Abstract
A novel class of aqueous biphasic systems (ABS) formed by zwitterions (ZI) has been investigated in the present work. A series of water soluble ZIs have been synthesized using triethylamine, N-Methylimidazole, N-Vinylimidazole, pyridine, N-Methylpyrrolidine, N-Ethylpiperidine and 1,4 butane sultone. The synthesized ZIs were explored for their ability to form biphasic systems in combination with aqueous inorganic salt solutions of K3PO4, K2HPO4 and K2CO3. The phase diagrams for all systems have been constructed through cloud point titration method at 298.15 K and atmospheric pressure. The phase behavior of ZI based ABS have been analyzed to understand the structural effects of ZIs as well as the effect of nature of salt used on the overall phase formation. Further the temperature dependence of the ZI based ABS was also explored by studying the phase behavior at variable temperatures of 298.15, 308.15 and 318.15 K. In order to estimate the applicability of proposed ZI based ABS, extraction experiments have been performed for an alkaloid i.e. caffeine for all synthesized ZIs with K3PO4 and at 298.15 K. ZI based ABS have been found to be capable of single step extraction of caffeine similar to IL based ABS thus providing the possibilities to explore these ZI based ABS as efficient extraction and separation systems.
Introduction
Aqueous biphasic systems (ABS) are most studied extraction and separation techniques based on the partitioning of target compound between two aqueous rich phases [1]. The constant search by scientific community for the plausible replacements of volatile organic solvents by more “greener” solvents has boosted up the interest in ABS and related fields. ABS are class of liquid-liquid extractions composed of two immiscible aqueous phases conventionally based on polymer-polymer, polymer-salt or salt-salt combinations [2], [3]. Eventually to overcome the draw backs like higher viscosity and slower separation rates of phases, polymers were replaced by new class of solvents called ionic liquids (ILs) [4]. Out of various IL mediated processes, IL based ABS have been explored to greater extent due to the combined advantage of biocompatibility offered by water and the tunability of system as presented by structure of constituting ILs [5]. ILs are low melting salts typically below 100°C, comprising of large asymmetric organic cations like quaternary ammonium, imidazolium, pyrrolidinium, pyridinium ions and organic or inorganic anions such as of halides, phosphates, carboxylates etc. [6], [7], [8]. The properties of ILs are resultant of nature of constituting cations and anions and their structures can be fine-tuned to form ILs with desirable properties. The notable properties of ILs that make them suitable constituents of ABS include their solubility for compounds of wide range polarities, high thermal stability, negligible vapor pressure etc. [9] ILs either in their pure form or as mixtures have found remarkable applications in fields like pretreatment of biomass [10], [11], as extraction solvents [12], [13], [14] for biological molecules and in separation and purification processes [15] etc.
However, when mixtures of ILs with solvents like water are used in ABS and the system results in formation of more than one phase, the unequal distribution of their ions between the phases may occur leading subsequently to changes in composition and properties of coexisting phases [16]. With the purpose to overcome this drawback, a new class of ABS has been proposed recently based on zwitterions (ZIs) as phase forming components.
Zwitterions (ZIs) or zwitterionic salts are organic salts consisting of covalently bonded cation and anion. ZIs do not further dissociate into ions and therefore the unintentional partitioning of ions could be avoided. Ohno and co-workers initially synthesized imidazolium based zwitterionic salts and reported that they act as excellent ion conductive matrix on addition of LiTFSI like lithium salts [17], and as non-volatile solvents for polymer gel electrolytes [18]. The stability of ZIs even after addition of lithium salts and their intra molecular neutrality has found them interesting applications as single ion conductors [19], carriers in transport membranes [20], for separation of mixtures [21] etc. Another interesting attribute of ZIs is their ability to act as precursors for Bronsted acidic ionic liquids which were further used as solvents as well as catalysts in various organic reactions like esterification, pinacol/benzopinacole rearrangement etc. [22], [23]. However, their potential applications in the separation and extraction field remained unexplored until very recent times. Ohno and co-workers proposed that ZIs can be used as additives for controlling the water content of hydrophobic ILs and facilitated the dissolution of otherwise insoluble protein i.e. cytochrome c in selected hydrophobic ILs [24], [25], thus paving the path for application of ZIs in the field of liquid-liquid extractions. Nevertheless, most of these studies involved use of highly hydrophobic ZIs and hydrophilic ZIs were considered to be unable to induce the phase separation. However, recently the relatively hydrophilic ZIs were explored for their ability to form ABS in combination with traditional salts [26]. The prime advantage of ZI based ABS is that the undesired ion pair formation that happens during the phase formation by ILs is completely suppressed in ZI based ABS. A recent report based on computational approach to the thermodynamic analysis of ZIs and their application in separation processes suggested that ZIs exhibit high polarity, high viscosity, and low volatility than structurally similar ILs [27]. The intra molecular covalent bonding of cationic and anionic sites makes them stronger hydrogen bond donor or acceptors than counterpart ILs thus making them suitable candidates for separation processes involving alcohols and aromatic mixtures.
Temperature dependent phase transitions are a topic of current interest and these are systems that dynamically transit between monophasic and biphasic regions through variation in temperature. Most systems of mixtures of ILs or ZIs with water exhibit either upper critical solution temperature (UCST) or lower critical solution temperature (LCST) type behavior [28], [29]. Yet, ammonium based ZIs were reported to show both LCST and UCST type transitions when mixed in suitable molar ratio with appropriate hydrophilicity-hydrophobicity balance [30]. Thermo regulated IL solvent mixture systems have useful applications in catalysis, in separation of biomolecules like proteins and metals [31], [32]. These studies suggested that temperature has significant influence on the liquid-liquid extraction systems and therefore is an essential parameter to be analyzed during phase formation. Further, understanding the phase behavior is vital to design efficient separation and extraction systems for value added compounds. Various studies have reported the IL based ABS have been successfully applied for extraction and separation of wide range of compounds from simple amino acids, alkaloids, vitamin to complex proteins, enzymes etc. [5], [15], [33], [34]. ZIs based ABS could be explored for their potential applications in separation and extraction of useful biomolecules.
