Abstract
In gesture studies character viewpoint and observer viewpoint (McNeill 1992) characterize co-speech gestures depending on whether the gesturer’s hand and body imitate a referent’s hand and body or the hand represents a referent in its entirety. In sign languages, handling handshapes and entity handshapes are used in depicting predicates. Narratives in Danish Sign Language (DTS) elicited to make signers describe an event from either the agent’s or the patient’s perspective demonstrate that discourse perspective is expressed by which referent, the agent or the patient, the signers represent at their own locus. This is reflected in the orientation and movement direction of the manual articulator, not by the type of representation in the articulator. Signers may also imitate the gaze direction of the referent represented at their locus or have eye contact with the addressees. When they represent a referent by their own locus and simultaneously have eye contact with the addressee, the construction mixes referent perspective and narrator perspective. This description accords with an understanding of linguistic perspective as grounded in bodily perspective within a physical scene (Sweetser 2012) and relates the deictic and attitudinal means for expressing perspective in sign languages to the way perspective is expressed in spoken languages.
References
Aarons, Debra, & Ruth Morgan. 2003. Classifier predicates and the creation of multiple perspectives in South African Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 3, 125-156. Search in Google Scholar
Ahlgren, Inger, & Brita Bergman. 1994. Reference in narratives. In Inger Ahlgren, Brita Bergman & Mary Brennan (eds.), Perspectives on sign language structure: papers from The Fifth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, Salamanca, Spain, 25-30 May 1992, 29-36. Durham, UK: The Deaf Studies Research Unit. Search in Google Scholar
Banfield, Ann. 1973. Narrative style and the grammar of direct and indirect speech. Foundations of language, 10, 1-39. Search in Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., & Richard J. Gerrig. 1990. Quotations as demonstrations. Language, 66(4), 764-805. Search in Google Scholar
Cogill-Koez, Dorothy. 2000a. A model of signed language ‘classifier predicates’ as templated visual representation. Sign Language & Linguistics, 3(2), 209-236. Search in Google Scholar
Cogill-Koez, Dorothy. 2000b. Signed language classifier predicates: linguistic structures or schematic visual representation? Sign Language & Linguistics, 3, 153-207. Search in Google Scholar
Cormier, Kearsy, David Quintos-Pozos, Zed Sevcikova, & Adam Schembri. 2012. Lexicalisation and de-lexicalisation in sign languages: comparing depicting constructions and viewpoint gestures. Language & Communication, 32, 329-348. Search in Google Scholar
Coulmas, Florian. 1986. Reported speech: some general issues. In Florian Coulmas (ed.), Direct and indirect speech, 1-28. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110871968.1Search in Google Scholar
Dudis, Paul. 2004. Body partitioning and real-space blends. Cognitive Linguistics, 15, 223-238. Search in Google Scholar
Dudis, Paul. 2007. Types of depiction in ASL. Gallaudet University. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.google.dk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCoQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gallaudet.edu%2Fdocuments%2Facademic%2Fdrl-dudis2007.pdf&ei=EYiRU-CQAeqm0QXgq4CoCw&usg=AFQjCNE3sIIbpEOyfOFKMnNDGU92RnKcgQ&sig2=XZbcEertlBwFINvMYkVRbA&bvm=bv.68445247,d.d2k (last accessed April 30, 2015). Search in Google Scholar
Dudis, Paul. 2011. The body in scene depictions. In C. B. Roy (ed.), Discourse in sign languages, 3-45. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press. 10.2307/j.ctv2rh28s4.7Search in Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth. 1993. Space in Danish Sign Language: the semantics and morphosyntax of the use of space in a visual language. Hamburg, Germany: Signum Press. Search in Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth. 1995. Point of view expressed through shifters. In Karen Emmorey & Judy Reilly (eds.), Language, gesture, and space, 133-154. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Search in Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth. 2003. From pointing to reference and predication: pointing signs, eyegaze, and head and body orientation in Danish Sign Language. In Sotaro Kita (ed.), Pointing: where language, culture, and cognition meet, 269-292. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Search in Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth. 2010. Factors that shape classifier constructions. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages, 252-283. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511712203.013Search in Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth. 2011. Cognitive foundations of topic-comment and foreground-background structures: evidence from sign languages, cospeech gesture and homesign. Cognitive Linguistics, 22, 691-718. 10.1515/cogl.2011.026Search in Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 2012. Some problems in the typology of quotation: a canonical approach. In Dunstan Brown, Marina Chumakina & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), Canonical morphology and syntax, 66-98. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199604326.003.0004Search in Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press. Search in Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1971. Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb. In Roman Jakobson: Selected writings, vol. II: word and language, 130-147. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110873269.130Search in Google Scholar
