Phonetica was published by Karger Publishers up to and including 2020. If you or your institution subscribed to Phonetica during that period, you might still have access to the full text of this article on the Karger platform if you cannot access it here.
Showing a limited preview of this publication:Reviewed Publication:
Caroline Féry. Intonation and Prosodic Structure ( Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2017 ). ISBN 9781107400382 (paperback).
Funding source: Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Award Identifier / Grant number: 2020kfyXJJS106
Research funding: This work is supported by ‘the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities’ (grant number 2020kfyXJJS106), awarded to Mengzhu Yan, Huazhong University of Science and Technology.
Competing interests: The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.
References
Bänziger, Tanja & Klaus R. Scherer. 2005. The role of intonation in emotional expressions. Speech Communication 46(3–4), 252–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2005.02.016.Search in Google Scholar
Clifton, Charles & Lyn Frazier. 2016. Focus in corrective exchanges: Effects of pitch accent and syntactic form. Language and Speech 59(4), 544–561. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830915623578.Search in Google Scholar
Cole, Jennifer. 2015. Prosody in context: A review. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 30(1–2), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2014.963130.Search in Google Scholar
Fodor, Janet D. 1998. Learning to parse? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 27(2), 285–319. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023258301588.10.1023/A:1023258301588Search in Google Scholar
Foltz, Anouschka. 2020. Using prosody to predict upcoming referents in the L1 and the L2: The role of recent exposure. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263120000509.Search in Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah. 2010. The implicit prosody hypothesis and overt prosody in English. Language and Cognitive Processes 25(7–9), 1201–1233. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.503658.Search in Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert. 2008. Intonational phonology, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University.10.1017/CBO9780511808814Search in Google Scholar
Mitchell, Rachel L. C. & Elliot D. Ross. 2013. Attitudinal prosody: What we know and directions for future study. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 37(3), 471–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.01.027.Search in Google Scholar
Neitsch, Jana & Oliver Niebuhr. 2020. Are Germans better haters than Danes? Language-specific implicit prosodies of types of hate speech and how they relate to perceived severity and societal rules. In Proceedings of the 16th edition of the annual conference of the international speech communication association. Shanghai, China: International Speech Communication Association.10.21437/Interspeech.2020-1611Search in Google Scholar
Niebuhr, Oliver & Alexis Michaud. 2015. Speech data acquisition: The underestimated challenge. Kalipho 3, 1–42.Search in Google Scholar
Niebuhr, Oliver, Henning Reetz, Jonathan Barnes, & Alan C. L. Yi. 2020. Fundamental aspects in the perception of f0. In Carlos Gussenhoven & Aoju Chen (eds.), The Oxford handbook of language prosody, 29–42. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198832232.013.3Search in Google Scholar
Scherer, Klaus R. 2003. Vocal communication of emotion: A review of research paradigms. Speech Communication 40(1–2), 227–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6393(02)00084-5.Search in Google Scholar
Sudhoff, Stefan, Denisa Lenertova, Roland Meyer, Sandra Pappert, Petra Augurzky, Ina Mleinek, Nicole Richter, & Johannes Schließer. 2006. Methods in empirical prosody research. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110914641Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
