Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Oldenbourg November 20, 2023

The Rule of Law at Risk: The Dark Side of the Digital Markets Act

  • Maya-Salomé Garnier EMAIL logo
From the journal ORDO

Abstract

The Digital Markets Act is a new European Regulation which entered into force on October 2022. It will apply to “gatekeepers”, namely undertakings providing core platform services, with the aim of fostering “fairness” and “contestability” in the digital sector. If these objectives appear at first sight both relevant and legitimate, this paper sheds light on the dark side of this Regulation by arguing that it will undermine the Rule of Law. Indeed, for several reasons which will be discussed, the Digital Markets Act will impede or limit the respect of principles which are deeply rooted in the legal tradition of European countries. This leads to an important question: is the cure worse than the disease?

JEL-Classification: A12; B11; B13; B25; B53; K21; K40; L40

References

Ahlborn and Leslie (2021), Jack of All Trades, Masters of None’s: The Ever-Increasing Ambit of the Market Investigation Regime, in: Rodger, Whelan, MacCulloch (eds.), The UK Competition Regime: A Twenty-Year Retrospective, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 137–168.10.1093/oso/9780198868026.003.0006Search in Google Scholar

Ahlborn and Piccinin (2010), Between Scylla and Charybdis: Market Investigation and the Consumer Interest’, in: Barry Rodger (ed.), Ten Years of UK Competition Law, Dundee University Press, Edinburgh, pp. 169–197.Search in Google Scholar

Assemblée Nationale (2021), Rapport d’information déposé par la Commission des affaires européennes sur le Digital Markets Act, no 4409.Search in Google Scholar

Bailleux (2014), The Fiftieth Shade of Grey of Competition Law, “Criministrative Law”, and Fairly Fair Trials, in: Galli, Weyembergh (eds.), Do Labels Still Matter? Blurring Boundaries Between Administrative and Criminal Law: The Influence of the EU, Éditions de l’Université de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, pp. 137–152. Search in Google Scholar

Bentata (2022), Regulation “Gatekeepers”: Predictable “Unintended Consequences” of the DMA for Users’ Welfare, Competition Forum, no 0031, https://competition-forum.com. 10.2139/ssrn.3804067Search in Google Scholar

Budzinski, Stöhr (2018), “Competition Policy Reform in Europe and Germany – Institutional Change in the Light of Digitization”, European Competition Journal, 15(1), 15–54.10.1080/17441056.2018.1555942Search in Google Scholar

Cabral, Haucap, Parker, Petropoulos, Valletti, Van Alstyne (2021), The EU Digital Markets Act : A Report from a Panel of Economic Experts, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.Search in Google Scholar

Commun (2016), Les ordolibéraux : Histoire d’un libéralisme à l’allemande, Les Belles Lettres, Paris.10.14375/NP.9782251399065Search in Google Scholar

Competition Commission (2013), Guidelines for Market Investigations: Their Role, Procedures, Assessment and Remedies, CC3. Search in Google Scholar

Crane (2007), Rules versus Standards in Antitrust Adjudication, Washington and Lee Law Review, 64(1), pp. 49–110. Search in Google Scholar

Crémer, de Montjoye, Schweitzer (2019), Competition Policy for the Digital Era, European Commission. Search in Google Scholar

De Roover (1951), Monopoly Theory Prior to Adam Smith: A Revision, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 65(4), pp. 492–523. 10.2307/1882577Search in Google Scholar

Dunne (2014), Between Competition Law and Regulation: Hybridized Approaches to Market Control, Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, 2(2), pp. 225–269.10.1093/jaenfo/jnu002Search in Google Scholar

European Economic and Social Committee (2020), The Rule of Law and its Impact on Economic Growth, Opinion ECO/511. Search in Google Scholar

Foucault (2008), The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France 1978-1979, Palgrave Macmillan, New York. Search in Google Scholar

Garnier (2020), The New Competition Tool: A Trojan Horse to Win the War Against Liberty, Competition Forum, no 0005, htpps://competition-forum.com. Search in Google Scholar

Gerber (2003), Law and Competition in Twentieth Century Europe: Protecting Prometheus, Oxford University Press, Oxford. Search in Google Scholar

Gordon (1976), Economic Analysis Before Adam Smith: Hesiod to Lessius, Palgrave Macmillan, New York. 10.1007/978-1-349-02116-1Search in Google Scholar

Hart (2012), The Concept of Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Hayek (1982), Law, Legislation and Liberty: A new statement of the liberal principles of justice and political economy, Routledge, London.Search in Google Scholar

Hayek (2001), The Road to Serfdom, Routledge, London. Search in Google Scholar

Hayek (2002), Competition as a Discovery Procedure, The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 5(3), pp. 9–23. 10.1007/s12113-002-1029-0Search in Google Scholar

Hayek (2011), The Constitution of Liberty, Routledge, London. 10.7208/chicago/9780226320519.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Ibáñez Colomo (2021), The Draft Digital Markets Act: A Legal and Institutional Analysis, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 12(7), pp. 561–576.10.1093/jeclap/lpab065Search in Google Scholar

Jenny (2015), Worst Decision of the EU Court of Justice: The Alrosa Judgment in Context and the Future of Commitment Decisions, Fordham International Law Journal, 38(3), pp. 701–770.Search in Google Scholar

Kaplow (1992), Rules versus Standards: An Economic Analysis, Duke Law Journal, 42(3), pp. 557–629.10.2307/1372840Search in Google Scholar

Kerber (2019), Updating Competition Policy for the Digital Economy? An Analysis of Recent Reports in Germany, UK, EU and Austria, available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3469624.10.2139/ssrn.3469624Search in Google Scholar

