Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access January 18, 2019

“I’ll take care of you,” said the robot

Reflecting upon the legal and ethical aspects of the use and development of social robots for therapy

Eduard Fosch-Villaronga and Jordi Albo-Canals

Abstract

The insertion of robotic and artificial intelligent (AI) systems in therapeutic settings is accelerating. In this paper, we investigate the legal and ethical challenges of the growing inclusion of social robots in therapy. Typical examples of such systems are Kaspar, Hookie, Pleo, Tito, Robota,Nao, Leka or Keepon. Although recent studies support the adoption of robotic technologies for therapy and education, these technological developments interact socially with children, elderly or disabled, and may raise concerns that range from physical to cognitive safety, including data protection. Research in other fields also suggests that technology has a profound and alerting impact on us and our human nature. This article brings all these findings into the debate on whether the adoption of therapeutic AI and robot technologies are adequate, not only to raise awareness of the possible impacts of this technology but also to help steer the development and use of AI and robot technologies in therapeutic settings in the appropriate direction. Our contribution seeks to provide a thoughtful analysis of some issues concerning the use and development of social robots in therapy, in the hope that this can inform the policy debate and set the scene for further research.

References

[1] J. J. Cabibihan, H. Javed, M. Ang, S.M. Aljunied, Why robots? A survey on the roles and benefits of social robots in the therapy of childrenwith autism, International journal of social robotics, 2013, 5(4), 593-61810.1007/s12369-013-0202-2Search in Google Scholar

[2] B. Scassellati, H. Admoni, M.Matarić, Robots for use in autism research, Annual review of biomedical engineering, 2012, 14, 275-29410.1146/annurev-bioeng-071811-150036Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] M. Salem, G. Lakatos, F. Amirabdollahian, K. Dautenhahn, Towards safe and trustworthy social robots: ethical challenges and practical issues, International Conference on Social Robotics, Springer, Cham, 2015, 584-59310.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_58Search in Google Scholar

[4] E. Palmerini, F. Azzarri, F. Battaglia, A. Bertolini, A. Carnevale, J. Carpaneto, K. Warwick, Guidelines on regulating robotics. Pisa, Italy: Robolaw project, 2014Search in Google Scholar

[5] M. Coeckelbergh, C. Pop, R. Simut, A. Peca, S. Pintea, D. David, B. Vanderborght, A survey of expectations about the role of robots in robot-assisted therapy for children with ASD: Ethical acceptability, trust, sociability, appearance, and attachment, Science and engineering ethics, 2016, 22(1), 47-6510.1007/s11948-015-9649-xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] N. Carr, The shallows: What the Internet is doing to our brains, W. W. Norton and Company, 2011Search in Google Scholar

[7] A. Barco-Martelo, E. Fosch-Villaronga, Child-Robot Interaction Studies: From Lessons Learned to Guidelines, Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Child-Robot Interaction, CRI 2017: Research, Methodology and Best Practices at ACM Human-Robot Interaction Conference, Vienna, 2017Search in Google Scholar

[8] Cfr.: www.autismeurope.org/files/files/charter-for-personswith-autism.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

[9] B. M. Prizant, E. Rubin, Contemporary issues in interventions for autism spectrum disorders: A commentary, Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 1999, 24(3), 199-20810.2511/rpsd.24.3.199Search in Google Scholar

[10] F. Michaud, T. Salter, A. Duquette, J. F. Laplante, Perspectives on mobile robots as tools for child development and pediatric rehabilitation, Assistive Technology, 2007, 19(1), 21-3610.1080/10400435.2007.10131863Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] B. Robins, K. Dautenhahn, R. Te Boekhorst, A. Billard, Robotic assistants in therapy and education of children with autism: can a small humanoid robot help encourage social interaction skills?, Universal Access in the Information Society, 2005, 4(2), 105-12010.1007/s10209-005-0116-3Search in Google Scholar

[12] B. Caci, A. D’amico, M. Cardaci, New frontiers for psychology and education: Robotics, Psychological Reports, 2004, 94(3suppl), 1372-137410.2466/pr0.94.3c.1372-1374Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] K. Dautenhahn, Design issues on interactive environments for children with autism, In: Procs of ICDVRAT 2000, the 3rd Int Conf on Disability, Virtual Reality and Associated Technologies. University of Reading, 2000Search in Google Scholar

