Abstract
This paper describes our recent results in the field of zirconocene-catalyzed α-oltfin transformations, and focuses on questions regarding the reaction mechanism, rational design of zirconocene pre-catalysts, as well as prospective uses of α-olefin products. It has been determined that a wide range of α-olefin-based products, namely vinylidene dimers, oligomers and polymers, can be prepared via catalysis by zirconocene dichlorides, activated by a minimal (10–20 eq.) amount of MAO. We assumed that in the presence of minimal quantities of MAO, various types of zirconocene catalysts form different types of catalytic particles. In the case of bis-cyclopentadienyl complexes, the reactive center is formed under the influence of R2AlCl, which makes the chain termination via β-hydride elimination significantly easier, with α-olefin dimers being formed as the primary product. Bis-indenyl complexes and their heteroanalogues, form stable cationic catalytic particles and effectively catalyze the polymerization. Mono-indenyl and mono-substituted bis-cyclopentadienyl-ansa complexes catalyze α-olefin oligomerization. Effective catalysts of dimerization, oligomerization and polymerization of α-olefins in the presence of minimal MAO quantities are proposed. Prospects of using α-olefin dimers, oligomers and polymers in the synthesis of branched hydrocarbon functional derivatives (dimers), high quality, low viscosity motor oils (oligomers), and thickeners and absorbents (polymers) are examined.
Introduction
α-Olefins are very important large-scale raw materials used in the chemical industry. Nowadays the chemical industry applies α-olefins as co-monomers for the production of medium and high molecular weight, low density polyethylenes and polypropylenes [1], [2], [3], functional polymers [4], oils and lubricants [5], [6], [7], depressants [8], [9], dispersants [10], and other products. The discovery of selective methods of ethylene tri- and tetramerization [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18] makes synthesis and processing of 1-hexene and 1-octene more attractive and cost-effective.
Traditionally, polyolefins are produced by means of heterogeneous Zigler-Natta catalysts. For production of advanced polyolefins the single-site zirconocene catalysts of various structures are often used [19]. Most zirconocenes are able to catalyze the polymerization of olefins and produce medium and high molecular weight polymers only after activation with considerable excess (up to 103–104 eq.) of methylalumoxane (MAO) [20], [21], [22], [23].
Low molecular weight products of α-olefin transformations (dimers, oligomers) are also of interest for chemical industry [24]. These products can be prepared by means of zirconocene catalysts activated with minimal (1–100 eq.) amounts of MAO [25], [26], [27], [28]. However, only several zirconocene complexes were studied under these conditions and the product composition is strictly dependent on the type of zirconocene used [25], [26], [27], [28].
In the present work we generalize the results obtained by our group in the study of the zirconocene catalyzed olefin oligomerization. The paper focuses on questions regarding the reaction mechanism, rational design of zirconocene pre-catalysts, as well as prospective uses of α-olefin products.
Reaction mechanism and Zirconocene dichloride activation
Assuming that selective dimerization of α-olefins occurs only in the presence of zirconocene dichlorides, activated by several eq. of MAO, Bergman [25] suggested that the catalytic particle in the dimerization is not the classical zirconocene cation, but a hydride complex containing a Cl atom in the Zr atom’s coordination sphere. Considering recent works, which studied the formation of bridged Zr–Al complexes [29], [30], [31], [32], their role in alkene polymerization [33], [34], [35], as well as the nature of ion pairs [34], [35], [36], [37], and mechanisms of chain propagation and termination [38], [39] we proposed a dimerization scheme [28] (Fig. 1b), which compliments the traditional mechanism of zirconocene catalysis.

Traditional (a) and non-traditional (b) ways of zirconocene dichloride – MAO catalysis.
Taking this concept into account, one can propose that for zirconocenes with relatively weak electron-donating η5-ligands (cyclopentadienyl, mono-substituted cyclopentadienyl), in alkyl complex B (Fig. 1b), which is formed within the first α-olefin insertion, the Cl coordination to zirconium is retained. After the insertion of a second molecule of α-olefin, β-hydride elimination is carried out easily through transition state С thanks to the assistance of Al. This leads to a formation of the α-olefin dimer and cation complex A, which is our proposed dimerization catalytic particle. The hypothesis regarding direct presence of coordinated Cl is an important addition to the traditional cationic polymerization mechanism. We should note that there are a few examples of single-site olefin oligomerization processes where the direct participation of Cl has been established, e.g. in Cr-catalyzed ethylene trimerization [40], [41], [42]. A number of experimental results support this hypothesis. We have determined that (η5-C5H5)2ZrF2 – as opposed to (η5-C5H5)2ZrCl2 – in the presence of 10 eq. of MAO catalyzes the oligomerization of 1-hexene. Furthermore, the dimerization selectivity in the presence of (η5-C5H5)2ZrCl2 is influenced only by R2AlCl: the increase of the AlCl/Zr ratio almost fully suppresses the formation of higher oligomers, and the addition of soluble ionic chlorides does not affect the product distribution. Another supporting factor for our hypothesis that the reaction mechanism is dependent upon the zirconocene structure is that is that R2AlCl does not visibly observably influence the properties of bis-indenyl complexes – both, in the presence and absence, of additional quantities of R2AlCl, polymer products of same molecular mass are formed.
Therefore, we propose that a weak, reversible coordination of R2AlCl to zirconocene cation results in oligomer formation. In the case of complexes with highly electron-donating η5-ligands, there is no Zr–Cl–Al coordination (the acidity of Zr center is poor), and the interaction with an α-olefin goes by the traditional cation pathway with polymer product formation. Therefore we can control the direction of α-olefin transformation catalyzed by zirconocene dichlorides in the minimal presence of MAO. The instruments for such reaction management are the design of the zirconocene structure, variation of the MAO/Zr ratio, as well as the introduction of additional quantities of chain termination regulator R2AlCl into the reaction mixture.
According to the Fig. 1b, the dimerization/oligomerization/polymerization processes starts after the zirconium hydride A forms. Treatment of a zirconocene dichloride with any methyl-aluminum derivative, for example, with MAO is not the best way to generate Zr–H particles. It was reported that zirconocene dichloride (η5-C5H5)2ZrCl2, activated with 10 eq. of MAO, catalyzed the formation of vinylidene dimers of α-olefins with very low rates. The reaction was characterized by a long induction period and took tens of hours to complete [25], [26]. We repeated the dimerization experiment for 1-hexene, described in [25], using analogs of (η5-C5H5)2ZrCl2 – bis-cyclopentadienyl and bis-indenyl ansa-complexes Me2C(η5-C5H4)2ZrCl2 and Me2C(η5-C9H6)2ZrCl2 – as pre-catalysts and 10 eq. of MAO as an activator. In both cases, even after 2 h at 60 °С, there was no observed signifciant monomer conversion.
In order to solve the problem of pre-catalyst activation, we developed a two-step method [28]. In the beginning, LZrCl2 reacted with 10–20 eq. of triisobutylaluminium (TIBA) to form soluble isobutyl derivative D (Fig. 1b) and Zr–Al hydride complex E therefrom [43], [44], [45], [46]. We observed that the intermediate E was not able to oligomerize an α-olefin, however, the reaction starts immediately after introduction of minimal amounts of MAO, which transforms complex E into the catalytic particle A.
The newly developed activation method for zirconocene dichlorides of various structures allowed us to carry out a comparative study of the catalytic activities of a wide range of complexes. Based on results of this study, we elaborated effective synthetic approaches to different types of α-olefin products: vinylidene dimers, oligomers and polymers.
α-olefin dimerization
Zirconocene-catalyzed dimerization of α-olefins (Scheme 1) has been known since the late 1980s [47]. The reaction is carried out in the presence of (η5-C5H5)2ZrCl2 (1), activated by a minimal quantity of methylalumoxane (MAO). By now, zirconocene-catalyzed dimerization is the most effective method to prepare α-olefin dimers with the vinylidene fragment >C=CH2 [25], [26], [27], [28], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52].
