Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 3.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access July 9, 2019

Computer Modeling in Philosophy of Religion

F. LeRon Shults
From the journal Open Philosophy

Abstract

How might philosophy of religion be impacted by developments in computational modeling and social simulation? After briefly describing some of the content and context biases that have shaped traditional philosophy of religion, this article provides examples of computational models that illustrate the explanatory power of conceptually clear and empirically validated causal architectures informed by the bio-cultural sciences. It also outlines some of the material implications of these developments for broader metaphysical and metaethical discussions in philosophy. Computer modeling and simulation can contribute to the reformation of the philosophy of religion in at least three ways: by facilitating conceptual clarity about the role of biases in the emergence and maintenance of phenomena commonly deemed “religious,” by supplying tools that enhance our capacity to link philosophical analysis and synthesis to empirical data in the psychological and social sciences, and by providing material insights for metaphysical hypotheses and metaethical proposals that rely solely on immanent resources.

References

Barlev, Michael, Spencer Mermelstein, and Tamsin C. German. “Core Intuitions About Persons Coexist and Interfere With Acquired Christian Beliefs About God.” Cognitive Science 41 (2017): 425-454. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12435.10.1111/cogs.12435Search in Google Scholar

Benzmüller, Christoph, and Bruno Woltzenlogel Paleo. “The Inconsistency in Gödel’s Ontological Argument: A Success Story for AI in Metaphysics.” In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 936-942. AAAI Press, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

Bourget, David, and David J. Chalmers. “What do philosophers believe?” Philosophical studies 170, no. 3 (2014): 465-500.10.1007/s11098-013-0259-7Search in Google Scholar

Breslin, Michael J., and Christopher A. Lewis. “Schizotypy and Religiosity: The Magic of Prayer.” Archive for the Psychology of Religion 37, no. 1 (2015): 84-97. https://doi.org/10.1163/15736121-12341300.10.1163/15736121-12341300Search in Google Scholar

Bulbulia, Joseph. “Spreading Order: Religion, Cooperative Niche Construction, and Risky Coordination Problems.” Biology & Philosophy 27, no. 1 (2012): 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-011-9295-x.10.1007/s10539-011-9295-xSearch in Google Scholar

Conte, Rosaria, Giulia Andrighetto, and Marco Campennì. Minding Norms : Mechanisms and Dynamics of Social Order in Agent Societies. Oxford University Press, 2014.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199812677.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Dávid-Barrett, Tamás, and James Carney. “The deification of historical figures and the emergence of priesthoods as a solution to a network coordination problem.” Religion, Brain & Behavior 6, no. 4 (2016): 307-317.10.1080/2153599X.2015.1063001Search in Google Scholar

Davies, Martin F., Murray Griffin, and Sue Vice. “Affective Reactions to Auditory Hallucinations in Psychotic, Evangelical and Control Groups.” British Journal of Clinical Psychology 40, no. 4 (2001): 361-370. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466501163850.10.1348/014466501163850Search in Google Scholar

De Cruz, Helen, and Johan De Smedt. A Natural History of Natural Theology: The Cognitive Science of Theology and Philosophy of Religion. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2014.10.7551/mitpress/10219.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

De Cruz, Helen, and Johan De Smedt. “How do philosophers evaluate natural theological arguments? An experimental philosophical investigation.” In Advances in religion, cognitive science, and experimental philosophy, edited by Helen De Cruz and Ryan Nichols, pp. 119-142. London: Bloomsbury Academic (2016).Search in Google Scholar

De Cruz, Helen, and Johan De Smedt. “Paley’s IPod: The Cognitive Basis of the Design Argument within Natural Theology.” ZYGON, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2010.01120.x.10.1111/j.1467-9744.2010.01120.xSearch in Google Scholar

De Smedt, J., and H. De Cruz. “The Cognitive Appeal of the Cosmological Argument.” Method & Theory in The Study Of Religion 23, no. 2 (2011): 103-122. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006811X567715.10.1163/157006811X567715Search in Google Scholar

