Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access February 17, 2018

Conceiving God: Literal and Figurative Prompt for a More Tectonic Distinction

Robert Masson
From the journal Open Theology

Abstract

John Sanders’ Theology in the Flesh, the first comprehensive overview of the toolkit that contemporary cognitive linguistics offers for theological appropriation, despite its remarkable success, gives rather minimal attention to blending theory, one of the discipline’s most formidable tools. This paper draws on blending theory to offer an alternative to Sanders’ chapter on conceiving God. Central to the proposal is claim that God-talk, like many of the advances in science, technology, and art, entails a kind of tectonic understanding and conceptual mapping that is neither literal nor figurative.

References

Boeve, Lieven. “Linguistica Ancilla Theologiae: The Interest of Fundamental Theology in Cognitive Systematics.” In The Bible Through Metaphor and Translation: a Cognitive Semantic Perspective, edited by Kurt Feyaerts. New York: Peter Lang, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

Hofstadter, Douglas R. Surfaces and Essences: Analogy as the Fuel and Fire of Thinking. New York: Basic Books, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Gerhart, Mary, and Allan Melvin Russell. Metaphoric Process: The Creation of Scientific and Religious Understanding. Fort Worth, TX: Texas Christian UP, 1984.Search in Google Scholar

Gerhart, Mary, and Allan Russell. New Maps for Old: Explorations in Science and Religion. New York: Continuum, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

Masson, Robert. Without Metaphor, No Saving God: Theology After Cognitive Linguistics. Leuven: Peeters Press, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

Rinderknecht, Jakob Karl. Mapping the Differentiated Consensus of the Joint Declaration. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.10.1007/978-3-319-40099-0Search in Google Scholar

Sanders, John. Theology in the Flesh: How Embodiment and Culture Shape the Way We Think About Truth, Morality, and God. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2016.10.2307/j.ctt1b3t7k7Search in Google Scholar

Shaver, Stephen. “Metaphors of Eucharistic Presence: A Cognitive Linguistics Approach to an Ecumenical Theology of Bread, Wine, and the Body and Blood of Christ.” Graduate Theological Union Berkeley, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

Slingerland, Edward G. What Science Offers the Humanities: Integrating Body and Culture. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.10.1017/CBO9780511841163Search in Google Scholar

Sokolowski, Robert. The God of Faith & Reason: Foundations of Christian Theology. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 1982.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles. A Secular Age. Cambridge: Harvard, 2007.10.4159/9780674044289Search in Google Scholar

Tremlin, Todd. Minds and Gods: The Cognitive Foundations of Religion. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.10.1093/0195305345.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-10-28
Accepted: 2018-02-02
Published Online: 2018-02-17

© 2018

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Scroll Up Arrow