![Scheme 1:
Dimerization of 1-hexene (a), structural formulas of zirconocene dichlorides studied in this reaction (b) and selected geometric parameters of zirconocene geometry (c) [28].](/document/doi/10.1515/pac-2016-1131/asset/graphic/j_pac-2016-1131_fig_006.jpg)
Dimerization of 1-hexene (a), structural formulas of zirconocene dichlorides studied in this reaction (b) and selected geometric parameters of zirconocene geometry (c) [28].
Only a few zirconocene dichlorides have been studied as catalysts of α-olefin dimerization. It has been determined that n-alkyl-substituted complexes [for example, (n-BuC5H4)2ZrCl2] somewhat outperform 1 by productivity, while losing in selectivity [49]. The increase in size of alkyl substitutes in cyclopentadienyl rings serves to worsen both parameters. We have recently carried out a comparative study [28] of a series of different geometry zirconocenes 1–8 in 1-hexene dimerization (Scheme 1a, b). It was found that dimerization selectivity drops after replacement of the Cp fragment with a more electron-donating indenyl ligand (2), or upon introduction of bulky substituents into the Cp ring (3). Comparing the catalytic performances of 1 and bis-cyclopentadienyl ansa-complexes 4–8 allowed us conclude that an increase in the bridge length leaded to an increase of productivity and selectivity of hexene dimerization. This effect can be explained in the terms of geometric parameters of zirconocenes, the dihedral angle β between the cyclopentadienyl rings that is related with Coordination Gap Aperture (CGA, Scheme 1c) [53]. This dihedral angle is correlated to the catalytic activity of complexes 4–8; as β decreases, the productivity of the metallocene catalyst increases. Among zirconocenes with a minimal dihedral angle β (1, 7, 8) complex 8 having three-membered Me2SiOSiMe2 bridge has demonstrated the highest selectivity and productivity (Table 1). The results presented in Table 1 are clearly illustrated in Fig. 2.
Product distribution in the zirconocene-catalyzed oligomerization of 1-hexene and selected geometric parameters of zirconocene dichlorides 1–8 [28].
Run | Cat. | Product distribution |
Selected geometric parameters (X-Ray) |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conv., % | Dimer, wt.% in products | Olig. wt.% in products | 2-hexenes wt.% in products | Dimer, wt.% in reaction mixture | α | β | γ | d(Zr–Cp) | CGAa | Ref. | ||
1 | 1 | 76 | 84.4 | 12.2 | 3.4 | 64.1 | 129.5 | 53.5 | 97.0 | 2.20 | 92 | [54] |
2 | 1 b | 91 | 72.7 | 22.6 | 4.7 | 66.2 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
3 | 1 c | 62 | 87.0 | 9.8 | 3.2 | 53.9 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
4 | 2 | 55 | 38.2 | 57.1 | 4.7 | 21.0 | No data | |||||
5 | 3 | 5 | 40.0 | 55.0 | 5.0 | 2 | 128.7 | 54.2 | 94.3 | 2.22 | – | [55] |
6 | 4 | 38 | 83.4 | 8.1 | 8.5 | 31.7 | 116.7 | 71.1 | 100.3 | 2.19 | 108 | [56] |
7 | 5 | 45 | 86.5 | 7.9 | 5.6 | 38.9 | 125.4 | 60.1 | 98.0 | 2.20 | 100 | [57] |
8 | 6 | 86 | 81.8 | 13.3 | 4.9 | 70.3 | 125.0 | 55.9 | 97.5 | 2.19 | 95 | [58] |
9 | 7 | 94 | 76.7 | 20.6 | 2.7 | 72.1 | 131.2 | 51.2 | 95.7 98.4d |
2.21 | 90 | [59] |
10 | 8 | 95 | 88.0 | 9.0 | 3.0 | 83.6 | 130.8 | 51.1 | 98.7 | 2.20 | 89 | [60] |
11 | 8 c | 82 | 91.9 | 5.3 | 2.8 | 75.3 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
12 | 8 e | 100 | 93.7 | 2.8 | 3.5 | 93.7 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
-
Catalyst activation procedure: (1) TIBA, AlTIBA:Zr=20:1, 20 min; (2) MAO, AlMAO:Zr=10:1. Conditions: neat 1-hexene, 0.05 mol% Zr, 60°C, 1 h. aCoordination gap aperture. bAlMAO:Zr=100:1. cEt2AlCl:Zr=1:1. dTwo structurally independent molecules in the crystal cell. eEt2AlCl:Zr=2:1, 4 h.

Product distribution in catalytic experiment with 1-hexene in the presence of zirconocenes 1–8. Reaction conditions: neat monomer, 60°C, 1 h, 0.05 mol% of zirconocene, 20 eq. of TIBA and 10 eq. of MAO.
In order to demonstrate the general character of α-olefins dimerization catalyzed by 8, we studied the reactivity of various substrates (Scheme 2). The reactions were carried out in the presence of 1–2 eq. of Et2AlCl, 20 eq. of TIBA and 10 eq. of MAO. Isolated yields of linear α-olefin dimers were over 90%. It is remarkable that 8 effectively catalyzes the dimerization of sterically hindered α-olefins. For example, the dimer of 3-methyl-1-butene (14) was produced with yield of 78% (when catalyzed with 1 the yield of 14 was only 3%) [25]), the dimer of vinylcyclopentane (16) was synthesized with a yield of 84% (25% in the literature [51]). Ethers, thioethers, amines and pyrrole derivatives did not enter in the reaction, but dimers of allylfuran 20 and allylthiopenes 21 and 22 were isolated with low (20) or moderate (21, 22) yields.

Preparation of R–CH=CH2 dimers using precatalyst 8. Reaction conditions: 0.05 mmol of zirconocene, 100 mmol of substrate, 60°C; 1 mmol of TIBA (20 min, first activation step), 0.5 mmol of MAO (4 h, second activation and oligomerization step, exept 20–22, see Experimental).
Dimers of α-olefins are structural analogs of isobutylene and can be successfully used in the synthesis of analogs of isobutylene-based products. Due to a highly branched structure with long alkyl fragments, α-olefin dimers are prospective starting compounds for the synthesis of functional derivatives with regulated lipophilicity, such as analogs of 2-ethylhexanol, 2-ethylhexanoic and 2-ethylhexylphosphoric acids. However, the scientific and patent literature contains only few examples of transformations of vinylidene dimers [61], [62], [63], [64], [65], [66], [67]. For example, 1-decene dimer was used in Friedel-Crafts alkylation of benzene [61] and N,N-diphenylamine [62] to give the mixture of branched alkylarenes. Epoxydation of 1-decene dimer by H2O2 [63] allowed to get an epoxide, which was transformed into a corresponding aldehyde via acid-catalyzed dehydration [64]. The catalytic processes are illustrated by hydroformylation [65], hydroaminomethylation [66] and hydrocarbomethoxylation [67] with relatively low yields and selectivities.
In order to estimate the synthetic potential of α-olefin dimers, we carried out some catalytic, electrophylic and radical transformations of 2-butyl-1-octene (9) (Fig. 3). We prepared the lipophylic 2-butyl-1-octanol and its methacrylic ester 23, which is the prospective monomer for the preparation of hydrocarbon-soluble polyacrylates. Chlorosilane 24 was obtained by hydrosilylation of 9 in the presence of the Karstedt catalyst. Hydrocarbomethoxylation product 25 was synthesized in high yield and very high regioselectivity using bulky diphosphine/Pd catalyst [68], [69], [70]. The possibility of very effective radical addition to vinilydene fragment was illustrated by reactions of 9 with hydrosulfite (26), H3PO2 (prospective phosphonic 27 and phosphinic 28 acids), thiol (29) and thioacetic acid (30). The last product was converted into branched thiol 31. Ene reaction with maleic anhydride leads after hydrolysis to dicarboxylic acid 33. Characteristics of the products 23–33 are given in Experimental.

2-Butyl-1-octene derivatives and their prospective applications.
