Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access September 23, 2017

Theological Predication, Doctrinal Location, and Method in Analytic Theology

Ryan S. Peterson EMAIL logo
From the journal Open Theology

Abstract

Theological method is situated properly in relation to a range of doctrinal commitments, especially commitments located in the doctrines of God, creation, and theological anthropology. In this article, I use Thomas Aquinas’s account of theological predication to illustrate this doctrinal and methodological interconnection. Then, I describe the methodological commitments of analytic theology as they have been articulated by its advocates and argue that analytic theology should embrace an explicitly theological methodology. This requires taking seriously the proper ends of theology and the varied means used by theologians in the Christian theological tradition. I argue that analytic theologians should nurture attentiveness to theology’s chief end (the visio Dei and the corresponding goals of faithful worship and personal formation), the doctrinal order in which specific doctrinal questions find their proper context and location (beginning from and ending with the doctrine of God), and the practices that facilitate good theological judgment-making (prayer and contemplation).

References

Abraham, William J. “Systematic Theology as Analytic Theology.” In Analytic Theology: New Essays in the Philosophy of Theology, edited by Oliver D. Crisp and Michael C. Rea, 54-69. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

Allen, Michael. “Theological Commentary.” In Theological Commentary: Evangelical Perspectives, edited by R. Michael Allen, 1-9. New York: T&T Clark, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

Alston, William P. Divine Nature and Human Language: Essays in Philosophical Theology. New York: Cornell University Press, 1989.10.7591/9781501733161Search in Google Scholar

Burrell, David. Analogy and Philosophical Language. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1973. Search in Google Scholar

Clarke, W. Norris. “Review of ‘Speaking the Incomprehensible God’” by Gregory P. Rocca, The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review, 68:4 (2004): 633-636.10.1353/tho.2004.0005Search in Google Scholar

Crisp, Oliver D. “On Analytic Theology.” In Analytic Theology: New Essays in the Philosophy of Theology, edited by Oliver D. Crisp and Michael C. Rea, 33-53. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199203567.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Gregory of Nazianzus. On God and Christ: The Five Theological Orations and Two Letters of Cledonius, translated by Frederick Williams and Lionel Wickham. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

Griffiths, Paul J. Religious Reading: The Practice of Reading in the Practice of Religion. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195125771.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Hector, Kevin W. Theology without Metaphysics: God, Language, and the Spirit of Recognition. Current Issues in Theology. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.10.1017/CBO9780511845819Search in Google Scholar

James, Aaron B. Analogous Uses of Language, Eucharistic Identity, and the ‘baptist’ Vision. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

McCall, Thomas. An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology. Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 2015. Search in Google Scholar

Rea, Michael. “Introduction.” In Analytic Theology: New Essays in the Philosophy of Theology, edited by Oliver D. Crisp and Michael C. Rea, 1-30. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

Rocca, Gregory P. Speaking the Incomprehensible God: Aquinas on the Interplay of Positive and Negative Theology. Washington: Catholic University of America Press, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

Rocca, Gregory P. “The Distinction between Res Significata and Modus Significandi in Aquinas’s Theological Epistemology,” The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review, 55:2 (1991): 173-197.10.1353/tho.1991.0017Search in Google Scholar

Soskice, Janet Martin. Metaphor and Religious Language. New York: Oxford University Press, 1985.Search in Google Scholar

Thomas Aquinas. Summa Contra Gentiles, translated by Anton C. Pegis. South Bend: University of Notre Dame Press, 1991.Search in Google Scholar

Thomas Aquinas. Summa Theologiae, translated by the Fathers of the English Dominican Province. New York: Benziger Bros., 1948; reprinted in a Latin-English edition by NovAntiqua, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

Vanhoozer, Kevin J. “Introduction.” In Dictionary of Theological Interpretation of the Bible, edited by Kevin J. Vanhoozer. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

Wood, William. “Trajectories, Traditions, and Tools in Analytic Theology,” Journal of Analytic Theology, 4 (2016): 254-256.10.12978/jat.2016-4.220812221403aSearch in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-7-25
Accepted: 2017-8-31
Published Online: 2017-9-23
Published in Print: 2017-9-26

© 2017

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Downloaded on 27.11.2022 from frontend.live.degruyter.dgbricks.com/document/doi/10.1515/opth-2017-0036/html
Scroll Up Arrow