[14] C.R. Rogers, Significant learning in therapy and in education, Educational leadership, 1959, 16(4), 232-242Search in Google Scholar

[15] O. Sans-Cope, A. Barco, J. Albo Canals, M. Díaz Boladeras, C. Angulo Bahón, Robotics@ Montserrat: A case of Learning through robotics community in a primary and secondary school, Child-Robot Interaction Workshop at Interaction Design and Children Conference, 2014, 1-5Search in Google Scholar

[16] M. Ylvisaker, L. S. Turkstra, C. Coelho, Behavioral and social interventions for individuals with traumatic brain injury: A summary of the research with clinical implications, In: Seminars in speech and language, 2005, 26(4), 256-26710.1055/s-2005-922104Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] L. L. Andersen, S. P. Magnusson, M. Nielsen, J. Haleem, K. Poulsen, P. Aagaard, Neuromuscular activation in conventional therapeutic exercises and heavy resistance exercises: implications for rehabilitation, Physical therapy, 2006, 86(5), 683-69710.1093/ptj/86.5.683Search in Google Scholar

[18] M. Matarić, A. Tapus, C. Winstein, J. Eriksson, Socially assistive robotics for stroke and mild TBI rehabilitation, Advanced Technologies in Rehabilitation, 2009, 145, 249-262Search in Google Scholar

[19] A. Barco, J. Albo-Canals, M. Kaouk Ng, C. Garriga, L. Callejón, M. Turón, et al., A robotic therapy for children with TBI, In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 2013, 75-7610.1109/HRI.2013.6483508Search in Google Scholar

[20] A. Barco, J. Albo-Canals, C. Garriga-Berga, X. Vilasís-Cardona, L. Callejón, M. Turón, et al., A drop-out rate in a long-term cognitive rehabilitation program through robotics aimed at children with TBI, In: Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2014), 2014, 186-19210.1109/ROMAN.2014.6926251Search in Google Scholar

[21] The American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.978089042559610.1176/appi.books.9780890425596Search in Google Scholar

[22] S. W. White, K. Keonig, L. Scahill, Social skills development in children with autism spectrum disorders: A review of the intervention research, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2007, 37(10), 1858-186810.1007/s10803-006-0320-xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, C. Wylie, (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement, Springer Science and Business Media, 201210.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7Search in Google Scholar

[24] K. Dautenhahn, I. Werry, Towards interactive robots in autism therapy: Background, motivation and challenges, Pragmatics and Cognition, 2004, 12(1), 1-35.10.1075/pc.12.1.03dauSearch in Google Scholar

[25] J. Wainer, E. Ferrari, K. Dautenhahn, B. Robins, The effectiveness of using a robotics class to foster collaboration among groups of children with autism in an exploratory study, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 2010, 14(5), 445-45510.1007/s00779-009-0266-zSearch in Google Scholar

[26] J. Albo-Canals, M. Heerink, M. Diaz, V. Padillo, M. Maristany, A. Barco, et al., Comparing two LEGO Robotics-based interventions for social skills training with children with ASD, Proceedings of the 22nd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2013), 2013, 638-64310.1109/ROMAN.2013.6628420Search in Google Scholar

[27] M. Heerink, M. Díaz, J. Albo-Canals, C. Angulo, A. Barco, J. Casacuberta, C. Garriga, A field study with primary school children on perception of social presence and interactive behavior with a pet robot, In: Proceedings of the 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2012), 2012, 1045-105010.1109/ROMAN.2012.6343887Search in Google Scholar

[28] B. Finio, A. Riccio, M. Rogers, L. Brodsky, E. Milto, A. Barco, et al., An exploratory study in using LEGO robotics curriculumfor middle school studentswith autism spectrumdisorders (ASD) to teach social skills, Autism Consortium Research Symposium, Boston, MA, 2012Search in Google Scholar

[29] E. Valenzuela, A. Barco, J. Albo-Canals, Learning social skills through LEGO-based social robots for children with autism spectrumdisorder at CASPAN center in Panama, In: Conference Proceedings of New Friends, 2015, https://mheerink.home.xs4all.nl/pdf/ProceedingsNF2015-3.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