DeLanda, Manuel. A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. London: Continuum, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

DeLanda, Manuel. Assemblage Theory. Edinburgh University Press, 2016.10.1515/9781474413640Search in Google Scholar

DeLanda, Manuel. Intensive Science and Virtual Philosophy. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

DeLanda, Manuel. Philosophy and Simulation: The Emergence of Synthetic Reason. London: Continuum, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

Donaldson, Steve, and Melanie McConnell. “Simulation as a Method for Theological and Philosophical Inquiry.” Theology and Science 13, no. 3 (2015): 354-370. https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2015.1053763.10.1080/14746700.2015.1053763Search in Google Scholar

Draper, Paul, and Ryan Nichols. “Diagnosing Bias in Philosophy of Religion.” The Monist 96, no. 3 (2013): 420.10.5840/monist201396319Search in Google Scholar

Dutton, Edward, and Dimitri Van der Linden. “Why Is Intelligence Negatively Associated with Religiousness?” Evolutionary Psychological Science, 2017, 1-12.10.1007/s40806-017-0101-0Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Lee, Anthony W. Hoskin, Edward Dutton, and Helmuth Nyborg. “The Future of Secularism: A Biologically Informed Theory Supplemented with Cross-Cultural Evidence.” Evolutionary Psychological Science, 2017, 1-19.10.1007/s40806-017-0090-zSearch in Google Scholar

Elsenbroich, Corinna, and Nigel Gilbert. Modelling Norms. Dordrecht: Springer, 2014.10.1007/978-94-007-7052-2Search in Google Scholar

Floridi, Luciano. Philosophy and computing: An introduction. London: Routledge, 2002.10.4324/9780203015315Search in Google Scholar

Ganzach, Yoav, and Chemi Gotlibovski. “Intelligence and Religiosity: Within Families and over Time.” Intelligence 41, no. 5 (2013): 546-552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.07.003.10.1016/j.intell.2013.07.003Search in Google Scholar

Gervais, Will M., and Ara Norenzayan. “Analytic Thinking Promotes Religious Disbelief.” Science (New York, N.Y.) 336, no. 6080 (2012): 493-96. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1215647.10.1126/science.1215647Search in Google Scholar

Gore, Ross, Carlos Lemos, F. LeRon Shults, and Wesley J. Wildman. “Forecasting Changes in Religiosity and Existential Security with an Agent-Based Model.” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 21 (2018): 1-31.10.18564/jasss.3596Search in Google Scholar

Grim, Patrick, Robert Rosenberger, Adam Rosenfeld, Brian Anderson, and Robb E. Eason. “How simulations fail.” Synthese 190, no. 12 (2013): 2367-2390.10.1007/s11229-011-9976-7Search in Google Scholar

Grim, Patrick. “Modeling Epistemology: Examples and Analysis in Computational Philosophy of Science.” Proceedings of the Spring Simulation Conference, Society for Modeling & Simulation International, 2019, 1-12.10.23919/SpringSim.2019.8732892Search in Google Scholar

Haynes, Chris, Michael Luck, Peter McBurney, Samhar Mahmoud, Tomáš Vítek, and Simon Miles. “Engineering the Emergence of Norms: A Review.” The Knowledge Engineering Review 32 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269888917000169.10.1017/S0269888917000169Search in Google Scholar

Henrich, Joseph. “The Evolution of Costly Displays, Cooperation and Religion: Credibility Enhancing Displays and Their Implications for Cultural Evolution.” Evolution and Human Behavior 30, no. 4 (2009): 244-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.03.005.10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.03.005Search in Google Scholar

Hungerman, D. M. “The Effect of Education on Religion: Evidence from Compulsory Schooling Laws.” Journal Of Economic Behavior & Organization 104 (2014): 52-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.09.004.10.1016/j.jebo.2013.09.004Search in Google Scholar

Iannaccone, Laurence R., and Michael D. Makowsky. “Accidental atheists? Agent-based explanations for the persistence of religious regionalism.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 46, no. 1 (2007): 1-16.10.1111/j.1468-5906.2007.00337.xSearch in Google Scholar

