Suzanne Lacy introduced the term ‘New Genre Public Art’ (NGPA) to refer to art practices that depart from those traditional of public art (such as installing works in parks and plazas) and focus instead on the direct engagement of artists with audiences to deal with pressing socio-political issues. In this paper, I argue that some works of NGPA should be valued for the intellectual value grounded in their artistic features, not dissimilarly to works of conceptual art. In developing my argument, I take distance from Vid Simoniti’s recent account of ‘Socially Engaged Art’, offer a thorough analysis of Thomas Hirschhorn’s Bataille Monument (2002) and Kathrin Bohm’s and Stefan Saffer’s Mobile Porch (1999), and submit that both such works qualify as good works of NGPA.
Bishop, Claire. Artificial Hells. Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship. London: Verso, 2012.Search in Google Scholar
Böhm, Kathrin. “Public works”. In Contemporary Art. From Studio to Situation, edited by Claire Doherty, 162-167. London: Black Dog, 2004.Search in Google Scholar
Dodd, Julian. “The Ontology of Conceptual Art. Against the Idea Idea”. In Art, Mind, and Narative. Themes from the Work of Peter Goldie, edited by Julian Dodd, 241-260. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198769736.003.0016Search in Google Scholar
Hirschhorn, Thomas. “Bataille Monument”. In Contemporary Art. From Studio to Situation, edited by Claire Doherty, 134-147. London: Black Dog, 2004.Search in Google Scholar
Lacy, Suzanne. Mapping the Terrain. New Genre Public Art. Winnipeg: Bay Press, 1994.Search in Google Scholar
© by Elisa Caldarola, published by De Gruyter Open
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.