Considering the role of ZIs as effective phase forming components and their possible applications, we focused in our present study on the ability of water soluble ZIs to form ABS on combining with aqueous solutions of potassium based inorganic salts. ZIs belonging to various classes of nitrogen containing compounds have been synthesized and studied for their ability to form biphasic systems with water as solvent. With the view to assess the influence of temperature on the phase behavior, phase diagrams have been determined at variable temperatures of 298.15, 308.15 and 318.15 K. The prospective application of proposed ZI based ABS has been analyzed for extraction of an alkaloid, caffeine. Extraction of caffeine is useful to obtain decaffeinated products, highly concentrated samples of caffeine for further applications, or pure form of caffeine to be used in food, beverage or pharmaceutical industries. Most of the currently available methods for extraction of caffeine are solvent extraction methods based on the organic solvents like ethyl acetate, methylene chloride etc. or supercritical fluids [35], [36]. Since the traditional methods of extraction are not environmentally compatible, we tried to explore the ability of ZIs as extraction media in eco-friendly aqueous phase. Here in we report the single step extraction of caffeine into ZI rich phase.
Materials and methods
Synthesis of zwitterions
The selected zwitterions have been synthesized from various bases including triethylamine, N-Methyl imidazole, N-Vinyl imidazole, pyridine, N-Methyl pyrrolidine, N-Ethyl piperdine and 1,4-butane sultone by following earlier reported synthesis method [17], [37]. Typical synthesis method for the triethylamine based ZI is explained here. Triethylamine along with acetonitrile as solvent was taken in a round bottom flask fitted with reflux condenser and nitrogen gas supply to maintain inert conditions. The equimolar quantity of 1,4-butane sultone was added to the round bottom flask and the reaction was carried out at 80°C under constant stirring conditions for 12 h. After 12 h, the acetonitrile was removed under reduced pressure. The resultant zwitterion product was washed with diethyl ether and toluene to remove starting materials present if any. Then the product was dried under vacuum for 12 h to obtain the white colored solid compound and was characterized by 1H and 13C NMR spectral techniques. Bruker Avance Spectrometer (400 MHz) was employed for NMR spectral analysis where D2O and TMS were used as solvent and internal standard, respectively. The general synthesis scheme followed for ZI synthesis and the structures of resultant ZIs are given in Fig. 1. The water content of synthesized ZIs has been determined through Karl Fischer titrator (Metrohm 970 KF Titrino plus) and were found to be less than 2000 ppm. The list of zwitterions synthesized along with their abbreviations, molecular weights and purities are presented in Table 1.

(a) Synthesis scheme for zwitterions and (b) structures of synthesized ZIs.
Details of the synthesized zwitterions including the abbreviation, molecular weight, onset decomposition temperatures and purity.
Name of the zwitterion | Abbreviation | Molecular weight/g·mol−1 | Onset temperature Tonset/°C | Purity (mass fraction) |
---|---|---|---|---|
N,N,N-Triethyl-4-sulfonyl-1-butaneammonium | [N222(C4SO3)] | 237.36 | 305.1 | 0.997 |
N-Methyl-4-sulfonyl-1-butaneimidazolium | [MeIm(C4SO3)] | 218.27 | 338.6 | 0.996 |
N-Vinyl-4-sulfonyl-1-butaneimidazolium | [ViIm(C4SO3)] | 230.28 | 352.7 | 0.994 |
4-Sulfonyl-1-butanepyridinium | [Py(C4SO3)] | 215.27 | 290.2 | 0.997 |
N-Methyl-4-sulfonyl-1-butanepyrrolidinium | [MePyr(C4SO3)] | 221.32 | 327.9 | 0.995 |
N-Ethyl-4-sulfonyl-1-butanepiperidinium | [EtPip(C4SO3)] | 249.37 | 302.5 | 0.995 |
Spectral characterization
N,N,N-Triethyl-4-sulfonyl-1-butaneammonium [N222(C4SO3)]
1H NMR (ppm): 1.26 (t, 9H), 1.83 (m, 4H), 2.96 (t, 2H), 3.21 (t, 2H), 3.28 (q, 6H), 13C NMR (ppm): 6.55, 19.86, 21.16, 49.95, 52.54, 55.92, yield 86%.
N-Methyl-4-sulfonyl-1-butaneimidazolium [MeIm(C4SO3)]
1H NMR (ppm): 1.80 (quintet, 2H), 2.05 (quintet, 2H), 2.97 (t, 2H), 3.91 (s, 3H), 4.27 (t, 2H), 7.46 (s, 1H), 7.52 (s, 1H), 8.76 (s, 1H), 13C NMR (ppm): 20.92, 28.08, 35.65, 48.91, 50.05, 122.16, 123.65, 135.97, yield 90%.
N-Vinyl-4-sulfonyl-1-butaneimidazolium [ViIm(C4SO3)]
1H NMR (ppm): 1.76 (quintet, 2H), 2.05 (quintet, 2H), 2.95 (t, 2H), 4.29 (t, 2H), 5.42 (d, 1H), 5.79 (d, 1H), 7.14 (s, 1H), 7.60 (s, 1H), 7.78 (s, 1H), 9.07 (s, 1H), 13C NMR (ppm): 20.87, 27.91, 49.25, 49.97, 109.25, 119.53, 122.76, 128.19, 134.45, yield 74%.
4-Sulfonyl-1-butanepyridinium [Py(C4SO3)]
1H NMR (ppm): 1.80 (quintet, 2H), 2.18 (quintet, 2H), 2.96 (t, 2H), 4.66 (t, 2H), 8.7 (t, 2H), 8.55 (t, 1H), 8.88 (t, 2H), 13C NMR (ppm): 20.83, 29.27, 49.90, 61.16, 128.26, 144.22, 145.63, yield 96%.
N-Methyl-4-sulfonyl-1-butanepyrrolidinium [MePyr(C4SO3)]
1H NMR (ppm): 1.82 (quintet, 2H), 1.97 (quintet, 2H), 2.21 (m, 4H), 2.98 (t, 2H), 3.05 (s, 3H), 3.38 (t, 2H), 3.52 (m, 4H), 13C NMR (ppm): 21.27, 21.99, 48.07, 49.97, 63.49, 64.36, yield 89%.