Kerber (2021), Taming tech giants with a per se rules approach? The Digital Markets Act from the “rules vs. standard” perspective, Concurrences, (3), pp. 28–34.10.2139/ssrn.3861706Search in Google Scholar

Kirzner (1978), Competition and Entrepreneurship, University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 10.7208/chicago/9780226375489.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lamadrid de Pablo and Bayón Fernández (2021), Why the Proposed DMA Might Be Illegal Under Article 114 TFEU, And How To Fix It?, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 12(7), pp. 576–589.10.1093/jeclap/lpab059Search in Google Scholar

Larouche and de Streel (2021), The European Digital Markets Act: A Revolution Grounded on Traditions, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 12(7), pp. 542–560.10.1093/jeclap/lpab066Search in Google Scholar

Leoni (1961), Freedom and the Law, Liberty Fund, Indianapolis. Search in Google Scholar

Lewin (2019), Ludwig Lachamnn and the Austrians, Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 57(70), pp. 75–89.10.2478/slgr-2019-0005Search in Google Scholar

Malaurie Vignal (2021), L’analyse économique du droit expliquée aux juristes, in: Chagny (ed.), Mélanges en l’honneur du Professeur Gilbert Parleani, IRJS, Paris, pp. 329–350. Search in Google Scholar

Marsden (2013), The Emperor’s Clothes Laid Bare: Commitments Creating the Appearance of the Law, While Denying the Access to Law, (1), Competition Policy International: Antitrust Chronicle.Search in Google Scholar

Marty and Deschamps (2008), L’analyse économique du droit est-elle une théorie scientifique du droit ?, Cahiers de méthodologie juridique, (5), pp. 2541–2569.Search in Google Scholar

Marty (2012), Concurrence et politique industrielle : analyse de logiques distinctes, in: de Beaufort (ed), Entreprises stratégiques nationales et modèles économiques européens, Bruylant, Bruxelles. Search in Google Scholar

Oppetit (1986), L’hypothèse du déclin du droit, Droits, (4), pp. 9–20.Search in Google Scholar

Oppetit (1992), Droit et économie, Archives de philosophie du droit, Tome 37, pp. 17–26.Search in Google Scholar

Petit (2021), The Proposed Digital Markets Act (DMA): A Legal and Policy Review, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 12(7), pp. 529–541. 10.1093/jeclap/lpab062Search in Google Scholar

Petit (2020), Big Tech and the Digital Economy: The Moligopoly Scenario, Oxford University Press, Oxford.10.1093/oso/9780198837701.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Podszun (2022), Competition in the Digital Economy: What Next After the Digital Markets Act?, Statement for the Economic Committee of the German Parliament (Bundestag), https://ssrn.com/abstract=4096357. 10.2139/ssrn.4096357Search in Google Scholar

Portuese (2013), Principle of Proportionality as Principle of Economic Efficiency, European Law Journal, 19(5), pp. 612–635.10.1111/j.1468-0386.2012.00611.xSearch in Google Scholar

Ramírez Pérez and van de Scheur (2013), The Evolution of the Law on Articles 85 and 86 EEC [Articles 101 and 102 TFEU], Ordoliberalism and its Keynesian Challenge, in: Klaus Patel, Schweitzer (eds.), The Historical Foundations of EU Competition Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 19–53.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665358.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Ripert (1949), Le déclin du droit : Études sur la législation contemporaine, LGDJ, Paris. Search in Google Scholar

Rivero (1957), L’État moderne peut-il être encore un État de droit ?, Annales de la faculté de droit de Liège, pp. 65–101.Search in Google Scholar

Sacco (1995), Mute Law, The American Journal of Comparative Law, 43(3), pp. 455–467. 10.2307/840648Search in Google Scholar

Savatier (1965), L’ordre public économique, Recueil Dalloz, pp. 37–44. Search in Google Scholar

Shackle (1976), Time & Choice, British Academy, London. Search in Google Scholar

Schumpeter (1987), History of Economic Analysis, Routledge, London. Search in Google Scholar

Slobodian (2018), Globalists: The end of Empire and the Birth of Neoliberalism, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. 10.4159/9780674919808Search in Google Scholar

Stones (2018), EU Competition Law and the Rule of Law: Justification and Realisation, PhD Thesis, London School of Economics and Political Science, London. Search in Google Scholar

Thiery (2018), Les actes délégués en droit de l’Union européenne, PhD Thesis, Université de Rennes 1, Rennes. Search in Google Scholar

Tremblay (2018), The Mythical Origin of the Rule of Law: Hesiod and the Gods, Revue juridique Thémis de l’Université de Montréal, 52(425), pp. 425–519.Search in Google Scholar

Trifilio (2010), Esprit mathématique et pensée économique dans l’Antiquité et au Moyen Âge, PhD Thesis, Université d’Aix-Marseille, Aix-en-Provence. Search in Google Scholar

Venice Commission (2016), Rule of Law Checklist Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 106th Plenary Session, Study no 711/2013. Search in Google Scholar

Vogel (2004), L’économie, serviteur ou maître du droit ?, in: Une certaine idée du droit – Mélanges offerts à André Decocq, Litec, Paris, pp. 605–614.Search in Google Scholar

Whyte (2019), The Morals of the Market: Human Rights and the Rise of Neoliberalism, Verso, New York.Search in Google Scholar

Witt (2022), Platform Regulation in Europe – Per Se Rules to the Rescue?, Journal of Competition Law & Economics, forthcoming.10.2139/ssrn.4017504Search in Google Scholar

Wittgenstein (1922), Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & co., London. Search in Google Scholar

Zenati-Castaing (2021), Le savoir des lois : Essai sur le droit romaniste, Dalloz, Paris. Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2023-11-20
Published in Print: 2023-11-01

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 29.2.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ordo-2023-2016/pdf
Scroll to top button