Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access July 4, 2019

Spatial Analysis of New Testament Textual Emendations Utilizing Confusion Distances

Vincent van Altena EMAIL logo , Jan Krans , Henk Bakker , Balázs Dukai and Jantien Stoter
From the journal Open Theology

Abstract

Before the interpretation of any text can start, the original wording of the text itself must be critically established. Conventionally, this is done following qualitative criteria. This article, however, explores the application of spatial analyses to New Testament textual criticism by demonstrating how the Levenshtein edit distance could be adapted to calculate confusion distances for variant readings in New Testament manuscripts, i.e. the possibility that a (combination of) letter(s) is confused by another (combination of) letter(s). Subsequently the outcomes are translated to Euclidian space using classical Multi-Dimensional Scaling, which enables visualisation and spatial analyses (in this case not related to geographical space). The article focuses on the data preparation and algorithm to make the data suitable for spatial analyses, thus providing the New Testament textual critic with new analytical tools.

References

Aland, Barbara. “New Testament Textual Research, Its Methods and Its Goals.” In Translating the New Testament: Text, Translation, Theology, edited by S. E. Porter and M. J. Boda, 13–26. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

Aland, Kurt, et al., eds. Text und Textwert der griechischen Handschriften des neuen Testaments. ANTF. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1987.10.1515/9783110862867Search in Google Scholar

Barrett, C. K. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Acts of the Apostles:. Vol. 1: Preliminary Introduction and Commentary on Acts I–XIV. London: T&T Clark Clark, 2008 [reprint].Search in Google Scholar

Bishop, E. F. F. “Professor Burkitt and the Geographical Catalogue.” Journal of Roman Studies 42 no. 1–2 (1952), 84–85. https://doi.org/10.2307/297518.10.2307/297518Search in Google Scholar

Borg, Ingwer, and Patrick J. F. Groenen. Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications. 2nd edition. New York: Springer, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

Bruce, F. F. The Book of the Acts. Revised edition. NICNT. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1988.Search in Google Scholar

“Codex Sinaiticus,” July 2009. http://www.codexsinaiticus.org.Search in Google Scholar

Das, Gautam, Rudolf Fleischer, Leszek Gasieniec, Dimitris Gunopulos, and Juha Kärkkäinen. “Episode Matching.” In Combinatorial Pattern Matching, edited by A. Apostolico and J. Hein, 1264:12–27. Berlin: Springer, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63220-4_46.10.1007/3-540-63220-4_46Search in Google Scholar

Davies, Clare. “Reading Geography between the Lines: Extracting Local Place Knowledge from Text.” In Spatial Information Theory, edited by T. Tenbrink, J. Stell, A. Galton, and Z. Wood, 8116:320–37. Cham: Springer, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01790-7_18.10.1007/978-3-319-01790-7_18Search in Google Scholar

Goodchild, Michael F., and Donald G. Janelle. “Specialization in the Structure and Organization of Geography.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 78 no. 1 (1988), 1–28 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1988.tb00189.x.10.1111/j.1467-8306.1988.tb00189.xSearch in Google Scholar

Hamming, R. W. “Error Detecting and Error Correcting Codes.” Bell System Technical Journal 29 (1959), 147–160 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1950.tb00463.x.10.1002/j.1538-7305.1950.tb00463.xSearch in Google Scholar

Holmes, Michael W. “From ‘Original Text’ to ‘Initial Text’: The Traditional Goal of New Testament Textual Criticism in Contemporary Discussion.” In The Text of the New Testament in Contemporary Research: Essays on the Status Quaestionis, edited by B. D. Ehrman and M. W. Holmes, 2nd edition, 637–688. Leiden: Brill, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Holmes, Michael W. “Reconstructing the Text of the New Testament.” In The Blackwell Companion to the New Testament, edited by D. E. Aune, 77–89. Malden: Wiley Blackwell, 2010.10.1002/9781444318937.ch5Search in Google Scholar

Institut für Neutestamentliche Textforschung. “Liste.” http://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/liste [Accessed 15 February 2019].Search in Google Scholar

Institut für neutestamentliche Textforschung. “New Testament Virtual Manuscript Room -Manuscript Workspace - GA133 - Document ID: 30133 - PageID: 3480.” http://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/community/modules/papyri/?site=INTF&image=30133/undefined/3480/20/2293 [Accessed 4 May 2018].Search in Google Scholar

Keener, Craig S. Acts: An Exegetical Commentary – Introduction and 1:1–2:47. Volume 1. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

Kilpatrick, George D. “Conjectural Emendation in the New Testament.” In New Testament Textual Criticism: Its Significance for Exegesis: Essays in Honour of Bruce M. Metzger, edited by B. M. Metzger, E. J. Epp, and G. D. Fee, 349–360. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981.Search in Google Scholar

Krans, Jan. “Conjectural Emendation and the Text of the New Testament.” In The Text of the New Testament in Contemporary Research: Essays on the Status Quaestionis, edited by B. D. Ehrman and M. W. Holmes, 2nd edition, 613–635. Leiden: Brill, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Krans, Jan, and Bert Jan Lietaert Peerbolte. “The Amsterdam Database of New Testament Conjectural Emendation.” http://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/nt-conjectures [Accessed 26 May 2017].Search in Google Scholar

Levenshtein, Vladimir I. “Binary Codes Capable of Correcting Deletions, Insertions, and Reversals.” Soviet Physics - Doklady 10 no. 8 (1966), 707–710.Search in Google Scholar