N-Ethyl-4-sulfonyl-1-butanepiperidinium [EtPip(C4SO3)]
1H NMR (ppm): 1.26 (t, 3H), 1.66 (quintet, 2H), 1.82 (m, 8H), 2.96 (t, 2H), 3.3 (m, 8H), 13C NMR (ppm): 6.32, 19.11, 19.64, 20.71, 21.24, 50.01, 53.91, 56.87, 58.83, yield 70%.
Thermogravimetric analysis
The thermal stability of synthesized ZIs has been determined through thermogravimetric analysis. TGA instrument (TA instruments Hi-Res. TGA Q500) was used for the analysis. It measures the difference in sample weight taken on aluminum pan maintained under inert nitrogen atmosphere with the weighing precision of ±0.01%. The heating is performed from room temperature to 500°C at the heating rate of 10°C min−1. The heating rate is controlled using thermocouples kept adjacent to the sample. Prior to the measurements, instrument was calibrated with Nickel metal.
Cloud point titration
Cloud point titration method was used for experimental determination of binodal curves and phase diagrams for polymer based [38] as well as IL based ABS [39]. All binodal curves were determined at atmospheric pressure and fixed temperature of 298.15 K that was maintained using temperature controller bath (F25-ME, Julabo, Germany) with an uncertainty of ±0.1 K. For titration experiments, aqueous solutions of ZIs (50–60 wt%) and aqueous solutions of potassium salts (40 wt%) were prepared on gravimetric basis. Analytical balance (Sartorius CPA225D) with the precision of ±0.01 mg was used for measuring weights during the course of experiments. The process of titration involved the drop wise addition of aqueous salt solution to the aqueous ZI solution maintained at constant temperature and constant stirring, till the appearance of turbidity. The turbidity indicates the formation of biphasic system and the amount of salt solution that was added to obtain the turbidity was recorded. In next step, ultrapure Millipore quality water was added drop-wise till the solution turned clear suggesting the formation of monophasic region. The weight of water added was also recorded. The steps were repeated sufficient number of times to construct the complete binodal curve that extends over range of concentrations. Based on the recorded weights, exact compositions of all three components i.e. ZI, salt and water, involved in phase formation were calculated. All experiments were performed at least for three times in order to obtain reliable and accurate results.
The experimental data derived from cloud point titration was fitted to Merchuks’ equation [5] through least squares regression. Merchuks’ equation that was initially proposed for polymer based ABS, later successfully applied for IL based ABS, was used in present work also. The Merchuks’ equation is given as below:
X and Y in the equation represent concentration in weight fractions for salt and ZI, respectively and constants A, B and C are regression coefficients.
Tie-line determination
The selected ternary systems containing ZI, salt and water were observed to form biphasic systems at specific concentrations resulting in visibly separated top and bottom phases. Tie line data helps to know the concentration of each individual component in top and bottom phases separately. In order to determine tie line data, ternary mixtures with composition in biphasic region is selected and prepared in weight basis. These mixtures were stirred vigorously for half an hour and then allowed to equilibrate for 12 h at 298.15 K. Top and bottom phases’ separation could be clearly observed after sufficient time of equilibration, which were then separated and weighed accurately. By using the measured weights and other known parameters including fitting parameters of Merchuks’ equation, the tie line compositions were determined using Lever arm rule [5]. The system of following four equations (eqs. 2–5) was employed to get the tie line compositions.
In present system, X and Y represent the concentration of salt and ZI phases, respectively while subscripts T, B and M denote top phase, bottom phase and mixture, respectively. The α parameter is the ratio between weight of top phase to weight of total mixture. On obtaining compositions of salt and ZI in both phases, tie line length (TLL) can also be determined through the eq. 6.
TLL is numerical quantification of the difference in concentration of ZI and salt in two co existing phases.
Partitioning of caffeine
The preferential partitioning of caffeine to the ZI rich phase has been explored through extraction experiments executed at 298.15 K and atmospheric pressure. Caffeine aqueous solution of 5×10−3 m was used for all partitioning experiments. Specific compositions of ternary systems belonging to the biphasic region are selected and solutions were prepared on weight basis. Prepared solutions were stirred vigorously and left for 12 h at 298.15 K to attain equilibrium. The temperature controller bath (F25-ME, Julabo, Germany) was used for maintaining the constant temperature. UV-Visible spectroscopy was employed to quantify the amount of caffeine present in each phase separated after equilibrium. Samples from each phase were taken and diluted sufficiently and their absorbance was measured using UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV-1300) at 274 nm. Concentration of caffeine was determined using the previously established calibration plots. Three sets of individual samples were prepared to obtain reliable and accurate data. To account for the interventions caused by ZI or salt, blank samples of same ternary mixture compositions were prepared using water instead of aqueous caffeine solutions. For calculation of partition coefficients for caffeine, the following equation was used
here the concentration of caffeine is given by [Caf]. Further, the extraction efficiencies in percentage can also be calculated using the given equation
the EEcaf is percentage ratio of quantity of caffeine in ZI rich phase,
Results and discussion
TGA analysis of synthesized zwitterions
Thermogravimetric analysis evaluates the thermal stability of ZIs through their decomposition temperatures. The experimentally obtained onset decomposition temperatures for all ZIs are given in Table 1 and the values indicated that all studied ZIs are stable up to 250°C. The graphical representation of the thermogravimetric analysis is given in Fig. 2. The overall thermal stability order for ZIs is as follows: [ViIm(C4SO3)]>[MeIm (C4SO3)]>[MePyr(C4SO3)]>[N222(C4SO3)]>[EtPip(C4SO3)]>[Py(C4SO3)]. The order observed can be attributed to the structure and aliphatic moieties present in ZIs. From the order, ZIs with imidazole group were observed to show highest stability in comparison to those containing other groups like pyrrolidine, pyridine, piperidine etc. Similar observation was found in case of ILs with imidazolium cations. In addition, thermal stability of ZIs was found to be higher than structurally similar acidic ILs containing HSO4− and CF3SO3− anions [40].
