Inferences in Interaction and Language Change

References

Apperly, Ian. 2011. Mindreaders. The Cognitive Basis of “Theory of Mind”. Hove, New York: Psychology Press.10.4324/9780203833926Search in Google Scholar

Ariel, Mira. 2010. Defining Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511777912Search in Google Scholar

Auer, Peter. 2005. Projection in interaction and projection in grammar. Text 25(1). 7-36.10.1515/text.2005.25.1.7Search in Google Scholar

Auer, Peter. 2009. On-line syntax: Thoughts on the temporality of spoken language. Language Sciences 31(1). 1-13.10.1016/j.langsci.2007.10.004Search in Google Scholar

Auer, Peter. 2015. The temporality of language in interaction: projection and latency. In Deppermann, Arnulf and Susanne Günthner (eds.), Temporality in Interaction, 27-56. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/slsi.27.01aueSearch in Google Scholar

Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar. 2014. Dialogism and the emergence of final particles: The case of and. In Günthner, Susanne, Wolfgang Imo and Jörg Bücker (eds.), Grammar and Dialogism: Sequential, Syntactic and Prosodic Patterns between Emergence and Sedimentation, 335-366. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110358612.335Search in Google Scholar

Bolden, Galina B. 2010. ‘Articulating the unsaid’ via and-prefaced formulations of others’ talk. Discourse Studies 12(1). 5-32.10.1177/1461445609346770Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L., Revere D. Perkins and William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar. Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Call, Josep and Michael Tomasello. 2008. Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12(5). 187-192.10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.010Search in Google Scholar

Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Clark, Herbert H. and Susan A. Brennan. 1991. Grounding in communication. In Resnick, Lauren B., John M. Levine and Stephanie D. Teasley (eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition, 127-149. Washington: APA Books.10.1037/10096-006Search in Google Scholar

Dahl, Östen. 1985. Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

De Smet, Hendrik. 2012. The course of actualization. Language 88(3). 601-633.10.1353/lan.2012.0056Search in Google Scholar

Deo, Ashwini. 2014. Formal semantics/ pragmatics and language change. In Bowern, Claire and Bethwyn Evans (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 393-309. London, New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Deppermann, Arnulf. 2014. ‘Don’t get me wrong’: Recipient design by using negation to constrain an action’s interpretation. In Günthner, Susanne, Wolfgang Imo and Jörg Bücker (eds.), Grammar and Dialogism: Sequential, Syntactic and Prosodic Patterns between Emergence and Sedimentation, 15-52. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110358612.15Search in Google Scholar

Deppermann, Arnulf and Hardarik Blühdorn. 2013. Negation als Verfahren des Adressatenzuschnitts: Verstehenssteuerung durch Interpretationsrestriktionen. Deutsche Sprache 1(13 (Themenheft: Interaktionale Linguistik des Verstehens)). 6-30.10.37307/j.1868-775X.2013.01.03Search in Google Scholar

Deppermann, Arnulf and Henrike Helmer. 2013. Zur Grammatik des Verstehens im Gespräch: Inferenzen anzeigen und Handlungskonsequenzen ziehen mit also und dann. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 32(1). 1-40.10.1515/zfs-2013-0001Search in Google Scholar

Detges, Ulrich. 1999. Wie entsteht Grammatik? Kognitive und pragmatische Determinanten der Grammatikalisierung von Tempusmarkern. In Lang, Jürgen and Ingrid Neumann-Holzschuh (eds.), Reanalyse und Grammatikalisierung in den romanischen Sprachen, 410, 31-52. Tübingen: Niemeyer.10.1515/9783110924824-004Search in Google Scholar

Detges, Ulrich and Richard Waltereit. 2002. Grammaticalization vs. reanalysis: a semantic-pragmatic account of functional change in grammar. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 21(2). 151-195.10.1515/zfsw.2002.21.2.151Search in Google Scholar

Diewald, Gabriele. 2002. A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. In Wischer, Ilse and Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New Reflections on Grammaticalization, 103-120. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.49.09dieSearch in Google Scholar

Diewald, Gabriele. 2006. Context types in grammaticalization as constructions. Constructions 1(9).Search in Google Scholar

Diewald, Gabriele and Kerstin Fischer. 1998. Zur diskursiven und modalen Funktion der Partikeln aber, auch, doch und ja in Instruktionsdialogen. Linguistica 38. 75-99.Search in Google Scholar

