Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access January 18, 2019

Ethics and inscription in social robot design. A visual ethnography

Jamie Wallace EMAIL logo

Abstract

In this paper, by turning to examples of visual inscriptions adopted within HRI research, and more specifically social robotic interaction, I wish to explore through visual ethnography some of the challenges faced in designing ethical robots. Firstly, visual ethnography allows for an alternative categorisation of the inscriptions of HRI based on visual characteristics. Secondly, visual inscriptions show multiple and paradoxical meanings when appearing juxtaposed revealing challenges of diminished and asymmetric consideration of human orientated concerns in favour of technical and experimental certainty. Thirdly, by taking a human orientated perspective of experimental arrangements, the understanding of ethics becomes a way of framing and of looking at inscriptions. The paper calls for a better understanding of the role of inscription practices in HRI generally in order to find new approaches useful to bolster a more robust inclusion of ethics within the field.

References

[1] J. van den Hoven, P. E. Vermaas, I. van de Poel, Design for values: An introduction, In: J. van den Hoven, P. E. Vermaas, I. van de Poel (Eds.), Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design, Springer, Dordrecht, 2015, 1-710.1007/978-94-007-6970-0_40Search in Google Scholar

[2] J. Davis, L. P. Nathan, Value sensitive design: applications, adaptations, and critiques, In: J. van den Hoven, P. E. Vermaas, I. van de Poel (Eds.), Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design, Springer, Dordrecht, 2015, 11-4010.1007/978-94-007-6970-0_3Search in Google Scholar

[3] M. M. Bakhtin, Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, University of Texas Press, Austin, 2010Search in Google Scholar

[4] K. Knorr Cetina, Sociality with objects: Social relations in postsocial knowledge societies, Theory, Culture and Society, 1997, 14(4), 1-4310.1177/026327697014004001Search in Google Scholar

[5] K. Knorr Cetina, Objectual practice, In: T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, E. von Savigny (Eds.), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, Routledge, London, 2001, 175-188Search in Google Scholar

[6] R.Wiles, A. Clark, J. Prosser, Visual research ethics at the crossroads, In: E. Margolis, L. Pauwels (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods, SAGE Publications, London, 2011, 68510.4135/9781446268278.n36Search in Google Scholar

[7] S. Frennert, B. Östlund, Review: Seven matters of concern of social robots and older people, International Journal of Social Robotics, 2014, 6(2), 299-31010.1007/s12369-013-0225-8Search in Google Scholar

[8] G. Herrmann, M. Pearson, A. Lenz, P. Bremner, A. Spiers, U. Leonards (Eds.), Social Robotics, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Social Robotics (ICSR 2013), Bristol, UK, October 27-29, 2013, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 8239, Springer, Cham, 201310.1007/978-3-319-02675-6Search in Google Scholar

[9] M. Beetz, B. Johnston, M.-A. Williams (Eds.), Social Robotics, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Social Robotics (ICSR 2014), Sydney, NSW, Australia, October 27- 29, 2014, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 8755, Springer, Cham, 201410.1007/978-3-319-11973-1Search in Google Scholar

[10] A. Tapus, E. André, J. C. Martin, F. Ferland, M. Ammi (Eds.), Social Robotics, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Social Robotics (ICSR 2015), Paris, France, October 26-30, 2015, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 9388, Springer, Cham, 201510.1007/978-3-319-25554-5Search in Google Scholar

[11] A. Agah, J. J. Cabibihan, A. M. Howard, M. A. Salichs, H. He (Eds.), Social Robotics, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Robotics (ICSR 2016), Kansas City, MO, USA, November 1-3, 2016, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 9979, Springer, Cham, 201610.1007/978-3-319-47437-3Search in Google Scholar

[12] G. Goldschmidt, The dialectics of sketching, Creativity Research Journal, 1991, 4(2), 123-14310.1080/10400419109534381Search in Google Scholar

