Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access October 30, 2019

How Dumb Are Big Dumb Objects? OOO, Science Fiction, and Scale

  • Raino Isto EMAIL logo
From the journal Open Philosophy

Abstract

This article considers the potential intersections of object-oriented ontology and science fiction studies by focusing on a particular type of science-fictional artifact, the category of ‘Big Dumb Objects.’ Big Dumb Objects is a terminology used—often quite playfully—to describe things or structures that are simultaneously massive in size and enigmatic in purpose: they stretch the imagination through both the technical aspects of their construction and the obscurity of their purpose. First used to designate the subjects of several science fiction novels written in the 1970s, Big Dumb Objects (often called BDOs) have been understood in terms of science fiction’s enduring interest in the technological sublime and the transcendental. While object-oriented ontology has often turned to science fiction and weird fiction for inspiration in rethinking the possibilities inherent in things and their relations, it has not considered the implications of BDOs for a theory of the object more broadly. The goal of this article is to consider how extreme size and representations of scale in science fiction can help expand an understanding of the object along lines that are similar to those pursued by object-oriented ontology, especially Timothy Morton’s notion of hyperobjects.

References

Banks, Iain M. Matter. New York: Orbit, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

Bear, Greg. Eon. New York: Tor, 1985.Search in Google Scholar

Bogost, Ian. Alien Phenomenology, or What It’s Like to Be a Thing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2012.10.5749/minnesota/9780816678976.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Bryant, Levi. The Democracy of Objects. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press, 2011.10.3998/ohp.9750134.0001.001Search in Google Scholar

Chu, Seo-Young. Do Metaphors Dream of Literal Sleep? A Science-Fictional Theory of Representation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2010.10.2307/j.ctvjghw79Search in Google Scholar

Clarke, Arthur C. Rendezvous with Rama. New York: Bantam, 1990.Search in Google Scholar

Clarke, Arthur C. 2001: A Space Odyssey. New York: Roc, 1993.Search in Google Scholar

Dyson, Freeman J. “Search for Artificial Stellar Sources of Infrared Radiation.” Science. 131:3414 (June 3, 1960), 1667-1668.10.1126/science.131.3414.1667Search in Google Scholar

Fortin, David Terrance. Architecture and Science-Fiction Film: Phillip K. Dick and the Spectacle of Home. Burlington: Ashgate, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

Harman, Graham. “Materialism is Not the Solution: On Matter, Form, and Mimesis.” The Nordic Journal of Aesthetics. 47 (2014), 94-110.Search in Google Scholar

Harman, Graham. The Quadruple Object. Washington: Zero Books, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

Harman, Graham. Weird Realism: Lovecraft and Philosophy. Washington: Zero Books, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

Heinlein, Robert A. “—And He Built a Crooked House—.” In The Unpleasant Profession of Jonathan Hoag, 191-214. New York: Berkeley Medallion: 1959.Search in Google Scholar

Isto, Raino. “In the Valley of the Time Tombs: Monumentality, Temporality, and History in SF.” Science Fiction Studies (forthcoming November 2019).10.5621/sciefictstud.46.3.0490Search in Google Scholar

Kaveney, Roz. “Science Fiction in the 1970s: Some Dominant Themes and Personalities.” Foundation. (June 1981), 5-35.Search in Google Scholar

Latham, Rob, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Science Fiction. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199838844.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Meillassoux, Quentin. After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency. New York: Continuum, 2008.10.5040/9781350252059Search in Google Scholar

Meillassoux, Quentin. Science Fiction and Extro-Science Fiction, trans. Aloyshe Edlbei.Search in Google Scholar

Morton, Timothy. Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology After the End of the World. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Nicholls, Peter. “Big Dumb Objects.” In The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction, edited by John Clute and Peter Nicholls, 118-119. New York: St. Martin’s Griffin, 1993.Search in Google Scholar

Nicholls, Peter. “Big Dumb Objects and Cosmic Enigmas: The Love Affair between Space Fiction and the Transcendental.” In Space and Beyond: The Frontier Theme in Science Fiction, edited by Gary Westfahl, 11-23. Westport: Greenwood, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

Niven, Larry. “Bigger than Worlds.” In A Hole in Space, 111-126. New York: Ballantine, 1974.Search in Google Scholar

Niven, Larry. Ringworld. New York: Del Rey, 1970.Search in Google Scholar

Renault, Gregory. “Science Fiction as Cognitive Estrangement: Darko Suvin and the Marxist Critique of Mass Culture.” Discourse. 2 (Summer, 1980), 113-141.Search in Google Scholar

Scharmen, Fred. “What is a Big Dumb Object?” Journal of Architectural Education. 69:2 (2015), 178-186.10.1080/10464883.2015.1063397Search in Google Scholar

Shaviro, Steven. Discognition. London: Repeater, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

Shaw, Bob. Orbitsville. New York: Baen, 1989.Search in Google Scholar

Stapledon, Olaf. The Last and First Men & Star Maker. New York: Dover, 1968.Search in Google Scholar

Suvin, Darko. The Metamorphoses of Science Fiction: On the Poetics and History of a Literary Genre. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979.Search in Google Scholar

Willems, Brian. Speculative Realism and Science Fiction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2017.10.3366/edinburgh/9781474422697.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, Robert Charles. The Chronoliths. New York: Tor, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

Wolfe, Gary. “The Artifact as Icon in Science Fiction.” Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts. 1:1 (1988), 51-69.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-05-30
Accepted: 2019-10-16
Published Online: 2019-10-30

© 2019 Raino Isto, published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 19.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/opphil-2019-0039/html
Scroll to top button