Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton July 5, 2018

The faces at play in performance appraisals: With a focus upon a UK retail organization

Dawn Archer and Phil Willcox

Abstract

A variety of face types can be in operation in workplaces, dependent on, for example, the kind of workplace, the various activities engaged in in that workplace, the status/role/gender of participants working in and/or connected with the workplace, etc. This paper offers an adapted version of Archer’s (2015) Facework Scale as a means of accounting for the different types of face in evidence in one activity - Performance Appraisals - in one workplace, relating to a UK retail organization. We will show that interlocutors used facework strategies that emphasized different or multiple facets of face on both a professional and personal level (Jagodziński 2013). This includes attempting to safeguard/support their working relationships (Haugh 2013) by managing impressions of self and/or the company (Jones and Pitman 1982) at the same time as maintaining credibility for self and/or other(s) (Bolino et al. 2016). We use our findings to argue that employers and their employees would benefit from having an understanding of face(work), and briefly discuss the training implications for Performance Appraisals if face(work) notions were introduced.

References

ACAS, 2014. How to manage Performance. Advisory booklet [online]. Available at http://www.acas.org.uk/media/pdf/m/0/How-to-manage-performance-advisory-booklet.pdf. (Accessed 1 May 2015).Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, Cameron, Sanjay Srivastava, Jennifer S. Beer, Sandra E. Spataro & Jennifer A. Chatman. 2006. Knowing your place: Self-perceptions of status in face-to-face groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91(6). 1094-1110.10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1094Search in Google Scholar

Archer, Dawn. 2008. Verbal aggression and impoliteness: Related or synonymous? In Derek Bousfield & Miriam Locher (eds.) Impoliteness in language. (Language, Power and Social Processes Series), 181-207. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Archer, Dawn. 2015. Slurs, insults, (backhanded) compliments and other strategic facework moves. Language Sciences 52. 82-97.10.1016/j.langsci.2015.03.008Search in Google Scholar

Archer, Dawn. 2018. Impression management in the Early Modern English courtroom. In Merja Kytö & Terry Walker (eds.). Dialogues in diachrony. [Special issue]. Journal of Historical Pragmatics. 19(2): (not yet paginated).10.1075/jhp.00019.arcSearch in Google Scholar

Arundale, Robert B. 2009. Face as emergent in interpersonal communication: An alternative to Goffman. In Francesca Bargiela-Chappini & Michael Haugh (eds.), Face, communication and social Interaction, 33-54. London: Equinox.Search in Google Scholar

Bolino, Mark, David Long & William Turnley. 2016. Impression management in organizations: Critical questions, answers, and areas for future research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 3. 377-406.10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062337Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Penelope & Steven C. Levinson. 1987, Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813085Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Serena, Helen C. Boucher & Molly Parker Tapas. 2006. The relational self revealed: Integrative conceptualization and implications for interpersonal life. Psychological Bulletin 123(2). 151-179.10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.151Search in Google Scholar

CIPD. 2014. Performance Appraisal Factsheet [online]. Available at http://www.cipd.co.uk/hr-resources/factsheets/performance-appraisal.aspx. (Accessed 28 July 2014)Search in Google Scholar

CIPD. 2017. ‘HR Professionalism: What do we stand for?’ Research Report [online]. Available at https://www.cipd.co.uk/Images/hr-professionalism-what-do-we-stand-for_2017_tcm18-17960.pdf. (Accessed 28 July 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Cordella, Marisa. 2004. The dynamic consultation: A discourse analytical study of doctor patient communication. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.128Search in Google Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan. 2005. Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: The Weakest Link. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 1(1). 35-72.10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35Search in Google Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511975752Search in Google Scholar

DuBrin, Andrew J. 2010. Impression management in the workplace: Research, theory and practice. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203865712Search in Google Scholar

Edelmann, Robert J. 1994. Embarrassment and blushing: Factors influencing face-saving strategies. In: Stella Ting-Toomey (ed.), The Challenge of Facework: Cross-cultural and interpersonal issues, 231-268. New York: State University of New York Press.Search in Google Scholar

Emerson, Richard M. 1962. Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review 27(1). 31-41.10.4324/9780429302824-6Search in Google Scholar

