Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 3.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access February 25, 2016

Compare Within and Between Groups: The Interpretation of Weak Generic Sentences

  • Zhiguo Xie
From the journal Open Linguistics

Abstract

This paper explicates the precise meaning of weak generic sentences of the form Ks are P, best represented by the Port Royal Puzzle sentence Dutchmen are good sailors. The sentence is true even though the majority of Dutchmen do not know how to sail at all and a fortiori do not sail well. Two observations motivate my analysis. One is that weak generic sentences express a property that “distinguishes the subject referent from other entities that might belong to the same category” (Krifka et al. 1995). This leads to the use of alternative set in my analysis. The other observation is that the scale structure of the predicate P affects the availability of weak generic reading for sentences of the form Ks are P. I argue that the interpretation of weak generic sentences involves: (i) partitioning the set of entities denoted by the bare plural subject based on the property denoted by the predicate P; (ii) partitioning the set of entities alternative to the denotation of the subject in a similar fashion; and (iii) comparing an appropriate partition in (i) to its counterpart in (ii) with respect to the predicate P. The Port Royal Puzzle sentence is true if and only if: those Dutchmen who can sail and who are good at sailing in comparison with the Dutch-internal standard of being good at sailing and those international citizens who can sail and who are good at sailing in comparison to the international standard of being good at sailing are such that the former population generally have better sailing skills than the latter population.

References

Carlson, Gregory. 1977. Reference to Kinds in English. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Search in Google Scholar

Chierchia, Gennaro. 1995. Individual level predicates as inherent generics. In: Gregory Carlson and Francis Pelletier (eds.). The Generic Book. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, Ariel. 1999. Think Generic!: The Meaning and Use of Generic Sentences. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, Ariel. 2001. Relative readings of many, often, and generics. Natural Language Semantics 9(1): 41–67. 10.1023/A:1017913406219Search in Google Scholar

Farkas, Donka and Yoko Sugioka. 1983. Restrictive if/when clauses. Linguistics and Philosophy 6(2): 225-258. 10.1007/BF00635644Search in Google Scholar

Greenberg, Yael. 2007. Exceptions to generics: Where vagueness, context dependence and modality interact. Journal of Semantics 24(2): 131-167. 10.1093/jos/ffm002Search in Google Scholar

Kadmon, Nirit and Fred Landman. 1993. Any. Linguistics and Philosophy 16(4): 353-422 10.1007/BF00985272Search in Google Scholar

Kennedy, Christopher. 2007. Vagueness and grammar: The semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 30(1): 1–45. 10.1007/s10988-006-9008-0Search in Google Scholar

Kennedy, Christopher and Louise McNally. 2005. Scale Structure, Degree Modification, and the Semantics of Gradable Predicates. Language 81(2): 345-381 10.1353/lan.2005.0071Search in Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika. 1981. The notional category of modality. In Hans-Jürgen Eikmeyer & Hannes Rieser (eds.) Words, Worlds, and Contexts. New Approaches in Word Semantics: 38-74. Berlin: de Gruyter. Search in Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika.1995. Stage-level and individual-level predicates. In: Gregory Carlson and Francis Pelletier (eds.). The Generic Book. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Search in Google Scholar

Krifka Manfred, Francis Pelletier, Gregory Carlson et al. 1995. Genericity: An introduction. In: Gregory Carlson and Francis Pelletier (eds.). The Generic Book. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Search in Google Scholar

Larson, Richard. 1998. Events and modification in nominals. Proceedings of the 8th Semantic and Linguistic Theory. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications. 145–168. Search in Google Scholar

Mari Alda, Claire Beyssade, and Fabio Del Prete. 2013. Introduction. In: Alda Mari, Claire Beyssade, and Fabio Del Prete (eds.). Genericity. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199691807.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

McNally, Louise. 2011. The relative role of property type and scale structure in explaining the behavior of gradable adjectives. In: Rick Nouwen, et al. (eds.), ViC 2009 (Papers from the ESSLLI 2009 Workshop on Vagueness in Communication), 151–168. Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978-3-642-18446-8_9Search in Google Scholar

Menendez-Benito, Paula. 2007. Course Materials for 24.921. MIT. Search in Google Scholar

Nickel, Bernhard. 2010. Sharks and mosquitoes, habits and capacities. Ms. Harvard University. Search in Google Scholar

Nickel, Bernhard. 2012. Dutchmen are good sailors: Generics and gradability. In Alda Mari and Claire Beyssade, and Fabio Del Prete (eds.) Genericity, 390-405. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199691807.003.0016Search in Google Scholar

Pustejovsky, James. 1995. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Search in Google Scholar

Rooth, Mats. 1985. Association with Focus, Ph.D. dissertation. University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Search in Google Scholar

Toledo, Assaf, and Galit W. Sassoon. 2011. Absolute vs. relative adjectives: variance within vs. between individuals. In: Neil Ashton, Anca Chereches, and David Lutz (eds.) Proceedings of the 21st Semantics and Linguistic Theory, 135–154. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications. 10.3765/salt.v21i0.2587Search in Google Scholar

von Fintel, Kai. 1997. Bare plurals, bare conditionals, and only. Journal of Semantics 14(1): 1-56. 10.1093/jos/14.1.1Search in Google Scholar

Wilkinson, Karina. 1991. Studies in the Semantics of Generic Noun Phrases. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-3-23
Accepted: 2015-1-13
Published Online: 2016-2-25

© 2016 Zhiguo Xie

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Downloaded on 10.12.2023 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/opli-2016-0004/html
Scroll to top button