Abstract
In an artificial language-learning task, two groups of English and French participants learned one of two language rules: 1) stress the first heavy (CVC) syllable, else the first syllable, or, 2) stress the first light (CV) syllable, else the first syllable. French and English participants were chosen to compare learning outcomes by speakers of different native stress systems, fixed and variable. Participants were trained on the target language by listening to a set of nonsense familiarization words exemplifying the stress rule. This was followed by a forced-choice task to choose the correct version of the words they had just learned. Following the training procedure, participants were tested on novel words with the same stress pattern to which they were familiarized. The result of the novel word testing was that the natural rule with stress on heavy syllables was learned significantly better than the unnatural, stress light syllables, rule. To account for the learnability of both the natural and the unnatural rules, I argue for the interaction of a general cognitive mechanism that facilitates learning in general and a domain-specific language mechanism that can access universal phonological principles to aid in learning a natural language rule.
References
Ausubel, David P. (1965). The role of frequency in learning and retention: A cognitive structure interpretatioin. Journal of General Psychology, 72(2), 359-368. 10.1080/00221309.1965.9710705Search in Google Scholar
Baer-Henney, Dinah, Kügler, Frank & van de Vijver, Ruben (2015). The interaction of language-specific and universal factors during the acquisition of morphophonemic alternations with exceptions. Cognitive Science, 39, 1537-1569. 10.1111/cogs.12209Search in Google Scholar
Becker, Michael, Nevins, Andrew & Levine, Jonathan (2012). Asymmetries in generalizing alternations to and from initial syllables. Language, 88(2), 231-268. 10.1353/lan.2012.0049Search in Google Scholar
Berent, Iris, Steriade, Donca, Lennertz, Tracy & Vaknin, Vered (2007). What we know about what we have never heard: Evidence from perceptual illusions. Cognition, 104(3), 591-630. 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.05.015Search in Google Scholar
Burzio, Luigi (1994). Principles of English stress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511519741Search in Google Scholar
Buss, David M., Haselton, Martie G., Shackelford, Todd, Bleske, April L., & Wakefield, Jerome C. (1998). Adaptations, exaptations, and spandrels. American Psychologist, 53(5), 533-548. 10.1037/0003-066X.53.5.533Search in Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan (2002). Sequentiality as the basis of constituent structure. In T. Givon & B. F. Malle (Eds.), The evolution of language out of pre-language (pp. 109-134). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Search in Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan (2006). From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82(4), 711-733. 10.1353/lan.2006.0186Search in Google Scholar
Carpenter, Angela (2010). A naturalness bias in learning stress. Phonology, 27, 345-392. 10.1017/S0952675710000199Search in Google Scholar
Carpenter, Angela (2015). Phonetic training significantly mitigates the stress ‘deafness’ of French speakers. International Journal of Linguistics, 7(3), 94-108. 10.5296/ijl.v7i3.7661Search in Google Scholar
Carpenter, Angela (Submitted). Learning natural and unnatural phonological stress by 9- and10-year-olds: A preliminary report. Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1972). Language and Mind. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World. Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, & Halle, Morris (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row. Search in Google Scholar
Christiansen, Morten & Chater, Nick (2008). Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 489-509. 10.1017/S0140525X08004998Search in Google Scholar
Cole, Ronald A. & Scott, Brian (1974). The phantom in the phoneme: Invariant cues for stop consonants. Perception & Psychophysics, 15(1), 101-107. 10.3758/BF03205836Search in Google Scholar
Comins, Jordan A. & Gentner, Timothy (2013). Perceptual categories enable pattern generalization in songbirds. Cognition, 128, 113-118. 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.03.014Search in Google Scholar
Culbertson, Jennifer (2012). Typological universals as reflections of biased learning: Evidence from artificial language learning. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6(5), 310-329. 10.1002/lnc3.338Search in Google Scholar
de Graaff, Rick (1997). The Experanton experiment: Effects of explicit instruction on second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 249-276. Search in Google Scholar
de la Moro, Daniela & Toro, Juan M. (2014). Discrimination of acoustic patterns in rats using theater T-maze. Psicológica, 35, 195-208. Search in Google Scholar
DeLattre, Pierre (1966). A comparison of syllable length conditioning among languages. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 4(3), 183-198. 10.1515/iral.1966.4.1-4.183Search in Google Scholar