α-olefin oligomerization
Practical interest toward oligomers of higher α-olefins is due to the fact that the products of their hydrogenation (commercially known as PAO, from “poly-α-olefins”) are the main components of synthetic motor oils and low temperature lubricants, the properties of which outperform those of naturally occurring mineral oils. The most important characteristics of motor oils are the pour point (PP) and the ability to resist large reductions in viscosity with increasing temperature. It is desirable to have the lubricant flow easily upon “cold starting” an engine, but at high operating temperatures the oil should have a high enough viscosity to maintain a fluid film between moving parts. The temperature dependence of the viscosity of a lubricant is typically characterized by the viscosity index (VI). The VI is determined using a standard method (ASTM D-2270) in which the kinematic viscosity of an oil at 40°C (KV40) and 100°C (KV100) is compared against the viscosities of two reference oils.
The tribological characteristics and physical properties of PAOs depend on their molecular structure [71]. For high molecular weight hydrocarbons, these structures can be categorized as linear, short-chain branched, alicyclic, long-chain branched, and “star-like” (Scheme 3). The type of molecular structure is determined by the hydrocarbon source. Mineral oils, isolated directly from crude oil, contain significant quantities of linear and cyclic hydrocarbons, characterized by very high pour points and low viscosity indexes. Currently, most PAOs are produced with electrophilic oligomerization of 1-decene. Even when using a relatively “soft” catalyst, such as BF3/ROH, this process is accompanied by the isomerization of the carbon skeleton, with a partial formation of short-chain branched hydracarbons characterized by low VI [72]. Long-chain branched and star-like products have the best characteristics; their synthesis is based on coordination oligomerization of α-olefins.

Main structural types of hydrocarbons – PAO components.
Janiak and Blank [73] gave a review of α-olefin metallocene oligomerization, but they sum up the data mostly about the synthesis of high molecular weight oligomers. Besides, it has been experimentally determined that 1 and its substituted analogs such as (n-BuC5H4)2ZrCl2, are not useful for preparation of α-olefin oligomers [74]. An effective oligomerization catalyst should primarily provide the formation of oligomers, characterized by a given Pn in the range of 3–10. It also should not form the polymers, as well as α-olefin isomerization byproducts, such as 2-alkenes.
In [75], it has been shown that of ansa-zirconocenes 34 (Scheme 4) with alkyl groups in the α-position relative to the bridge catalyzed the formation of higher oligomers of α-olefins. The difficulty in synthesizing complex 34 pushed us toward searching for alternative catalytic systems, which also contain alkyl substituents in the α-position to the bridge fragment. We chose ansa-zirconocenes 35 and 36 as promising catalysts with one-carbon bridges (Scheme 4) and studied their catalytic activity in oligomerzation of 1-hexene. Complex 35, synthesized first by Erker and coll [76], demonstrated high activity. The products obtained in the presence of 35 were a mixtures of dimer and high oligomers. However, during the course of the reaction, about 20% of initial 1-hexene was transformed into 2-hexene which is an unwanted products of the process. Complex 36 is newly obtained, its synthesis and X-Ray structure determination are described in our recent work [77]. This complex, despite its structural similarity to 35, demonstrated a higher productivity, catalyzing dimer and higher oligomer formation in approximately equal amounts; the partial loss of the monomer through 2-hexene formation was less than 2%. 1-Octene and 1-decene in the presence of 36 also formed a mixture of dimers and oligomers with a high fraction of desired product and minimal 2-alkene content. Table 2 shows the results of 1-hexene oligomerzation experiments for 35, 36 and reference compounds 1 and 4, including GC data for oligomer ratios. As far as the reaction mixtures after the oligomerization in the presence of 36 contain the compounds of definite structures only (there is no isomerization products as it was within BF3 or AlR3 assisted oligomerization) we managed to isolate the individual trimers, tetramers and pentamers of 1-hexene, 1-octene, and 1-decene (Table 3), to hydrogenate them in order to estimate the viscosity characteristics of these individual compounds.

Zirconocenes studied in 1-hexene oligomerization.
α-Olefin oligomerization data for zirconocenes 1, 4, 35 and 36. Reaction conditions: 0.1 mmol of zirconocene, 200 mmol of α-olefin, 60°C; 2 mmol of TIBA (30 min, first activation step), 1 mmol of MAO (4 h, second activation and oligomerization step) [77].
Cat. | 4 h conv. %a | Dimer yield, % a | Oligomers yield, % a | 2-Alkenes yield, % a | Dimer, b wt.% in C12–C40 fraction | Trimer, b wt.% in C12–C40 fraction | Tetramer, b wt.% in C12–C40 fraction | Pentamer, b wt.% in C12–C40 fraction |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 d | 99 | 84 | 11 | 4 | 87.8 | 11.1 | 0.8 | 0.3 |
4 d | 84 | 70 | 8 | 6 | 92.3 | 7.3 | 0.3 | 0.1 |
35 d | 82 | 38 | 28 | >16 | 57.6 | 22.7 | 11.1 | 8.7 |
36 d | 90 | 46 | 42 | <2 | 52.0 | 24.8 | 13.6 | 9.6 |
36 e | 88 | 46 | 41 | <2 | 52.7 | 25.1 | 13.8 | 8.4 |
36 f | 86 | 45 | 38 | <2 | 58.2 | 25.9 | 15.9 | n.d. |
-
aEstimated by the analysis of 1H NMR spectra. bGC data. cGPC data. α-Olefins used in experiments: d1-hexene, e1-octene; f1-decene.
Boiling points and fractional distribution of α-olefin oligomers (2 mol monomer loading).
Monomer | Dimer |
Trimer |
Tetramer |
Pentamer |
Residue |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yield, % | B.p.°C /p, Torr | Yield, % | B.p.°C /p, Torr | Yield, % | B.p.°C /p, Torr | Yield, % | B.p.°C /p, Torr | Yield, % | |
1-Hexene | 42.0 | 80/7 | 13.6 | 120/0.5 | 8.4 | 145/0.2 | 6.8 | 190/0.2 | 29.2 |
1-Octene | 34.2 | 105/0.8 | 16.3 | 166/0.8 | 12.6 | 212/0.8 | 10.1 | 242/0.2 | 26.8 |
1-Decene | 40.0 | 125/0.5 | 16.9 | 182/0.3 | 14.2 | 235/0.3 | 12.9 | 290/0.2 | 16 |
An alternative way to prepare the hydrocarbons of definite structure, which can be considered as promising PAOs, consists of vinylidene dimers RR′C=CH2 dimerization in the presence of acids (Scheme 5) to give long-chain branched “dimers of dimers”. It was shown that the dimer of 1-decene in the presence of EtAlCl2/silica forms C40-hydrocarbons with the yield of ~80% at room temperature [49]. We have also studied the acid-catalyzed dimerization of α-olefin dimers and found out that EtAlCl2 in the presence of tertiary alkyl chlorides, for example, tert-BuCl, is a much more effective catalyst of this process, providing ~90% conversion after 1 h even at −30°C. Carrying out the reaction at lower temperatures allowed us to prevent the isomerization of the skeleton of the long chains within vinylidene dimers RR′C=CH2 dimerization.

Dimerization of α-olefin dimers.
We compared the viscosities and physical properties of the oligomers obtained by us with known characteristics of commercially available PAOs, produced by means of acid catalysis. The results are shown in Table 4. It can be seen that the decene-based PAOs have the best characteristics. However, the octene-based PAOs, obtained by coordination oligomerization, in contrast to the products of 1-hexene oligomerization, match the technical requirements of PAO engine oils (Fig. 4). It is important that the octene-based PAOs obtained by coordination oligomerization outperform significantly 1-decene oligomers, obtained via AlCl3 catalysis, and their characteristics are similar to that of commercial 1-decene derived products, synthesized by means of soft electrophilic catalyst BF3/ROH.
Viscosity characteristics of α-olefin oligomers.
