Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access January 17, 2018

CHURCH, Category, and Speciation

  • Jakob Karl Rinderknecht EMAIL logo
From the journal Open Theology

Abstract

The Roman Catholic definition of “church”, especially as applied to groups of Protestant Christians, creates a number of well-known difficulties. The similarly complex category, “species,” provides a model for applying this term so as to neither lose the centrality of certain examples nor draw a hard boundary to rule out border cases. In this way, it can help us to more adequately apply the complex ecclesiology of the Second Vatican Council. This article draws parallels between the understanding of speciation and categorization and the definition of Church since the council. In doing so, it applies the work of cognitive linguists, including George Lakoff, Zoltan Kovecses, Giles Fauconnier and Mark Turner on categorization. We tend to think of categories as containers into which we sort objects according to essential criteria. However, categories are actually built inductively by making associations between objects. This means that natural categories, including species, are more porous than we assume, but nevertheless bear real meaning about the natural world. Taxonomists dispute the border between “zebras” and “wild asses,” but this distinction arises out of genetic and evolutionary reality; it is not merely arbitrary. Genetic descriptions of species has also led recently to the conviction that there are four species of giraffe, not one. This engagement will ground a vantage point from which the Council‘s complex ecclesiology can be more easily described so as to authentically integrate its noncompetitive vision vis-a-vis other Christians with its sense of the unique place held by Catholic Church.

References

Aitchison, Jean. Words in the Mind: An Introduction to the Mental Lexicon. New York: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

Bradley, Robert D. and Robert J. Baker. “A Test of the Genetic Species Concept,” Journal of Mammalogy, 82, no. 4 (November, 2006): 960-73.10.1644/1545-1542(2001)082<0960:ATOTGS>2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

Bradley, Robert D. and Robert J. Baker. “Speciation in Mammals and the Genetic Species Concept,” Journal of Mammalogy, 87, no. 4 (August, 2006): 643-662.10.1644/06-MAMM-F-038R2.1Search in Google Scholar

Barsalou, Lawrence W. “Ad Hoc Categories,” Memory & Cognition 11, no. 3 (1983), 211-27.10.3758/BF03196968Search in Google Scholar

Becker, Karl J. “On the Meaning of Subsistit In.” Origins, 35.31 (January 19, 2006): 514-22.Search in Google Scholar

Bellarmine, Robert Cardinal. De controversiis, tom. 2, liber 3, De ecclesia militante. Naples: Guiliano, 1857. Available at: https://goo.gl/QqHmavSearch in Google Scholar

Benedict XV, Pope. Codex Iuris Canonici. New York: Kennedy & Sons, 1918.Search in Google Scholar

Berlin, Brent. Ethnobiological Classification: Principles of Categorization of Plants and Animals in Traditional Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

Bradley, Robert D., and Robert J. Baker. “A Test of the Genetic Species Concept: Cytochrome-b Sequences and Mammals.” Journal of Mammalogy 82, no. 4 (2001): 960-73.10.1644/1545-1542(2001)082<0960:ATOTGS>2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

Bradley, Robert D., and Robert J. Baker. “Speciation in Mammals and The Genetic Species Concept.” Journal of Mammalogy, 87(4), 643-62.10.1644/06-MAMM-F-038R2.1Search in Google Scholar

Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Declaration, “Mysterium Ecclesiae.” June 24, 1973. Available at: https://goo.gl/s2hY6PSearch in Google Scholar

Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Declaration, “Dominus Iesus: On the Unity and Salvific Universality of Jesus Christ and the Church.” August 6, 2000. Available at: https://goo.gl/64oaUVSearch in Google Scholar

Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. “Responses to Some Questions Regarding Certain Aspects of the Doctrine on the Church.” June 29, 2007. Available at: https://goo.gl/ux3R5hSearch in Google Scholar

Duffy, Steven J. The Dynamics of Grace: Perspectives in Theological Anthropology. Collegeville: Liturgical Press, 1993.Search in Google Scholar

Feiner, Johannes. “Decree on Ecumenism: Commentary on the Decree,” In Commentary on the Documents of Vatican II, Herbert Vorgrimler, ed. vol. 2. New York: Herder and Herder, 1968: 57-164.Search in Google Scholar

Fennessy, Julian, Tobias Bidon, Friederike Reuss, Vikas Kumar, Paul Elkan, Maria A. Nilsson, Melita Vamberger, Uwe Fritz, and Axel Janke. “Multi-locus Analyses Reveal Four Giraffe Species Instead of One.” Current Biology (2016), 2543-49.10.1016/j.cub.2016.07.036Search in Google Scholar

Gaillardetz, Richard R. An Unfinished Council: Vatican II, Pope Francis, and the Renewal of Catholicism. Collegeville: Liturgical Press, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

Granfield, Patrick. “The Church as Societas Perfecta in the Schemata of Vatican I.” Church History, 48 no 4 (1979): 431-46.10.2307/3164535Search in Google Scholar

Granfield, Patrick. “Churches and Ecclesial Communities.” Josephinum Journal of Theology, 13, no 1 (2006): 32-45.Search in Google Scholar

Gros, Jeffrey, Eamon McManus, and Ann Riggs. Introduction to Ecumenism. Manwah: Paulist Press, 1998.Search in Google Scholar

Groves, Colin P. “The Nature of Species: A Rejoinder to Zachos, et al.,” Mammalian Biology 78 (2013): 7-9.10.1016/j.mambio.2012.09.009Search in Google Scholar

Havarti, Katharina, Stephen R. Frost, and Kieran P. McNulty. “Neanderthal taxonomy reconsidered: Implications of 3D primate models of intra- and interspecific differences.” PNAS 101, no. 5 (2003), 1147-1152.Search in Google Scholar