[13] G. Goldschmidt, On visual design thinking: the vis kids of architecture, Design Studies, 1994, 15(2), 158-17410.1016/0142-694X(94)90022-1Search in Google Scholar

[14] D. A. Schön, G. Wiggins, Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing, Design Studies, 1992, 13(2), 135-15610.1016/0142-694X(92)90268-FSearch in Google Scholar

[15] M. Suwa, J. Gero, T. Purcell, Unexpected discoveries and Sinvention of design requirements: important vehicles for a design process, Design Studies, 2000, 21(6), 539-56710.1016/S0142-694X(99)00034-4Search in Google Scholar

[16] A. Ioannou, I. Kartapanis, P. Zaphiris, Social robots as cotherapists in autism therapy sessions: a single-case study, In: A. Tapus, E. André, J. C. Martin, F. Ferland, M. Ammi (Eds.), Social Robotics, ICSR 2015, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9388, Springer, Cham, 2015, 255-26310.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_26Search in Google Scholar

[17] M. Lewis, E. Oleari, C. Pozzi, L. Cañamero, An embodied AI approach to individual differences: supporting self-efficacy in diabetic children with an autonomous robot, In: A. Tapus, E. André, J. C. Martin, F. Ferland, M. Ammi (Eds.), Social Robotics, ICSR 2015, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9388, Springer, Cham, 2015, 401-41010.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_40Search in Google Scholar

[18] Y. M. Foong, X. Liu, S. S. Ge, J. Guo, Mechanical design of Christine, the social robot for the service industry, In: A. Agah, J. J. Cabibihan, A. M. Howard, M. A. Salichs, H. He (Eds.), Social Robotics, ICSR 2016, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9979, Springer, Cham, 2016, 819-82810.1007/978-3-319-47437-3_80Search in Google Scholar

[19] J. R. Orejana, B. A. MacDonald, H. S. Ahn, K. Peri, E. Broadbent, Healthcare robots in homes of rural older adults, In: A. Tapus, E. André, J. C. Martin, F. Ferland, M. Ammi (Eds.), Social Robotics, ICSR 2015, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9388, Springer, Cham, 2015, 512-52110.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_51Search in Google Scholar

[20] V. Gonzalez-Pacheco, M. Malfaz, J. C. Castillo, A. Castro- Gonzalez, F. Alonso-Martín, M. A. Salichs, How much should a robot trust the user feedback? Analyzing the impact of verbal answers in active learning, In: A. Agah, J. J. Cabibihan, A. M. Howard, M. A. Salichs, H. He (Eds.), Social Robotics, ICSR 2016, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9979, Springer, Cham, 2016, 190-19910.1007/978-3-319-47437-3_19Search in Google Scholar

[21] A. Meghdari, M. Alemi, A. G. Pour, A. Taheri, Spontaneous human-robot emotional interaction through facial expressions, In: A. Agah, J. J. Cabibihan, A. M. Howard, M. A. Salichs, H. He (Eds.), Social Robotics, ICSR 2016, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9979, Springer, Cham, 2016, 351-36110.1007/978-3-319-47437-3_34Search in Google Scholar

[22] D. Cazzato, P. L. Mazzeo, P. Spagnolo, C. Distante, Automatic joint attention detection during interaction with a humanoid robot, In: A. Tapus, E. André, J. C. Martin, F. Ferland, M. Ammi (Eds.), Social Robotics, ICSR 2015, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9388, Springer, Cham, 2015, 124-13410.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_13Search in Google Scholar

[23] V. H. Andaluz, D. Pérez, D. Sáchez, C. Bucay, C. Sáchez, V. Morales, D. Rivas, Nonlinear controller of arachnid mechanism based on Theo Jansen, In: A. Agah, J. J. Cabibihan, A. M. Howard, M. A. Salichs, H. He (Eds.), Social Robotics, ICSR 2016, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9979, Springer, Cham, 2016, 328-33910.1007/978-3-319-47437-3_32Search in Google Scholar

[24] L. Markauskaite, P. Goodyear, Epistemic Fluency and Professional Education: Innovation, Knowledgeable Action and Actionable Knowledge, Springer, Dordrecht, 201710.1007/978-94-007-4369-4Search in Google Scholar

[25] L. Verschaffel, E. de Corte, T. de Jong, J. Elen (Eds.), Use of Representations in Reasoning and Problem Solving Analysis and Improvement, Routledge, London, 201010.4324/9780203847824Search in Google Scholar

[26] S. Pink, Digital visual anthropology: Potentials and challenges, In: A. I. Alfonso, L. Kurti, S. Pink (Eds.), Working Images: Visual Research and Representation in Ethnography, Routledge, New York, 2004, 1Search in Google Scholar

[27] K. Henderson, The visual culture of engineers, In: S. L. Star (Ed.), The Cultures of Computing, Blackwell, Cambridge, 1995Search in Google Scholar

[28] K. Henderson, On Line, on Paper: Visual Representations, Visual Culture, andComputer Graphics in Design Engineering, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1999Search in Google Scholar

[29] L. L. Bucciarelli, Designing Engineers, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1994Search in Google Scholar

[30] S. E. Newman, Here, there, and nowhere at all: Distribution, negotiation, and virtuality in postmodern ethnography and engineering, Knowledge and Society, 1998, 11, 235-267Search in Google Scholar

[31] J. Hindmarsh, C. Heath, Sharing the tools of the trade: The interactional constitution of workplace objects, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 2000, 29(5), 523-56210.1177/089124100129023990Search in Google Scholar

[32] J. Wallace, Different matters of invention: design work as the transformation of dissimilar design artefacts, PhD dissertation, Aarhus University, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2010Search in Google Scholar

[33] J. K. Whyte, B. Ewenstein, M. Hales, J. Tidd, Visual practices and the objects used in design. Build. Res. Inf., 2007, 35(1), 1810.1080/09613210601036697Search in Google Scholar

[34] S. Pink, D. Tutt, A. Dainty, A. Gibb, Ethnographic methodologies for construction research: knowing, practice and interventions, Building Research and Information, 2010, 38(6), 647-65910.1080/09613218.2010.512193Search in Google Scholar

[35] J. Elkins, The Domain of Images, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 200110.7591/9781501723902Search in Google Scholar

[36] W. M. Roth, M. K. McGinn, Inscriptions: Toward a theory of representing as social practice, Review of Educational Research, 1998, 68(1), 35-5910.3102/00346543068001035Search in Google Scholar

[37] H. U. Gumbrecht, Perception versus sciences: Moving pictures and their resistance to interpretation, In: T. Lenoir (Ed.), Inscribing Science: Scientific Texts and the Materiality of Communication, Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1998, 351-364Search in Google Scholar

[38] H. A. Horst, D. Miller (Eds.), Digital Anthropology, A&C Black, London, 2013Search in Google Scholar

[39] D. Warr, M. Guillemin, S. Cox, J. Waycott, Ethics and Visual Research Methods - Theory, Methodology, and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan US, Basingstoke, 201610.1057/978-1-137-54305-9Search in Google Scholar

[40] J. G. Greeno, R. P. Hall, Practicing representation: Learning with and about representational forms, Phi Delta Kappan, 1997, 78(5), 361-367Search in Google Scholar

[41] J. R. Orejana, B. A. MacDonald, H. S. Ahn, K. Peri, E. Broadbent, Healthcare robots in homes of rural older adults, In: A. Tapus, E. André, J. C. Martin, F. Ferland, M. Ammi (Eds.), Social Robotics, ICSR 2015, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9388, Springer, Cham, 2015, 512-52110.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_51Search in Google Scholar

