Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter (A) March 28, 2019

Te veniente die, te decedente canebat: il τόπος del mattino e della sera tra neoterismo e poesia augustea

  • Paola Gagliardi EMAIL logo
From the journal Philologus


The reference to the rising and setting of the sun to indicate the unceasing duration of an action becomes a τόπος in Latin poetry from an influential distich of Cinna onwards, which was reworked a number of times in Augustan poetry. As well as Vergil and Horace, who adapt the model to different genres and occasions, the treatment of it by the elegists is interesting, in whom the two terms that define East and West are set in relation to the eternity of poetic renown. This transformation may go back to Gallus, to whom Ovid, above all, makes significant references. The numerous occurrences of the τόπος in different authors and genres make possible interesting comparisons.


A. S. Hollis, Fragments of Roman Poetry, c. 60 BC–AD 20, Oxford/New York 2007.Search in Google Scholar

Ciris, A Poem Attributed to Vergil, ed. R. O. A. M. Lyne, Cambridge ²2004.Search in Google Scholar

P. Ovidii Nasonis Epistularum ex Ponto liber II, a cura di Luigi Galasso, Firenze 1995. Search in Google Scholar

Ovidio, Tristia. Introduzione di D. Giordano, traduzione di R. Mazzanti, note e commenti di M. Bonvicini, Milano 42013.Search in Google Scholar

Properzio, Elegie. Libro II. Introduzione, testo e commento di Paolo Fedeli, Cambridge 2005. Search in Google Scholar

Virgil, Georgics, volume 2, books III–IV, edited by R. F. Thomas, Cambridge 1988.Search in Google Scholar

T. Baier, “Episches Erzählen in Vergils Georgica”, RhM 150, 2007, 314–336.Search in Google Scholar

A. Barchiesi, recensione a G. D’Anna, Virgilio. Saggi critici, RFIC 118, 1990, 470–472.Search in Google Scholar

H. Bardon, “L’aurore et le crépuscule”, REL 24, 1946, 82–115.Search in Google Scholar

J. P. Boucher, Caius Cornélius Gallus, Paris 1966.Search in Google Scholar

G. Brugnoli, “Corneli Galli Fragm.”, MCr 18, 1983, 233–236.10.1524/hzhz.1983.236.jg.233Search in Google Scholar

F. Cairns, Sextus Propertius. The Augustan Elegist, Cambridge 2006.Search in Google Scholar

W. V. Clausen, “Callimachus and Latin Poetry”, GRBS 5, 1964, 181–196.Search in Google Scholar

N. B. Crowther, “Parthenius and Roman Poetry”, Mnemosyne 29, 1976, 65–71.10.1163/156852576X00069Search in Google Scholar

N. B. Crowther, “Cornelius Gallus, His Importance in the Development of Roman Poetry”, ANRW II 30, 3, 1983, 1622–1648.10.1515/9783110847048-003Search in Google Scholar

H. Dahlmann, “Über Helvius Cinna”, AAM 8, 1977, 1–50. Search in Google Scholar

G. D’Anna, Virgilio. Saggi critici, Roma 1989.Search in Google Scholar

P. Domenicucci, “L’elegia di Orfeo nel IV libro delle Georgiche”, GIF 16, 1985, 239–248.Search in Google Scholar

I. M. L. M. Du Quesnay, “From Polyphemus to Corydon: Virgil, Eclogue 2 and the Idylls of Theocritus”, in: D. West/T. Woodman (edd.), Creative imitation and Latin literature, Cambridge 1979, 35–70.10.1017/CBO9780511659171.004Search in Google Scholar

I. Fielding, Transformations of Ovid in Late Antiquity, Cambridge 2017.10.1017/9781316823576Search in Google Scholar

C. Francese, Parthenius of Nicaea and Roman Poetry, Frankfurt a. M. 2001.Search in Google Scholar

P. Gagliardi, “Il processo di Gallo tra antichi e moderni”, RhM 154, 2011, 343–374.Search in Google Scholar

P. Gagliardi, Commento alla decima ecloga di Virgilio (Spudasmata 161), Hildesheim/Zürich/New York 2014. (= 2014a)Search in Google Scholar