Number of C | Product | KV40 | KV100 | VI | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
16 | Octene dimer (Zr catalyst) | 2.6 | 1.14 | 16 | This work |
18 | Hexene trimer (Zr catalyst) | 3.12 | This work | ||
20 | Decene dimer (Zr catalyst) | 4.55 | 1.7 | 14 | This work |
24 | Hexene tetramer (Zr catalyst) | 7.55 | 2.1 | 62 | This work |
24 | Octene trimer (Zr catalyst) | 6.5 | 2.06 | 114 | This work |
30 | Hexene pentamer (Zr catalyst) | 17.55 | 3.6 | 76 | This work |
30 | Decene trimer (Zr catalyst) | 14.61 | 3.65 | 140 | This work |
30 | Decene trimer (BF3 catalyst) | 3.7 | 122 | [78] | |
30 | Decene trimer (AlCl3 catalyst) | 4 | <120 | [79] | |
32 | Octene tetramer (Zr catalyst) | 13.94 | 3.44 | 125 | This work |
32 | Octene dimer of dimer (Zr and EtAlCl2/tBuCl) | 28.1 | 5.4 | 130 | This work |
40 | Octene pentamer (Zr catalyst) | 32.9 | 6.05 | 132 | This work |
40 | Decene tetramer (Zr catalyst) | 31.3 | 6.03 | 142 | This work |
30 | Decene tetramer (BF3 catalyst) | 5.7 | 133 | [78] | |
30 | Decene tetramer (AlCl3 catalyst) | 6 | <130 | [79] | |
40 | Decene dimer of dimer (Zr and EtAlCl2/tBuCl) | 29.43 | 5.90 | 150 | This work |
48 | Octene hexamer (Zr catalyst) | 66.0 | 10.06 | 137 | This work |

Viscosity characteristics of 1-decene (green) and 1-octene (red) oligomers.
α-olefin polymerization
According to the concept represented in Fig. 1b, large MAO/Zr ratios (higher than 100/1) are not compulsory to ensure a normal course of the zirconocene catalyzed α-olefin polymerization process. The only requirement, which should be met in this case, namely, the ligand at Zr should be able to decrease the ability of the metal center to coordinate ClAlR2 or any other organoaluminium particle. This can be implemented by applying the ligands at Zr with improved electron-donating ability, for example, by indenyls with alcoxy-groups or by cyclopentadienyls/indenyls with condensed pyrrole of thiophene rings. In our pioneering work on heterocenes (zirconocenes prepared from heterocyclic ligand) we found that the zirconocenes derived from heterocyclic indene such as indeno[1,2-b]indole demonstrated industrially satisfactory productivity in the polymerization of ethylene when activated by 15 eq. of MAO only [80]. Later we shown that in propylene and 1-butene polymerization zirconocene derived from methoxyindene and dithiophenocyclopentadienes demonstrated high productivity in the presence of 100–200 eq. of MAO.
During the present study we compared the catalytic properties of a series of conventional indenyl-derived zirconocenes and electron-reach zirconocenes 37 [81], [82] and 38 [83], [84], [85], [86], [87] (Scheme 6) in hexene-1 polymerization. The AlMAO/Zr=20 was taken and the catalyst was prepared via two-stage activation (TIBA + MAO). We have found that the nature of the ligand influenced mainly the molecular mass of the polyhexene so obtained and both 37 and 38 allowed to prepare the polymers with a relatively high Mn.

1-Hexene conversions and characteristics of polymers obtained using different zirconocene catalysts. Reaction conditions: 0.05 mmol of zirconocene, 200 mmol of 1-hexene, 60°C; 1 mmol of TIBA (30 min, first activation step), 1 mmol of MAO (4 h, second activation and oligomerization step).
Another application of zircononcene catalysis at low AlMAO/Zr ratios is the preparation of polymer composite materials. We have shown that zirconocene 38 was effective in forming composites based on α-olefin-diene co-polymers and microparticles of silica-coated Fe3O4 [88]. We have also demonstrated that this composite material represented a thermodegradable ferromagnetic absorbent for oil spill recovery.
Conclusion
Thus, α-olefins R–CH=CH2 can be transformed into dimers, oligomers and polymers via metallocene catalysis in the presence of small (10–20 eq.) excess of MAO. The product composition depends on the nature of the zirconocene being used. For example, complexes of the bis-cyclopentadyenyl type primarily catalyze dimerization with a formation of vinylidene dimers, R–C(H=CH2)CH2CH2R. The introduction of substituents into the cyclopentadienyl rings, or replacement of one cyclopentadienyl fragment with an indenyl ligand shifts the direction of the process toward the formation of oligomer mixtures. For bis-indenyl complexes, polymerization is the preferred mode of chemical transformation. We proposed effective catalysts for each type of processes. Bis-cyclopentadyenyl ansa-zirconocene 8 with Me2SiOSiMe2 bridge is effective for selective α-olefins dimerization. The ansa-complex containing shortest C1 bridge and α-alkyl substituent, 36, is applicable for low Pn oligomer formation. The “heterocene” 38 containing dithiophenocyclopentadienyl fragment represents very performant catalyst of hexane-1 polymerization even at AlMAO/Zr=20.
We assume that the direction of α-olefin transformation mostly depends on the zirconocene reaction center’s ability to coordinate the R2AlCl or any other organoaluminium particle that occurs after pre-catalyst activation. The realization of such coordination accelerates β-hydride elimination which leads to chain termination. For this reason, the reversible and relatively weak coordination of a organoaluminium particle to Zr-center is a factor, which influences the balance of chain propagation/chain termination and, as such, manages the degree of oligomerization. In the absence of coordination or if such coordination is relatively weak the process goes according to the classical cation mechanism and the polymer forms.
Products of α-olefin transformations have far-reaching prospective applications. Dimers of α-olefins can be used as substrate for the synthesis of various products with controlled lipophilicity, such as selective rare earth element extractans, detergents, plasticizers, adhesives, and surface modifiers, monomers for the production of motor oils and lubricants, as well as polar polymeric depressors. Oligomers of α-olefins are important for production of PAOs. α-Olefin polymers and co-polymers show promise as thickeners and absorbents.
Experimental
Preparation of R–CH=CH2 dimers
Reaction conditions: neat monomer; 0.05 mol% 8; 60°C; 1 h; two stage activation: (1) TIBA, AlTIBA:Zr=20:1, 20 min; (2) MAO AlMAO:Zr=10:1, reaction time 4 h. Characteristics of products:
2-Butyl-1-octene 9
Yield 94%. Liquid, B.p. 78°C (7 Torr). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 20°C) δ: 4.68 (bs, 2H); 1.99 (t, 3J=7.3 Hz, 4H); 1.40 (m, 4H); 1.28 (broad, 12H); 0.90 (t, 3J=7.1 Hz, 6H); 0.88 (t, 3J=7.1 Hz, 6H). 13C NMR: 150.4; 108.3; 36.1; 35.8; 31.8; 30.1; 29.2; 27.8; 22.7; 22.5; 14.1; 14.0.
2-Pentyl-1-nonene 10
Yield 94%. Liquid, B.p. 112°C (7 Torr). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 20°C) δ: 4.69 (s, 2H); 1.99 (t, 3J=7.8 Hz, 4H); 1.42 (m, 4H); 1.37–1.25 (m, 12H); 0.89 (t, 3J=7.1 Hz, 3H); 0.88 (t, 3J=7.1 Hz, 3H);. 13C NMR: 150.4; 108.3; 36.1; 35.9; 31.9; 31.7; 29.5; 29.3; 27.9; 27.5; 22.7; 22.6; 14.1; 14.00.
2-Hexyl-1-decene 11
Yield 93%. Liquid, B.p. 85°C (0.6 Torr). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 20°C) δ: 4.67 (bs, 2H); 1.98 (t, 3J=7.5 Hz, 4H); 1.39 (m, 4H); 1.26 (broad, 16H); 0.87 (t, 6H). 13C NMR: 150.4; 108.3; 36.1 (2); 31.9; 31.8; 29.6; 29.5; 29.4; 29.2; 27.9; 27.8; 22.7; 22.7; 14.1 (2).
2-Octyl-1-dodecene 12
Yield 91%. Liquid, B.p. 125°C (0.5 Torr). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 20°C) δ: 4.69 (bs, 2H); 1.99 (t, 3J=7.5 Hz, 4H); 1.41 (m, 4H); 1.27 (broad, 16H); 0.89 (t, 3J=6.7 Hz, 6H). 13C NMR: 150.4; 108.4; 36.1 (2); 32.0 (2); 29.7 (2); 29.62; 29.59; 29.5 (2); 29.4; 29.4; 27.9 (2); 22.7 (2); 14.1 (2).