[42] P. Alves-Oliveira, T. Ribeiro, S. Petisca, E. Di Tullio, F. S. Melo, A. Paiva, An empathic robotic tutor for school classrooms: considering expectation and satisfaction of children as end-users, In: A. Tapus, E. André, J.-C. Martin, F. Ferland, M. Ammi (Eds.), Social Robotics, ICSR 2015, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9388, Springer, Cham, 2016, 21-3010.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_3Search in Google Scholar

[43] H. Cheng, Z. Liu, L. Yang, X. Chen, Sparse representation and learning in visual recognition: Theory and applications, Signal Processing, 2013, 93(6), 1408-142510.1016/j.sigpro.2012.09.011Search in Google Scholar

[44] R. Coover, Interactive media representation, In: E. Margolis, L. Pauwels (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods, SAGE Publications, London, 2011, 619-63810.4135/9781446268278.n32Search in Google Scholar

[45] J. Drucker, Graphesis: Visual Forms of Knowledge Production, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 2014Search in Google Scholar

[46] R. Barthes, The third meaning, In: S. Manghani, A. Piper, J. Simons (Eds.), Images: A Reader, SAGE Publications, London, 2006, 109Search in Google Scholar

[47] J. Berger, J. Mohr, Another Way of Telling, Pantheon, New York, 1982Search in Google Scholar

[48] C. Goodwin, Professional vision, American Anthropologist, 1994, 96(3), 606-63310.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100Search in Google Scholar

[49] B. Latour, Drawing things together, In: M. Lynch, S. Woolgar (Eds.), Representation in Scientific Practice, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1990, 19-68Search in Google Scholar

[50] B. Latour, S. Woolgar, Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts., SAGE Publications, Beverly Hills, 1979Search in Google Scholar

[51] A. Sharkey, N. Sharkey, Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly, Ethics and Information Technology, 2012, 14(1), 27-4010.1007/s10676-010-9234-6Search in Google Scholar

[52] J. Welge, M. Hassenzahl, Better than human: about the psychological superpowers of robots, In: A. Agah, J. J. Cabibihan, A. M. Howard, M. A. Salichs, H. He (Eds.), Social Robotics, ICSR 2016, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9979, Springer, Cham 2016, 993-100210.1007/978-3-319-47437-3_97Search in Google Scholar

[53] M. Banks, D. Zeitlyn, Visual Methods in Social Research, SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, 201510.4135/9781473921702Search in Google Scholar

[54] G. Rose, Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials, SAGE Publications, London, 2016Search in Google Scholar

[55] K. Hentschel, Visual Cultures in Science and Technology: A Comparative History, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 201410.1093/acprof:oso/9780198717874.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[56] J. J. Larkin, H. A. Simon, Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words, Cognitive Science, 1987, 11, 65-6910.1111/j.1551-6708.1987.tb00863.xSearch in Google Scholar

[57] S. Pink, Digital visual anthropology: Potentials and challenges, In: M. Banks, J. Ruby (Eds.), Made to be Seen: Perspectives on the History of Visual Anthropology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2011, 209-233Search in Google Scholar

[58] P. Atkinson, M. Hammersley, Ethnography and participant observation, In: N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, SAGE Publications, ThousandOaks, 1994, 248-261Search in Google Scholar

[59] C. Denton, Examining documentary photography using the creative method, In: K. L. Smith, S. Moriarty, K. Kenney, G. Barbatsis (Eds.), Handbook of Visual Communication: Theory, Methods, and Media, Routledge, London, 2005, 405-428Search in Google Scholar

[60] S. Jasanoff, S. H. Kim (Eds.), Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 201510.7208/chicago/9780226276663.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[61] K. Knorr Cetina, Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 199910.4159/9780674039681Search in Google Scholar

[62] H. Rheinberger, Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube, Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1997Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-06-29
Accepted: 2018-10-04
Published Online: 2019-01-18

© 2019 Jamie Wallace, published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License.

Downloaded on 27.11.2022 from frontend.live.degruyter.dgbricks.com/document/doi/10.1515/pjbr-2019-0003/html
Scroll Up Arrow