P. Gagliardi, “Le Muse Pieridi in Virgilio e in Properzio (e forse in Gallo)”, Hermes 142, 2014, 102–128. (= 2014b)10.25162/hermes-2014-0007Search in Google Scholar

P. Gagliardi, “Il caso di Cornelio Gallo: una sfida per la propaganda augustea”, Klio 97, 2015, 625–647.10.1515/klio-2015-0039Search in Google Scholar

J. Griffin, “The Fourth Georgic, Virgil and Rome”, G&R 26, 1979, 61–80.10.1017/S0017383500026711Search in Google Scholar

H. Jacobson, “Aristaeus, Orpheus and the laudes Galli”, AJPh 105, 1984, 271–300.10.2307/294992Search in Google Scholar

J. L. Lightfoot, Parthenius of Nicaea, Oxford 1999.Search in Google Scholar

G. E. Manzoni, Foroiuliensis poeta. Vita e poesia di Cornelio Gallo, Milano 1995.Search in Google Scholar

J. C. McKeown, Ovid, Amores. Text, Prolegomena and Commentary in four volumes. Volume II, A Commentary on Book One, Leeds 1989. Search in Google Scholar

A. M. Morelli, “Rassegna sul nuovo Gallo”, in: V. Tandoi (ed.), Disiecti membra poetae. Studi di poesia latina in frammenti, vol. II, Foggia 1985, 140–183. Search in Google Scholar

R. G. M. Nisbet/M. Hubbard, A Commentary on Horace, Odes, Book II, Oxford 22004.10.1093/actrade/ in Google Scholar

L. Nicastri, Cornelio Gallo e l’elegia ellenistico-romana, Napoli 1984.Search in Google Scholar

L. Nosarti, Studi sulle Georgiche di Virgilio, Padova 1996.Search in Google Scholar

B. Otis, Virgil. A Study in Civilized Poetry, Oxford 1964.Search in Google Scholar

E. Paratore, “L’episodio di Orfeo”, in: Atti del convegno virgiliano sul bimillenario delle Georgiche, Napoli 1977, 9–18.Search in Google Scholar

F. Rohr Vio, “Non fuit obprobrio celebrasse Lycorida Gallo”, Sileno 20, 1994, 305–316.Search in Google Scholar

F. Rohr Vio, Le voci del dissenso, Padova 2000.Search in Google Scholar

D. O. Ross, Backgrounds to Augustan Poetry: Gallus, Elegy and Rome, Cambridge 1975. Search in Google Scholar

A. Salvatore, “Lettura del quarto libro delle Georgiche”, in: M. Gigante (ed.), Lecturae Vergilianae, vol. II, Napoli 1982, 123–157.Search in Google Scholar

A. Schott, Observationes humanae, Frankfurt a. M., II, 1615.Search in Google Scholar

G. Schultze, Euphorionea, Diss. Argentorati, 1888. Search in Google Scholar

A. Setaioli, Si tantus amor..., Bologna 1998.Search in Google Scholar

T. Stickler, Gallus amore peribat? Cornelius Gallus und die Anfänge der augusteischen Herrschaft in Ägypten, Rahden/Westf. 2002.Search in Google Scholar

W. Stroh, Die römische Liebeselegie als Werbende Dichtung, Amsterdam 1971.Search in Google Scholar

W. Stroh, “Tröstende Musen. Zur literarhistorischen Stellung und Bedeutung von Ovids Exilgedichten”, ANRW II 31, 4, Berlin/New York 1981, 2638–2684.10.1515/9783110863666-010Search in Google Scholar

R. Syme, History in Ovid, Oxford 1978.Search in Google Scholar

A. Traina, Poeti latini (e neolatini), note e saggi filologici 5, Bologna 1998.Search in Google Scholar

J. Wills, Repetition in Latin poetry. Figures of Allusion, Oxford 1996. Search in Google Scholar

T. P. Wiseman, Cinna the Poet and Other Roman Essays, Leicester 1974.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-03-28
Published in Print: 2019-05-29

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 23.3.2023 from
Scroll Up Arrow