Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access December 13, 2019

Measuring human perceptions of expressivity in natural and artificial systems through the live performance piece Time to compile

Catie Cuan EMAIL logo , Erin Berl and Amy LaViers

Abstract

Live performance is a vehicle where theatrical devices are used to exemplify, probe, or question how humans think about objects, each other, and themselves. This paper presents work using this vehicle to explore human perceptions of robot and human capabilities. The paper documents four performances at three distinct venues where user studies were conducted in parallel to live performance. A set of best practices for successful collection of data in this manner over the course of these trials is developed. Then, results of the studies are presented, giving insight into human opinions of a variety of natural and artificial systems. In particular, participants are asked to rate the expressivity of 12 distinct systems, displayed on stage, as well as themselves. The results show trends ranking objects lowest, then robots, then humans, then self, highest. Moreover, objects involved in the show were generally rated higher after the performance. Qualitative responses give further insight into how viewers experienced watching human performers alongside elements of technology. This work lays a framework for measuring human perceptions of robotic systems – and factors that influence this perception – inside live performance and suggests black-that through the lens of expressivity systems of similar type are rated similarly by audience members.

References

[1] M. Graham, Chronicle, Premiered at Guild Theatre, New York City, NY, 1936Search in Google Scholar

[2] Y. Rainer, Trio A, Premiered as part of The Mind Is a Muscle; Judson Memorial Church, New York. City, NY, 1966Search in Google Scholar

[3] C. Oliver, Virago-Man Dem, Premiered at the Next Wave Festival, Brooklyn Academy of Music (BAM), New York City, NY, 2017Search in Google Scholar

[4] I. F. of Robotics, 31 million robots helping in households worldwide by 2019, Technical report, International Federation of Robotics, https://ifr.org/ifr-press-releases/news/31-million-robotshelping-in-households-worldwide-by-2019, 2016Search in Google Scholar

[5] A. Steinfeld, T. Fong, D. Kaber, M. Lewis, J. Scholtz, A. Schultz, M. Goodrich, Common metrics for human-robot interaction, In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on Human-robot interaction, ACM, 2006, 33–4010.1145/1121241.1121249Search in Google Scholar

[6] C. Bartneck, D. Kulic, E. Croft, S. Zoghbi, Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots, International Journal of Social Robotics, 2009, 1(1), 71–8110.1007/s12369-008-0001-3Search in Google Scholar

[7] B. Reeves, C. I. Nass, The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places, Cambridge University Press, 1996Search in Google Scholar

[8] C. Nass, Y. Moon, N. Green, Are machines gender neutral? Gender stereotypic responses to computers with voices, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1997, 27(10), 864–87610.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb00275.xSearch in Google Scholar

[9] F. Eyssel, D. Kuchenbrandt, Social categorization of social robots: Anthropomorphism as a function of robot group membership, British Journal of Social Psychology, 2012, 51(4), 724–73110.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02082.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] F. Eyssel, F. Hegel, (s)he’s got the look: Gender stereotyping of robots, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2012, 42(9), 2213–223010.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00937.xSearch in Google Scholar

[11] C. D. Kidd, C. Breazeal, Effect of a robot on user perceptions, In: Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2004), IEEE, 2004, 4, 3559–3564Search in Google Scholar

[12] R. Tamagawa, C. I. Watson, I. H. Kuo, B. A. MacDonald, E. Broadbent, The effects of synthesized voice accents on user perceptions of robots, International Journal of Social Robotics, 2011, 3(3), 253–26210.1007/s12369-011-0100-4Search in Google Scholar

[13] M. Saerbeck, C. Bartneck, Perception of affect elicited by robot motion, In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction, IEEE Press, 2010, 53–6010.1109/HRI.2010.5453269Search in Google Scholar

[14] M. Heimerdinger, A. LaViers, Influence of environmental context on recognition rates of stylized walking sequences, In: International Conference on Social Robotics, Springer, 2017, 272–28210.1007/978-3-319-70022-9_27Search in Google Scholar

[15] E. Jochum, E. Vlachos, A. Christoffersen, S. G. Nielsen, I. A. Hameed, Z.-H. Tan, Using theatre to study interaction with care robots, International Journal of Social Robotics, 2016, 8(4), 457–47010.1007/s12369-016-0370-ySearch in Google Scholar

