Smelser, 207–234. Los Angeles: University of California Press. Search in Google Scholar

———. 1993. “Reflections on Quantification in the Study of Conversation.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 26 (1): 99–128. doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi2601_5. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2601_5Search in Google Scholar

———. 1997. “Practices and actions: Boundary cases of other-initiated repair.” Discourse Processes 23 (3): 499–545. doi:10.1080/01638539709545001. 10.1080/01638539709545001Search in Google Scholar

———. 2000. “When ‘others’ initiate repair.” Applied Linguistics 21 (2): 205–243. doi:10.1093/applin/21.2.205. 10.1093/applin/21.2.205Search in Google Scholar

———. 2004. “On dispensability.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 37 (2): 95–149. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3702_2Search in Google Scholar

———. 2005. “On Complainability.” Social Problems 52 (4): 449–476. 10.1525/sp.2005.52.4.449Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks. 1977. “The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation.” Language 53 (2): 361–382. 10.1353/lan.1977.0041Search in Google Scholar

Seifart, Frank. 2005. The structure and Use of Shape-based Noun Classes in Miraña (North West Amazon). PhD dissertation, Radboud Universiteit, Nijmegen. Search in Google Scholar

Selting, Margret. 1987. Verständigungsprobleme. Eine empirische Analyse am Beispiel der Bürger-Verwaltungs-Kommunikation. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783111357669Search in Google Scholar

———. 1996. Prosody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation: the case of so-called “astonished” questions in repair initiation. In Prosody in conversation : interactional studies, ed by. Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Margret Selting, 231–270. Cambridge / New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511597862.008Search in Google Scholar

Selting, Margret, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, eds. 2001. Studies in Interactional Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.10Search in Google Scholar

Sicoli, M. A., T. Stivers, N. Enfield, and S. C. Levinson. 2014. “Marked Initial Pitch in Questions Signals Marked Communicative Function.” Language and Speech. doi:10.1177/0023830914529247. http://las.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0023830914529247. Search in Google Scholar

Sidnell, Jack. 2007. Repairing person reference in a small Caribbean community. In Person reference in interaction: linguistic, cultural and social perspectives, ed by. N. J. Enfield and Tanya Stivers, 281–308. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486746.013Search in Google Scholar

———. 2010. Conversation Analysis: An Introduction. Chichester, U.K: Wiley-Blackwell. Search in Google Scholar

Ultan, Russell. 1978. Some general characteristics of interrogative systems. In Universals of human language, 4:211–248. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2014-9-29
Accepted: 2015-1-16
Published Online: 2015-2-26

© 2015 Mark Dingemanse

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Downloaded on 27.11.2022 from frontend.live.degruyter.dgbricks.com/document/doi/10.1515/opli-2015-0001/html
Scroll Up Arrow