Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access October 2, 2019

Antinomies of Metaphysical Experience between Theodor Adorno and Philippe Lacoue-Labarthe

  • Berkay Ustun EMAIL logo
From the journal Open Philosophy

Abstract

This article is an inquiry into the concept of metaphysical experience through a joint discussion of two authors and philosophers with different approaches that nevertheless converge in the reclamation of the concept and rely both on the experience of death as an example. In both cases, the authors are guided by the central problem of how not to relinquish metaphysical experience to unscrutinized immediacy or a powerful conversion which enjoins subjection, putting it in contact with aesthetics and ethics at once. Theodor Adorno situates metaphysical experience as a problem of philosophy of history and devotes attention to the contemporary possibility of experiences that evoke transcendence. The transformations he identifies in the concept also lead him to propose art as a domain where metaphysical experience is alive. The implicit personal investment Adorno makes is much more clear in Lacoue-Labarthe who, in a dialogue with Maurice Blanchot, shows the experience as deeply bound up with literature and its links to subjectivity. The article argues that the main difference between the two approaches is modal and temporal from the side of the object, aside from the different modes of interrogation recognized with the labels deconstruction and critical theory.

References

Adorno, Theodor. Aesthetics. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Adorno, Theodor. Aesthetic Theory. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Adorno, Theodor. In Search of Wagner. London: Verso, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

Adorno, Theodor. Mahler: A Musical Physiognomy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.Search in Google Scholar

Adorno, Theodor. Metaphysics: Concepts and Problems. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

Adorno, Theodor. Negative Dialectics. London: Routledge, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

Adorno, Theodor. Notes to Literature, Vol. 2. New York: Columbia University Press, 1992.Search in Google Scholar

Adorno, Theodor. The Culture Industry: Selected Essays on Mass Culture. London: Routledge, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

Allen, William S. Blanchot and the Outside of Literature. London: Bloomsbury, 2018.10.5040/9781501345272Search in Google Scholar

Bernstein, Jay. “Why Rescue Semblance: Metaphysical Experience and the Possibility of Ethics.” In Why Rescue Semblance?, edited by Tom Huhn and Lambert Zuidervaart. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

Blair, Lindsay. Joseph Cornell’s Vision of Spiritual Order. London: Reaktion Books, 1998.Search in Google Scholar

Blanchot, Maurice. The Writing of Disaster. Lincoln: Nebraska University Press, 1995.Search in Google Scholar

Blanchot, Maurice and Jacques Derrida. The Instant of my Death / Demeure: Fiction and Testimony. Palo Alto: Standford University Press, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

Brittain, Christopher C. Adorno and Theology. London: Continuum, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

Evans, Jules. The Art of Losing Control: A Philosopher’s Search for Ecstatic Experience. Canongate Books, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

Fenves, Peter D. The Messianic Reduction: Walter Benjamin and the Shape of Time. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

Fort, Jeff. “The Look of Nothingness: Blanchot and the Image.” In Understanding Blanchot, Understanding Modernism, edited by Christophe Langlois, 219-46. New York: Bloomsbury, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Gordon, Peter. Adorno and Existence. Boston: Harvard University Press, 2016.10.4159/9780674973510Search in Google Scholar

Hegarty, Paul. “Violent Silence: Noise and Bataille’s ‘Method of Meditation.”’ Negative Ecstasies: Georges Bataille and the Study of Religion, edited by Jeremy Biles and Kent Brintnall. New York: Fordham University Press, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

James, William. Varieties of Religious Experience. London: Routledge, 2012.10.1093/owc/9780199691647.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe. Ending and Unending Agony: On Maurice Blanchot. New York: Fordham University Press, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe. Phrase. New York: SUNY Press, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Magun, Artemy. “Negativity (Dis)embodied: Philippe Lacoue-Labarthe and Theodor W. Adorno on Mimesis.” New German Critique 118, Vol. 40, No. 1 (2013): 119-148.10.1215/0094033X-1812595Search in Google Scholar

Marrati, Paola. “The Difficulty of Experience.” MLN, Volume 132, Number 5, December (2017): 1225-1235.10.1353/mln.2017.0093Search in Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Sense and Non-sense. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1993.Search in Google Scholar

Rasula, Jed. Modernism and Poetic Inspiration: The Shadow Mouth. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.10.1057/9780230622197Search in Google Scholar

Smock, Ann. “No Music...” MLN, Volume 132, Number 5, December (2017): 1151-1169.10.1353/mln.2017.0089Search in Google Scholar

Stocker, Barry. Philosophy of the Novel. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.10.1007/978-3-319-65891-9Search in Google Scholar

Thacker, Eugene. Starry Speculative Corpse: Horror of Philosophy. Winchester: Zero Books, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

Wahl, Jean André. L’Experience metaphysique. Flammarion, 1965.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-05-20
Accepted: 2019-09-09
Published Online: 2019-10-02

© 2019 Berkay Ustun, published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 19.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/opphil-2019-0030/html
Scroll to top button