[30] M. Heerink, M. Jong (Eds.), Conference Proceedings, New Friends 2015, The 1st International Conference on Social Robots in Therapy and Education, 2015, https://mheerink.home.xs4all.nl/pdf/ProceedingsNF2015-3.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

[31] M. Díaz, A. Barco, J. Casacuberta, J. Albo-Canals, C. Angulo, C. Garriga, Robot assisted play with a mobile robot in a training group of children with autism, In: Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems IROS, Vilamoura, Portugal, 2012Search in Google Scholar

[32] Cfr.: roboautism.k12engineering.comSearch in Google Scholar

[33] E. Fosch-Villaronga, C. Millard, Cloud Robotics Law and Regulation, Challenges in the Governance of Complex and Dynamic Cyber-Physical Ecosystems, SSRN, forthcoming, 201810.1016/j.robot.2019.06.003Search in Google Scholar

[34] E. Ferrari, B. Robins, K. Dautenhahn, Therapeutic and educational objectives in robot assisted play for children with autism. Proceedings of the 18th Int Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 200910.1109/ROMAN.2009.5326251Search in Google Scholar

[35] Roadmap Robotics for Healthcare, The European Foresight Monitoring Network, 2011Search in Google Scholar

[36] E. Libin, Robotherapy: Definition, Assessment and Case Study, In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia, Creative Digital Culture, 2002, 906-915Search in Google Scholar

[37] R. L. Griffin, Changing the Culture for Dementia Care - The Path to a Better Quality of Life for People with Alzheimer’s Disease, PESI HealthCare - PHC Publishing Group, 2012Search in Google Scholar

[38] R. Leenes, E. Palmerini, B. J. Koops, A. Bertolini, P. Salvini, F. Lucivero, Regulatory challenges of robotics: some guidelines for addressing legal and ethical issues. Law, Innovation and Technology, 2017, 9(1), 1-4410.1080/17579961.2017.1304921Search in Google Scholar

[39] E. Fosch Villaronga, M. A. Heldeweg, “Regulation, I presume?” said the robot - Towards an iterative regulatory process for robot governance, Computer Law and Security Review, 2018, 34(6), 1258-127710.1016/j.clsr.2018.09.001Search in Google Scholar

[40] J. Albo-Canals, Toy robot vs. medical device, Presentation at the 1st International Conference on Social Robots in Therapy and Education (NEW FRIENDS 2015), 2015, https://legalrobotics.files.wordpress.com/2015/11/10-workshop-nf2015-jalbo.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

[41] C. Alvaro-Rodero, M. Garcia-Fernandez, Pet robots assisted therapy: Proposal for a new standardized nursing intervention, In: Conference Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference NewFriends on social robots in therapy and education, 2016Search in Google Scholar

[42] A. Steinfeld, T. Fong, D. Kaber, M. Lewis, J. Scholtz, A. Schultz, M. Goodrich, Common metrics for human-robot interaction, In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI’06), 2006, 33-4010.1145/1121241.1121249Search in Google Scholar

[43] E. Fosch-Villaronga, J. Albo-Canals, Robotic Therapies: Notes on Governance. Workshop on Social Robots in Therapy: Focusing on Autonomy and Ethical Challenges, 2018, HRI 2018, Chicago, U.S.Search in Google Scholar

[44] R. Calo, Robotics and the Lessons of Cyberlaw, California Law Review, 2015, 103(3), 101-148Search in Google Scholar

[45] “Safe,” Oxford Dictionary, last accessed July 14, 2018, Cfr.: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/safeSearch in Google Scholar

[46] “Building a European Data Economy,” COM(2017) 9 final, last modified January 10, 2017, p. 4Search in Google Scholar

[47] G. N. La Diega, I. Walden, Contracting for the ‘Internet of Things’: Looking into the Nest. European Journal of Law and Technology, 2016, 7(2)Search in Google Scholar

[48] L. Mabry, The Rhetoric of Social Robots: How Consumerism is Shaping Perceptions of Robotic Ontology, 2016,Master Thesis, University of Washington.Search in Google Scholar

[49] B. Matthias, S. Kock, H. Jerregard, M. Källman, I. Lundberg, R. Mellander, Safety of collaborative industrial robots: Certification possibilities for a collaborative assembly robot concept, 2011 IEEE International Symposiumon Assembly andManufacturing (ISAM), 2011, 1-610.1109/ISAM.2011.5942307Search in Google Scholar

