Accessible Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton August 24, 2016

Inter-speaker variation, Optimality theory, and the prosody of clitic left-dislocations in Spanish

Ingo Feldhausen
From the journal Probus

Abstract

This paper presents an empirical study on the prosody of clitic left-dislocations (CLLDs) in Spanish and offers new perspectives on how the phenomenon of inter-speaker variation in linguistic data can be integrated into formal grammatical theory. Results from a production experiment based on scripted speech show that CLLDs have an obligatory left and right boundary (typically a high edge tone at the intermediate phrase level), while other sentence-internal boundaries are subject to inter-speaker variation. The hypothesis presented here suggests that prosodic boundaries which mark information structural (IS) categories are more necessary than boundaries which satisfy alignment constraints; only the latter can show inter-speaker variation (IS-over-Alignment Hypothesis). A modified version of the Stochastic Optimality Theory (SOT) is proposed to account for the attested inter-speaker variation. By assuming that the degree of constraint overlap can vary between individual speakers while the underlying hierarchy remains invariant, the modified version of SOT is applicable beyond variation in the output structure of a whole population.

Funding statement: This work was supported by the French Investissements d’Avenir – Labex EFL program (ANR-10-LABX-0083).

Appendix

Two additional sets of sentences from the experiment are presented here. Again, the left-dislocated constituents are in bold type (note that hermano ‘brother’ is a paroxytonic word).

Context II: ¿Qué hacemos con la lámpara que me compré en Mérida?

  1. (a)

    La lámpara la regalamos a unos vecinos.

  2. (b)

    La lámpara de Mérida la regalamos a unos vecinos.

  3. (c)

    Bárbara piensa que la lámpara la regalamos a unos vecinos.

  4. (d)

    Bárbara piensa que la lámpara de Mérida la regalamos a unos

  5. vecinos.

  6. ‘(Barbara thinks that) the lamp (of Mérida), we offered some neighbors.’

Context III: Ya he buscado el pájaro de mi hermano. ¿Dónde estaba?

  1. (a)

    El pájaro lo he encontrado en la cocina.

  2. (b)

    El pájaro de tu hermano lo he encontrado en la cocina.

  3. (c)

    La vecina dice que el pájaro lo ha encontrado en la cocina.

  4. (d)

    La vecina dice que el pájaro de tu hermano lo ha encontrado en la

  5. cocina.

  6. ‘(The neighbor says that) the bird (of your brother), she found in the kitchen.’

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Elisabeth Delais-Roussarie, Gorka Elordieta, Shinichiro Ishihara, Luis López, Esther Rinke, Maria del Mar Vanrell, Marina Vigário, and two anonymous reviewers for thoughtful observations and comments. I also would like to thank Izarbe García Sánchez for helping me finding the speakers, to whom I am also grateful. My gratitude also goes to my student assistant Alina Lausecker for help of different kinds and to Audrey MacDougall for her assistance with editing. Very special thanks to Andreas Heuer for help with the statistics and to Andrea Pešková for help with the data. All errors are my own.

References

Aguilar, Lourdes, Carme de la Mota & Pilar Prieto. 2009. Sp_ToBI Training Materials. http://prosodia.upf.edu/sp_tobi/en/ (accessed June, 2014). Search in Google Scholar

Astruc, Lluїsa. 2005. The intonation of extra-sentential elements in Catalan and English. Cambridge: University of Cambridge dissertation. Search in Google Scholar

Avanzi, Mathieu. 2012. L’Interface Prosodie: Syntaxe en Français : Dislocations, Incises et Asyndètes. Bruxelles: Peter Lang. Search in Google Scholar

Beas, Omar. 2007. Agreement on the left edge: The syntax of left dislocation in Spanish. California: University of Southern California dissertation. Search in Google Scholar

Bocci, Giuliano. 2007. Criterial positions and left periphery in Italian. Nanzan Linguistics 3(1). 35–70. Search in Google Scholar

Bocci, Giuliano. 2013. The syntax–prosody interface. A cartographic perspective with evidence from Italian. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Search in Google Scholar

Boersma, Paul & Bruce Hayes. 2001. Empirical tests of the gradual learning algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry 32(1). 45–86. Search in Google Scholar

Boersma, Paul & David Weenink. 2014. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. http://www.praat.org/ (accessed June 2014). Search in Google Scholar

