Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access July 4, 2019

Embedded, not Plugged-In: Digital Humanities and Fair Participation in Systematic Theological Research

Matthew Ryan Robinson EMAIL logo
From the journal Open Theology

Abstract

The article examines the disparity in use of digital humanities tools and resources among the theological disciplines, highlighting the question of why systematic theology has struggled to follow the digital turn. The author argues that issues of fairness in access and use of digital resources in knowledge production constitute an important set of concerns for systematic theologians in considering appropriate uses of the digital in their research. The article suggests that there are indeed reasons for methodological innovation in systematic theology in reaction to the digital revolution in humanities research – not, however, toward more plugged-in methods but toward methods embedded in life with the poor, underrepresented, and excluded. Three principles for a methodological “reboot” in systematic theology are given, which offer directions for further research as well as material for debate.

Bibliography

Anderson, Clifford. “Digital Humanities and the Future of Theology: What Potential Does Digital Humanities have to Shape the Practice of Theology? Are There Theological Questions at Stake?” Cursor: Zeitschrift für explorative Theologie (25 July 2018). Last accessed 30 December 2018. https://cursor.pubpub.org/pub/anderson-digitalhumanities-2018.10.21428/47f01edfSearch in Google Scholar

Astley, Jeff. Ordinary Theology: Looking, Listening and Learning in Theology. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

Astley, Jeff and Leslie J. Francis, eds. Exploring Ordinary Theology: Everyday Christian Believing and the Church. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Bhatti, Deborah, Helen Cameron, and Catherine Duce. Talking about God in Practice: Theological Action Research and Practical Theology. London: SCM Press, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

Bielo, James. “Digital Scholarship and the Critical Study of Religion.” Religion 48 (2018): 252–254.10.1080/0048721X.2018.1445602Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, Heidi, ed. Digital Religion: Understanding Religious Practice in New Media Worlds. London: Routledge, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Caponetto, Ilaria, Jeffrey Earp, and Michela Ott. “Gamification and Education: A Literature Review.” In Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Games Based Learning 2014, vol. 1, edited by Carsten Busch, 50–57. Reading: Academic Conferences International Limited, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

Charmaz, Kathy. Constructing Grounded Theory. London: Sage, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

Christian, Ngnaoussi Elongué Cedric. “Why Should We Develop More Mobile Serious Games in Africa?” eLearning Africa NEWS (7 September 2018). Last accessed 5 January 2019. https://ela-newsportal.com/why-should-we-develop-more-mobile-serious-games-in-africa/.Search in Google Scholar

Clarke, Steve, Julian Savulescu, C. A. J. Coady, Alberto Giubilini, and Sagar Sanyal, eds. The Ethics of Human Enhancement: Understanding the Debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

Cloete, Anita L. “Living in a Digital Culture: The Need for Theological Reflection.” HTS Theological Studies 71 (2015): 1–7.10.4102/hts.v71i2.2073Search in Google Scholar

DeRogatis, Amy and Isaac Weiner. “Turning Students into Scholars: Using Digital Methods to Teach the Critical Study of Religion.” Religion 48 (2018): 255–261.10.1080/0048721X.2018.1445601Search in Google Scholar

Duffer, Ellen. “As Artificial Intelligence Advances, What are its Religious Implications?” Religion and Politics (29 August 2017). Last accessed 29 December 2018. https://religionandpolitics.org/2017/08/29/as-artificial-intelligence-advances-what-are-its-religious-implications/.Search in Google Scholar

Evangelische Kirche in Deutschland. Gezählt 2018. Zahlen und Fakten zum kirchlichen Leben. Hannover: Evangelische Kirche in Deutschland, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Ferraris, Maurizio. Documentality: Why it is Necessary to Leave Traces. Translated by Richard Davies. New York: Fordham University Press, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

Frankfurt, Harry. On Bullshit. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