[50] ISO 13482:2014 Safety requirements for personal care robots.Search in Google Scholar

[51] E. Fosch-Villaronga, G. S. Virk, Legal issues for mobile servant robots, International Conference on Robotics in Alpe- Adria Danube Region, 2016, 605-61210.1007/978-3-319-49058-8_66Search in Google Scholar

[52] A. Rodić, T. Borangiu, Advances in Robot Design and Intelligent Control: Proceedings of the 25th Conference on Robotics in Alpe-Adria-Danube Region (RAAD16), 2016, 540, Springer10.1007/978-3-319-49058-8Search in Google Scholar

[53] P. Simmonds, N. Brown, M. Rentel, M. Evaluation of Directive 2006/42/EC on Machinery, Final Report, Technopolis Group, 2017Search in Google Scholar

[54] H. Robinson, B. MacDonald, E. Broadbent, The role of healthcare robots for older people at home: A review, International Journal of Social Robotics, 2014, 6(4), 575-59110.1007/s12369-014-0242-2Search in Google Scholar

[55] M.J. Matarić, Socially assistive robotics: Human augmentation versus automation. Science Robotics, 2017, 2(4), eaam5410.10.1126/scirobotics.aam5410Search in Google Scholar

[56] T. Fong, I. Nourbakhsh, K. Dautenhahn, A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and autonomous systems, 2003, 42(3-4), 143-16610.1016/S0921-8890(02)00372-XSearch in Google Scholar

[57] D. Feil-Seifer, M. J.Mataric, Defining socially assistive robotics, ICORR 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005, 465-468Search in Google Scholar

[58] Google Patent US 8996429B1 Methods and systems for robot personality developmentSearch in Google Scholar

[59] M. Scheutz, The inherent dangers of unidirectional emotional bonds between humans and social robots, Robot ethics: The ethical and social implications of robotics, 2011, 205Search in Google Scholar

[60] P. Lin, K. Abney, G. Bekey (Eds.), Robot ethics: The ethical and social implications of robotics, The MIT Press, 2014, 205-222Search in Google Scholar

[61] V. Konok, B. Korcsok, Á. Miklósi, M. Gácsi, Should we love robots?-The most liked qualities of companion dogs and how they can be implemented in social robots,Computers in Human Behavior, 2018, 80, 132-14210.1016/j.chb.2017.11.002Search in Google Scholar

[62] European Parliament Resolution 2017 op. Cit.Search in Google Scholar

[63] C. Bartneck, D. Kulić, E. Croft, S. Zoghbi, Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots, International journal of social robotics, 2009, 1(1), 71-8110.1007/s12369-008-0001-3Search in Google Scholar

[64] J. Olivier, Development of Walk Assistive Orthoses for Elderly. Thesis 6947. EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2016Search in Google Scholar

[65] E. Fosch-Villaronga, Artificial Intelligence, Healthcare and the Law. Regulating Personal Care Automation. Routledge, forthcoming, 201910.4324/9780429021930Search in Google Scholar

[66] Ibidem.Search in Google Scholar

[67] E. Fosch-Villaronga, A.Jr. Golia, The Intricate Relationships between Private Standards and Public Policymaking in the Case of Personal Care Robots. Who Cares More?, In: Human-Robot Interaction: Safety, Standardization, and Benchmarking, CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton 2019, forthcoming10.1201/9781315213781-2Search in Google Scholar

[68] P. Barattini, Experiments Comparison and Benchmarking in Social and Emotional Robotics, Taylor and Francis, forthcoming, 2018Search in Google Scholar

[69] C. Kuner, F. H. Cate, C. Millard, D. J. B. Svantesson, O. Lynskey, Risk management in data protection, International Data Privacy Law, 2015, 5(2), 95-9810.1093/idpl/ipv005Search in Google Scholar

[70] Regulation 2016/679 of the European Parliament and the Council on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, 2016Search in Google Scholar

[71] M. Salem, F. Eyssel, K. Rohlfing, S. Kopp, F. Joublin, To err is human (-like): Effects of robot gesture on perceived anthropomorphism and likability. International Journal of Social Robotics, 2013, 5(3), 313-32310.1007/s12369-013-0196-9Search in Google Scholar