Loader, James Alfred and Oda Wischmeyer. “Twentieth Century Interpretation.” In Dictionary of Biblical Criticism and Interpretation, edited by S. E. Porter, 371–383. New York: Routledge, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

Louwerse, Max, Zhiqiang Cai, Xiangen Hu, Matthew Ventura, and Patrick Jeuniaux. “Cognitively Inspired NLP-Based Knowledge Representations: Further Explorations of Latent Semantic Analysis.” International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools 15 no. 06 (2006), 1021–1039 https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218213006003090.10.1142/S0218213006003090Search in Google Scholar

Louwerse, Max M., and Rolf A. Zwaan. “Language Encodes Geographical Information.” Cognitive Science 33 no. 1 (2009), 51–73 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2008.01003.x.10.1111/j.1551-6709.2008.01003.xSearch in Google Scholar

Melo, Fernando, and Bruno Martins. “Automated Geocoding of Textual Documents: A Survey of Current Approaches.” Transactions in GIS 21 no. 1 (2017), 3–38 https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12212.10.1111/tgis.12212Search in Google Scholar

Metzger, Bruce M. A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament – A Companion Volume to the United Bible Societies’ Greek New Testament (Fourth Revised edition). Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 1994.Search in Google Scholar

Metzger, Bruce M. “Ancient Astrological Geography and Acts 2:9–11.” In Apostolic History and the Gospel: Biblical and Historical Essays Presented to F. F. Bruce on His 60th Birthday, edited by F. F. Bruce, W. W. Gasque, and R. P. Martin, 123–133. Exeter: Paternoster, 1970.Search in Google Scholar

Metzger, Bruce M., and Bart D. Ehrman. The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration. 4th edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

Navarro, Gonzalo. “A Guided Tour to Approximate String Matching.” ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 33 no. 1 (2001), 31–88.Search in Google Scholar

Needleman, Saul B., and Christian D. Wunsch. “A General Method Applicable to the Search for Similarities in the Amino Acid Sequence of Two Proteins.” Journal of Molecular Biology 48 no. 3 (1970), 443–453 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(70)90057-4.10.1016/0022-2836(70)90057-4Search in Google Scholar

Nongbri, Brent. “The Use and Abuse of P52: Papyrological Pitfalls in the Dating of the Fourth Gospel.” Harvard Theological Review 98 no. 01 (2005), 23–48 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017816005000842.10.1017/S0017816005000842Search in Google Scholar

Old, L. John. “Utilizing Spatial Information Systems for Non-Spatial-Data Analysis.” Scientometrics 51 no. 3 (2001), 563–571.Search in Google Scholar

Parker, D. C. An Introduction to the New Testament Manuscripts and Their Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.10.1017/CBO9780511619922Search in Google Scholar

Pervo, Richard I. Acts: A Commentary. Hermeneia. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

Richards, E. Randolph. “Reading, Writing, and Manuscripts.” In The World of the New Testament: Cultural, Social, and Historical Contexts, edited by J. B. Green and L. M. McDonald, 345–366. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Royse, James R. “Scribal Tendencies in the Transmission of the Text of the New Testament.” In The Text of the New Testament in Contemporary Research: Essays on the Status Quaestionis, edited by B. D. Ehrman and M. W. Holmes, 2nd edition, 461–478. Leiden: Brill, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Rutgers, Johannes. “Index Palaeographicus.” Mnemosyne (1859), 85–110.Search in Google Scholar

Skupin, André and Barbara P. Buttenfield. “Spatial Metaphors for Visualizing Very Large Data Archives.” Proceedings of GIS/LIS ‘96 Annual Conference and Exposition (1996), 607–617.Search in Google Scholar

Skupin, André and Sara Fabrikant. “Spatialization Methods: A Cartographic Research Agenda for Non-Geographic Information Visualization.” Cartography and Geographic Information Science 30 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1559/152304003100011081.10.1559/152304003100011081Search in Google Scholar

Skupin, André and Sara I. Fabrikant. “Spatialization.” In The Handbook of Geographic Information Science, edited by J. P. Wilson and A. S. Fotheringham, 61–79. Oxford: Blackwell, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470690819.ch4.10.1002/9780470690819.ch4Search in Google Scholar

Strutwolf, Holger et al., eds. Novum Testamentum Graece. 28th revised edition. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

Tobler, W., and S. Wineburg. “A Cappadocian Speculation.” Nature 231 no. 5297 (1971), 39–41.Search in Google Scholar

Wagner, Robert A., and Michael J. Fischer. “The String-to-String Correction Problem.” Journal of the ACM (JACM) 21 no. 1 (1974), 168–173.10.1145/321796.321811Search in Google Scholar

Wasserman, Tommy, and Peter J Gurry. A New Approach to Text Criticism: Introduction to the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2017.10.2307/j.ctt1whm8zrSearch in Google Scholar

Witherington, Ben. The Acts of the Apostles: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998.Search in Google Scholar

Yuan, May. “Mapping Text.” In The Spatial Humanities: GIS and the Future of Humanities Scholarship, edited by D. J. Bodenhamer, J. Corrigan, and T. M. Harris, 109–123. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-12-23
Accepted: 2019-03-11
Published Online: 2019-07-04

© 2019 Vincent van Altena et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License.

Downloaded on 29.11.2022 from frontend.live.degruyter.dgbricks.com/document/doi/10.1515/opth-2019-0004/html
Scroll Up Arrow