Gerber, Kent T. K. “Getting Involved with the Digital Humanities in Theology, Biblical Studies, and Religious Studies.” Theological Librarianship 9 (2016): 5–10.10.31046/tl.v9i1.420Search in Google Scholar

“Global Christianity at Your Fingertips: Providing Online Access to Global Christian Theology Starting with Africa.” Last accessed 19 March 2019. https://www.templeton.org/grant/global-christianity-at-your-fingertips-providing-online-access-to-global-christian-theology-starting-with-africa.Search in Google Scholar

“Global Christianity Website Project Granted 175.000 Euro.” Last Accessed 19 March 2019. https://www.pthu.nl/en/News_and_Events/News/global-christianity-website-project-granted-175000-euro/.Search in Google Scholar

Globethics.net 10th Anniversary. Last accessed 19 March 2019. https://www.globethics.net/10th-anniversary.Search in Google Scholar

Godwin, Richard. “Triathalons, Ultramarathons and Ambitious Baking: Why is Modern Leisure so Competitive?” (21 November 2018). Last accessed 30 December 2018. https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2018/nov/21/triathlons-ultramarathons-and-ambitious-baking-why-is-modern-leisure-so-competitive.Search in Google Scholar

Hahn, Oliver. “Analyse der Schreibmaterialien Schleiermachers.” In Friedrich Schleiermacher, Vorlesungen über die Pädagogik und ämtliche Voten zum öffentlichen Unterricht, edited by Jens Beljan et al., KGA II/12, 885–894. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

Hutchings, Tim. Creating Church Online: Ritual, Community and New Media. New York: Routledge, 2017.10.4324/9780203111093Search in Google Scholar

Hutchings, Tim. “Digital Humanities and the Study of Religion.” In Between Humanities and the Digital, edited by Patrik Svensson and David Theo Goldberg, 283–294. London: MIT, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

Karagiorga, Dimitrios N. and Shari Niemann. “Gamification and Game-Based Learning.” Journal of Education Technology Systems 45 (2017): 499–519.10.1177/0047239516665105Search in Google Scholar

Le Cornu, Alison and Zoë Bennet, eds. Theological Reflection: Processes of Learning, Patterns of Belief. New York: Routledge, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

Lorrimar, Victoria. “Human Flourishing, Joy, and the Prospect of Radical Life Extension.” Expository Times 129 (2018): 554–561.10.1177/0014524618767222Search in Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas. A Systems Theory of Religion. Edited by André Kieserling and translated by David A. Brenner with Adrian Hermann. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Majuri, Jenni, Jonna Koivisto, and Juho Hamari. “Gamification of Education and Learning: A Review of Empirical Literature.” In Proceedings of the GamiFIN Conference 2018, edited by Jonna Koivisto and Juho Hamari. CEUR-WS.org: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 11–19.Search in Google Scholar

Marsh, Charles, Peter Slade and Sarah Azaransky. Lived Theology: New Perspectives on Method, Style, and Pedagogy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

McBride, Jennifer M. The Church for the World: A Theology of Public Witness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

McGrath, James F. Theology and Science Fiction. Eugene: Wipf and Stock, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

McGuire, Meredith B. Lived Religion: Faith and Practice in Everyday Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195172621.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

McPhail, Thomas L., ed. Development Communication: Reframing the Role of the Media. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, 2009.10.1002/9781444310740Search in Google Scholar

McPhail, Thomas L. “eColonialism Theory: How Trends are Changing the World.” World Financial Review (21 March 2014). Last Accessed 15 March 2019. http://www.worldfinancialreview.com/?p=209.Search in Google Scholar

McPhail, Thomas L. Electronic Colonialism: The Future of International Broadcasting and Communication. 2nd ed. Newbury Park: Sage, 1987.Search in Google Scholar

Merritt, Jonathan. “Is AI a Threat to Christianity? Are you there, God? It’s I, Robot.” The Atlantic (3 February 2017). Last accessed 28 December 2018. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/02/artificial-intelligence-christianity/515463/.Search in Google Scholar