Inglehart, Ronald, and Christian Welzel. Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge University Press, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

Kirchner, Daniel, Christoph Benzmüller, and Edward N. Zalta. “Computer Science and Metaphysics: A Cross-Fertilization.” ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1905.00787, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

Knepper, Timothy. The ends of philosophy of religion: Terminus and telos. New York: Springer, 2013.10.1057/9781137324412Search in Google Scholar

Lane, Justin. “Strengthening the supernatural punishment hypothesis through computer modeling.” Religion, Brain & Behavior 8, no. 3 (2018): 290-300.10.1080/2153599X.2017.1302977Search in Google Scholar

Lanman, Jonathan A., and Michael D. Buhrmester. “Religious Actions Speak Louder than Words: Exposure to Credibility-Enhancing Displays Predicts Theism.” Religion, Brain & Behavior, 2015, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2015.1117011.10.1080/2153599X.2015.1117011Search in Google Scholar

Lemos, Carlos M., Ross J. Gore, Laurence Lessard-Phillips, and F. LeRon Shults. “A Network Agent-Based Model of Ethnocentrism and Intergroup Cooperation.” Quality & Quantity, 2019, 1-27.10.1007/s11135-019-00856-ySearch in Google Scholar

Lewis, James R. “Education, Irreligion, and Non-Religion: Evidence from Select Anglophone Census Data.” Journal of Contemporary Religion 30, no. 2 (2015): 265-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537903.2015.1025556.10.1080/13537903.2015.1025556Search in Google Scholar

Lindeman, Marjaana, and Annika M. Svedholm-Häkkinen. “Does Poor Understanding of Physical World Predict Religious and Paranormal Beliefs?” Applied Cognitive Psychology 30, no. 5 (2016): 736-742. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3248.10.1002/acp.3248Search in Google Scholar

Lindeman, Marjaana, Annika M. Svedholm-Häkkinen, and Jari Lipsanen. “Ontological Confusions but Not Mentalizing Abilities Predict Religious Belief, Paranormal Belief, and Belief in Supernatural Purpose.” Cognition 134 (2015): 63-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.09.008.10.1016/j.cognition.2014.09.008Search in Google Scholar

Maitzen, Stephen. “Against Ultimacy.” In Renewing Philosophy of Religion: Exploratory Essays, edited by Paul Draper & J.L. Schellenberg, 48-62. Oxford University Press, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Marks, Joel. Hard Atheism and the Ethics of Desire: An Alternative to Morality. New York: Springer, 2016.10.1007/978-3-319-43799-6Search in Google Scholar

Mascaro, Steven. Evolving Ethics: The New Science of Good and Evil. Imprint Academic, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/inu.30000127033425.Search in Google Scholar

Matthews, Luke J., Jeffrey Edmonds, Wesley J. Wildman, and Charles L. Nunn. “Cultural inheritance or cultural diffusion of religious violence? A quantitative case study of the Radical Reformation.” Religion, Brain & Behavior 3, no. 1 (2013): 3-15.10.1080/2153599X.2012.707388Search in Google Scholar

McLaughlin, Anne, and Alicia McGill. “Explicitly Teaching Critical Thinking Skills in a History Course.” Science & Education 26, no. 1 (2017): 93-105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-017-9878-2.10.1007/s11191-017-9878-2Search in Google Scholar

Norenzayan, Ara, Will M. Gervais, and Kali H. Trzesniewski. “Mentalizing Deficits Constrain Belief in a Personal God.” PLoS ONE 7, no. 5 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036880.10.1371/journal.pone.0036880Search in Google Scholar

Norris, Pippa, and Ronald Inglehart. “Are High Levels of Existential Security Conducive to Secularization? A Response to Our Critics,” In The changing world religion map, pp. 3389-3408. Springer: Dordrecht, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

Norris, Pippa, and Ronald Inglehart. Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. 2 edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.10.1017/CBO9780511894862Search in Google Scholar