[72] J. L. Rault, Pets in the digital age: live, robot, or virtual?, Frontiers in veterinary science, 2015, 2, 1110.3389/fvets.2015.00011Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[73] R. Mead, M. J. Mataric, Robots have needs too: People adapt their proxemic preferences to improve autonomous robot recognition of human social signals, New Frontiers in Human- Robot Interaction, 2015, 100Search in Google Scholar

[74] M. E. Kaminski, M. Rueben,W. D. Smart, C. M. Grimm, Averting Robot Eyes, Maryland Law Review, 2016, 76, 983Search in Google Scholar

[75] “Hello Barbie, Barbie Hello Dreamhouse. Privacy Policy” Toytalk, last modified April 11, 2017, www.toytalk.com/hellobarbie/privacy/Search in Google Scholar

[76] J. Derby, Anthropomorphism in Children’s Literature or" Mom, My Doll’s Talking Again.", Elementary English, 1970, 47(2), 190- 192Search in Google Scholar

[77] M. Weiser, The Computer for the 21st Century, Scientific american, 1991, 265(3), 94-10510.1038/scientificamerican0991-94Search in Google Scholar

[78] K. M. Lee, W. Peng, S. A. Jin, C. Yan, Can robots manifest personality?: An empirical test of personality recognition, social responses, and social presence in human-robot interaction. Journal of communication, 2006, 56(4), 754-77210.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00318.xSearch in Google Scholar

[79] P. Fung, Robots with heart, Scientific American, 2015, 313(5), 60-6310.1038/scientificamerican1115-60Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[80] R. W. Picard, Affective Computing-MIT Media Laboratory Perceptual Computing Section, Technical Report, 1995, 321Search in Google Scholar

[81] E. Fosch-Villaronga, “I love you,” said the robot, Boundaries of the use of emotions in human-robot interaction, 201810.1007/978-3-319-96722-6_6Search in Google Scholar

[82] V. Popovski, Emotions and International Law, Emotions in International Politics: Beyond Mainstream International Relations, 2016, 184-20310.1017/CBO9781316286838.010Search in Google Scholar

[83] S. Karstedt, I. Loader, H. Strang, (Eds.) Emotions, crime and justice. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2011Search in Google Scholar

[84] D. Clifford, Citizen-Consumers in a Personalised Galaxy: Emotion Influenced Decision-Making, a True Path to the Dark Side?, CiTiP Working Paper Series, 201710.2139/ssrn.3037425Search in Google Scholar

[85] H. Ayanoglu, E. Duarte, (Eds.) Emotional Design in Human Robot Interaction: Theory, Methods, and Application, Human- Computer Interaction Series, Springer, 201810.1007/978-3-319-96722-6Search in Google Scholar

[86] S. Turkle, A nascent robotics culture: New complicities for companionship, Online article, 2006, 6, 2007Search in Google Scholar

[87] J. Shukla, J. Cristiano, D. Amela, L. Anguera, J. Vergés-Llahí, D. Puig, A case study of robot interaction among individuals with profound and multiple learning disabilities, International Conference on Social Robotics, Springer, 2015, 613-62210.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_61Search in Google Scholar

[88] S. Petisca, J. Dias, A. Paiva, More social and emotional behaviourmay lead to poorer perceptions of a social robot, International Conference on Social Robotics, Springer, 2015, 522- 53110.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_52Search in Google Scholar

[89] K. Richardson, Challenging Sociality? An Anthropology of robots, autism and attachment. New York, Palgrave-MacMill, 201810.1007/978-3-319-74754-5Search in Google Scholar

[90] Y. H. Weng , S. T. H. Zhao, The legal challenges of networked robotics: From the safety intelligence perspective, International Workshop on AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems, 2011, 61-7210.1007/978-3-642-35731-2_4Search in Google Scholar

[91] W.K. Hon, C. Millard, Cloud Technologies and Services, Cloud Computing Law, 201310.1093/acprof:oso/9780199671670.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[92] W.K. Hon, C. Millard, Control, Security, and Risk in the Cloud. Millard, C. (ed) Cloud Computing Law, 201310.1093/acprof:oso/9780199671670.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[93] V. Strobel, E. Castelló Ferrer, M. Dorigo, Managing Byzantine robots via blockchain technology in a swarm robotics collective decision making scenario, In: AAMAS ’18 Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2018, 541-549Search in Google Scholar

