Accessible Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter September 3, 2015

Non-governmental Organisations and Democracy: An Empirical Analysis

Tania Masi

Abstract

The United Nations established in 2005 the United Nations Democracy Fund (UNDEF), whose objective is to support projects submitted by national NGOs aimed at increasing government accountability. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of NGOs activity on democracy exploiting the UNDEF database. An empirical analysis based on a propensity score matching (PSM) method is implemented on a sample of 102 developing countries. The findings indicate that the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) is positive and significant only when countries receive UNDEF-funded NGOs projects for three rounds or more. In this case the Polity IV indicator improves by an average of 1.08 points with respect to the level of 2005.


Corresponding author: Tania Masi, University of Verona, Verona, Italy, E-mail:

References

Bratton, M., (1989), The Politics of Government-NGO Relations in Africa, World Development, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 569–587. Search in Google Scholar

Burnell, P.J., Calvert, P., (eds.) (2004), Civil Society in Democratization, Frank Cass, London. Search in Google Scholar

Diamond, L.J., (1994), Toward Democratic Consolidation, Journal of Democracy, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 4–17. Search in Google Scholar

Diamond, L.J., (ed.) (1997), Consolidating the Third Wave Democracies: Themes and Perspectives, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. Search in Google Scholar

Edwards, M., Hulme, D., (1994), NGOs and Development: Performance and Accountability in the “New World Order”, International Workshop on NGOs and Development, University of Manchester. Search in Google Scholar

Hirschman, A.O., (1987), Getting Ahead Collectively: Grassroots Experiences in Latin America, Pergamon Press, New York. Search in Google Scholar

Holland, P.W., (1986), Statistics and Causal Inference, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 81, no. 396, pp. 945–960. Search in Google Scholar

Marshall, M.G., Gurr, T.R., Jaggers, K., (2014), Polity IV Project. Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2013, Center For Systemic Peace, http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/p4manualv2013.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Neyman, J., (1935), Statistical Problems in Agricultural Experimentation, Supplement to the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 107–180. Search in Google Scholar

OECD, (2013), Aid at a Glance. Flows of Official Development Assistance to and through Civil Society Organisations in 2011, OECD Development Co-operation Directorate. Search in Google Scholar

Rosenbaum, P.R., (2002), Observational Studies, Springer, New York. Search in Google Scholar

Rosenbaum, P.R., Rubin, D.B., (1983), The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects, Biometrika, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 41–55. Search in Google Scholar

Rubin, D.B., (1974), Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies, Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 688. Search in Google Scholar

United Nations, (2000), United Nations Millennium Declaration, Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly, A/55/L.2. Search in Google Scholar

United Nations, (2005), 2005 World Summit Outcome, Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly, A/RES/60/1. Search in Google Scholar

United Nations, (2009), Guidance Note of the Secretary-General on Democracy, http://www.un.org/en/globalissues/democracy/pdfs/FINAL%20Guidance%20Note%20on%20Democracy.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Year Book of International Organizations, (2014), Guide to Global Civil Society Networks, 2014–2015. The Union of International Associations. Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2015-9-3
Published in Print: 2015-12-1

©2015 by De Gruyter