![Fig. 2: Thermogravimetric analysis of synthesized zwitterions where (a) [Py(C4SO3)], (b) [EtPip(C4SO3)], (c) [N222(C4SO3)], (d) [MePyr(C4SO3)], (e) [MeIm(C4SO3)] and (f) [ViIm(C4SO3)].](/document/doi/10.1515/pac-2018-0921/asset/graphic/j_pac-2018-0921_fig_002.jpg)
Thermogravimetric analysis of synthesized zwitterions where (a) [Py(C4SO3)], (b) [EtPip(C4SO3)], (c) [N222(C4SO3)], (d) [MePyr(C4SO3)], (e) [MeIm(C4SO3)] and (f) [ViIm(C4SO3)].
Phase behavior of zwitterions
The ability of each ZI to form biphasic systems when mixed with potassium based inorganic salt solutions was evaluated. It was observed that all synthesized ZIs were able to form ABS in combination with selected three potassium based inorganic salts. The evaluated phase behavior of all synthesized ZIs in combination with K3PO4, K2HPO4 and K2CO3 are presented in Fig. 3a–c respectively. Binodal curves are graphical representation of the concentrations of ZI and salts at which the ABS are formed and they are presented in molality units for better analysis of results and to avoid the interference of difference in molecular weights of ZIs. In phase diagrams, the position of binodal curve gives idea about the hydrophobic/hydrophilic nature of the system. The region in phase diagram that lies below the binodal curve is monophasic in nature while the concentration region above binodal curve is biphasic in nature. The nearer the binodal curve is to the origin, the higher is the ability to form biphasic systems suggesting that particular system is relatively hydrophobic.

Phase diagrams for systems composed of ZIs, water and (a) K3PO4 (b) K2HPO4 (c) K2CO3 at 298.15 K and atmospheric pressure.
From the Fig. 3a, it can be observed that highest phase formation ability among ZIs was shown by [EtPip(C4SO3)] followed by triethylamine based ZI i.e. [N222(C4SO3)]. Figure 3a–c assist in evaluating the influence of ZI structure on their phase formation ability. From Fig. 3a, the overall order for studied ZIs can be inferred as [EtPip(C4SO3)]>[N222(C4SO3)]>[MePyr(C4SO3)]≈[ViIm(C4SO3)]>[MeIm(C4SO3)]≥[Py(C4SO3)].
As per the observed order, the ZI with highest phase formation ability is [EtPip(C4SO3)] and it is the most hydrophobic among studied ZIs. The observed order reflects the extent of interactions between ZIs and the solvent i.e. water or the ability of these ZIs to be solvated by water. The solubility of ZIs in water depends on various interactions including hydrogen bonding, steric effect, entropic contributions etc. ZIs containing larger nitrogen containing groups like piperidinium were able to cause formation more easily in comparison to the smaller ring containing ZIs like imidazolium and pyrrolidinium groups. However, the discrepancy observed in case of pyridine containing ZI showing the least ability to induce phases among all studied ZIs could be attributed to the steric effects caused by the alkyl substituents present in all other ZIs. [Py(C4SO3)] could interact with water through the aromatic hydrogen bonding leading to its higher solubility in water and consequential difficulty in phase formation. Further aromatic moieties are known to present higher solvation capabilities for water in comparison to aliphatic ones thus making aromatic group containing ZIs hydrophilic. These hydrophilic ZIs require higher quantities of water to show phase separation. Similar observations were reported in case of ABS formed by ILs belonging to various cation classes in combination with potassium salts with primary focus on evaluating ability of IL cations towards phase formation [41].
The phase diagrams for all ZIs in presence of other two potassium salts i.e. K2HPO4 and K2CO3 were determined and graphically presented in Fig. 3b and c, respectively. The phase formation trends of ZIs in presence of K2HPO4 and K2CO3 are almost similar to that observed in case of K3PO4. This suggests that irrespective of identity of salt, the phase formation ability of studied ZIs remain almost same.
In addition, binodal curves obtained in present work were also compared with reported ammonium based ZIs containing propane sulfonate and butane sulfonate groups [26]. K3PO4 was the common salt for all ZIs and the comparison is graphically presented in Fig. 4. The dependence of phase formation ability on the alkyl chain length and consequent hydrophobicity was further confirmed form this comparison. The ZI constituting tripentyl groups i.e. [N555(C3SO3)] showed highest phase formation ability among all ZIs, due to longer alkyl chain length and hydrophobic nature. The position of binodal curves of ammonium ZIs with intermediate chain length were comparable to those obtained for ZIs in present study. Again, the ZI of shortest alkyl chain i.e. [N111(C3SO3)] was most hydrophilic among all ZIs including earlier reported as well as ZIs of current study.

Phase diagrams for synthesized ZIs in comparison with reported ammonium based ZIs.
Further, the effect of potassium salts on the phase behavior has also been systematically studied and phase diagrams of all six ZIs in combination with K3PO4, K2HPO4 and K2CO3 are given in Fig. 5. The observed trends with respect to salts could be mainly ascribed to salt anions since the potassium cation remains same in all cases. Thus the experimentally determined trends for phase formation by salts can be given as PO43−>HPO42−>CO32−. The trend observed was same for all ZIs. The observed salting-out strength of salts can be explained based on Hofmeister series [42]. During the ABS formation, there exists mutual competition between ions of salts and ZIs for the amount of water available in order to get hydrated. As per the Hofmeister series, the ions of higher valence gets hydrated to larger extent thus reducing the amount of water available for the ZIs to get hydrated. Potassium salts in present case acts as salting-out agents and salt with higher valency showed higher salting-out as well phase separation ability. Further, salting-out ability of ions could also be explained based on their Gibbs free energy of hydration, ΔGhyd values for the anion studied: PO43−=−2835 kJ·mol−1, HPO42−=−1125 kJ·mol−1, CO32−=−1300 kJ·mol−1 [43]. The larger negative ΔGhyd values suggest the more structuring of water molecules surrounding them and consequent kosmotropic nature of salts. Though this analysis of observed salt behavior was proposed for ABS composed of ILs and salts [5], it was found to be equally applicable for ZI based ABS also [26].