Drew, Paul. 1985. Analyzing the use of language in courtroom interaction. In Dijk, Teun A. van (ed.), Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 133-147. London: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Drew, Paul. 1992. Contested evidence in a courtroom cross - examination: The case of a trial for rape. In Drew, Paul and John Heritage (eds.), Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, 470 - 520. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Drew, Paul and J. Maxwell Atkinson. 1979. Order in Court. The Organisation of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press.Search in Google Scholar

Drew, Paul and John Heritage (eds.). 1992. Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Eckardt, Regina. 2006. Meaning Change in Grammaticalization. An Enquiry into Semantic Renalysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199262601.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Eckardt, Regine. 2009. APO: Avoid Pragmatic Overload. In Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard and Jacqueline Visconti (eds.), Current Trends in Diachronic Semantics and Pragmatics, 21-41. Bingley: Emerald.10.1163/9789004253216_003Search in Google Scholar

Ehmer, Oliver. 2016. Complex adverbial constructions. The case of X-MAIS-COMME-Y-Z in spoken French. Language Sciences 58. 126-143.10.1016/j.langsci.2016.03.004Search in Google Scholar

Enfield, Nick J. 2009. The anatomy of meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511576737Search in Google Scholar

Fischer, Kerstin. 2007. Grounding and common ground. Modal particles and their translational equivalents. In Fetzer, Anita and Kerstin Fischer (eds.), Lexical Markers of Common Grounds, 47-66. Amsterdam: Elsevier.10.1163/9780080466316_005Search in Google Scholar

Fleischman, Suzanne. 1982. The Future in Thought and Language: Diachronic Evidence from Romance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Search in Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 1991. Serial verbs and the mental reality of event: grammatical vs. cognitive packaging. In Traugott, Elizabeth C. and Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, 1, 81-127. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.19.1.06givSearch in Google Scholar

Grice, Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Cole, Peter and James L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics: Speech acts, 41-58. New York: Academic.10.1163/9789004368811_003Search in Google Scholar

Grossman, Eitan and Ira Noveck. 2015. What can historical linguistics and experimental pragmatics offer each other? Linguistic Vanguard 1. 145-153.10.1515/lingvan-2015-1005Search in Google Scholar

Grossman, Eitan and Stéphane Polis. 2014. On the pragmatics of subjectification: the grammaticalization of verbless allative futures (with a case study in Ancient Egyptian). Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 46(1). 1-40.10.1080/03740463.2014.956007Search in Google Scholar

Gumperz, John J. 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511611834Search in Google Scholar

Gumperz, John J. 1992. Contextualization and understanding. In Duranti, Alessandro and Charles Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking context, 229-252. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gumperz, John J. 1993. Culture and conversational inference. In Foley, William A. (ed.), The role of theory in language description, 193-214. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Gumperz, John J. 2000. Inference. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 9(1-2). 131-133.10.1525/jlin.1999.9.1-2.131Search in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael. 2017. Implicature and the inferential substrate. In Cap, Piotr and Marta Dynel (eds.), Implicitness. From lexis to discourse, 281-304. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.276.13hauSearch in Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd. 2002. On the role of context in grammaticalization. In Wischer, Ilse and Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New Reflections on Grammaticalization, 83-101. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.49.08heiSearch in Google Scholar

Heritage, John. 1984. Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul J. and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. 2. Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165525Search in Google Scholar

Huang, Yan. 2011. Types of inference: entailment, presupposition, and implicature. In Bublitz, Wolfram and Neal R. Norrick (eds.), Foundations of Pragmatics, 397-421. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110214260.397Search in Google Scholar

Imo, Wolfgang. 2011. Cognitions are not observable - but their consequences are: Mögliche Aposiopese-Konstruktionen in der gesprochenen Alltagssprache. Gesprächsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 12. 265-300.Search in Google Scholar

Imo, Wolfgang. 2014. Elliptical structures as dialogical resources for the management of understanding. In Günthner, Susanne, Wolfgang Imo and Jörg Bücker (eds.), Grammar and Dialogism: Sequential, Syntactic and Prosodic Patterns between Emergence and Sedimentation, 139-176. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110358612.139Search in Google Scholar

Jucker, Andreas H. and Joanna Kopaczyk. 2013. Communities of practice as a locus of language change. In Kopaczyk, Joanna and Andreas H. Jucker (eds.), Communities of Practice in the History of English, 1-16. Amsterdam, Philadephia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.235.01intSearch in Google Scholar

Keller, Rudi. 2014. Sprachwandel. Von der unsichtbaren Hand in der Sprache. 4. Ed. Tübingen: Francke.10.36198/9783838542539Search in Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813313Search in Google Scholar

