Abstract
This article proposes a direction—inspired by a reading of Heidegger’s reflections on sculpture— in which thinking enriched by artistic experience can unfold an alternative mode of being-in-the-world. Heidegger points out that, in contrast to a scientific understanding of space as an empty container, the special character of space in sculpture is characterized by a clearing-away (Räumen), which presupposes and points to an open, receptive attitude toward experience that is necessary for dwelling to take place. From Heidegger this article proceeds to reflect on artworks by Eduardo Chillida and Janet Echelman. These offer concrete examples of how a thinking of sculpture can apply to different notions of place. While Chillida’s sculptures present a sense of place as rooted and embedded in the landscape, Echelman’s artworks explore an expanded notion of place through a multisensory sense of immersion. Applying Heidegger’s meditations on Räumen, it turns out that the differences between these artworks are of greatest significance in illustrating the breadth of the experiential space that they share: an openness to dwelling and a receptivity toward being-in-the-world. In this way, Heidegger’s reflections on sculpture are unfolded in a contemporary context and the potential of sculpture for a thinking of experience is established.
References
Böhme, Gernot. “Atmosphere as the Fundamental Concept of a New Aesthetics”. Thesis Eleven. Number 36 (1993), 113-126.Search in Google Scholar
Crowther, Paul. “Space, Place, and Sculpture: Working with Heidegger”. Continental Philosophy Review 40, 2007, 151-170.10.1007/s11007-007-9051-8Search in Google Scholar
Echelman, Janet. www.echelman.com. Accessed 24 Apr. 2019.Search in Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Wahrheit und Methode. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1990.Search in Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. “Art and Space.” In Rethinking Architecture: A Reader in Cultural Theory, edited by Neil Leach, 121-124. New York: Routledge, 1997.Search in Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time. Transl. Joan Stambaugh. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2010.Search in Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Bemerkungen zu Kunst–Plastik–Raum, (Remarks on Art–Sculpture–Space). Edited by Hermann Heidegger. St. Gallen: Erker Verlag, 1996.Search in Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Die Kunst und der Raum. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 2007.Search in Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Sein und Zeit. 17th ed. Tübingen: Max Neimeyer Verlag, 1993.Search in Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin.. “The End of Philosophy and the Task of Thinking”. In Basic Writings, edited by David Farrell Krell. New York: HarperCollins, 1993.Search in Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. “The Question Concerning Technology”. In Basic Writings, edited by David Farrell Krell. New York: HarperCollins, 1993.Search in Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. “The Origin of the Work of Art”. In Poetry, Language, Thought. Trans. Hofstadter, Albert. New York: Harper & Row, 1975.Search in Google Scholar
Malpas, Jeff E. Heidegger’s Topology: Being, Place, World. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2008.Search in Google Scholar
Mitchell, Andrew J. Heidegger Among the Sculptors. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2010.10.1515/9780804775762Search in Google Scholar
Mitchell, Andrew J. The Fourfold. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2015.Search in Google Scholar
Slimbach, Guido. “Zusammenspiel von Masse und Leere”. In Eduardo Chillida. Architekt der Leere. Edited by Alexander Klar. Köln: Verlag der Buchhandlung Walther König, 2018.Search in Google Scholar
Volboudt, Pierre. Eduardo Chillida. London: Thames and Hudson, 1967.Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Jakob Due Lorentzen et al., published by De Gruyter
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.