Abstract
This essay calls for an independent theory of features in object-oriented philosophy. Theories of features are in general motivated by at least two interconnected demands: 1) to explain why objects have the characteristics they have, 2) to explain how regular divisions in those characteristics can be intuited. While a theory of universal properties may be the most internally consistent means of addressing these demands, an object-oriented metaphysics needs to address them without a concept of shared features. This means that regular divisions of invariant features and our intuitions of them cannot be explained by the repetition of self-same characteristics or natural laws. They can instead be explained by the immanent repetition of similar features. However, this requires a new, radically aesthetic understanding of what it means to be similar in the first place, one in which similarity is an emergent process rather than a state of affairs existing between resembling particulars.
References
Aristotle. The Works of Aristotle: De Amina. Translated by J.A. Smith. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1931.Search in Google Scholar
Armstrong, David Malet. What is a Law of Nature? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. Kindle edition.Search in Google Scholar
Armstrong, David Malet. Nominalism and Realism v. 1: Universals and Scientific Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.Search in Google Scholar
Brassier, Ray. “That Which is Not: Philosophy as Entwinement of Truth and Negativity.” Stasis. No. 1 (2013), 174-186.Search in Google Scholar
Campbell, Keith. Abstract Particulars. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.Search in Google Scholar
Edwards, Douglas. Properties. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2014. Kindle Edition.Search in Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. “The Uncanny.” Translated by Alix Strachey. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Online Library, 1919. Accessed July 30, 2018. http://web.mit.edu/allanmc/www/freud1.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Goodman, Nelson. “Seven Strictures on Similarity.” In Problems and Projects, edited by Nelson Goodman and W.V.O. Quine, 437-446. Indianapolis: Bobs-Merrill Co., 1972.Search in Google Scholar
Harman, Graham. Dante’s Broken Hammer: The Ethics, Aesthetics, and Metaphysics of Love. London: Repeater Books, 2016. Kindle edition.Search in Google Scholar
Harman, Graham. “Materialism is Not the Solution: On Matter, Form, and Mimesis.” The Nordic Journal of Aesthetics. No. 47 (2014), 94-110.Search in Google Scholar
Harman, Graham. The Quadruple Object. Winchester, UK: Zero Books, 2011.Search in Google Scholar
Harman, Graham. “On Vicarious Causation.” Collapse. V. 2 (2007), 171-206.Search in Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. Translated by W.R. Boyce Gibson. New York: Macmillan, 1931.Search in Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. The Critique of Judgement. Translated by J.H. Bernard. New York: Hafner Press, 1951.Search in Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. The Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. Translated by Leon S. Roudiez. New York: Columbia University Press, 1982.Search in Google Scholar
Morreau, Michael. “It Simply Does Not Add Up: Trouble with Overall Similarity.” The Journal of Philosophy. V. 107, No. 9 (2010), 469-490.Search in Google Scholar
Plato. Timaeus. Translated by Peter Kalkavage. Bemidji, MN: Focus Publishing, 2001.Search in Google Scholar
Plato. Meno. Translated by George Anastaplo and Laurence Berns. Bemidji, MN: Focus Publishing, 1998.Search in Google Scholar
Plato. The Republic (2nd Edition). Translated by Alan Bloom. New York: Basic Books, 1991.Search in Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. The Problems of Philosophy. Urbana, IL: Project Gutenberg, 2009. Accessed July 30, 2018. http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/5827Search in Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid. Science, Perception and Reality. Austin, TX: Ridgeview Publishing Digital, 1991. Kindle edition.Search in Google Scholar
Williams, Donald C. The Elements and Patterns of Being: Essays in Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Search in Google Scholar
© by Noah Roderick, published by De Gruyter
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
