The development of self-cleaning biomimetic surfaces has the potential to be of great benefit to human health, in addition to reducing the economic burden on industries worldwide. Consequently, this study developed a biomimetic wax surface using a moulding technique which emulated the topography of the self-cleaning Gladiolus hybridus (Gladioli) leaf. A comparison of topographies was performed for unmodified wax surfaces (control), biomimetic wax surfaces, and Gladioli leaves using optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy. The results demonstrated that the biomimetic wax surface and Gladioli leaf had extremely similar surface roughness parameters, but the water contact angle of the Gladioli leaf was significantly higher than the replicated biomimetic surface. The self-cleaning properties of the biomimetic and control surfaces were compared by measuring their propensity to repel Escherichia coli and Listeria monocytogenes attachment, adhesion, and retention in mono- and co-culture conditions. When the bacterial assays were carried out in monoculture, the biomimetic surfaces retained fewer bacteria than the control surfaces. However, when using co-cultures of the bacterial species, only following the retention assays were the bacterial numbers reduced on the biomimetic surfaces. The results demonstrate that such surfaces may be effective in reducing biofouling if used in the appropriate medical, marine, and industrial scenarios. This study provides valuable insight into the anti-fouling physical and chemical control mechanisms found in plants, which are particularly appealing for engineering purposes.
Funding source: European Union’s Horizon 2020
Award Identifier / Grant number: 952471
Funding source: Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT)
Award Identifier / Grant number: CEECIND/01700/2017
Research funding: This work was financially supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 952471. L. C. Gomes acknowledges the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) for the financial support of her work contract through the Scientific Employment Stimulus – Individual Call – [CEECIND/01700/2017].
 F. Geyer, M. D’Acunzi, A. Sharifi-Aghili, A. Saal, N. Gao, A. Kaltbeitzel, T. F. Sloot, R. Berger, H. J. Butt, D. Vollmer. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaw9727 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaw9727.Search in Google Scholar
 H. L. Røder, P. K. Raghupathi, J. Herschend, A. Brejnrod, S. Knøchel, S. J. Sørensen, M. Burmølle. Food Microbiol. 51, 18 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2015.04.008.Search in Google Scholar
 F. Saubade, L. I. Pilkington, C. M. Liauw, L. C. Gomes, J. McClements, M. Peeters, M. El Mohtadi, F. Mergulhão, K. A. Whitehead. Langmuir, Accepted, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c00853.10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c00853Search in Google Scholar PubMed
 G. M. Intelligence. Global anti-microbial peptides market report 2030: based on peptides type, based on products, based on application & by region with COVID-19 impact | Forecast Period 2017–2030 (2020), [Online]. Available: https://www.goldsteinresearch.com/report/anti-microbial-peptides-market-outlook-2024-global-opportunity-and-demand-analysis-market-forecast-2016-2024.Search in Google Scholar
 M. Kazemzadeh-Narbat, H. Cheng, R. Chabok, M. M. Alvarez, C. De La Fuente-Nunez, K. S. Phillips, A. Khademhosseini. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 41, 94 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2020.1828810.Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 IUPAC & De Gruyter. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. For more information, please visit: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/