Pennycook, Gordon, James Allan Cheyne, Nathaniel Barr, Derek J. Koehler, and Jonathan A. Fugelsang. “Cognitive Style and Religiosity: The Role of Conflict Detection.” Memory and Cognition 42, no. 1 (2014): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-013-0340-7.10.3758/s13421-013-0340-7Search in Google Scholar

Roitto, Rikard. “Dangerous but contagious altruism: recruitment of group members and reform of cooperation style through altruism in two modified versions of Hammond and Axelrod’s simulation of ethnocentric cooperation.” Religion, Brain & Behavior 6, no. 2 (2016): 154-168.10.1080/2153599X.2015.1022795Search in Google Scholar

Schilbrack, Kevin. Philosophy and the Study of Religions: A Manifesto. Wiley-Blackwell Manifestos. John Wiley & Sons, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

Shults, F. LeRon. “Can Theism Be Defeated? CSR and the Debunking of Supernatural Agent Abductions.” Religion, Brain & Behavior, 2015, 14-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2015.1107251.10.1080/2153599X.2015.1107251Search in Google Scholar

Shults, F. LeRon. “How to Survive the Anthropocene: Adaptive Atheism and the Evolution of Homo Deiparensis.” Religions 6, no. 2 (2015): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel6020724.10.3390/rel6020724Search in Google Scholar

Shults, F. LeRon. Iconoclastic Theology: Gilles Deleuze and the Secretion of Atheism. Edinburgh University Press, 2014.10.3366/edinburgh/9780748684137.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Shults, F. LeRon. “Modeling Metaphysics: The Rise of Simulation and the Reversal of Platonism.” Proceedings of the Spring Simulation Conference, Society for Modeling & Simulation International, 2019, 1-12.10.23919/SpringSim.2019.8732897Search in Google Scholar

Shults, F. LeRon. Practicing Safe Sects: Religious Reproduction in Scientific and Philosophical Perspective. Leiden: Brill Academic, 2018.10.1163/9789004360952Search in Google Scholar

Shults, F. LeRon. Theology after the Birth of God : Atheist Conceptions in Cognition and Culture. Radical Theologies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.10.1057/9781137358035Search in Google Scholar

Shults, F. LeRon. “Toxic Theisms?: New Strategies for Prebunking Religious Belief-Behavior Complexes," in press.Search in Google Scholar

Shults, F. LeRon, Ross Gore, Carlos Lemos, and Wesley J. Wildman. “Why Do the Godless Prosper? Modeling the Cognitive and Coalitional Mechanisms That Promote Atheism.” Psychology of Religion and Spirituality 10, no. 3 (2018): 218-28.10.1037/rel0000198Search in Google Scholar

Shults, F. LeRon, Ross Gore, Wesley J. Wildman, Christopher Lynch, Justin E. Lane, and Monica Toft. “A Generative Model of the Mutual Escalation of Anxiety Between Religious Groups.” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 21, no. 4 (2018): DOI: 10.18564/jasss.3840.10.18564/jasss.3840Search in Google Scholar

Shults, F. LeRon, Justin E. Lane, Saikou Diallo, Christopher Lynch, Wesley J. Wildman, and Ross Gore. “Modeling Terror Management Theory: Computer Simulations of the Impact of Mortality Salience on Religiosity.” Religion, Brain & Behavior 8, no. 1 (2018): 77-100.10.1080/2153599X.2016.1238846Search in Google Scholar

Shults, F. LeRon, Wesley J. Wildman, Justin E. Lane, Christopher J. Lynch, and Saikou Diallo. “Multiple Axialities: A Computational Model of the Axial Age.” Journal of Cognition and Culture 18, no. 5 (2018): 537-564.10.1163/15685373-12340043Search in Google Scholar

Shults, F. LeRon, and Wesley J. Wildman. “Simulating religious entanglement and social investment in the neolithic.” In Religion, History and Place in the Origin of Settled Life, edited by Ian Hodder. University of Colorado Press (2018): 33-63.10.2307/j.ctv3c0thf.6Search in Google Scholar