2-Decyl-1-tetradecene 13
Yield 86%. Liquid, B.p. 155°C (0.13 Torr). 1H NMR: 4.68 (bs, 2H); 1.99 (t, 3J=7.3 Hz, 4H); 1.40 (m, 4H); 1.26 (m, 32H); 0.88 (t, 3J=6.3 Hz, 6H). 13C NMR: 150.4; 108.6; 36.1; 32.0; 29.72; 29.68; 29.61; 29.5; 28.2; 27.9; 22.7; 14.1.
2-(1-Methylethyl)-3-methyl-1-butene 14
Yield 78%. Liquid, B.p. 51°C (15 Torr). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 20°C) δ: 4.75 (s, 1H); 4.70 (s, 1H); 2.26 (sep, 3J=6.4 Hz, 1H); 2.05 (td, 3J=8.4 Hz, 2H); 1.58 (sep, 3J=6.8 Hz, 1H); 1.36 (m, 2H); 1.05 (d, 3J=6.4 Hz, 6H), 0.93 (d, 3J=6.8 Hz, 6H). 13C NMR: 156.7; 106.1; 37.8; 33.9; 32.5; 28.2; 22.8; 22.1.
2-(2-Methypropyl)-4-methyl-1-pentene 15
Yield 81%. Liquid, B.p. 72°C (8 Torr). 1H NMR: 4.73 (s, 1H); 4.68 (s, 1H); 1.96 (t, 3J=8.1 Hz, 2H); 1.89 (d, 3J=7.3 Hz, 2H); 1.75 (sep, 3J=6.6 Hz, 1H); 1.55 (sep, 3J=6.6 Hz, 1H); 1.42 (m, 2H); 1.19 (m, 2H); 0.88 (d, 3J=6.6 Hz, 6H); 0.87 (d, 3J=6.6 Hz, 6H). 13C NMR: 149.0; 110.0; 46.1; 38.9; 36.1; 28.1; 26.1; 25.6; 22.7; 22.6.
[1-(2-Cyclopentylethyl)vinyl]cyclopentane 16
Yield 84%. Liquid, B.p. 113°C (7 Torr). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 20°C) δ: 4.75 (s, 1H); 4.69 (s, 1H); 2.40 (quint, 3J=8.5 Hz, 1H); 2.06 (m, 2H); 1.36–1.84 (mm, 17H); 1.10 (m, 2H). 13C NMR: 154.0; 106.3; 46.3; 40.2; 35.1; 34.9; 32.9; 31.7; 25.4; 25.1%.
[3-(4-Phenylbutyl)-3-butenyl]benzene 17
Yield 83%. Liquid, B.p. 142°C (0.4 Torr). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 20°C) δ: 7.31 (m, 4H); 7.23 (m, 6H); 4.80 (s, 2H); 2.78 (t, 2H); 2.66 (t, 2H); 2.34 (m, 2H); 2.13 (m, 2H); 1.68 (m, 2H); 1.54 (m, 2H). 13C NMR: 149.3; 142.8; 142.4; 128.5; 128.5; 128.4; 128.4; 125.9; 125.8; 109.5; 37.9; 36.3; 36.0.; 34.5; 31.3; 27.5.
Trimethyl{2-[3-(trimethylsilyl)propyl]-2-propenyl}silane 18
Yield 79%. Liquid, B.p. 95°C (10 Torr). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 20°C) δ: 4.57 (s, 1H); 4.51 (s, 1H); 1.97 (t, 3J=7.3 Hz, 2H); 1.51 (s, 2H); 1.43 (m, 2H); 0.48 (t, 3J=8.8 Hz, 4H); 0.02 (s, 9H); −0.02 (s, 9H). 13C NMR: 147.8; 106.9; 42.2; 26.8; 22.3; 16.5; −1.3; −1.6.
Trimethyl{4-[5-(trimethylsilyl)pentyl]-4-pentenyl}silane 19
Yield 82%. Liquid, B.p. 110°C (0.6 Torr). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 20°C) δ: 4.68 (s, 2H); 4.67 (s, 1H); 2.01 (t, 2H); 1.96 (t, 2H); 1.4 (m, 4H); 1.29 (m, 4H); 0.47 (m, 4H); −0.03 (s, 9H); −0.04 (s, 9H). 13C NMR: 150.4; 108.8; 40.1; 36.1; 33.5; 27.8; 24.0; 22.4; 16.8; 16.6; −1.5.
2-Methyl-5-{1-[2-(5-methyl-2-furyl)ethyl]vinyl}furan 20
Reaction time 16 h. Yield 8%. Liquid, B.p. 105°C (0.16 Torr). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 20°C) δ: 5.89 (m, 2H); 5.85 (m, 2H); 5.82 (s, 2H); 4.84 (s, 1H); 4.82 (s, 1H); 3.29 (s, 2H); 2.55 (t, 3J=7.6 Hz, 2H); 2.24 (s, 6H); 2.07 (t, 3J=7.8 Hz, 2H); 1.75 (quint, 3J~7.7 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR: 154.4; 151.9; 150.9; 150.4; 146.2; 111.7; 107.1; 106.1; 105.9; 105.5; 77.2; 35.5; 35.0; 27.7; 26.2; 13.7; 13.6.
2-{1-[2-(2-Thienyl)ethyl]vinyl}-thiophene 21
Reaction time 16 h. Yield 64% Liquid, B.p. 105°C (0.16 Torr). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 20°C) δ: 7.18 (m, 2H); 6.98 (m, 2H); 6.84 (m, 2H); 4.97 (s, 1H); 4.95 (s, 1H); 3.61 (s, 2H); 2.88 (t, 2H); 2.19 (t, 2H); 1.91 (quint, 2H). Contains ~40% of >C=CH2 reduced product.
2-Methyl-5-{1-[2-(5-methyl-2-thienyl)ethyl]-vinyl}thiophene 22
Reaction time 16 h. Yield 70% Liquid, B.p. 128°C (0.16 Torr). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 20°C) δ: 6.63–6.50 (mm, 6H); 4.92 (s, 1H); 4.89 (s, 1H); 3.48 (s, 2H); 2.76 (t, 3J=7.6 Hz, 2H); 2.46 (s, 6H); 2.14 (t, 3J=7.6 Hz, 2H); 1.83 (quint, 3J=7.6 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR: 148.1; 143.2; 140.5; 138.2; 137.3; 125.2; 124.8; 124.7; 123.9; 111.6; 37.3; 34.5; 29.7; 15.4; 15.4. Contains ~20% of >C=CH2 reduced product.
Products of 2-butyl-1-octene transformations
2-Butyloctyl 2-methylacrylate 23
2-Butyl-1-octanol was prepared by the reaction of 9 and TIBA (3:1) at 140°C (8 h). After hydrolysis, separated by distillation. Yield 88%. Liquid, B.p. 120°C (6 Torr). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 20°C) δ: 3.52 (d, 3J=5.6 Hz, 2H); 1.85 (m, 1H); 1.45 (m, 1H); 1.28 (br, 16H); 0.90 (t, 3H); 0.89 (t, 3H). 13C NMR δ: 65.7; 40.6; 32.0; 31.0; 30.7; 29.9; 29.2; 27.0; 23.2; 22.8; 14.2 (2). 23 was prepared by the reaction of 2-butyl-1-octanol with methacrylic acid (110°C, toluene, 6 h). Yield 72%. Liquid, B.p. 112°C (0.5 Torr). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 20°C) δ: 6.09 (s, 1H); 5.53 (s, 1H); 4.04 (d, 3J=5.8 Hz, 2H); 1.94 (s, 3H); 1.67 (m, 1H); 1.37–1.22 (br, 16H); 0.89 (t, 3H); 0.87 (t, 3H). 13C NMR δ: 167.7; 136.7; 125.2; 67.6; 37.4; 31.9; 31.5; 31.2; 29.7; 29.1; 26.8; 23.1; 22.8; 18.5; 14.2; 14.2.