[94] E. C. Ferrer, O. Rudovic, T. Hardjono, A. Pentland, RoboChain: A secure data-sharing framework for human-robot interaction, arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.04480, 2018Search in Google Scholar

[95] S. Razzaki, A. Baker, Y. Perov, K. Middleton, J. Baxter, D. Mullarkey, et al., A comparative study of artificial intelligence and human doctors for the purpose of triage and diagnosis, arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.10698, 2018Search in Google Scholar

[96] F. Cabitza, R. Rasoini, G. F. Gensini, Unintended consequences of machine learning in medicine, Jama, 2017, 318(6), 517-51810.1001/jama.2017.7797Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[97] D. Amodei, C. Olah, J. Steinhardt, P. Christiano, J. Schulman, D. Mané, Concrete problems in AI safety, arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.06565, 2016Search in Google Scholar

[98] Resolution on Civil Law Rules on Robotics European Parliament resolution with recommendations to the EC (2015/2103(INL), 2017Search in Google Scholar

[99] A. Van Wynsberghe, Designing robots for care: Care centered value-sensitive design, Science and engineering ethics, 2013, 19(2), 407-43310.1007/s11948-011-9343-6Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[100] Cfr.: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ProcrustesSearch in Google Scholar

[101] S. de Conca, E. Fosch Villaronga, R. Pierce, A. de Groot, H. Felzmann, S. Robins, A. Ponce Del Castillo, Nothing comes between my robot and me: Privacy and human-robot interaction in robotized healthcare, In: CPDP 2018 Proceedings, 2018 (in press)10.5040/9781509926237.ch-004Search in Google Scholar

[102] R. Leenes, R. van Brakel, S. Gutwirth, P. de Hert, Data Protection and Privacy: The Internet of Bodies, Hart Publishing, forthcoming, 201810.5040/9781509926237Search in Google Scholar

[103] P. P. Verbeek, Toward a theory of technological mediation: A program for postphenomenological research, In: J. K. B. O. Friis, R. P. Crease (Eds.), Technoscience and Postphenomenology: TheManhattan Papers, Postphenomenology and Philosophy of Technology, Lexington Books, 2016Search in Google Scholar

[104] P. P. Verbeek, Cover story: Beyond interaction: a short introduction to mediation theory, Interactions (ACM), 2015, 22(3), 26-3110.1145/2751314Search in Google Scholar

[105] NHS, Personalised medicine, last accessed July 13, 2018, Cfr.: https://www.england.nhs.uk/healthcarescience/personalisedmedicine/Search in Google Scholar

[106] T. P. Caldeira, J. Holston, Democracy and violence in Brazil, Comparative studies in society and history, 1999, 41(4), 691- 72910.1017/S0010417599003102Search in Google Scholar

[107] Z. Bauman, Liquid love: On the frailty of human bonds, John Wiley and Sons, 2013Search in Google Scholar

[108] N. Kardaras, Glow Kids: How Screen Addiction Is Hijacking Our Kids-and How to Break the Trance. St. Martin’s Press, 2016Search in Google Scholar

[109] F. Lin, Y. Zhou, Y. Du, L. Qin, Z. Zhao, J. Xu, H. Lei, Abnormal white matter integrity in adolescents with internet addiction disorder: a tract-based spatial statistics study, PloS ONE, 2012, 7(1), e30253 , DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.003025310.1371/journal.pone.0030253Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[110] S.-B. Hong, A. Zalesky, L. Cocchi, A. Fornito, E. J. Choi, H. H. Kim, et al., Decreased functional brain connectivity in adolescents with internet addiction, PloS ONE, 2013, 8(2), e57831, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.005783110.1371/journal.pone.0057831Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[111] Y. N. Harari, Sapiens: A brief history of humankind. Random House, 2014Search in Google Scholar

[112] A. Vee, Coding literacy: How computer programming is changing writing. MIT Press, 201710.7551/mitpress/10655.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[113] G. Soltana, A Model-Based Framework for Legal Policy Simulation and Legal Compliance Checking, Doctoral Symposium co-located with 18th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (DS@ MODELS 2015). CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 201510.1109/MODELS.2015.7338237Search in Google Scholar