Dupoux, Emmanuel, Pallier, Christophe, Sebastián-Gallés, Nuria & Mehler, Jacques (1997). A destressing “deafness” in French? Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 406-421. 10.1006/jmla.1996.2500Search in Google Scholar
Edwards, Jette G. H., & Zampini, Mary (2008). Phonology and Second Language Acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.36Search in Google Scholar
Ellis, Nick & Collins, Laura (2009). Input and second language acquisition: The roles of frequency form, and function - Introduction to the special issue. The Modern Language Journal, 93(3), 329-335. 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00893.xSearch in Google Scholar
Finley, Sara (2011). The privileged status of locality in consonant harmony. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 74-83. 10.1016/j.jml.2011.02.006Search in Google Scholar
Finley, Sara & Badecker, William (2010). Linguistic and non-linguistic influences on learning biases for vowel harmony. Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX. Search in Google Scholar
Fry, Dennis (1955). Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress. JASA, 27, 765-768. 10.1121/1.1908022Search in Google Scholar
Fry, Dennis (1958). Experiments in the perception of stress. Language and Speech, 126-152. 10.1177/002383095800100207Search in Google Scholar
Goad, Heather & White, Lydia (2008). Prosodic structure and the representation of L2 functional morphology: A nativist approach. Lingua, 118(4), 577-594. 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.01.008Search in Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew (1999). Syllable Weight: Phonetics, Phonology and Typology. (Ph.D.), University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles. Search in Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew (2002). A phonetically-driven account of syllable weight [March 2002]. Language, 78, 51-80. 10.1353/lan.2002.0020Search in Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew (2004). Syllable Weight. In B. Hayes, D. Steriade, & R. Kirchner (Eds.), Phonetically-based Phonology. West Nyack, NY: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar
Greenberg, Steven, Carvey, Hannah & Hitchcock, Leah (2002). The relations between stress accent and pronunciation variation in spontaneous American English discourse. Paper presented at the ISCA Workshop on Prosody and Speech Processing. Search in Google Scholar
Greenberg, Steven, Chang, Shawn & Hitchcock, Leah (2001). The relation between stress accent and vocalic identity in spontaneous American English discourse. Paper presented at the Prosody and Speech Recognition 2001, Red Bank, NJ. Search in Google Scholar
Hammond, Michael (1999). The Phonology of English: A Prosodic Optimality-Theoretic Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar
Hancin-Bhatt, Barbara (2008). Second-language phonology in optimality theory. In J. G. H. Edward & M. Zampini (Eds.), Phonology and Second Language Acquisition (pp. 117-146). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Search in Google Scholar
Harris, Katherine (1958). Cues for the discrimination of American English fricatives in spoken syllables. Language and Speech, 1(1), 1-7. 10.1177/002383095800100101Search in Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce (1982). Extrametricality and English stress. Linguitic Inquiry, 13, 227-276. Search in Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce (1995). Metrical Stress Theory. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Search in Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce, Zuraw, Kie, Siptár, Peter & Londe, Zsuzsa (2009). Natural and unnatural constraints in Hungarian vowel harmony. Language, 85(4), 822-863. 10.1353/lan.0.0169Search in Google Scholar
Hemera Technologies (2001). Big Box of Art 350,000: Hemera Technologies, Inc. Search in Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. (1985/2003). A theory of phonological weight. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. 10.1515/9783110854794Search in Google Scholar
Jassem, Wiktor, Morton, John, & Steffen-Batog, Maria (1968). The perception of stress in synthetic speech-like stimuli by Polish listeners. In W. Jassem (Ed.), Speech Analysis and Synthesis (pp. 289-308). Warsaw: Institute of Fundamental Technical Research. Search in Google Scholar
Kapatsinski, Vsevolod (2013). Conspiring to mean: Experimental and computational evidence for a usage-based harmonic approach to morphophonology. Language, 89(1), 110-148. 10.1353/lan.2013.0003Search in Google Scholar
Kawahara, Shigeto (2008). Phonetic naturalness and unnaturalness in Japanese loanword phonology. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 17, 317-330. 10.1007/s10831-008-9030-zSearch in Google Scholar
Klatt, Dennis H. (1976). Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 59(5), 1208-1221. 10.1121/1.380986Search in Google Scholar
Lewicki, Pawel, Czyzewska, Maria & Hoffman, Hunter (1987). Unconscious acquisition of complex procedural knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13(4), 523-530. Search in Google Scholar
Maye, Jessica, Werker, Janet & Gerken, LouAnn (2002). Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination. Cognition, 82, B101-B111. 10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00157-3Search in Google Scholar