(2-Butyloctyl)(chloro)dimethylsilane 24
Prepared by hydrosilylation of 9 by Me2SiHCl without solvent in the presence of Karstedt catalyst (0.01% mol) at 20°C (2 h). Liquid, B.p. 105°C (1 Torr). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 20°C) δ: 1.58 (br, 1H); 1.26 (br, 16H); 0.92–0.84 (m, 8H); 0.43 (s, 6H). 13C NMR δ: 36.4; 36.1; 33.6; 32.1; 29.8; 28.8; 26.6; 24.5; 23.2; 22.8; 14.3; 14.3; 3.1.
Methyl 3-butylnonanoate 25
Prepared by hydrocarbomethoxylation of 9 (30 bar CO + H2, 120°C, 8 h, MeOH, toluene as a solvent, cat. PdCl2 + diphosphine) Yield 80%. Liquid, B.p. 115°C (5 Torr). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 20°C) δ: 3.64 (s, 3H); 2.21 (d, 3J=6.8 Hz, 2H); 1.82 (m, 1H); 1.3–1.2 (m, 16H); 0.86 (m, 6H). 13C NMR δ: 174.1; 51.3; 39.1; 35.0; 33.9; 33.6; 31.8; 29.5; 28.7; 26.5; 22.9; 22.6; 14.1; 14.0.
2-Butyl-1-octanesulfonic acid 26
Prepared by the reaction of 9 and 10% solution of NaHSO3 in H2O–iPrOH (1:1) at 60°C (10 h). Separated by extraction. Yield 75%. Yellow liquid. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 20°C) δ: 7.09 (br, 1H); 2.88 (d, 3J=5.9 Hz, 2H); 1.95 (m, 1H); 1.5–1.25 (m, 16H); 0.89 (t, 3H); 0.88 (t, 3H). 13C NMR δ: 55.5; 34.4; 33.1; 32.5; 32.1; 29.9; 28.1; 26.0; 23.1; 22.9; 14.2 (2).
2-Butyloctylphosphinic acid 27
Prepared by the reaction of 9 and two-fold excess of H3PO2 (50% aq.) in iPrOH at 90°C (4 h), with AIBN initiation. Purified by column chromatography. Yield 80%. Colorless liquid. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 20°C) δ: 8.9 (br, 1H); 7.83 and 6.48 (d, 1JP-H=540 Hz, 1H); 1.83 (m, 1H); 1.70 (m, 2H); 1.36 (br, 2H); 1.25 (br, 14H); 0.88 (t, 3H); 0.86 (t, 3H). 31P NMR δ: 38.26. 13C NMR δ: 53.6; 34.5 (d); 32.3; 32.0; 29.7; 28.4; 27.2; 26.2; 23.0; 22.8; 14.2; 2.06.
Bis(2-butyloctyl)phosphinic acid 28
Prepared by the reaction of 9 and 27 at 145°C (5 h), with AIBN initiation. Purified by column chromatography. Yield 73%. Colorless liquid. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 20°C) δ: 10.5 (br, 1H); 1.83 (m, 2H); 1.60 (dd, 4H); 1.41 (m, 8H); 1.27 (br, 24H); 0.89 (t, 6H); 0.87 (t, 6H). 13C NMR δ: 34.9; 34.8 (d); 34.5 (d); 34.0, 32.2 (d); 29.8, 28.5, 26.3, 23.1, 22.8, 14.28, 14.25.
3-[(2-Butyloctyl)sulfanyl]propanoic acid 29
Prepared by the reaction of 9 and 3-mercaptopropanoic acid in toluene at 90°C (2 h), with AIBN initiation. Purified by column chromatography. Yield 92%. Colorless liquid. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 20°C) δ: 2.77 (t, 3J=7.2 Hz, 2H); 2.66 (t, 3J=7.2 Hz, 2H); 2.53 (d, 3J=6.3 Hz, 2H); 1.56 (t, 3J=6.3 Hz, 1H); 1.29 (br, 16H); 0.90 (t, 6H).
S-(2-butyloctyl) ethanethioate 30
Prepared by the reaction of 9 and thioacetic acid in toluene at 90°C (2 h), with AIBN initiation. Purified by column chromatography. Yield 92%. Pale yellow liquid. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 20°C) δ: 2.88 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 1H); 2.30 (s, 3H); 1.52 (m, 1H); 1.25 (m, 16H); 0.86 (m, 6H). 13C NMR δ: 196.0; 37.9; 33.6; 33.4; 33.1; 31.9; 30.8; 29.7; 28.9; 26.7; 23.0; 22.8; 14.2; 14.1.
2-Butyl-1-octanethiol 31
Prepared with quantitative yield by alkaline hydrolysis of 30. Liquid. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 20°C) δ: 2.51 (dd, 3J=5.6 and 8.1 Hz, 2H); 1.47 (m, 1H); 1.37–1.20 (m, 16H); 1.14 (t, 3J=8.1 Hz, 1H); 0.88 (t, 3J=6.8 Hz, 3H); 0.87 (t, 3J=6.8 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR δ: 40.2; 32.5; 32.1; 32.0; 29.7; 29.0; 28.7; 26.7; 23.1; 22.8; 4.2.
2-Butyl-1-octene dimer 32
Prepared with >90% yield by stirring at −30°C (2 h) after addition to 9 1% mol EtAlCl2 and 2% mol tert-BuCl. Liquid.
2-[(2E)-2-butyl-2-octenyl]succinic acid (and isomer) 33
Anhydride was prepared by heating of 9 and maleic anhydride (140°C, 12 h) in the presence of hydroquinone. After alkaline hydrolysis of the anhydride, the product 33 was purified by extraction. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 20°C) δ: 11.0–11.5 (1H); 5.34 (t) and 5.15 (t, 1H total); 2.76–2.29 (mm, 3H); 1.94 (m, 6H); 1.23 (br, 10H); 0.87 (t, 3H); 0.85 (t, 3H).
Article note
A collection of invited papers based on presentations at the XX Mendeleev Congress on General and Applied Chemistry (Mendeleev XX), held in Ekaterinburg, Russia, September 25–30 2016.
Acknowledgments
Financial support by the Russian Science Foundation (Grant No. 15-13-00053) is gratefully acknowledged.
