Abstract
The relationship between philosophy and research on artificial intelligence (AI) has been difficult since its beginning, with mutual misunderstanding and sometimes even hostility. By contrast, we show how an approach informed by both philosophy and AI can be productive. After reviewing some popular frameworks for computation and learning, we apply the AI methodology of “build it and see” to tackle the philosophical and psychological problem of characterizing perception as distinct from sensation. Our model comprises a network of very simple, but interacting agents which have binary experiences of the “yes/no”-type and communicate their experiences with each other. When does such a network refer to a single agent instead of a distributed network of entities? We apply machine learning techniques to address the following related questions: i) how can the model explain stability of compound entities, and ii) how could the model implement a single task such as perceptual inference? We thereby find consistency with previous work on “interface” strategies from perception research.
While this reflects some necessary conditions for the ascription of agency, we suggest that it is not sufficient. Here, AI research, if it is intended to contribute to conceptual understanding, would benefit from issues previously raised by philosophy. We thus conclude the article with a discussion of action-selection, the role of embodiment, and consciousness to make this more explicit. We conjecture that a combination of AI research and philosophy allows general principles of mind and being to emerge from a “quasi-empirical” investigation.
References
Acedo, Luis. “A cellular automaton model for collective neural dynamics.” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 50: 5-6 (2009), 717–725.10.1016/j.mcm.2008.12.018Search in Google Scholar
Agrawal, Himanshu. “Extreme self-organization in networks constructed from gene expression data.” Physical Review Letters, 89: 268702 (2012).10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.268702Search in Google Scholar
Amari, Sun-ichi. Information Geometry and its Applications. Tokyo: Springer Japan, 2016.10.1007/978-4-431-55978-8Search in Google Scholar
Augustyn, Kenneth A. (ed). “Biological Mentality.”, Journal of Cognitive Science, 19:2 (2018), 99 – 284.10.17791/jcs.2018.19.2.99Search in Google Scholar
Baldassarre Gianluca, and Mirolli, Marco (eds). Intrinsically motivated learning in natural and artificial systems. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2013.10.1007/978-3-642-32375-1Search in Google Scholar
Baluška, František, and Levin, Michael. “On having no head: Cognition throughout biological systems.” Frontiers in Psychology, 7:902 (2016).10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00902Search in Google Scholar
Bateson, Gregory. Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity. New York: Duton, 1979.Search in Google Scholar
Boden, Margaret A. “Is metabolism necessary?” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 50 (1999), 231–248.10.1093/bjps/50.2.231Search in Google Scholar
Boden, Margaret A. The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. London: Routledge, 2003.Search in Google Scholar
Cangelosi Angelo, and Schlesinger, Matthew. Developmental robotics: from babies to robots. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2015.Search in Google Scholar
Chater, Nick. The Mind is Flat. London: Allen Lane, 2018.10.12987/9780300240610Search in Google Scholar
Chemero, Anthony. Radical Embodied Cognitive Science. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 2009.10.7551/mitpress/8367.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Clark, A. and Chalmers, D. The extended mind. Analysis, 58:1 (1998), 7-19.10.1093/analys/58.1.7Search in Google Scholar
Copeland, B. Jack “Hypercomputation.” Minds and Machines, 12:4 (2002), 461–502.10.1023/A:1021105915386Search in Google Scholar
Copeland, B. Jack. Artificial Intelligence: A Philosophical Introduction. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 1993.Search in Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel C. The Intentional Stance. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 1987.Search in Google Scholar
Dretske, Fred I. Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 1981.Search in Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert. What Computers Can’t Do. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 1972.Search in Google Scholar
Faggin, Federico. “Requirements for a Mathematical Theory of Consciousness.” Journal of Consciousness, 18 (2015), 421.Search in Google Scholar
Fields, Chris, Hoffman, Donald D., Prakash, Chetan, and Singh, Manish. “Conscious agent networks: Formal analysis and application to cognition.” Cognitive Systems Research, 47 (2018), 186–213.Search in Google Scholar
Fields, Chris. “Consequences of nonclassical measurement for the algorithmic description of continuous dynamical systems.” Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 1 (1989), 171-178.Search in Google Scholar
Fields, Chris. “If physics is an information science, what is an observer?” Information, 3 (2012), 92-123.Search in Google Scholar