[16] S. Bianchini, F. Levillain, A. Menicacci, E. Quinz, E. Zibetti, Towards behavioral objects: A twofold approach for a system of notation to design and implement behaviors in non-anthropomorphic robotic artifacts, In: Dance Notations and Robot Motion, Springer, 2016, 1–2410.1007/978-3-319-25739-6_1Search in Google Scholar

[17] K. Goldberg, R. Siegwart, Beyond Webcams: an introduction to online robots, MIT press, 200210.7551/mitpress/1588.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[18] S. Miller, J. Van Den Berg, M. Fritz, T. Darrell, K. Goldberg, P. Abbeel, A geometric approach to robotic laundry folding, The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2012, 31(2), 249–26710.1177/0278364911430417Search in Google Scholar

[19] S. J. Burton, A.-A. Samadani, R. Gorbet, D. Kulic, Laban movement analysis and affective movement generation for robots and other nearliving creatures, In: Dance Notations and Robot Motion, Springer, 2016, 25–4810.1007/978-3-319-25739-6_2Search in Google Scholar

[20] P. Gemeinboeck, R. Saunders, Creative machine performance: computational creativity and robotic art, In: ICCC, 2013, 215–219Search in Google Scholar

[21] M. Egerstedt, T. Murphey, J. Ludwig, Motion programs for puppet choreography and control, In: International Workshop on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control, Springer, 2007, 190–20210.1007/978-3-540-71493-4_17Search in Google Scholar

[22] E. Jochum, J. Schultz, E. Johnson, T. Murphey, Robotic puppets and the engineering of autonomous theatre, In: Controls and Art, Springer, 2014, 107–12810.1007/978-3-319-03904-6_5Search in Google Scholar

[23] S. Nakaoka, A. Nakazawa, K. Yokoi, H. Hirukawa, K. Ikeuchi, Generating whole body motions for a biped humanoid robot from captured human dances, In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA’03), IEEE, 2003, 3, 3905–3910Search in Google Scholar

[24] A. LaViers, L. Teague, M. Egerstedt, Style-based robotic motion in contemporary dance performance, volume Controls and Art: Inquiries at the Intersection of the Subjective and the Objective, Springer Science & Business Media, 201410.1007/978-3-319-03904-6_9Search in Google Scholar

[25] M. L. Walters, K. L. Koay, D. S. Syrdal, A. Campbell, K. Dautenhahn, Companion robots for elderly people: Using theatre to investigate potential users’ views, In: 2013 IEEE RO-MAN, IEEE, 2013, 691–69610.1109/ROMAN.2013.6628393Search in Google Scholar

[26] A. R. Chatley, K. Dautenhahn, M. L. Walters, D. S. Syrdal, B. Christianson, Theatre as a discussion tool in human-robot interaction experiments-a pilot study, In: 2010 Third International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions, IEEE, 2010, 73–7810.1109/ACHI.2010.17Search in Google Scholar

[27] Z. Pare, Robot drama research: from identification to synchronization, In: International Conference on Social Robotics, Springer, 2012, 308–31610.1007/978-3-642-34103-8_31Search in Google Scholar

[28] T.-D. Lin, Theater as a site for technology demonstration and knowledge production: theatrical robots in Japan and Taiwan, East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal, 2015, 9(2), 187–21110.1215/18752160-2881956Search in Google Scholar

[29] T. Schiphorst, A case study of merce cunningham’s use of the lifeforms computer choreographic system in the making of trackers, Ph.D. thesis, Arts and Social Sciences: Special Arrangements, 1993Search in Google Scholar

[30] M. Nyman, Experimental music: Cage and beyond, vol. 9, Cambridge University Press, 1999Search in Google Scholar

[31] A. Schollig, F. Augugliaro, R. D’Andrea, A platform for dance performances with multiple quadrocopters, Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) – Workshop on Robots and Musical Expressions, 2010, 1–8Search in Google Scholar