References
[1] M. Stürzel, S. Mihan, R. Mülhaupt. Chem. Rev.116, 1398 (2016).10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00310Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[2] J. Klosin, P. P. Fontaine, R. Figuero. Acc. Chem. Res.48, 2004 (2015).10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00065Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[3] J. Qiao, M. Guo, L. Wang, D. Liu, X. Zhang, L. Yu, W. Song, Y. Liu. Polym. Chem.2, 1611 (2011).10.1039/c0py00352bSearch in Google Scholar
[4] F. Stempfle, P. Ortmann, S. Mecking. Chem. Rev.116, 4597 (2016).10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00705Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[5] H. Sun, B. Shen, D. Wu, X. Guo, D. Li. J. Catalysis339, 84 (2016).10.1016/j.jcat.2016.03.023Search in Google Scholar
[6] A. G. N. Coxon, R. D. Köhn. ACS Catal.6, 3008 (2016).10.1021/acscatal.6b00542Search in Google Scholar
[7] A. V. Lavrenov, T. R. Karpova, E. A. Buluchevskii, E. N. Bogdanets. Catal. Ind.8, 316 (2016).10.1134/S2070050416040061Search in Google Scholar
[8] J. Xu, H. Jiang, T. Li, X. Wei, T. Wang, J. Huang, W. Wang, A. L. Smith, J. Wang, R. Zhang, Y. Xu, L. Li, R. K. Prud’homme, X. Guo. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.54, 5204 (2015).10.1021/acs.iecr.5b00674Search in Google Scholar
[9] F. Yang, Y. Zhao, J. Sjoblom, C. Li, K. G. Paso. J. Disp. Sci. Technol.36, 213 (2015).10.1080/01932691.2014.901917Search in Google Scholar
[10] P. Raffa, D. A. Z. Wever, F. Picchioni, A. A. Broekhuis. Chem. Rev.115, 8504 (2015).10.1021/cr500129hSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[11] F. Zhu, L. Wang, H. Yu. Design. Monom. Polym.14, 1 (2011).10.1163/138577210X541169Search in Google Scholar
[12] J. T. Dixon, M. J. Green, F. M. Hess, D. H. Morgan. J. Organomet. Chem.689, 3641 (2004).10.1016/j.jorganchem.2004.06.008Search in Google Scholar
[13] T. Agapie. Coord. Chem. Rev.255, 861 (2011).10.1016/j.ccr.2010.11.035Search in Google Scholar
[14] P. W. N. M. van Leeuwen, N. D. Clément, M. J.-L. Tschan. Coord. Chem. Rev.255, 1499 (2011).10.1016/j.ccr.2010.10.009Search in Google Scholar
[15] D. F. Wass. Dalton. Trans.2007, 816 (2007).10.1039/B616291FSearch in Google Scholar
[16] A. L. Bergamo, H. K. Da Cas, R. S. Rambo, C. S. Schwalm, A. C. A. Casagrande, R. Stieler, O. L. Casagrande Jr. Catal. Commun.86, 77 (2016).10.1016/j.catcom.2016.08.007Search in Google Scholar
[17] C. Fliedel, A. Ghisolfi, P. Braunstein. Chem. Rev.116, 9237 (2016).10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00153Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[18] G. J. P. Britovsek, D. S. McGuinness, A. K. Tomov. Catal. Sci. Technol.6, 8234 (2016).10.1039/C6CY02112CSearch in Google Scholar
[19] C. Copéret, A. Comas-Vives, M. P. Conley, D. P. Estes, A. Fedorov, V. Mougel, H. Nagae, F. Núñez-Zarur, P. A. Zhizhko. Chem. Rev.116, 323 (2016).10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00373Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[20] M. Vathauer, W. Kaminsky. Macromolecules33, 1955 (2000).10.1021/ma991498wSearch in Google Scholar
[21] N. Suzuki, T. Mise, Y. Yamaguchi, T. Chihara, Y. Ikegami, H. Ohmori, A. Matsumoto, Y. Wakatsuki. J. Organomet. Chem. 560, 47 (1998).10.1016/S0022-328X(98)00524-5Search in Google Scholar
[22] X. Zhao, G. Odian, A. Rossi. J. Polym. Sci. Part A: Polym. Chem. 38, 3802 (2000).10.1002/1099-0518(20001015)38:20<3802::AID-POLA110>3.0.CO;2-NSearch in Google Scholar
[23] N. Suzuki, Y. Masubuchi, Y. Yamaguchi, T. Kase, T. K. Miyamoto, A. Horiuchi, T. Mise. Macromolecules33, 754 (2000).10.1021/ma9917850Search in Google Scholar
[24] C. Janiak. Coord. Chem. Rev.250, 66 (2006).10.1016/j.ccr.2005.02.016Search in Google Scholar
[25] J. Christoffers, R. G. Bergman. J. Am. Chem. Soc.118, 4715 (1996).10.1021/ja960227nSearch in Google Scholar
[26] J. Christoffers, R. G. Bergman. Inorg. Chim. Acta270, 20 (1998).10.1016/S0020-1693(97)05819-2Search in Google Scholar
[27] S. Fujikawa, T. Okamoto, K. Yokota. US Patent 8119850, Filed 15 Feb 2006, Issued 21 Feb 2012.Search in Google Scholar
[28] I. E. Nifant’ev, A. A. Vinogradov, A. A. Vinogradov, P. V. Ivchenko. Catal. Commun. 79, 6 (2016).10.1016/j.catcom.2016.02.013Search in Google Scholar
[29] S. M. Baldwin, J. E. Bercaw, H. H. Brintzinger. J. Am. Chem. Soc.130, 17423 (2008).10.1021/ja8054723Search in Google Scholar
[30] S. M. Baldwin, J. E. Bercaw, L. M. Henling, M. W. Day, H. H. Brintzinger. J. Am. Chem. Soc.133, 1805 (2011).10.1021/ja1050428Search in Google Scholar
[31] E. Yu. Pankratyev, T. V. Tyumkina, L. V. Parfenova, L. M. Khalilov, S. L. Khursan, U. M. Dzhemilev. Organometallics28, 968 (2009).10.1021/om800393jSearch in Google Scholar
[32] L. V., Parfenova P. V. Kovyazin, I. E. Nifant’ev, L. M. Khalilov, U. M. Dzhemilev. Organometallics34, 3559 (2015).10.1021/acs.organomet.5b00370Search in Google Scholar
[33] D. E. Babushkin, V. N. Panchenko, M. N. Timofeeva, V. A. Zakharov, H. H. Brintzinger. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 209, 1210 (2008).10.1002/macp.200800084Search in Google Scholar
[34] J. T. Hirvi, M. Bochmann, J. R. Severn, M. Linnolahti. ChemPhysChem15, 2732 (2014).10.1002/cphc.201402298Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[35] M. S. Kuklin, J. T. Hirvi, M. Bochmann, M. Linnolahti. Organometallics34, 3586 (2015).10.1021/acs.organomet.5b00394Search in Google Scholar
[36] G. Theurkauff, M. Bader, N. Marquet, A. Bondon, T. Roisnel, J.-P. Guegan, A. Amar, A. Boucekkine, J.-F. Carpentier, E. Kirillov. Organometallics35, 258 (2016).10.1021/acs.organomet.5b00965Search in Google Scholar
[37] G. Theurkauff, A. Bondon, V. Dorcet, J.-F. Carpentier, E. Kirillov. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 54, 6343 (2015).10.1002/anie.201501967Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[38] P. Brant, P. Jiang, J. Lovell, D. Crowther. Organometallics35, 2836 (2016).10.1021/acs.organomet.6b00409Search in Google Scholar
[39] G. Talarico, P. H. M. Budzelaar. Organometallics35, 47 (2016).10.1021/acs.organomet.5b00866Search in Google Scholar
[40] A. Jabri, C. B. Mason, Y. Sim, S. Gambarotta, T. J. Burchell, R. Duchateau. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 9717 (2008).10.1002/anie.200803434Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[41] I. Vidyaratne, G. B. Nikiforov, S. I. Gorelsky, S. Gambarotta, R. Duchateau, I. Korobkov. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 6552 (2009).10.1002/anie.200900957Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[42] S. V. Kulangara, C. Mason, M. Juba, Y. Yang, I. Thapa, S. Gambarotta, I. Korobkov, R. Duchateau. Organometallics31, 6438 (2012).10.1021/om300673uSearch in Google Scholar
[43] Z. Guo, D. C. Swenson, R. F. Jordan. Organometallics13, 1424 (1994).10.1021/om00016a050Search in Google Scholar
[44] K. P. Bryliakov, E. P. Talsi, N. V. Semikolenova, V. A. Zakharov, J. Brand, C. Alonso-Moreno, M. Bochmann. J. Organomet. Chem. 692, 859 (2007).10.1016/j.jorganchem.2006.10.037Search in Google Scholar
