Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 3.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access June 25, 2015

Lexical selection and the evolution of language units

Glenn Hadikin
From the journal Open Linguistics

Abstract

In this paper I discuss similarities and differences between a potential new model of language development - lexical selection, and its biological equivalent - natural selection. Based on Dawkins' (1976) concept of the meme I discuss two units of language and explore their potential to be seen as linguistic replicators. The central discussion revolves around two key parts - the units that could potentially play the role of replicators in a lexical selection system and a visual representation of the model proposed. draw on work by Hoey (2005), Wray (2008) and Sinclair (1996, 1998) for the theoretical basis; Croft (2000) is highlighted as a similar framework. Finally brief examples are taken from the free online corpora provided by the corpus analysis tool Sketch Engine (Kilgarriff, Rychly, Smrz and Tugwell 2004) to ground the discussion in real world communicative situations. The examples highlight the point that different situational contexts will allow for different units to flourish based on the local social and linguistic environment. The paper also shows how a close look at the specific context and strings available to a language user at any given moment has potential to illuminate different aspects of language when compared with a more abstract approach.

References

Baxter, Gareth J., Richard A. Blythe, William Croft et al. 2009. Modeling language change: an evaluation of Trudgill’s theory of the emergence of New Zealand English. Language Variation and Change 21(2). 157-196. 10.1017/S095439450999010XSearch in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas. 2009. A corpus-driven approach to formulaic language in English: multi- word patterns in speech and writing. Paper presented at Corpus Linguistics 2009, University of Liverpool, 20-23 July. Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2000. Explaining Language Change. Harlow: Pearson Education. Search in Google Scholar

Darwin, Charles. 1871. The descent of man. London: Murray. Search in Google Scholar

Dawkins, Richard. 1976. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University press. Search in Google Scholar

Dennett, Daniel. 2003. Freedom evolves. New York City: Viking. Search in Google Scholar

Hadikin, Glenn. 2014. Korean English: a corpus driven study of a New English. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.62Search in Google Scholar

Hoey, Michael. 2005. Lexical Priming: a new theory of words and language. London: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Hull, David. 1988. Science as a process: an evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science. Chicago: University of Chicago press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226360492.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Jablonka, Eva, Anna Zeligowski & Marion J. Lamb. 2014. Evolution in Four Dimensions : Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT press. 10.7551/mitpress/9689.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Kilgariff, Adam, Pavel Rychly, Pavel Smrz et al. 2004. The Sketch Engine. In Proceedings of Euralex 2004, Lorient, France, 6-10 July, 105-116. Search in Google Scholar

Kirby, Simon. 2007. The Evolution of Meaning-space Structure through Iterated Learning. In Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on the Emergence and Evolution of Linguistic Communication, University of Hertfordshire, 12-15 April, http://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/~simon/Papers/Kirby/kirby%20aisb%20v2.pdf (accessed 5th April 2015). Search in Google Scholar

Martincorena, Iñigo, Aswin Seshasayee & Nicholas Luscombe. 2012. Evidence of non- random mutation rates suggests an evolutionary risk management strategy. Nature 485 (7396). 95-98. 10.1038/nature10995Search in Google Scholar

node. In Oxford English Dictionary. 2014. Search in Google Scholar

Pagel, Mark. 2009. Human language as a culturally transmitted replicator. Nature reviews: genetics 10. 405-415. 10.1038/nrg2560Search in Google Scholar

Sinclair, John. 1996. The search for units of meaning. Textus 9. 75-106. Search in Google Scholar

Sinclair, John. 1998. The lexical item. In Edda Weigand (ed.) Contrastive Lexical Semantics. 1-24. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.171.02sinSearch in Google Scholar

Swadesh, Morris. 1952. Lexico-statistic dating of prehistoric ethnic contacts. In Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 96(4). 453-463. Search in Google Scholar

Williams, Geoffrey. 1998. Collocational networks: interlocking patterns of lexis in a corpus of plant biology research articles. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 3(1). 151-171. 10.1075/ijcl.3.1.07wilSearch in Google Scholar

Wray, Alison. 2002. Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511519772Search in Google Scholar

Wray, Alison. 2008. Formulaic Language: pushing the boundaries. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2014-9-15
Accepted: 2015-5-27
Published Online: 2015-6-25

© 2015 Glenn Hadikin

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Scroll Up Arrow