![Fig. 5: Phase diagrams for systems composed of ZIs, water and (a) [N222(C4SO3)] (b) [MeIm(C4SO3)] (c) [ViIm(C4SO3)] (d) [Py(C4SO3)] (e) [MePyr(C4SO3)] (f) [EtPip(C4SO3)] at 298.15 K and atmospheric pressure.](/document/doi/10.1515/pac-2018-0921/asset/graphic/j_pac-2018-0921_fig_005.jpg)
Phase diagrams for systems composed of ZIs, water and (a) [N222(C4SO3)] (b) [MeIm(C4SO3)] (c) [ViIm(C4SO3)] (d) [Py(C4SO3)] (e) [MePyr(C4SO3)] (f) [EtPip(C4SO3)] at 298.15 K and atmospheric pressure.
On formation of two phases in case of all ZI based ABS, the upper phase was rich in ZI and the bottom phase was salt rich and this behavior matched with most cases of IL based ABS where top phase was IL rich and bottom salt rich [5].
The binodal curve data obtained through experiment is fitted to the Merchuks’ equation as given in eq. 1 and obtained fitting parameters A, B and C for all combinations of ZIs and salts are given in Table 2 along with corresponding standard deviations and correlation coefficients. The correlation used helps in predicting the binodal data in the regions where experimental data is unavailable and appreciable correlation coefficients have been obtained in present study suggests the applicability of Merchuks’ equation for ZI based ABS too. Additionally, tie line data has been determined using eqs. 2–5. Experimental details of mixture compositions selected for the determination of tie lines and calculated concentrations of ZI and salt in each phase along with resultant tie line lengths have been presented in Table 3. A representative tie line data of system containing [Py(C4SO3)] and K3PO4 is given in Fig. 6. Tie lines for two different mixture compositions were almost parallel to each other as can be seen from Fig. 6. For representative purpose, tie line data determined for other two salts with [Py(C4SO3)] are also given in Table 3. Tie line length is a numerical expression for the difference in concentration of ZIs and salts in top and bottom phases. The higher TLL values as seen in case of [Py(C4SO3)] and K3PO4 indicates the higher concentration of ZI and salt in top and bottom phases, respectively.
Fitting parameters of eq. 1, their standard error of estimate, σ and correlation coefficients, R2 for systems consisting of ZIs, salts and water.
ZI | Salt | A±σ | B±σ | (C ±σ)×105 | R2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
[N222(C4SO3)] | K3PO4 | 77.4±1.0 | −0.308±0.006 | 6.38±0.29 | 0.999 |
K2HPO4 | 77.5±0.8 | −0.313±0.004 | 4.30±0.11 | 0.999 | |
K2CO3 | 81.9±0.8 | −0.276±0.004 | 4.82±0.09 | 0.999 | |
[MeIm(C4SO3)] | K3PO4 | 75.3±1.4 | −0.259±0.006 | 5.24±0.10 | 0.999 |
K2HPO4 | 80.5±1.2 | −0.263±0.005 | 3.11±0.07 | 0.999 | |
K2CO3 | 91.2±1.5 | −0.236±0.005 | 3.90±0.07 | 0.999 | |
[ViIm(C4SO3)] | K3PO4 | 78.6±0.6 | −0.286±0.003 | 7.13±0.09 | 0.999 |
K2HPO4 | 81.9±1.8 | −0.285±0.007 | 4.19±0.12 | 0.999 | |
K2CO3 | 92.4±1.3 | −0.265±0.005 | 3.74±0.09 | 0.999 | |
[Py(C4SO3)] | K3PO4 | 81.1±0.9 | −0.266±0.004 | 5.17±0.07 | 0.999 |
K2HPO4 | 71.5±0.9 | −0.209±0.004 | 3.24±0.05 | 0.999 | |
K2CO3 | 92.8±2.4 | −0.236±0.008 | 3.45±0.09 | 0.999 | |
[MePyr(C4SO3)] | K3PO4 | 70.5±0.4 | −0.271±0.002 | 6.39±0.07 | 0.999 |
K2HPO4 | 72.8±1.5 | −0.274±0.008 | 3.58±0.16 | 0.998 | |
K2CO3 | 86.2±2.7 | −0.283±0.011 | 3.02±0.19 | 0.997 | |
[EtPip(C4SO3)] | K3PO4 | 70.6±0.6 | −0.299±0.004 | 8.74±0.15 | 0.999 |
K2HPO4 | 73.3±1.6 | −0.285±0.009 | 5.56±0.26 | 0.998 | |
K2CO3 | 73.5±1.4 | −0.251±0.007 | 4.86±0.12 | 0.997 | |
ZI+K3PO4 | T/K | A±σ | B±σ | (C±σ)×105 | R2 |
[N222(C4SO3)] | 308.15 | 75.1±1.2 | −0.297±0.007 | 6.92±0.24 | 0.999 |
318.15 | 74.5±0.5 | −0.271±0.003 | 6.75±0.08 | 0.999 | |
[MeIm(C4SO3)] | 308.15 | 76.1±0.8 | −0.254±0.004 | 5.53±0.07 | 0.999 |
318.15 | 58.2±3.6 | −0.153±0.021 | 5.29±0.34 | 0.996 | |
[ViIm(C4SO3)] | 308.15 | 79.6±0.6 | −0.279±0.003 | 6.75±0.08 | 0.999 |
318.15 | 78.5±0.9 | −0.271±0.004 | 6.33±0.10 | 0.999 | |
[Py(C4SO3)] | 308.15 | 79.5±1.7 | −0.246±0.008 | 4.41±0.15 | 0.999 |
318.15 | 54.7±2.3 | −0.114±0.014 | 5.40±0.19 | 0.998 | |
[MePyr(C4SO3)] | 308.15 | 67.5±0.8 | −0.238±0.004 | 6.69±0.13 | 0.999 |
318.15 | 72.9±0.5 | −0.268±0.003 | 4.82±0.06 | 0.999 | |
[EtPip(C4SO3)] | 308.15 | 72.4±0.8 | −0.297±0.004 | 7.54±0.15 | 0.999 |
318.15 | 71.5±0.7 | −0.289±0.004 | 7.42±0.12 | 0.999 |
Weight fraction compositions for salt (X) and ZI (Y) in mixture (M), bottom phase (B) and top phase (T) and corresponding tie line lengths for systems consisting of all synthesized ZIs, salt and water at 298.15 K and atmospheric pressure.
