Abstract
The United Nations established in 2005 the United Nations Democracy Fund (UNDEF), whose objective is to support projects submitted by national NGOs aimed at increasing government accountability. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of NGOs activity on democracy exploiting the UNDEF database. An empirical analysis based on a propensity score matching (PSM) method is implemented on a sample of 102 developing countries. The findings indicate that the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) is positive and significant only when countries receive UNDEF-funded NGOs projects for three rounds or more. In this case the Polity IV indicator improves by an average of 1.08 points with respect to the level of 2005.
References
Bratton, M., (1989), The Politics of Government-NGO Relations in Africa, World Development, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 569–587.Search in Google Scholar
Burnell, P.J., Calvert, P., (eds.) (2004), Civil Society in Democratization, Frank Cass, London.10.4324/9780203493786Search in Google Scholar
Diamond, L.J., (1994), Toward Democratic Consolidation, Journal of Democracy, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 4–17.Search in Google Scholar
Diamond, L.J., (ed.) (1997), Consolidating the Third Wave Democracies: Themes and Perspectives, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.10.56021/9780801857959Search in Google Scholar
Edwards, M., Hulme, D., (1994), NGOs and Development: Performance and Accountability in the “New World Order”, International Workshop on NGOs and Development, University of Manchester.Search in Google Scholar
Hirschman, A.O., (1987), Getting Ahead Collectively: Grassroots Experiences in Latin America, Pergamon Press, New York.Search in Google Scholar
Holland, P.W., (1986), Statistics and Causal Inference, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 81, no. 396, pp. 945–960.Search in Google Scholar
Marshall, M.G., Gurr, T.R., Jaggers, K., (2014), Polity IV Project. Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2013, Center For Systemic Peace, http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/p4manualv2013.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Neyman, J., (1935), Statistical Problems in Agricultural Experimentation, Supplement to the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 107–180.Search in Google Scholar
OECD, (2013), Aid at a Glance. Flows of Official Development Assistance to and through Civil Society Organisations in 2011, OECD Development Co-operation Directorate.Search in Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, P.R., (2002), Observational Studies, Springer, New York.10.1007/978-1-4757-3692-2Search in Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, P.R., Rubin, D.B., (1983), The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects, Biometrika, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 41–55.Search in Google Scholar
Rubin, D.B., (1974), Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies, Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 688.Search in Google Scholar
United Nations, (2000), United Nations Millennium Declaration, Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly, A/55/L.2.Search in Google Scholar
United Nations, (2005), 2005 World Summit Outcome, Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly, A/RES/60/1.Search in Google Scholar
United Nations, (2009), Guidance Note of the Secretary-General on Democracy, http://www.un.org/en/globalissues/democracy/pdfs/FINAL%20Guidance%20Note%20on%20Democracy.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Year Book of International Organizations, (2014), Guide to Global Civil Society Networks, 2014–2015. The Union of International Associations.Search in Google Scholar
©2015 by De Gruyter