Hotchin, John. “Canon Law and Ecumenism: Giving Shape to the Future.” Origins 30, no. 19 (October 19, 2000): 289-98.Search in Google Scholar

Br. John of Taizé. “Remarks for the Dignitas Humana Award.” Saint John’s University, Collegeville, MN. October 22, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

Kasper, Walter Cardinal. “The Meaning and Impact of Vatican II’s Ecumenism Decree.” Origins 34, no. 28 (December 23, 2004): 445-50.Search in Google Scholar

Kasper, Walter Cardinal. The Catholic Church: Nature, Reality, and Mission. New York: Bloomsbury T & T Clark, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

Kefena, E., Y. Mekasha, J.L. Han, S. Rosenbom, A. Haile, T. Dessie, A. Beja-Pereira. “Discordances Between Morphological Systematics and Molecular Taxonomy in the Stem Line of Equids: A Review of the Case of Taxonomy of Genus Equus.” Livestock Science 143, no. 2-3 (Feb 2012): 105-15.10.1016/j.livsci.2011.09.017Search in Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán. Language, Mind and Culture: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. Women Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York, Basic Books, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George and Rafel E. Núñez. Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics Into Being. New York: Basic Books, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

Lonergan, Bernard. Insight: A Study of Human Understanding. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1992.Search in Google Scholar

Lonergan, Bernard. Method in Theology. New York: Seabury, 1972.Search in Google Scholar

Masson, Robert. Without Metaphor, No Saving God: Theology After Cognitive Linguistics. Leuven: Peeters, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

McKelvey, Bill. Organizational Systematics: Taxonomy, Evolution, Classification. Oakland: University of California Press, 1982.10.1525/9780520314696Search in Google Scholar

Nix v. Heddon, 149 U.S. 304 (1893).Search in Google Scholar

Pesch, Otto Hermann. The Ecumenical Potential of the Second Vatican Council. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 2006.10.5840/pmlt2006372Search in Google Scholar

Ratzinger, Joseph Cardinal. Letter to Dr. Johannes Hanselmann, March 9, 1993. In Pilgrim Fellowship of Faith: The Churches as Communion. Translated by Henry Taylor. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

Sanders, John. Theology in the Flesh: How Embodiment and Culture Shape the Way We Think about Truth, Morality, and God. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2016.10.2307/j.ctt1b3t7k7Search in Google Scholar

Sankararaman, Sriram, Swapan Mallick, Michael Dannemann, Kay Prüfer, Janet Kelso, Svante Pääbo, Nick Patterson, and David Reich. “The Genomic Landscape of Neanderthal Ancestry in Present-day Humans.” Nature 507, no. 7492 (2014): 354-7.10.1038/nature12961Search in Google Scholar

Schelkens, Karim. “Lumen Gentium’s ‘Subsistit in’ Revisited: The Catholic Church and Christian Unity after Vatican II.” Theological Studies, 69, no. 4 (2008): 875-93.10.1177/004056390806900406Search in Google Scholar

Second Vatican Council. Dogmatic Constitution on the Church, “Lumen Gentium,” November 21, 1964. Translation from Norman P. Tanner, ed., Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1990. II:849-98. (LG)Search in Google Scholar

Second Vatican Council. Decree on Ecumenism, “Unitatis Redintegratio.” November 21, 1964. Translation from Tanner, ed., Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils. II:908-22. (UR)Search in Google Scholar

Steiner, Cynthia, Anna Mitelberg, Rosanna Tursi, Oliver A. Ryder. “Molecular Phylogeny of Extant Equids and Effects of Ancestral Polymorphism in Resolving Species-Level Phylogenies.” Molecular Phylogenics and Evolution 62, no. 2 (Nov 2012): 573-81.10.1016/j.ympev.2012.07.010Search in Google Scholar

Sullivan, Francis A. “A Response to Karl Becker, S.J. on the Meaning of Subsistit In.” Theological Studies 67, no. 2 (2006): 395-409.10.1177/004056390606700207Search in Google Scholar

Sullivan, Francis A. “The Meaning of Subsistit In as Explained by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.” Theological Studies, 69, no. 1 (2008): 116-24.10.1177/004056390806900106Search in Google Scholar

Sullivan, Francis A. “Further Thoughts on the Meaning of Subsistit In.” Theological Studies 71 no. 1 (2010): 133-147.10.1177/004056391007100108Search in Google Scholar

Sullivan, Francis A. “‘Ecclesial Communities’ and their ‘Defectus Sacramenti Ordinis.’” Ecumenical Trends 39, no. 3 (March 2010): 6-7.Search in Google Scholar

Suprema Sacea Congregatio S. Officii, Instruction, “Ecclesia Catholica.” 20. December, 1949. Acta Apostolicae Sedis, 42 (1950), 142-147. Available at https://goo.gl/CLQNBvSearch in Google Scholar

Wijlens, Miriam. Sharing the Eucharist: A Theological Evaluation of Post Conciliar Legislation. New York: University Press of America, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

Williams, Rowan. Arius: Heresy and Tradition. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

Zachos, Frank E., Marco Apollonio, Eva V. Bärmann, Marco Festa-Bianchet, Ursula Göhlich, Jan Christian Habel, Elisabeth Haring, Luise Kruckenhauser, Sandro Lovari, Allan D. McDevitt, Franz Suchentrunk. “Species Inflation and Taxonomic Artefacts - A Critical Comment on Recent Trends in Mammalian Classification.” Mammalian Biology 78 (2013): 1-6.10.1016/j.mambio.2012.07.083Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-09-28
Accepted: 2017-12-18
Published Online: 2018-01-17

© 2018

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Downloaded on 23.2.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/opth-2018-0004/html
Scroll to top button