ZI | Salt | XM | YM | XB | YB | XT | YT | TLL |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[N222(C4SO3)] | K3PO4 | 19.97 | 24.06 | 37.69 | 0.38 | 2.55 | 47.33 | 58.64 |
[MeIm(C4SO3)] | K3PO4 | 19.96 | 24.07 | 36.92 | 1.12 | 3.47 | 46.39 | 56.29 |
[ViIm(C4SO3)] | K3PO4 | 19.99 | 23.99 | 35.04 | 0.67 | 2.15 | 51.63 | 60.65 |
[Py(C4SO3)] | K3PO4 | 20.01 | 23.97 | 34.81 | 1.90 | 3.79 | 48.14 | 55.68 |
25.00 | 23.99 | 43.26 | 0.21 | 2.46 | 53.35 | 66.99 | ||
K2HPO4 | 24.42 | 23.49 | 41.09 | 1.97 | 2.55 | 51.13 | 62.47 | |
K2CO3 | 25.01 | 23.99 | 38.61 | 2.93 | 5.52 | 52.91 | 59.93 | |
[MePyr(C4SO3)] | K3PO4 | 20.00 | 24.00 | 37.07 | 0.52 | 1.81 | 49.01 | 59.96 |
[EtPip(C4SO3)] | K3PO4 | 19.99 | 24.00 | 38.92 | 0.06 | 1.87 | 46.91 | 59.73 |
![Fig. 6: Phase diagram representing tie-line compositions for system containing [Py(C4SO3)], K3PO4 and water at 298.15 K and atmospheric pressure.](/document/doi/10.1515/pac-2018-0921/asset/graphic/j_pac-2018-0921_fig_006.jpg)
Phase diagram representing tie-line compositions for system containing [Py(C4SO3)], K3PO4 and water at 298.15 K and atmospheric pressure.
Effect of temperature on phase behavior of zwitterions
In order to analyze the effect of temperature on the phase behavior of ZIs, phase diagrams have been determined at three different temperatures i.e. 298.15, 308.15, 318.15 K and common salt K3PO4. The obtained representative binodal curves for [Py(C4SO3)], [MePyr(C4SO3)] and [EtPip(C4SO3)] are given in Fig. 7a–c. The position of binodal curve suggested that with increase in temperature, the biphasic region narrowed down and monophasic region increased. This indicates that phase formation is more favorable at lower temperatures and thus exhibits UCST type phase behavior.
![Fig. 7: Phase diagrams for systems containing K3PO4, water and (a) [Py(C4SO3)] (b) [MePyr(C4SO3)] and (c) [EtPip(C4SO3)] at temperatures of 298.15, 308.15 and 318.15 K and atmospheric pressure.](/document/doi/10.1515/pac-2018-0921/asset/graphic/j_pac-2018-0921_fig_007.jpg)
Phase diagrams for systems containing K3PO4, water and (a) [Py(C4SO3)] (b) [MePyr(C4SO3)] and (c) [EtPip(C4SO3)] at temperatures of 298.15, 308.15 and 318.15 K and atmospheric pressure.
Recent reports on ABS formed by ammonium based ZIs with potassium salts and PEG have explored their temperature reversible behavior. Hydrophilic ZIs based on trimethylamine, [N111(C3SO3)] were reported to show UCST type phase behavior while hydrophobic ZIs like tripentylamine based ZIs, [N555(C3SO3)] showed LCST type behavior in presence of salts [26]. On the other hand, a reversal in trends was observed while they were studied in combination with polymers like PEG [44]. The transition from LCST to UCST or vice versa depends on the structure of ZI and the other phase forming component of the system.
In present case, the study on thermal effects on phase behavior suggested that all ZIs exhibited UCST behavior similar to the case of polymer-polymer ABS [45] and the phase formation was favorable at lower temperatures. Nevertheless, the extent of separation between constructed binodal curves for each system gives some idea about the hydrophilic/hydrophobic character of the ZI. In comparison to reported ammonium based ZIs, the ZIs of present work were hydrophilic enough to show same kind of thermal dependence i.e. UCST type behavior. For most hydrophobic ZI among all studied ZIs i.e. for [Py(C4SO3)], the appreciable separation between binodal curves at different temperatures was observed. Whereas the distance between binodal curves significantly decreased for ZI of intermediate hydrophilicity i.e. [MePyr(C4SO3)], while binodal curves started overlapping in case of [Etpip(C4SO3)]. The overlapping observed indicates that there is no significant dependence of phase behavior on temperature.
Partitioning of caffeine
The synthesized ZIs have been studied for their efficiency with respect to partitioning of an alkaloid i.e. caffeine. For partition studies we have considered the combination of synthesized ZIs with salt of highest salting-out ability i.e. K3PO4. The ternary mixtures of 20 wt% of K3PO4, 24 wt% of ZI and 56 wt% of caffeine aqueous solution were prepared for the partitioning study. The weight percentages of each component were selected based on the phase diagrams. The partition coefficients obtained for each system and the extraction efficiencies are graphically presented in Fig. 8a and b.

Bar diagram representing (a) partition coefficients, Kcaf and (b) extraction efficiencies in ZI based ABS at 298.15 K and atmospheric pressure.
In the present study, caffeine was observed to preferably partition to the ZI rich top phase in all cases. However, the partition coefficient values obtained were different depending on the structure of ZIs studied. The extraction of caffeine into the ZI rich phase seems to be dependent on various factors like π-π interactions between the aromatic groups of caffeine and that of ZIs, dispersive interactions among alkyl groups of caffeine and those present in ZIs, hydrogen bonding etc. [46]. The partition coefficient values obtained in case of pyridine and imidazole based ZIs suggested the favorable π-π interactions between the aromatic ring of pyridine and imidazole with the purine ring present in caffeine. In case of aliphatic cyclic groups like pyrrolidine and piperidine containing ZIs, dispersive interactions seem to be the dominating factor. The lowest partitioning among studied ZIs was observed for the triethylamine based ZI that could be attributed to the absence of favorable interactions with caffeine like π-π interactions.