Friston, Karl. “Life as we know it.” Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 10 (2013), 2013.0475.Search in Google Scholar
Froese, Tom, and Ziemke, Tom. “Enactive artificial intelligence: Investigating the systemic organization of life and mind.” Artificial Intelligence, 173 (2009), 466-500.10.1016/j.artint.2008.12.001Search in Google Scholar
Gardener, Martin. “The fantastic combinations of John Conway’s new solitaire game ‘life’”. Scientific American, 223 (1970), 120-123.Search in Google Scholar
Gebali, Fayes. Analysis of Computer Networks, second edition, Cham: Springer, 2015.10.1007/978-3-319-15657-6Search in Google Scholar
Gibson, James J. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1979.Search in Google Scholar
Goertzel B, Lian R, Arel I, de Garis H, and Chen S. “A world survey of artificial brain projects, part II: biologically inspired cognitive architectures.” Neurocomputing, 74 (2010), 30–49.Search in Google Scholar
Greil, Florian, and Drossel, Barbara. “Dynamics of Critical Kauffman Networks under Asynchronous Stochastic Update.” Physical Review Letters, 95:4 (2005), 177–4.10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.048701Search in Google Scholar
Grossberg, Stephen. “Nonlinear neural networks: Principles, mechanisms, and architectures”. Neural Networks, 1 (1988), 17-61.10.1016/0893-6080(88)90021-4Search in Google Scholar
Hebb, Donald O. The Organization of Behavior. New York: Wiley, 1949.Search in Google Scholar
Hegselmann, Rainer, Mueller, Ulrich, and Troitzsch, Klaus G. (eds.). Modelling and Simulation in the Social Sciences from the Philosophy of Science Point of View, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1996.10.1007/978-94-015-8686-3Search in Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1965.Search in Google Scholar
Hoffman, Donald D., and Prakash, Chetan. “Objects of consciousness.” Frontiers in Psychology, 5:77 (2014).10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00577Search in Google Scholar
Hoffman, Donald D., Prakash, Chetan, and Singh, Manish. “The Interface Theory of Perception”, Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 22 (2015), 1480-1506.10.3758/s13423-015-0890-8Search in Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Douglas R., and Mitchell, Melanie. “The copycat project: A model of mental fluidity and analogy-making.” In Fluid Concepts and Creative Analogies, edited by Douglas R. Hofstadter, and the Fluid Analogies Research Group, 205-26. Cambridge, MA: MIT/Basic Books, 1995.Search in Google Scholar
Holland, John H. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 1992.10.7551/mitpress/1090.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. Logical Investigations. London: Routledge, 2001.10.4324/9780203420034Search in Google Scholar
Jordan, J. Scott. The wild ways of conscious will: what we do, how we do it, and why it has meaning, Frontiers of Psychology, 4:574 (2013).Search in Google Scholar
Kauffman, Stuart. The Origins of Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.Search in Google Scholar
Keijzer, Fred A. “Evolutionary convergence and biologically embodied cognition.” Interface Focus, 7 (2017), 20160123.10.1098/rsfs.2016.0123Search in Google Scholar
Knill, David C. and Richards, Whitman A. Perception as Bayesian Inference. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1996.10.1017/CBO9780511984037Search in Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005.Search in Google Scholar
LeCun, Yann, Bengio, Yoshua, and Hinton, Geoffrey. “Deep learning”. Nature, 521: 7553 (2015), 436–444.Search in Google Scholar
Lucas, John R. “Minds, Machines, and Gödel.” Philosophy, 36 (1961), 112-127.10.1017/S0031819100057983Search in Google Scholar
Macy, Michael W., and Willer, Robert. “From Factors to Factors: Computational Sociology and Agent-Based Modeling.” Annual Review of Sociology, 28:1 (2002), 143–166.10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141117Search in Google Scholar
Mamassian, Pascal, Landy, Michael, and Maloney, Laurence T. “Bayesian Modelling of Visual Perception.” in Probabilistic Models of the Brain: Perception and Neural Function, edited by R.P.N. Rao et al., 13–36. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 2002.Search in Google Scholar
McClelland, James L., Rumelhart, David E. and the PDP Research Group. Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Vol. 2: Psychological and biological models. Cambridge MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books, 1986.Search in Google Scholar
McCulloch, Warren S., and Pitts, Walter H. “A logical calculus of ideas immanent in nervous activity.” Bulleting of American Biophysics, 5 (1943), 115-133.Search in Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1965.Search in Google Scholar
Mitchell, Melanie. Complexity: A Guided Tour, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Search in Google Scholar
Mumford, David. “Pattern theory: the mathematics of perception.” International Congress of Mathematicians. Vol 3, 1-3 (2002), 1-21.Search in Google Scholar
Newell, Allan, and Simon, Herbert A. “The logic theory machine: A complex information processing system.” IRE Transactions on Information Theory 2:3 (1956), 61-79.10.1109/TIT.1956.1056797Search in Google Scholar