[114] P. Ballon, D. Schuurman, Living Labs: Concepts, Tools and Cases, Info, 2015, 17(4)10.1108/info-04-2015-0024Search in Google Scholar

[115] E. Fosch-Villaronga, Creation of a Care Robot Impact Assessment, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology (WASET) International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2015, 9(6), 1913-1917Search in Google Scholar

[116] D. Wright, P. De Hert, Introduction to privacy impact assessment, Privacy Impact Assessment, 2012, 3-32. Springer, Dordrecht10.1007/978-94-007-2543-0_1Search in Google Scholar

[117] D. Wright, C. D. Raab, Constructing a surveillance impact assessment, Computer Law and Security Review, 2012, 28(6), 613-62610.1016/j.clsr.2012.09.003Search in Google Scholar

[118] G. Z. Yang, J. Bellingham, P. E. Dupont, P. Fischer, L. Floridi, R. Full, et al., The grand challenges of Science Robotics, Science Robotics, 2018, 3(14), eaar765010.1126/scirobotics.aar7650Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[119] Y. H.Weng, Y. Sugahara, K. Hashimoto, A. Takanishi, Intersection of “Tokku” special zone, robots, and the law: a case study on legal impacts to humanoid robots, International Journal of Social Robotics, 2015, 7(5), 841-85710.1007/s12369-015-0287-xSearch in Google Scholar

[120] CNIL, Data Protection Impact Assessment Toolkit, last accessed July 15, 2018, Cfr.: https://www.cnil.fr/en/opensource-pia-software-helps-carry-out-data-protection-impactassesmentSearch in Google Scholar

[121] US Consumer Safety Product Commission of the United States, Regulatory Robot, last accessed July 15, 2018, Cfr.: https://www.cpsc.gov/Business-Manufacturing/Regulatory-Robot/Safer-Products-Start-HereSearch in Google Scholar

[122] C. Adelle, A. Jordan, J. Turnpenny, Proceeding in parallel or drifting apart? A systematic review of policy appraisal research and practices, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 2012, 30(3), 401-41510.1068/c11104Search in Google Scholar

[123] C. Sicile-Kira, Autism spectrum disorder: The complete guide to understanding autism, TarcherPerigee, 2014Search in Google Scholar

[124] “It’s never too late to be diagnosed with ASD, although it’s not always easy because some local NHS authorities don’t provide NHS funding for diagnosing ASD in adults,” Cfr.: https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/autism/adults/Search in Google Scholar

[125] Employment status of the civilian population by sex, age, and disability status, not seasonally adjusted (2016-2017) from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, cfr: www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t06.htmSearch in Google Scholar

[126] A. V.Buescher, Z. Cidav, M. Knapp, D. S. Mandell, Costs of autism spectrum disorders in the United Kingdom and the United States, JAMA pediatrics, 2014, 168(8), 721-72810.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.210Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[127] European Parliament Resolution 2017 op. Cit.Search in Google Scholar

[128] B. Ingram, D. Jones, A. Lewis, M. Richards, C. Rich, L. Schachterle, A code of ethics for robotics engineers, In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 2010, 103-10410.1109/HRI.2010.5453245Search in Google Scholar

[129] T. L. Beauchamp, J. F. Childress, Principles of biomedical ethics, Oxford University Press, USA, 2001Search in Google Scholar

[130] K. W. Abbott, D. Snidal, D. Hard and soft law in international governance, International organization, 2000, 54(3), 421-45610.1162/002081800551280Search in Google Scholar

[131] N. Gleeson, I. Walden, ’It’s a Jungle Out There’?: Cloud Computing, Standards and the Law, European Journal of Law and Technology, 2014, 5(2), http://ejlt.org/article/view/363/46110.2139/ssrn.2441182Search in Google Scholar

[132] B. M. Hutter, A risk regulation perspective on regulatory excellence, Achieving Regulatory Excellence, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, USA, 2016, 101-114Search in Google Scholar

[133] L. Lessig, Code version 2.0. Basic Books, NY, 2006Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-07-16
Accepted: 2018-11-19
Published Online: 2019-01-18

© 2019 Eduard Fosch-Villaronga, Jordi Albo-Canals, published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License.

Scroll Up Arrow