Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access October 2, 2019

Patheticness and the Mundane Phenomenalisation of Transcendence according to Kierkegaard

Maria Gołębiewska EMAIL logo
From the journal Open Theology

Abstract

Referring to the Platonic division between the transcendent and the immanent world as but a manifestation of the former, Søren Kierkegaard grasped the phenomenal character of the earthly world. According to Kierkegaard, in Transcendence, God is, and the transcendent Ideas exist as patterns of beings given to us in temporality, the fontal phenomenal character of which (as manifestations) intertwines with the real mundane ontological character. Kierkegaard argued against the Hegelian theory of dialectics, as well as the pathos theory, presenting dialecticity and patheticness as two ways in which the existing subject refers to the immanent world of temporality and the spiritual realm of Transcendence. The process of phenomenalisation, accomplished along with the existence of all earthly beings, is accompanied by a singular, subjective response of each individual to the immanent world. This response assumes the form of a dialectical balanced reaction, or a pathetic, hyperbolic, in the aesthetic, ethical and religious stages of individual existence (in the religious stage, it is a response to the world of Transcendence). The paper is dedicated to discussing the relations of the process of the phenomenalisation of Transcendence to its individual, religious responses, particularly the relations to the pathetic type of religious response, as indicated by Kierkegaard.

References

Aristotle. Poetics. Edit. and trans. L. Tarán, D. Gutas. Leiden & Boston: Brill, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

Aristotle. Rhetoric. Edit. and trans. E. M. Cope, J. E. Sandys. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

Hanson, Jeffrey (ed.). Kierkegaard as Phenomenologist. An Experiment. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2010.10.2307/j.ctv47w62pSearch in Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg W. F. Aesthetics. Lectures on Fine Art. Trans. T. M. Knox. Vol. I-III. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.10.1093/actrade/9780198244998.book.1Search in Google Scholar

Kierkegaard, Søren. Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments. A Mimetic-Pathetic-Dialectic Compilation. An Existential Plea, by Johannes Climacus, published by S. Kierkegaard [Afsluttende uvidenskabelig Efterskrift til de philosophiske Smuler. Mimisk-pathetisk-dialektisk Sammenskrift. Existentielt Indlaeg, af Johannes Climacus. Udgiven af S. Kierkegaard, 1846]. Trans. D. F. Swenson. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1968.Search in Google Scholar

Kierkegaard, Søren. Either-Or. A Fragment of Life edited by Victor Eremita [Enten-Eller. Et Livs-Fragment, udgivet af Victor Eremita, 1843]. Part I-II. Trans. H. V. Hong and E. H. Hong. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988.Search in Google Scholar

Kierkegaard, Søren. Fear and Trembling. A Dialectical Lyric by Johannes de Silentio [Frygt og Baeven. Dialektisk Lyrik af Johannes de Silentio, 1843]. Edit. and trans. A. Hannay. London: Penguin Classics – Penguin Books, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

Kierkegaard, Søren. On the Concept of Irony, with Continual Reference to Socrates [Om Begrebet Ironi med stadigt Hensyn til Socrates, 1841]. Edit. and trans. H. V. Hong and E. H. Hong. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989.Search in Google Scholar

Kierkegaard, Søren. Philosophical Fragments, or a Fragment of Philosophy by Johannes Climacus, published by S. Kierkegaard [Philosophiske Smuler eller En Smule Philosophie. Af Johannes Climacus. Udgivet af S. Kierkegaard, 1844]. Edit. and trans. H. V. Hong and E. H. Hong. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985.Search in Google Scholar

Kierkegaard, Søren. Stages on Life’s Way. Studies by Various Persons, compiled, forwarded to the press, and published by Hilarious Bookbinder [Stadier paa Livets Vej. Studier af Forskjellige. Sammenbragte, befordrede til Trykken og udgivne af Hilarius Bogbinder, 1845]. Trans. H. V. Hong and E. H. Hong. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991.Search in Google Scholar

Richir, Marc. “Affectivité.” In Encyclopaedia Universalis. Vol. I, 347-353. Paris: Encyclopaedia Universalis SA, 1993.Search in Google Scholar

Schelling, Friedrich W. J. “On Construction in Philosophy” [“Über die Konstruktion in der Philosophie”, 1802]. Trans. A. A. Davis, A. I. Kukelijevic. Epoché. 12 (2008), 260-288.Search in Google Scholar

Stokes, Patrick. “Uniting the Perspectival Subject: Two Approaches.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. 10:1 (2011), 23-44.10.1007/s11097-010-9151-5Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-04-23
Accepted: 2019-08-08
Published Online: 2019-10-02

© 2019 Maria Gołębiewska, published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Downloaded on 6.12.2022 from frontend.live.degruyter.dgbricks.com/document/doi/10.1515/opth-2019-0026/html
Scroll Up Arrow