Oudeyer, Pierre-Yves, and Kaplan, Frederic. “What is intrinsic motivation? A typology of computational approaches.” Frontiers in Neurorobotics 1:6 (2009).10.3389/neuro.12.006.2007Search in Google Scholar
Palmer, Stephen E. Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 1999.Search in Google Scholar
Parker, Lynne E. “Distributed intelligence: Overview of the field and its application in multi-robot systems.” Journal of Physical Agents, 2:2 (2008), 5-14.10.14198/JoPha.2008.2.1.02Search in Google Scholar
Penrose, Roger. The Emperor’s New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds and The Laws of Physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.10.1093/oso/9780198519737.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Picard, Rosalind W. “Affective Computing: From laughter to IEEE.” IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 1:1 (2010), 11-17.10.1109/T-AFFC.2010.10Search in Google Scholar
Prakash, Chetan. “On Invention of Structure in the World: Interfaces and Conscious Agents.” Foundations of Science, 134: 3 (2019), 105–16.Search in Google Scholar
Réka, Albert, and Barabási, Albert-Lázsló. “Statistical mechanics of complex networks.” Reviews of Modern Physics, 74: 1 (2012), 47–97.Search in Google Scholar
Rovelli, Carlo. “Relational quantum mechanics.” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 35:8 (1996), 1637–1678.10.1007/BF02302261Search in Google Scholar
Rumelhart, David E., Hinton, Geoffrey E., and Williams, Ronald J. “Learning representations by back-propagating errors.” Nature, 323 (1986), 533-536.Search in Google Scholar
Russell, Stuart, and Norvig, Peter. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Third Edition. Upper Saddle River NJ: Prentice Hall, 2010.Search in Google Scholar
Samuelsson, Björn, and Troein, Carl. “Superpolynomial Growth in the Number of Attractors in Kauffman Networks.” Physical Review Letters, 90:9 (2002), 589–4.10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.098701Search in Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul. Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology. New York: Washington Square Press 1984.Search in Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C. “Dynamic models of segregation.” The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1:2 (1971), 143–186.10.1080/0022250X.1971.9989794Search in Google Scholar
Schmidhuber, Jürgen: “Deep learning in neural networks: an overview.” Neural Networks 61 (2015), 85–117.10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003Search in Google Scholar
Searle, John R. “Minds, brains, and programs.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3 (1980), 417–457.10.1017/S0140525X00005756Search in Google Scholar
Searle, John R. “The causal powers of the brain: The necessity of sufficiency” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13:1 (1990),16410.1017/S0140525X00078092Search in Google Scholar
Siegelmann, Hava T. “Neural and Super-Turing Computing.” Minds and Machines, 13 (2003), 103–114.Search in Google Scholar
Silver, David, et al. “Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search.” Nature, 529: 7585 (2016), 484–489.Search in Google Scholar
Sipper, Moshe. “Simple + parallel + local = cellular computing.” In Parallel Problem Solving from Nature – PPSN V, LNCS 1498 edited by A.E. Eiben et al., 653-662. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1998.10.1007/BFb0056907Search in Google Scholar
Sloman, Aaron: The Computer Revolution in Philosophy: Philosophy Science and Models of Mind. Harvester UK: Harvester Press, 1978.Search in Google Scholar
Smolensky, Paul. “On the proper treatment of connectionism.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11 (1988), 1 – 74.10.1017/S0140525X00052432Search in Google Scholar
Sporns, Olaf, and Honey, Christopher J. “Small worlds inside big brains.” PNAS, 103: 51 (2006), 19219-19220.Search in Google Scholar
Steels, Luc and Brooks, Rodney A. (eds). The Artificial Life Route to Artificial Intelligence: Building Embodied, Situated Agents. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1995.Search in Google Scholar
Turing, Alan. The Essential Turing: Seminal Writings in Computing, Logic, Philosophy, Artificial Intelligence, and Artificial Life plus The Secrets of Enigma. Edited by B. Jack Copeland, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004.Search in Google Scholar
Von Neumann, John, and Burks, Arthur. Theory of Self-reproducing Automata. Urbana Champaign IL: Illinois University Press, 1966.Search in Google Scholar
Warren, Richard M. “Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds.” Science, 167:3917 (1970), 392-393.10.1126/science.167.3917.392Search in Google Scholar
Watts, Duncan J., and Strogatz, Steven H. “Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks.” Nature, 393:6684 (1998), 440–442.10.1038/30918Search in Google Scholar
Wolfram Research, Inc. Mathematica 11.2. Champaign IL, 2017.Search in Google Scholar
Wolfram, Stephen. A New Kind of Science, Champaign IL: Wolfram Media, 2002.Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Robert Prentner et al., published by De Gruyter
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