Janzen, Terry. 2004. Space rotation, perspective shift, and verb morphology in ASL. Cognitive Linguistics, 15(2), 149-174. Search in Google Scholar
Janzen, Terry. 2012. Two ways of conceptualizing space: motivating the use of static and rotated vantage point space in ASL discourse. In Barbara Dancygier & Eve Sweetser (eds.), Viewpoint in language: a multimodal perspective, 156-174. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139084727.012Search in Google Scholar
Janzen, Terry, Barbara O’Dea, & Barbara Shaffer. 2001. The construal of events: passives in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 1(3), 281-310. Search in Google Scholar
Kegl, Judy A. 1985. Causative marking and the construal of agency in ASL. In William H. Eilfort, Paul D. Kroeber & Karen L. Peterson (eds.), CLS 21, part 2: papers from the parasession on causatives and agentivity at the twenty-first regional meeting, 120-137. Chicago, ILL: Chicago Linguistic Society. Search in Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar (Vol. 1: Theoretical perspectives). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Search in Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott K. 2000. Indicating verbs and pronouns: pointing away from agreement. In Karen Emmorey & Harlan Lane (eds.), The signs of language revisited: an anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, 303-320. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Search in Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott K. 2003. Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511615054Search in Google Scholar
Matthews, Peter H. 1981. Syntax. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar
McNeill, David. 1992. Hand and mind: what gestures reveal about thought. Chicago, ILL: The University of Chicago Press. Search in Google Scholar
Metzger, Melanie. 1995. Constructed dialogue and constructed action in American Sign Language. In Ceil Lucas (ed.), Sociolinguistics in deaf communities, 255-268. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press. Search in Google Scholar
Padden, Carol. 1988. Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. New York, NY: Garland Publishing, Inc. Search in Google Scholar
Parrill, Fey. 2009. Dual viewpoint gestures. Gesture, 9, 271-289. Search in Google Scholar
Parrill, Fey. 2010. Viewpoint in speech-gesture integration: linguistic structure, discourse structure, and event structure. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(5), 650-668. Search in Google Scholar
Parrill, Fey. 2011. The hands are part of the package: gesture, common ground and information packaging. In Sally Rice & John Newman (eds.), Empirical and experimental methods in cognitive/functional research, 285-302. Stanford, CA: CSL. Search in Google Scholar
Parrill, Fey. 2012. Interactions between discourse status and viewpoint in co-speech gesture. In Barbara Dancygier & Eve Sweetser (eds.), Viewpoint in language: a multimodal perspective, 97-112. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139084727.008Search in Google Scholar
Perniss, Pamela M. 2007a. Achieving spatial coherence in German Sign Language narratives: the use of classifiers and perspective. Lingua, 117, 1315-1338. 10.1016/j.lingua.2005.06.013Search in Google Scholar
Perniss, Pamela M. 2007b. Space and iconicity in German Sign Language (DGS). MPI Series in Psycholinguistics. 10.1075/sll.11.1.17perSearch in Google Scholar
Schembri, Adam. 2003. Rethinking ‘classifiers’ in signed languages. In Karen Emmorey (ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages, 3-34. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Search in Google Scholar
Stec, Kashmiri. 2012. Meaningful shifts: a review of viewpoint markers in co-speech gesture and sign language. Gesture, 12, 327-260. 10.1075/gest.12.3.03steSearch in Google Scholar
Stukenbrock, Anja. 2014. Pointing to an ‘empty’ space: Deixis am Phantasma in face-to-face interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 74, 70-93. Search in Google Scholar
Supalla, Ted. 1982. Structure and acquisition of verbs of motion and location in American Sign Language. PhD Thesis. San Diego, CA: University of California San Diego. Search in Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 2012. Introduction: viewpoint and perspective in language and gesture, from the Ground down. In Barbara Dancygier & Eve Sweetser (eds.), Viewpoint in language: a multimodal perspective, 1-22. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139084727.002Search in Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1986. Introducing constructed dialogue in Greek and American conversational and literary narrative. In Florian Coulmas (ed.), Direct and indirect speech, 311-332. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter. Search in Google Scholar
© 2015 Elisabeth Engberg-Pedersen
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
