In his book “Without Metaphor, No Saving God: Theology After Cognitive Linguistics”, Robert Masson describes a metaphoric process by which newly accepted truths emerge: for example, in the assertion “Jesus is the Messiah,” Christians reconfigure the field of meanings associated with an existing concept from the Hebrew scriptures (messiah) by asserting its identification with Jesus. Masson dubs this process a “tectonic equivalence” or “tectonic shift.” In this paper I build on Masson‘s work by examining some of the shifts he describes as tectonic through the lens of the cognitive linguistics concepts of radial extension and polysemy. I propose that a lasting tectonic shift may be understood as a blend creating a radial extension that substantially alters the category structure of the original source frame so that the blended space comes to be understood as a central instance of that category. Such an approach allows a fruitful analysis of the similarities and differences among three example blends: god is a rock, jesus is the messiah, and jesus is god.
Barcelona, Antonio. “The Metaphorical and Metonymic Understanding of the Trinitarian Dogma.” International Journal of English Studies 3, no. 1 (January 14, 2009): 1-28.Search in Google Scholar
Dalton, John. “On the Absorption of Gases by Water and Other Liquids.” In Memoirs of the Literary and Philosophical Society of Manchester, 2nd series, 1:271-87. Manchester/London: S. Russell for R. Bickerstaff, 1805.Search in Google Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara, and Eve Sweetser. Figurative Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Search in Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books, 2002.Search in Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk. Diachronic Prototype Semantics: A Contribution to Historical Lexicology. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.Search in Google Scholar
Gerhart, Mary, and Allan Melvin Russell. Metaphoric Process: The Creation of Scientific and Religious Understanding. Fort Worth, TX: Texas Christian University Press, 1984.Search in Google Scholar
Gerhart, Mary, and Allan Melvin Russell. New Maps for Old: Explorations in Science and Religion. New York: Continuum, 2001. The Hymnal 1982: According to the Use of the Episcopal Church. New York: Church Hymnal Corporation, 1985.Search in Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.Search in Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books, 1999.Search in Google Scholar
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Barbara. “Polysemy, Prototypes, and Radial Categories.” In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, edited by Dirk Geeraerts and Hubert Cuyckens, 139-69. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Search in Google Scholar
Masson, Robert. Without Metaphor, No Saving God: Theology after Cognitive Linguistics. Leuven: Peeters, 2014.Search in Google Scholar
McCabe, Herbert. God Matters. London: Geoffrey Chapman, 1987.Search in Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. Thomas Aquinas. Summa Theologiae. 60 vols. London: Blackfriars, 1964.Search in Google Scholar
Woodward, Sarah Cazneau. Embroidery for Church Guilds. New York: James Pott & Co., 1896.Search in Google Scholar
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.