[45] Y. W. Alelyunas, Z. Guo, R. E. LaPointe, R. F. Jordan. Organometallics12, 544 (1993).10.1021/om00026a042Search in Google Scholar
[46] E. Yu. Pankratyev, T. V. Tyumkina, L. V. Parfenova, L. M. Khalilov, S. L. Khursan, U. M. Dzhemilev Organometallics30, 6078 (2011).10.1021/om200518hSearch in Google Scholar
[47] L. H. Slaugh, G. W. Schoenthal. US Patent 4658078, Filed 15 Aug 1986, Issued 14 Apr 1987.Search in Google Scholar
[48] W. J. Heilman, Y. H. Jois, A. R. De Kraker, W. Song. US Patent 8168838, Filed 19 Jan 2010, Issued 1 May 2012.Search in Google Scholar
[49] Y. V. Kissin, F. C. Schwab. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 111, 273 (2009).10.1002/app.29030Search in Google Scholar
[50] A. C. Boccia, C. Costabile, S. Pragliola, P. Longo. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 205, 1320 (2004).10.1002/macp.200400174Search in Google Scholar
[51] B. G. Harvey, R. L. Quintana. Energy Environ. Sci. 2010, 352 (2010).10.1039/b924004gSearch in Google Scholar
[52] M. E. Wright, B. G. Harvey, R. L. Quintana. Energy Fuels22, 3299 (2008).10.1021/ef800380bSearch in Google Scholar
[53] C. Janiak, K. C. H. Lange, U. Versteeg, D. Lentz, P. H. M. Budzelaar. Chem. Ber. 129, 1517 (1996).10.1002/cber.19961291219Search in Google Scholar
[54] J. Y. Corey, X.-H. Zhu, L. Brammer, N. P. Rath. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C Cryst. Struct. Commun.C51, 565 (1995).10.1107/S0108270194011509Search in Google Scholar
[55] R. A. Howie, G. P. McQuillan, D. W. Thompson, G. A. Lock. J. Organomet. Chem.303, 213 (1986).10.1016/0022-328X(86)80133-4Search in Google Scholar
[56] T. Koch, S. Blaurock, F. B. Somoza, A. Voigt, R. Kirmse, E. Hey-Hawkins, Organometallics19, 2556 (2000).10.1021/om990763zSearch in Google Scholar
[57] C. S. Bajgur, W. R. Tikkanen, J. L. Petersen. Inorg. Chem.24, 2539 (1985).10.1021/ic00210a015Search in Google Scholar
[58] M. Buhl, G. Hopp, W. Philipsborn, S. Beck, M. H. Prosenc, U. Rief, H. H. Brintzinger. Organometallics15, 778 (1996).10.1021/om950757cSearch in Google Scholar
[59] K. H. Thiele, Ch. Schliessburg, K. Baumeister, K. Hassler. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.622, 1806 (1996).10.1002/zaac.19966221028Search in Google Scholar
[60] S. Ciruelos, T. Cuenca, P. Gomez-Sal, A. Manzanero, P. Royo. Organometallics14, 177 (1995).10.1021/om00001a028Search in Google Scholar
[61] H. De Wet, D. H. Morgan. WO Patent Application 0102512, Filed 6 Jul 1999, Issued 11 Jan 2001.Search in Google Scholar
[62] A. O. Patil. US Patent 7847030, Filed 29 Feb 2008, Issued 9 Sep 2009.Search in Google Scholar
[63] H. Sato, A. Shishikura. US Patent Application 2008234152, Filed 22 Feb 2005, Issued 25 Sep 2008.Search in Google Scholar
[64] H. Sato, T. Kashiwamura, Y. Ikeda. EU Patent 1908746, Filed 21 Jul 2006, Issued 09 Apr 2008.Search in Google Scholar
[65] H. Sato, T. Kashiwamura, T. Okamoto, K. Yokota. US Patent 7402610, Filed 28 Jan 2005, Issued 22 Jul 2008.Search in Google Scholar
[66] C. J. Kenneally, J. J. Scheibel. WO Patent Application 2006050994, Filed 15 Nov 2005, Issued 18 May 2006.Search in Google Scholar
[67] P. Hofmann. DE Patent 3121573, Filed 30 May 1981, Issued 16 Dec 1982.Search in Google Scholar
[68] I. E. Nifant’ev, N. T. Sevostyanova, V. A. Averyanov, S. A. Batashev, A. A. Vorobiev, S. A. Toloraya, V. V. Bagrov, A. N. Tavtorkin. Appl. Catal. A General449, 145 (2012).10.1016/j.apcata.2012.09.020Search in Google Scholar
[69] I. E. Nifant’ev, S. A. Batashev, S. A. Toloraya, A. N. Tavtorkin, N. T. Sevostyanova, A. A. Vorobiev, V. V. Bagrov, V. A. Averyanov. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem.350, 64 (2011).10.1016/j.molcata.2011.09.005Search in Google Scholar
[70] Nifant’ev, N. Sevostyanova, S. Batashev, A. Vorobiev, A. Tavtorkin. React. Kinet. Mech. Catal. 116, 63 (2015).10.1007/s11144-015-0888-2Search in Google Scholar
[71] L. I. Kioupis, E. J. Maginn. J. Phys. Chem. B103, 10781 (1999).10.1021/jp992399nSearch in Google Scholar
[72] A. Onopchenko, B. L. Cupples, A. N. Kresge. Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev. 22, 182 (1983).10.1021/i300010a006Search in Google Scholar
[73] C. Janiak, F. Blank. Macromol. Symp. 236, 14 (2006).10.1002/masy.200690047Search in Google Scholar
[74] C. Janiak, K. C. H. Lange, P. Marquardt. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 180, 43 (2002).10.1016/S1381-1169(01)00407-1Search in Google Scholar
[75] J. H. Park, Y. E. Jang, J. Y. Jeon, M. J. Go, J. Lee, S. K. Kim, S.-I. Lee, B. Y. Lee. Dalton Trans. 43, 10132 (2014).10.1039/c4dt00997eSearch in Google Scholar
[76] G. Erker C. Psiorz, R. Fröhlich, M. Grehl, C. Krüger, R. Noe, M. Nolte. Tetrahedron51, 4347 (1995).10.1016/0040-4020(94)01124-ISearch in Google Scholar
[77] I. E. Nifant’ev, A. A. Vinogradov, A. A. Vinogradov, S. I. Bezzubov, P. V. Ivchenko. Mendeleev Commun. 27, 35 (2017).10.1016/j.mencom.2017.01.010Search in Google Scholar
[78] J. A. Brennan. Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev. 19, 2 (1980).10.1021/i360073a002Search in Google Scholar
[79] Data for decene-dased PAO produced by NiznnekamskOil, Russia using Al - alkyl chloride technology. I. A. Arutyunov, S. N. Potapova, D. V. Tsetkov. RU Patent 2480512, Filed 26 Dec 2011, Issued 27 Apr 2013.Search in Google Scholar
[80] I. E. Nifant’ev, V. V. Bagrov. US Patent 6451724, Filed 4 Nov 1998, Issued 17 Sep 2002.Search in Google Scholar
[81] I. E Nifant’ev, P. V. Ivchenko, V. V. Bagrov, A. V. Churakov, P. Mercandelli. Organometallics31, 4962 (2012).10.1021/om300160vSearch in Google Scholar
[82] L. Resconi, F. Focante, D. Balboni, I. E. Nifant’ev, P. V. Ivchenko, V. Bagrov. US Patent 7834205, Filed 7 Apr 2007, Issued 16 Nov 2010.Search in Google Scholar
[83] I. E. Nifant’ev, I. P. Laishevtsev, P. V. Ivchenko, I. A. Kashulin, S., Guidotti F. Piemontesi, I. Camurati, L. Resconi, P. A. A. Klusener, J. J. H. Rijsemus, K. P. de Kloe, F. M. Korndorffer. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 205, 2275 (2004).10.1002/macp.200400238Search in Google Scholar
[84] L. Resconi, S. Guidotti, I. Camurati, R. Frabetti, F. Focante, I. E. Nifant’ev, I. P. Laishevtsev. Macromol. Chem. Phys.206, 1405 (2005).10.1002/macp.200400533Search in Google Scholar
[85] C. De Rosa, F. Auriemma, A. Di Capua, L. Resconi, S. Guidotti, I. Camurati, I. E. Nifant’ev, I. P. Laishevtsev. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 17040 (2004).10.1021/ja045684fSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[86] T. Dall’Occo, O. Fusco, M. Galimberti, I. Nifant’ev, I. Laishevtsev. US Patent 6822106, Filed 3 Nov 2003, Issued 23 Nov 2004.Search in Google Scholar
[87] I. E., Nifant’ev S. Guidotti, L. Resconi, I. P. Laishevtsev. US Patent 7112638, Filed 22 Dec 2000, Issued 26 Sep 2006.Search in Google Scholar
[88] P. V. Ivchenko, I. E. Nifant’ev, A. A. Vinogradov, D. P. Krut’ko, G. A. Shandryuk. Polym. Sci. Ser. B59, 83 (2017).10.1134/S1560090417010079Search in Google Scholar
©2017 IUPAC & De Gruyter. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. For more information, please visit: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/