McCarthy, John (1979). On stress and syllabification. Linguistic Inquiry, 10(3), 443-465. Search in Google Scholar
Moreton, Elliott (2008). Analytic bias and phonological typology. Phonology, 25, 83-127. 10.1017/S0952675708001413Search in Google Scholar
Moreton, Elliott (2009). Underphonologization and modularity bias. In S. Parker (Ed.), Phonological Argumentation: Essays on Evidence and Motivation (pp. 79-101). Bristol: Equinox Publishing Ltd. Search in Google Scholar
Moreton, Elliott & Pater, Joe (2012a). Structure and substance in artificial-phonology learning, Part I: Structure. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6, 686-701. 10.1002/lnc3.363Search in Google Scholar
Moreton, Elliott & Pater, Joe (2012b). Structure and substance in artificial-phonology learning, Part II: Substance. Language and Linguistic Compass, 6, 702-718. 10.1002/lnc3.366Search in Google Scholar
O’Shaughnessy, Douglas (1984). A multispeaker analysis of durations in read French paragraphs. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76(6), 1664-1672. 10.1121/1.391613Search in Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. (1994). Towards a universal, phonetically-based, theory of vowel harmony. Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 94), Yokohama, Japan. 10.21437/ICSLP.1994-113Search in Google Scholar
Pater, Joe (1997). Metrical parameter missetting in second language acquisition. In S. J. Hannahs and M. Young-Scholten (Eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Search in Google Scholar
Pater, Joe (2000). Non-uniformity in English secondary stress: The role of ranked and lexically specific constraints. Phonology, 17(2), 237-274. 10.1017/S0952675700003900Search in Google Scholar
Pater, Joe & Tessier, Anne-Michelle (2005). Phonotactics and alternations: Testing the connection with artificial language learning. In K. F. a. S. Kawahara (Ed.), UMOP 31: Papers in Experimental Phonetics and Phonology. Amherst, MA: GLSA. Search in Google Scholar
Peperkamp, Sharon & Dupoux, Emmanuel (2002). A typological study of stress ‘deafness’ Laboratory Phonology (2002 ed., Vol. 7, pp. 203-240). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Search in Google Scholar
Peperkamp, Sharon, Dupoux, Emmanuel & Sebastián-Gallés, Nuria (1999). Perception of stress by French, Spanish and bilingual subjects. Paper presented at the EuroSpeech ‘99. 10.21437/Eurospeech.1999-593Search in Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven (1994). The language instinct: How the mind creates language. New York: William Morrow and Company. Search in Google Scholar
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul (1993/2004). Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Rutgers University and University of Colorado, Malden, Mass & Oxford. 10.1002/9780470759400Search in Google Scholar
Roberts, John R. (1987). Amele. London: Croom Helm. Search in Google Scholar
Romberg, Alexa & Saffran, Jenny R. (2010). Statistical learning and language acquisition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Rev Cogn Sci, 1(6), 906-914. 10.1002/wcs.78Search in Google Scholar
Saffran, Jenny R. (2003). Statistical Language Learning: Mechanisms and Constraints. Current Directioins in Psychological Science, 12(4), 110-114. 10.1111/1467-8721.01243Search in Google Scholar
Saffran, Jenny R., Aslin, Richard N., & Newport, Elissa L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 1926-1928. 10.1126/science.274.5294.1926Search in Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward & Swadesh, Morris (1960). Yana Dictionary (Vol. 22). Berkeley: University of California Press. Search in Google Scholar
Sluijter, Agaath M. C., & van Heuven, Vincent J. (1996). Spectral balance as an acoustic correlate of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100(4), 2471-2485. 10.1121/1.417955Search in Google Scholar
Stadler, Michael (1989). On learning complex procedural knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(6), 1061-1069. Search in Google Scholar
Stampe, David (1973). A Book on Natural Phonology. (Doctoral Book), University of Chicago. Search in Google Scholar
ten Cate, Carel & Okanoya, Azuo (2012). Revisiting the syntactic abilities of nonhuman animals: Natural vocalizations and artificial grammar learning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of Biological Science, 367, 1984-1994. 10.1098/rstb.2012.0055Search in Google Scholar
White, Lydia (1990). Second Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12(2), 121-133. 10.1017/S0272263100009049Search in Google Scholar
Wilson, Colin (2003). Experimental investigation of phonological naturalness. Paper presented at the 22nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Search in Google Scholar
Wilson, Colin (2006). Learning phonology with substantive bias: an experimental and computational study of velar palatalization. Cognitive Science, 30, 945-982. 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_89Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, Jie & Lai, Yuwen (2010). Testing the role of phonetic knowledge in Mandarin tone sandhi. Phonology, 27, 153-201 10.1017/S0952675710000060Search in Google Scholar
© 2016 Angela C. Carpenter
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