Shults, F. LeRon, and Wesley J. Wildman. “Ethics, Computer Simulation, and the Future of Humanity.” In Human Simulation: Perspectives, Insights, and Applications, edited by Saikou Diallo, Wesley J. Wildman, F. LeRon Shults, & Andreas Tolk. Berlin: Springer, in press.Search in Google Scholar

Shults, F. LeRon, Wesley J. Wildman, and Virginia Dignum. “The Ethics of Computer Modeling and Simulation.” In 2018 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), 4069-4083. IEEE, 2018.10.1109/WSC.2018.8632517Search in Google Scholar

Slone, D. Jason. Theological Incorrectness : Why Religious People Believe What They Shouldn’t. Oxford University Press, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

Squazzoni, Flaminio, ed. Epistemological aspects of computer simulation in the social sciences. Springer, 2009.10.1007/978-3-642-01109-2Search in Google Scholar

Stoet, Gijsbert, and David C. Geary. “Students in Countries with Higher Levels of Religiosity Perform Lower in Science and Mathematics.” Intelligence 62 (2017): 71-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2017.03.001.10.1016/j.intell.2017.03.001Search in Google Scholar

Teehan, John. “The Cognitive Bases of the Problem of Evil.” The Monist 96, no. 3 (2013): 325.10.5840/monist201396315Search in Google Scholar

Tobia, Kevin Patrick. “Does Religious Belief Infect Philosophical Analysis?” Religion, Brain & Behavior 6, no. 1 (2016): 56-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2014.1000952.10.1080/2153599X.2014.1000952Search in Google Scholar

Troitzsch, Klaus G. “Can Lawlike Rules Emerge without the Intervention of Legislators?” Frontiers in Sociology 3 (2018):https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2018.00002.10.3389/fsoc.2018.00002Search in Google Scholar

Van Der Tempel, Jan, and James E. Alcock. “Relationships between Conspiracy Mentality, Hyperactive Agency Detection,and Schizotypy: Supernatural Forces at Work?” Personality and Individual Differences 82 (2015): 136-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.010.10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.010Search in Google Scholar

Weisberg, Michael. Simulation and similarity: Using models to understand the world. Oxford University Press, 2012.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199933662.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Whitehouse, Harvey, Ken Kahn, Michael E. Hochberg, and Joanna J. Bryson. “The role for simulations in theory construction for the social sciences: Case studies concerning divergent modes of religiosity.” Religion, Brain & Behavior 2, no. 3 (2012): 182-201.10.1080/2153599X.2012.691033Search in Google Scholar

Wildman, Wesley J. “Reforming Philosophy of Religion for the Modern Academy.” In Reconfigurations of Philosophy of Religion: A Possible Future, edited by Jim Kanaris, 253-69. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Wildman, Wesley J., and David Rohr. “North American Philosophers of Religion: How They See Their Field,” 133-153, in Draper, Paul, and John L. Schellenberg, eds. Renewing philosophy of religion: exploratory essays. Oxford University Press, 2017.10.1093/oso/9780198738909.003.0009Search in Google Scholar

Wildman, Wesley J., and Richard Sosis. “Stability of groups with costly beliefs and practices.” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 14, no. 3 (2011): 1-25.10.18564/jasss.1781Search in Google Scholar

Winsberg, Eric. Science in the age of computer simulation. University of Chicago Press, 2010.10.7208/chicago/9780226902050.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Wlodarski, Rafael, and Eiluned Pearce. “The God Allusion: Individual Variation in Agency Detection, Mentalizing and Schizotypy and Their Association with Religious Beliefs and Behaviors.” Human Nature 27, no. 2 (2016): 160-172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-016-9256-9.10.1007/s12110-016-9256-9Search in Google Scholar

Xenitidou, Maria, and Bruce Edmonds, eds. The Complexity of Social Norms. Berlin: Springer, 2014.10.1007/978-3-319-05308-0Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-03-19
Accepted: 2019-05-21
Published Online: 2019-07-09

© 2019 F. LeRon Shults, published by De Gruyter Open

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Scroll Up Arrow