Mignolo, Walter D. and Catherine E. Walsh. On Decoloniality: Concepts, Analytics, Praxis. Durham: Duke University Press, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Mlinar, Courtney. Embedded and Empowered: A Practical Guide for Librarians. New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha. Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge: Harvard Belknapp Press, 2011.10.4159/harvard.9780674061200Search in Google Scholar

van Oorschot, Fredericke and Thomas Renkert. “Digitale theologische Öffentlicheiten. Perspektiven aus Theorie und Praxis.” Cursor: Zeitschrift für explorative Theologie (10 November 2018). Last Accessed 30 December 2018. https://cursor.pubpub.org/pub/kqs8h2ky.10.21428/3249ee62Search in Google Scholar

Phillips, Peter. “The Pixelated Image: Reading the Bible within Digital Culture.” Theology 121 (2018): 403–412.10.1177/0040571X18794139Search in Google Scholar

Possamai-Inesedy, Alphia and Alan Nixon. “A Place to Stand: Digital Sociology and the Archimedean Effect.” Journal of Sociology 53 (2017): 865–884.10.1177/1440783317744104Search in Google Scholar

Postman, Neil. Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business. New York: Penguin, 1985.Search in Google Scholar

Reed, Ashley. “Digital Humanities and the Study and Teaching of North American Religions.” Religion Compass 10 (2016): 307–316.10.1111/rec3.12226Search in Google Scholar

Robinson, Matthew Ryan. “‘Fake Friends,’ Migration und Freundschaft. Über die Grenzen des Werts der Toleranz und ein Projekt zur Begegnung von Theologiestudierenden mit Migranten, ohne ihnen Hilfe geben zu sollen.” Pastoral-theologie 107 (2018): 333–352.10.13109/path.2018.107.7.333Search in Google Scholar

Robinson, Matthew Ryan. Redeeming Relationship, Relationships that Redeem: Free Sociability and the Completion of Humanity in the Thought of Friedrich Schleiermacher. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2018.10.1628/978-3-16-155588-6Search in Google Scholar

Schleiermacher, Friedrich. Brief Outline of Theology as a Field of Study. Revised Translation of the 1811 and 1830 Editions. Translated and edited by Terrence N. Tice. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

Shumaker, David. The Embedded Librarian: Innovative Strategies for Taking Knowledge Where It’s Needed. Medford: Information Today, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya. Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

Smiley, Bobby L. “Theological Librarianship in the Age of Digital Humanities.” American Theological Library Association Summary of Proceedings 70 (2016): 20–32.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Michael. “Theological Frames for Social Research.” Journal of Empirical Theology. 31 (2018): 71–92.10.1163/15709256-12341368Search in Google Scholar

Stichweh, Rudolf. Inklusion und Exklusion. Studien zur Gesellschaftstheorie. Bielefeld: Transcript, 2016.10.14361/9783839422946Search in Google Scholar

Sweet, Leonard. Viral: How Social Networking is Poised to Ignite Revival. Colorado Springs: Waterbrook Press, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

Troeltsch, Ernst. “Historical and Dogmatic Method in Theology.” In Ernst Troeltsch, Religion in History, translated by James Luther Adams and Walter F. Bense and with an Introduction by James Luther Adams, 11–32. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1991.Search in Google Scholar

Warren, Meredith J. C. “Teaching with Technology: Using Digital Humanities to Engage Student Learning.” Teaching Theology and Religion 19 (2016): 309–319.10.1111/teth.12343Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-01-06
Accepted: 2019-03-25
Published Online: 2019-07-04

© 2019 Matthew Ryan Robinson, published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License.

Downloaded on 29.11.2022 from frontend.live.degruyter.dgbricks.com/document/doi/10.1515/opth-2019-0005/html
Scroll Up Arrow