The partition coefficient values of present study were higher in comparison to those obtained for ABS formed by phosphonium based ILs with inorganic salts [47] and imidazolium based ILs with amino acids [33]. However, these were comparable to values observed for ABS formed by ILs belonging to imidazolium cation various anions in combination with K3PO4 suggesting that ABS based on ZIs of present study could be potential extraction systems. The extractive potential could be manipulated based on the structures and type of phase forming components and thus can find applications in separation and extraction processes as replacements for traditional systems.
Conclusions
With the motive to develop benign separation and extraction systems, we in present study propose a set of aqueous biphasic systems based on zwitterionic salts. We have synthesized six zwitterions (ZIs) namely N,N,N-Triethyl-4-sulfonyl-1-butaneammonium [N222(C4SO3)], N-Methyl-4-sulfonyl-1-butaneimidazolium [MeIm(C4SO3)], N-Vinyl-4-sulfonyl-1-butaneimidazolium [ViIm(C4SO3)], 4-Sulfonyl-1-butanepyridinium [Py(C4SO3)], N-Methyl-4-sulfonyl-1-butanepyrrolidinium [MePyr(C4SO3)] and N-Ethyl-4-sulfonyl-1-butanepiperidinium [EtPip(C4SO3)]. We dealt with the phase behavior analysis of these synthesized ZIs in combination with potassium salts such as K3PO4, K2HPO4 and K2CO3. The order of experimental binodal curves suggested that comparatively higher hydrophobic ZIs like [EtPip(C4SO3)] formed biphasic system easily and at lower concentration of salt and the over ll order was [EtPip(C4SO3)]>[N222(C4SO3)]>[MePyr(C4SO3)]≈[ViIm(C4SO3)] >[MeIm(C4SO3)]≥[Py(C4SO3)]. The three different potassium salts studied were observed to follow Hofmeister series with respect to their ability for phase formation. Binodal curves determined at variable increasing temperatures like 298.15, 308.15 and 318.15 K suggested the presence of upper critical solution temperature in case of ZIs based systems. However, for certain ZIs, the effect of temperature has been not very much pronounced. The partitioning studies using caffeine as solute suggested that the extraction capabilities depend on interplay of various factors. The results obtained suggested the presence of favorable π-π interactions between caffeine and ZI rich phase. The comparable partition coefficients obtained suggested that these ZI based ABS could be efficiently used for extraction of caffeine like biomolecules.
Article note
A collection of invited papers based on presentations at the 18th International Symposium on Solubility Phenomena and Related Equilibrium Processes (ISSP-18), Tours, France, 15–20 July 2018.
Acknowledgements
Authors thank IIT Madras for the financial support through Institute Research and Development Award, Funder Id: 10.13039/501100003845 (IRDA): CHY/ 15-16/833/RFIR/RAME.
References
[1] P. A. Albertsson, Partition of cell particles and macromolecules, 3rd ed., Wiley, New York (1986).Search in Google Scholar
[2] M. Van Berlo, K. C. A. M. Luyben, L. A. M. van der Wielen. J. Chrom. B Biomed. Sci. Appl.711, 61 (1998).10.1016/S0378-4347(97)00627-0Search in Google Scholar
[3] L. H. M. da Silva, A. J. A. Meirelles. Carbohydr. Polym.46, 267 (2001).10.1016/S0144-8617(00)00324-6Search in Google Scholar
[4] K. E. Gutowski, G. A. Broker, H. D. Willauer, J. G. Huddleston, R. P. Swatloski, J. D. Holbrey, R. D. Rogers. J. Am. Chem. Soc.125, 6632 (2003).10.1021/ja0351802Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[5] M. G. Freire, A. F. M. Claudio, J. M. M. Araujo, J. A. P. Coutinho, I. M. Marrucho, J. N. C. Lopes, L. P. N. Rebelo. Chem. Soc. Rev.41, 4966 (2012).10.1039/c2cs35151jSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[6] M. Freemantle. An Introduction to Ionic Liquids. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK (2010).Search in Google Scholar
[7] C. L. Hussey. Pure Appl. Chem.60, 1763 (1988).10.1351/pac198860121763Search in Google Scholar
[8] T. Welton. Chem. Rev.99, 2071 (1999).10.1021/cr980032tSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[9] J. G. Huddleston, A. E. Visser, W. M. Reichert, H. D. Willauer, G. A. Broker, R. D. Rogers. Green Chem.3, 156 (2001).10.1039/b103275pSearch in Google Scholar
[10] A. Brandt, J. Grasvik, J. P. Hallett, T. Welton. Green Chem.15, 550 (2013).10.1039/c2gc36364jSearch in Google Scholar
[11] F. Javed, F. Ullah, H. Md. Akil. Pure Appl. Chem.90, 1019 (2017).10.1515/pac-2017-0315Search in Google Scholar
[12] J. G. Huddleston, H. D. Willauer, R. P. Swatloski, A. E. Visser, R. D. Rogers. Chem. Commun.16, 1765 (1998).10.1039/A803999BSearch in Google Scholar
[13] S. P. M. Ventura, R. L. F. de Barros, J. M. P. Barbosa, C. M. F. Soares, A. S. Lima, J. A. P. Coutinho. Green Chem.14, 734 (2012).10.1039/c2gc16428kSearch in Google Scholar
[14] H. Passos, M. G. Freire, J. A. P. Coutinho. Green Chem.16, 4786 (2014).10.1039/C4GC00236ASearch in Google Scholar
[15] S. P. M. Ventura, F. A. e Silva, M. V. Quental, D. Mondal, M. G. Freire, J. A. P. Coutinho. Chem. Rev.117, 6984 (2017).10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00550Search in Google Scholar