Gass, Robert H. & John S. Seiter. 2015. Persuasion: Social influence and compliance gaining, 5th edn. London and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315664194Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday Anchor Books.Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction ritual. Essays in face-to-face behavior. Chicago: Aldine.Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1981. Footing. In Erving Goffman (ed.), Forms of talk, 124-159. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.10.1515/semi.1979.25.1-2.1Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles. 2007. Interactive footing. In Elizabeth Holt & Rebecca Clift (eds.), Reporting talk: Reported speech in interaction, 16-46. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressSearch in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael. 2013. Disentangling face, facework and im/politeness. Sociocultural Pragmatics 1(1). 46-73.10.1515/soprag-2012-0005Search in Google Scholar

Held, Gudrun. 2014. Figura … or Face? Reflections on two sociopragmatic key concepts in the light of a recent media conflict between Italians and Germans and its negotiation in Italian internet forums. In Kristina Bedjis, Gudrun Held & Christiane Maaß (eds.), Facework and social media, 31-62. Berlin: LIT Verlag Münster.Search in Google Scholar

Holland, Rob W., Ree Meertens & Mark Van Vugt. 2002. Dissonance on the road: Self-esteem as a moderator of internal and external self-justification strategies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28(12).1713-1724.10.1177/014616702237652Search in Google Scholar

Holmes, Janet, & Maria Stubbe. 2003. Power and politeness in the workplace: A sociolinguistic analysis of talk at work. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Jagodziński, Piotr. 2013. Impoliteness strategies in a British airline call centre: A pragmatic analysis of customer service interactions. Adam Mickiewicz University PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Jones, Edward E. & Thane Pittman. 1982. Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation. In Jerry Sules (ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self, 231-262. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Kádár, Dániel. & Michael Haugh. 2013. Understanding politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139382717.006Search in Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 2008. Metaphors we live by. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Levinson, Steven C. 1992. Activity types and language. In Paul Drew & John Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, 66-100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1515/ling.1979.17.5-6.365Search in Google Scholar

Lim, Tae-Seop & John W. Bowers. 1991. Facework solidarity, approbation, and tact. Human Communication Research 17(3). 415-450.10.1111/j.1468-2958.1991.tb00239.xSearch in Google Scholar

Lim, Tae-Seop. 1994. Facework and interpersonal relationships. In: Stella Ting-Toomey (ed.), The Challenge of Facework: Cross-cultural and interpersonal issues, 209-229. New York: State University of New York Press.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Malcolm, Fiona Whiting &Tricia Jackson. 2010. Human resource practice. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.Search in Google Scholar

Schlenker, Barry R. 1980. Impression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relationships. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Search in Google Scholar

Shea, Gordon. 2001. How to develop successful mentor behaviors. Seattle and Washington: Thomas Crisp Learning.Search in Google Scholar

Sinek, Simon. 2011. Start with why: How great leaders inspire everyone to take action. London: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, Helen D. 2002. Managing rapport in talk: Using rapport sensitive incidents to explore the motivational concerns underlying the management of relations. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 529-545.10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00039-XSearch in Google Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, Helen D. 2007. Theories of identity and the analysis of face. Journal of Pragmatics 39(4). 639-656.10.1016/j.pragma.2006.12.004Search in Google Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, Helen D. 2008. Face, (im)politeness and rapport. In Helen Spencer-Oatey (ed.), Culturally speaking: Culture, communication and politeness theory. 2nd edn., 11-47. London: Continuum.10.5040/9781350934085.ch-002Search in Google Scholar

Tannen, Deborah. 2007. Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511618987Search in Google Scholar

Tedeschi, James T. & Valerie Melburg. 1984. Impression management and influence in the organization. In Samuel B. Bacharach & Edward J. Lawler (eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations, 31-58. Greenwich, CT: JA.Search in Google Scholar

Vonk, Ross. 1999. Impression formation and impression management: Motives, traits, and likeability inferred from self-promoting and self-deprecating behavior. Social Cognition 17(4). 390-412.10.1521/soco.1999.17.4.390Search in Google Scholar

Wartenberg, Thomas E. 1990. The Forms of power: From domination to transformation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615184Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-07-05
Published in Print: 2018-07-26

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston