Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access July 18, 2018

Freedom from the Self: Luther and Løgstrup on Sin as “Incurvatus in Se”

Bjørn Rabjerg and Robert Stern
From the journal Open Theology

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to compare Martin Luther and K. E. Løgstrup on the theme of sin and grace, and to argue that while Løgstrup wanted to stay close to Luther in many respects, he nonetheless provides a secularized version of Luther’s picture, according to which we are liberated from our sinfulness not by God’s grace, but by our ethical encounter with other people. This then raises the question of whether Løgstrup’s approach can work, and thus whether this secularized alternative can be made stable and coherent. We begin by focusing on central themes concerning Løgstrup’s relation to Luther. We then outline the key features of Luther’s conception of sin and grace that were important to Løgstrup , and then consider how he develops that conception in a secularized manner. Finally, we discuss problems that might be raised for Løgstrup’s position.

References

Andersen, Svend. Løgstrup & Luther. Aarhus: Klim, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

Barone, Marco. Luther’s Augustinian Theology of the Cross. Eugene: Resource Publications, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

Gregersen, Niels Henrik, “K. E. Løgstrup and Scandinavian Creation Theology.” In Reformation Theology for a Post-Secular Age: Løgstrup, Prenter, Wingren, and the Future of Scandinavian Creation Theology edited by Niels Henrik Gregersen, Bengt Kristensson Uggla and Trygve Wyller, 37-66. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

Jensen, Ole. “‘Skabte livsmuligheder’-‘Suveræne livsytringer’: Bemærkninger til et grundtema hos K. E. Løgstrup.” In his Sårbar Usårlighed: Løgstrup og Religionens Genkomst i Filosofien, 18-34. Copenhagen: Gyldendal, 1994; translation available here: https://ethicaldemand.wordpress.com/resources-and-link/.Search in Google Scholar

Johnston, Mark. Saving God: Religion After Idolatry. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.10.1515/9781400830442Search in Google Scholar

Luther, Martin. D. Martin Luthers Werke: Kritische Gesamtausgabe, 65 vols in 127. Weimar: Hermann Böhlau, 1883- .Search in Google Scholar

Luther, Martin. Luther’s Works, American edition, 55 vols. St. Louis and Philadelphia: Concordia and Fortress Press, 1958-86.Search in Google Scholar

Løgstrup, K. E. “Antropologien i Kants Etik.” In Festskrift til Jens Nørregaard den 16. Maj 1947, 146-56. Copenhagen: G. E. C. Gad, 1947.Search in Google Scholar

Løgstrup, K. E. Beyond the Ethical Demand, translated by Susan Dew and Heidi Flegal, edited with an introduction by Kees van Kooten Niekerk. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

Løgstrup, K. E. Den Etiske Fordring. Aarhus: Klim, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

Løgstrup, K. E. “Ethics and Ontology”, translated by Eric Watkins. In The Ethical Demand, translated by Theodor I. Jensen and Gary Puckering; revised with an introduction by Hans Fink and Alasdair MacIntyre, 265-93. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press, 1997.Search in Google Scholar

Løgstrup, K. E. “Ethik und Ontologie.” Zeitschrift für Theologie und Kirche. 57 (1960), 357-91.Search in Google Scholar

Løgstrup, K. E. Etiske Begreber og Problemer. Aarhus: Klim, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

Løgstrup, K. E. Kunst og Etik. Copenhagen: Gyldendal, 1961.Search in Google Scholar

Løgstrup, K. E. Metaphysics, volume I, translated by Russell L. Dees. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1995.Search in Google Scholar

Løgstrup, K. E. Opgør med Kierkegaard. Aarhus: Klim, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Løgstrup, K. E. “Pligt eller Ansvar.” Kirken og Tiden, 14 (1938), 206-17; translation by Hans Fink and Robert Stern available at: https://ethicaldemand.wordpress.com/resources-and-link/.Search in Google Scholar

Løgstrup, K. E. Prædikener fra Sandager-Holevad, edited by Elsebeth Diderichsen and Ole Jensen. Copenhagen: Gyldendal, 1995.Search in Google Scholar

Løgstrup, K. E. Skabelse og Tilintetgørelse: Metaphysik IV: Religionsfilosofiske Betragtninger. Aarhus: Klim, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

Løgstrup, K. E. System og Symbol: Essays. Copenhagen: Gyldendal, 1982.Search in Google Scholar

Løgstrup, K. E. “The Anthropology of Kant’s Ethics,” translated by Kees van Kooten Niekerk. In What is Ethically Demanded? Essays on Knud Ejler Løgstrup’s “The Ethical Demand”, edited by Hans Fink and Robert Stern, 19-34. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press, 2017.10.2307/j.ctvpj755r.5Search in Google Scholar

Murdoch, Iris. The Sovereignty of Good. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1970.Search in Google Scholar

Rabjerg, Bjørn. “Efterskrift.” In K. E. Løgstrup, Etiske Begreber og Problemer, 121-147. Aarhus: Klim, 2014; translation by BjørnSearch in Google Scholar

Rabjerg and Robert Stern available at: https://ethicaldemand.wordpress.com/resources-and-link/.Search in Google Scholar

Rabjerg, Bjørn. “Løgstrup’s Ontological Ethics: An Analysis of Human Interdependent Existence”. Res Cogitans, 17 (2017), 93-110.Search in Google Scholar

Rabjerg, Bjørn. Tilværelse og Forståelse: Et Antropologisk Grundtema i Løgstrups Teologiske og Filosofiske tænkning. Aarhus: Klim, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-05-09
Accepted: 2018-06-04
Published Online: 2018-07-18

© 2018 Robert Stern, published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Scroll Up Arrow