[16] J. Han, R. Pan, X. Xie, Y. Wang, Y. Yan, G. Yin, W. Guan. J. Chem. Eng. Data.55, 3749 (2010).10.1021/je1002797Search in Google Scholar
[17] M. Yoshizawa, M. Hirao, K. Ito-Akita, H. Ohno. J. Mater. Chem.11, 1057 (2001).10.1039/b101079oSearch in Google Scholar
[18] H. Ohno, M. Yoshizawa, W. Ogihara. Electrochim. Acta.48, 2079 (2003).10.1016/S0013-4686(03)00188-9Search in Google Scholar
[19] F. Lu, X. Gao, A. Wu, N. Sun, L. Shi, L. Zheng. J. Phys. Chem. C.121, 17756 (2017).10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b06242Search in Google Scholar
[20] H. Lee, D. B. Kim, S. H. Kim, H. S. Kim, S. J. Kim, D. K. Choi, Y. S. Kang, J. Won. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.43, 3053 (2004).10.1002/anie.200353632Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[21] H. S. Kim, J. Y. Bae, S. J. Park, H. Lee, H. W. Bae, S. O. Kang, S. D. Lee, D. K. Choi. Chem. Eur. J.13, 2655 (2007).10.1002/chem.200600869Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[22] A. C. Cole, J. L. Jensen, I. Ntai, K. L. T. Tran, K. J. Weaver, D. C. Forbes, J. H. Davis Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc.124, 5962 (2002).10.1021/ja026290wSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[23] A. S. Amarasekara. Chem. Rev.116, 6133 (2016).10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00763Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[24] Y. Ito, Y. Kohno, N. Nakamura, H. Ohno. Chem. Commun.48, 11220 (2012).10.1039/c2cc36119aSearch in Google Scholar
[25] Y. Ito, Y. Kohno, N. Nakamura, H. Ohno. Int. J. Mol. Sci.14, 18350 (2013).10.3390/ijms140918350Search in Google Scholar
[26] A. M. Ferreira, H. Passos, K. Okafuji, M. G. Freire, J. A. P. Coutinho, H. Ohno. Green Chem.19, 4012 (2017).10.1039/C7GC02262JSearch in Google Scholar
[27] D. Moreno, M. Gonzalez-Miquel, V. R. Ferro, J. Palomar. ChemPhysChem.19, 1 (2018).10.1002/cphc.201701341Search in Google Scholar
[28] P. Nockeman, B. Thijs, S. Pittois, J. Thoen, C. Glorieux, K. V. Hecke, L. V. Meervelt, B. Kirchner, K. Binnemans. J. Phys. Chem. B110, 20978 (2006).10.1021/jp0642995Search in Google Scholar
[29] Y. Qiao, W. Ma, N. Theyssen, C. Chen, Z. Hou. Chem. Rev.117, 6881 (2017).10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00652Search in Google Scholar
[30] S. Saita, Y. Mieno, Y. Kohno, H. Ohno. Chem. Commun.50, 15450 (2014).10.1039/C4CC06210HSearch in Google Scholar
[31] A. Behr, C. Fangewisch. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.197, 115 (2003).10.1016/S1381-1169(02)00653-2Search in Google Scholar
[32] H. Passos, A. Luis, J. A. P. Coutinho, M. G. Freire. Sci. Rep.6, 20276 (2016).10.1038/srep20276Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[33] M. Dominguez-Perez, L. I. N. Tome, M. G. Freire, I. M. Marrucho, O. Cabeza, J. A. P. Coutinho. Sep. Purif. Technol.72, 85 (2010).10.1016/j.seppur.2010.01.008Search in Google Scholar
[34] V. P. Priyanka, A. Basaiahgari, R. L. Gardas. J. Mol. Liq.247, 207 (2017).10.1016/j.molliq.2017.09.111Search in Google Scholar
[35] A. Senol, A. Aydin. J. Food Eng.75, 565 (2006).10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.04.039Search in Google Scholar
[36] M. D. A. Saldana, R. S. Mohamed, M. G. Baer, P. Mazzafera. J. Agric. Food Chem.47, 3804 (1999).10.1021/jf981369zSearch in Google Scholar
[37] J. Fraga-Dubreuil, K. Bourahla, M. Rahmouni, J. P. Bazureau, J. Hamelin. Catal. Commun.3, 185 (2002).10.1016/S1566-7367(02)00087-0Search in Google Scholar
[38] H. D. Willauer, J. G. Huddleston, R. D. Rogers. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.41, 1892 (2002).10.1021/ie010598zSearch in Google Scholar
[39] A. Basaiahgari, R. L. Gardas. J. Chem. Thermodyn.120, 88 (2018).10.1016/j.jct.2018.01.009Search in Google Scholar
[40] Z. Ullah, M. A. Bustam, Z. Man, N. Muhhamad, A. S. Khan. RSC Adv.5, 71449 (2015).10.1039/C5RA07656KSearch in Google Scholar
[41] S. P. M. Ventura, S. G. Sousa, L. S. Serafim, A. S. Lima, M. G. Freire, J. A. P. Coutinho. J. Chem. Eng. Data.56, 4253 (2011).10.1021/je200714hSearch in Google Scholar
[42] S. Shahriari, C. M. S. S. Neves, M. G. Freire, J. A. P. Coutinho. J. Phys. Chem. B116, 7252 (2012).10.1021/jp300874uSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[43] Y. Marcus. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans.87, 2995 (1991).10.1039/FT9918702995Search in Google Scholar
[44] A. M. Ferreira, H. Passos, A. Okafuji, A. P. M. Tavares, H. Ohno, M. G. Freire, J. A. P. Coutinho. Green Chem.20, 1218 (2018).10.1039/C7GC03880ASearch in Google Scholar
[45] H. Walter, E. J. Krob. J. Chromatogr. A441, 261 (1988).10.1016/S0021-9673(01)83870-XSearch in Google Scholar
[46] M. G. Freire, C. M. S. S. Neves, I. M. Marrucho, J. N. C. Lopes, L. P. N. Rebelo, J. A. P. Coutinho. Green Chem.12, 1715 (2010).10.1039/c0gc00179aSearch in Google Scholar
[47] M. G. Freire, A. R. T. Teles, J. N. C. Lopes, L. P. N. Rebelo, I. M. Marrucho, J. A. P Coutinho. Sep. Sci. Technol.47, 284 (2012).10.1080/01496395.2011.620585Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 IUPAC & De Gruyter. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. For more information, please visit: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/