[32] A. Schollig, F. Augugliaro, R. D’Andrea, A platform for dance performances with multiple quadrocopters, Improving Tracking Performance by Learning from Past Data, 2012, 147Search in Google Scholar

[33] H. Knight, R. Simmons, An intelligent design interface for dancers to teach robots, In: 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (ROMAN), IEEE, 2017, 1344–135010.1109/ROMAN.2017.8172479Search in Google Scholar

[34] N. T. Fitter, H. Knight, N. Martelaro, D. Sirkin, What actors can teach robots, In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 2017, 574–58010.1145/3027063.3027078Search in Google Scholar

[35] C. Bartneck, T. Nomura, T. Kanda, T. Suzuki, K. Kato, Cultural differences in attitudes towards robots, In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Robot Companions (SSAISB 2005 Convention), 2005, 1–4Search in Google Scholar

[36] C. Bartneck, T. Suzuki, T. Kanda, T. Nomura, The influence of people’s culture and prior experiences with Aibo on their attitude towards robots, AI & Society, 2007, 21(1-2), 217–23010.1007/s00146-006-0052-7Search in Google Scholar

[37] D. Schofield, Digital emotion: How audiences react to robot on screen, International Journal of Computer Applications, 2018, 5(1), 1–2010.5121/caij.2018.5101Search in Google Scholar

[38] H. Lucas, J. Poston, N. Yocum, Z. Carlson, D. Feil-Seifer, Too big to be mistreated? Examining the role of robot size on perceptions of mistreatment, In: 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (ROMAN), IEEE, 2016, 1071–107610.1109/ROMAN.2016.7745241Search in Google Scholar

[39] I. H. Kuo, J. M. Rabindran, E. Broadbent, Y. I. Lee, N. Kerse, R. Stafford, B. A. MacDonald, Age and gender factors in user acceptance of healthcare robots, In: RO-MAN 2009-The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, IEEE, 2009, 214–21910.1109/ROMAN.2009.5326292Search in Google Scholar

[40] M. M. de Graaf, S. B. Allouch, The relation between people’s attitude and anxiety towards robots in human-robot interaction, In: 2013 IEEE RO-MAN, IEEE, 2013, 632–63710.1109/ROMAN.2013.6628419Search in Google Scholar

[41] T. Nomura, T. Suzuki, T. Kanda, S. Yamada, K. Kato, K. Dautenhahn, J. Saunders, Attitudes toward robots and factors influencing them, New Frontiers in Human-Robot Interaction, 2011, 73–8810.1075/ais.2.06nomSearch in Google Scholar

[42] N. Suzuki, C. Bartneck, Subtle expressivity for characters and robots, In: CHI’03 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 2003, 1064–106510.1145/765891.766150Search in Google Scholar

[43] C. Pelachaud, Studies on gesture expressivity for a virtual agent, Speech Communication, 2009, 51(7), 630–63910.1016/j.specom.2008.04.009Search in Google Scholar

[44] T. Flemisch, A. Viergutz, R. Dachselt, Easy authoring of variable gestural expressions for a humanoid robot, In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, ACM, 2014, 328–32810.1145/2559636.2559786Search in Google Scholar

[45] A. Beck, L. Canamero, K. A. Bard, Towards an affect space for robots to display emotional body language, In: 19th International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication, IEEE, 2010, 464–46910.1109/ROMAN.2010.5598649Search in Google Scholar

[46] E. I. Barakova, T. Lourens, Expressing and interpreting emotional movements in social games with robots, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 2010, 14(5), 457–46710.1007/s00779-009-0263-2Search in Google Scholar

[47] F. Heider, M. Simmel, An experimental study of apparent behaviour, The American Journal of Psychology, 1944, 57(2), 243–25910.2307/1416950Search in Google Scholar

[48] J. Forlizzi, C. DiSalvo, Service robots in the domestic environment: a study of the Roomba vacuum in the home, In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, ACM, 2006, 258–26510.1145/1121241.1121286Search in Google Scholar

[49] R. Hortensius, E. S. Cross, From automata to animate beings: The scope and limits of attributing socialness to artificial agents, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 201810.31234/osf.io/sr2c8Search in Google Scholar

