Abstract
Walking is an activity that always unfolds within a certain landscape. Tim Ingold has used the notion of “taskscape” to denote pragmatic uses of terrain. Whilst walking, we come to intersect with a variety of taskscapes. As Julia Tanney has highlighted, formal language can only get us so far when thinking about spontaneous, non-theoretical and non-representational activities. Borrowing Gilbert Ryle’s distinction between “knowing that” and knowing how”, I argue for a concept of walking that does not privilege intentions. When somebody walks, they melt into a taskscape not entirely of their own design. Mind is inherently ecological. It is enacted within a certain ecology, and is actually inseparable from its environment. Mind is the sum of intelligent enactments. According to the position I seek to advance in this article, walking may be approached in an object-oriented manner. Each form of behavior composes an enactment that meshes with a certain ecology, what W. Teed Rockwell has called a “behavioral field.” Mind is the inherently relational enactment of a set of behavioral dispositions which are always already enmeshed within a field. When these dispositions enter what, following Markus Gabriel, may be called “fields of sense”, mind and walking become independent objects in their own right.
References
Barad, Karen. Meeting the Universe Halfway. Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2007.10.2307/j.ctv12101zqSearch in Google Scholar
Gabriel, Markus. Fields of Sense. A New Realist Ontology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2015.10.1515/9780748692903Search in Google Scholar
Ingold, Tim. “The temporality of the landscape.” World Archaeology 25.2 (1993): 152-174.10.1080/00438243.1993.9980235Search in Google Scholar
Kyselo, Miriam. “The body social: an enactive approach to the self.” Frontiers in Psychology 5 (2014), 1-16.Search in Google Scholar
Lin, Chien-Te. „A Buddhist Take on Gilbert Ryle’s Theory of Mind.” Asian Philosophy 24.2 (2014): 178-196.10.1080/09552367.2014.923244Search in Google Scholar
Lovasz, Adam. The System of Absentology in Ontological Philosophy. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2016.Search in Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Phenomenology of Perception, trans. Colin Smith. New York and London: Routledge, 2005 [1962].Search in Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. The Visible and the Invisible, trans. Alphonso Lingis. Evanston: Northwestern University, 1968.Search in Google Scholar
Rockwell, W. Teed. Neither Brain nor Ghost. A Nondualist Alternative to the Mind-Brain Identity Theory. Cambridge and London: The MIT Press, 2005.10.7551/mitpress/4910.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert. The Concept of Mind. London and New York: Routledge, 2002 [1949].10.7208/chicago/9780226922652.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert. “Pleasure.” Collected Papers Volume 2. Collected Essays 1929-1968. Ed. Julia Tanney. London and New York: Routledge, 2009 [1971], 339-349.10.4324/9780203875308Search in Google Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert. “Sensation.” Collected Papers Volume 2. Collected Essays 1929-1968. Ed. Julia Tanney. London and New York: Routledge, 2009 [1971], 349-363.10.4324/9780203875308Search in Google Scholar
Schrader, Astrid. “Responding to pfiesteria piscicida (the fish killer) phantomatic ontologies, indeterminacy, and responsibility in toxic microbiology.” Social Studies of Science 40.2 (2010): 275-306.10.1177/0306312709344902Search in Google Scholar
Skrbina, David. Panpsychism in the West. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 2005.10.7551/mitpress/5220.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Sparrow, Tom. The End of Phenomenology. Metaphysics and the New Realism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2014.10.1515/9780748684847Search in Google Scholar
Staletovich, Jenny. “Dead fish, birds, manatees, even a whale shark. Toll from worst red tide in decade grows.” 31 July 2018, https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/environment/article215839815.html, accessed 4 August 2018.Search in Google Scholar
Tanney, Julia. “Remarks on the ‘thickness’ of action description: with Wittgenstein, Ryle, and Anscombe.” Philosophical Explorations 21.1 (2018), 170-177.10.1080/13869795.2017.1421698Search in Google Scholar
© by Adam Lovasz, published by De Gruyter Open
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.