Lightfoot, David. 1991. How to Set Parameters: Arguments from Language Change.Search in Google Scholar

Malle, Bertram F. and Sara D. Hodges (eds.). 2005. Other Minds. How Humans Bridge the Divide Between Self and Others. New York, London: Guilford Press.Search in Google Scholar

Maynard, Douglas W. 2012. Everyone and no one to turn to: Intellectual roots and contexts for Conversation Analysis. In Stivers, Tanya and Jack Sidnell (eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, 11-31. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781118325001.ch2Search in Google Scholar

Meillet, Antoine. 1912. L’evolution des formes grammaticales. Scientia (Rivista di Scienza) 12(26,6). Reprinted in Meillet, Antoine. 1958. Linguistique historique et linguistique générale. Paris. Champion. Molder, Hedwig te and Jonathan Potter (eds.). 2005. Conversation and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Moreton, Elliott. 2008. Analytic bias and phonological typology. Phonology 25(1). 83-127.10.1017/S0952675708001413Search in Google Scholar

Mulder, Jean and Sandra A. Thompson. 2008. The grammaticization of but as a final particle in English conversation. In Laury, Ritva (ed.), Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining: The Multifunctionality of Conjunctions, 179-204. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.80.09mulSearch in Google Scholar

Ohala, John L. 1981. The listener as a source of sound change. In Masek, Carrie S., Roberta A. Hendrick and Mary F. Miller (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Language and Behavior, Chicago Linguistic Society, May 1-2, 1981, 178-203. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Search in Google Scholar

Ohala, John L. 1993. The phonetics of sound change. In Jones, Charles (ed.), Historical Linguistics: Problems and Perspectives, 237-278. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Pfänder, Stefan. 2016. Fragmented adverbial clauses as resources for negotiating alignment: concessive repair patterns in French talk-in-interaction. Language Sciences 58 (Special issue: “Adverbial patterns in interaction”). 95-110.10.1016/j.langsci.2016.04.006Search in Google Scholar

Pinkster, Harm. 1987. The strategy and chronology of the development of future and perfect tense auxiliaries in Latin. In Harris, Martin and Paolo Ramat (eds.), Historical Development of Auxiliaries, 193-224. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Rosemeyer, Malte and Eitan Grossman. 2017. The road to auxiliariness revisited: the grammaticalization of FINISH anteriors in Spanish. Diachronica 34(4). 516-558.10.1075/dia.16024.rosSearch in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey. 1972. Notes on police assessment of moral character. In Sudnow, David (ed.), Studies in Social Interaction, 280-293. New York: Free Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey. 1989. Lecture fourteen: The inference-making machine. Human Studies 12(3/4). 379-393.10.1007/BF00142786Search in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff and Gail Jefferson. 1974. A simplest systematic for the organization of turn taking for conversation. Language 50. 696-735.10.1353/lan.1974.0010Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1996. Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology 102(1). 161-216.10.1086/230911Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction. A Primer in Conversation Analysis I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511791208Search in Google Scholar

Schwenter, Scott A. and Richard Waltereit. 2010. Presupposition accommodation and language change. In Cuyckens, Hubert, Kristin Davidse and Lieven Vandelanotte (eds.), Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, 75-102. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110226102.2.75Search in Google Scholar

Sidnell, Jack, Nicholas J. Enfield and Paul Kockelman. 2014. Interaction and intersubjectivity. In Enfield, Nicholas J., Paul Kockelman and Jack Sidnell (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology, 343-345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139342872.037Search in Google Scholar

Stalnaker, Robert C. 2002. Common Ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25. 701-721.10.1023/A:1020867916902Search in Google Scholar

Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620904Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, Sandra A. and Ryoko Suzuki. 2011. The Grammaticalization of final particles. In Narrog, Heiko and Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, 668-682. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0055Search in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth C. and Richard B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486500Search in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth C. and Ekkehard König. 1991. The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization, I: Focus on Theoretical and Methodological Issues, 189-218. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.19.1.10cloSearch in Google Scholar

Winter-Froemel, Esme. 2014. Re(de)fining grammaticalization from a usage-based perspective. Discursive ambiguity in innovation scenarios. Folia Linguistica 48(2). 503-556.10.1515/flin.2014.017Search in Google Scholar

Zlatev, Jordon, Timothy P. Racine, Chris Sinha and Esa Itkonen (eds.). 2008. The Shared Mind. Perspectives on Intersubjectivity. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/celcr.12Search in Google Scholar