[50] D. C. Reiizes, E. J. Mutran, M. E. Fernandez, Middle-aged working men and women: Similar and different paths to self-esteem, Research on Aging, 1994, 16(4), 355–37410.1177/0164027594164001Search in Google Scholar

[51] D. N. Smith, The relationship between academic major, self-esteem and body-esteem in nonclinical, undergraduate college women, Ph.D. thesis, Georgia State University, 1995Search in Google Scholar

[52] J. A. McMullin, J. Cairney, Self-esteem and the intersection of age, class, and gender, Journal of Aging Studies, 2004, 18(1), 75–9010.1016/j.jaging.2003.09.006Search in Google Scholar

[53] A. C. Keller, L. L. Meier, S. Gross, N. K. Semmer, Gender differences in the association of a high quality job and self-esteem over time: A multiwave study, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 2015, 24(1), 113–12510.1080/1359432X.2013.865118Search in Google Scholar

[54] S. Sprecher, J. E. Brooks, W. Avogo, Self-esteem among young adults: Differences and similarities based on gender, race, and cohort (1990–2012), Sex Roles, 2013, 69(5-6), 264–27510.1007/s11199-013-0295-ySearch in Google Scholar

[55] P. Dijkstra, D. P. Barelds, O. van Brummen-Girigori, Weight influenced self-esteem, Body comparisons and body satisfaction: Findings among women from The Netherlands and Curacao, Sex Roles, 2015, 73(7-8), 355–36910.1007/s11199-015-0528-3Search in Google Scholar

[56] J. A. Hampton, Abstraction and context in concept representation, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 2003, 358(1435), 1251–125910.1098/rstb.2003.1314Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[57] R. Hershkowitz, B. B. Schwarz, T. Dreyfus, Abstraction in context: Epistemic actions, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 2001, 195–22210.2307/749673Search in Google Scholar

[58] S. Lemaignan, M. Warnier, E. A. Sisbot, A. Clodic, R. Alami, Artificial cognition for social human-robot interaction: An implementation, Artificial Intelligence, 2017, 247, 45–6910.1016/j.artint.2016.07.002Search in Google Scholar

[59] F. Funke, A web experiment showing negative effects of slider scales compared to visual analogue scales and radio button scales, Social Science Computer Review, 2016, 34(2), 244–25410.1177/0894439315575477Search in Google Scholar

[60] C. Cuan, I. Pakrasi, E. Berl, A. LaViers, CURTAIN and time to compile: A demonstration of an experimental testbed for human-robot interaction, In: RO-MAN, IEEE, 2018, 255–26110.1109/ROMAN.2018.8525520Search in Google Scholar

[61] C. Cuan, I. Pakrasi, A. LaViers, Time to compile: An interactive art installation, Intersections: 16th Biennial Symposium, The Ammerman Center for Arts and Technology, 201810.1145/3212721.3212888Search in Google Scholar

[62] C. Cuan, I. Pakrasi, A. LaViers, Time to compile, 5th International Conference on Movement and Computing (MOCO), 201810.1145/3212721.3212888Search in Google Scholar

[63] C. Cuan, I. Pakrasi, A. LaViers, Perception of control in artificial and human systems: A study of embodied performance interactions, In: International Conference on Social Robotics, Springer, 2018, 503–51210.1007/978-3-030-05204-1_49Search in Google Scholar

[64] N. Kambhatla, T. K. Leen, Dimension reduction by local principal component analysis, Neural Computation, 1997, 9(7), 1493–151610.1162/neco.1997.9.7.1493Search in Google Scholar

[65] R. Heckel, H. Bolcskei, Robust subspace clustering via thresholding, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2015, 61(11), 6320–634210.1109/TIT.2015.2472520Search in Google Scholar

[66] S. Still, W. Bialek, How many clusters? An information-theoretic perspective, Neural Computation, 2004, 16(12), 2483–250610.1162/0899766042321751Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2018-12-13
Accepted: 2019-09-20
Published Online: 2019-12-13

© 2019 Catie Cuan et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License.

Downloaded on 28.11.2022 from frontend.live.degruyter.dgbricks.com/document/doi/10.1515/pjbr-2019-0031/html
Scroll Up Arrow