Bosque, Ignacio & Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach. 2009. Fundamentos de Sintaxis Formal. Madrid: Akal. Search in Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan, Ashwini Deo & Devyani Sharma. 2007. Typology in variation: a probabilistic approach to be and n‘t in the Survey of English Dialects. English Language and Linguistics 11(2). 301–346. Search in Google Scholar

Butcher, Andrew. 1981. Aspects of the speech pause: Phonetic correlates and communicative functions. AIPUK 15. Kiel: IPdS. Search in Google Scholar

Casielles-Suárez, Eugenia. 2003. Left-dislocated structures in Spanish. Hispania 86(2). 326–338. Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 1983. ‘Topic’ constructions in some European languages and ‘Connectedness’. In Konrad Ehlich & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), Connectedness in sentence, discourse and text, 93–118. Tilburg: KBU. Search in Google Scholar

Clifton, Charles, Katy Carlson & Lyn Frazier. 2002. Informative prosodic boundaries. Language and Speech 45(2). 87–114. Search in Google Scholar

Contreras, Helen. 1976. A theory of word order with special reference to Spanish. Amsterdam: North-Holland. Search in Google Scholar

D’Imperio, Mariapaola, Gorka Elordieta, Sónia Frota, Pilar Prieto & Marina Vigário. 2005. Intonational phrasing in Romance. In Sónia Frota, Marina Vigário & Marla J. Freitas (eds.), Prosodies: With special reference to Iberian languages, 59–97. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter. Search in Google Scholar

Delais-Roussarie, Elisabeth, Jenny Doetjes & Petra Sleeman. 2004. Dislocations in French. In Francis Corblin & Henriette de Swart (eds.), Handbook of French Semantics, 501–528. Stanford: CSLI. Search in Google Scholar

Delais-Roussarie, Elisabeth & Ingo Feldhausen. 2014. Variation in prosodic boundary strength in French. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 7. Dublin, 1052–1056. Search in Google Scholar

Delattre, Pierre. 1965. Comparing the phonetic features of English, French, German and Spanish. Heidelberg: Julius Groos. Search in Google Scholar

Domínguez, Laura. 2004. Mapping focus: The syntax and prosody of focus in Spanish. Boston: Boston University dissertation. Search in Google Scholar

Downing, Laura. 2011. The prosody of “dislocation” in selected Bantu languages. Lingua 121(5): 772–786. Search in Google Scholar

Elordieta, Gorka, Sónia Frota & Marina Vigário. 2005. Subjects, objects and intonational phrasing in Spanish and Portuguese. Studia Linguistica 59(2–3). 110–143. Search in Google Scholar

Escudero, David, Lourdes Aguilar, Maria del Mar Vanrell & Pilar Prieto. 2012. Analysis of inter-transcriber consistency in the Cat_ToBI prosodic labelling system. Speech Communication 54(4). 566–582. Search in Google Scholar

Estebas-Vilaplana, Eva & Pilar Prieto. 2010. Castilian Spanish intonation. In Pilar Prieto & Paolo Roseano, 17–48. Search in Google Scholar

Fant, Lars. 1984. Estructura informativa en enspañol: Estudio sintáctico y entonativo. Göteborg: Uppsala. Search in Google Scholar

Feldhausen, Ingo. 2010. Sentential form and prosodic structure of Catalan. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Search in Google Scholar

Feldhausen, Ingo. 2011. The prosodic phrasing of sentential objects. Lingua 121(13). 1934–1964. Search in Google Scholar

Feldhausen, Ingo. 2014a. Intonation and preverbal subjects in Italian. Proceedings of the 10th International Seminar on Speech Production, Köln, 118–121. Search in Google Scholar

Feldhausen, Ingo. 2014b. The intonation of left-dislocations in Spanish and other Romance languages. Frankfurt am Main: Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main habilitation thesis. Search in Google Scholar

Feldhausen, Ingo. 2016. The relation between prosody and syntax: The case of different types of left-dislocations in Spanish. In Meghan Armstrong, Nicholas Henriksen & Maria del Mar Vanrell (eds.), Intonational grammar in Ibero-Romance, 153–180. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Search in Google Scholar

Feldhausen, Ingo, Christoph Gabriel & Andrea Pešková. 2010. Prosodic phrasing in Argentinean Spanish: Buenos Aires and Neuquén. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 5, Chicago, IL. Search in Google Scholar

Féry, Caroline. 2004. Gradient prosodic correlates of phrasing in French. In Trudel Meisenburg & Maria Selig (eds.), Nouveaux départs en phonologie, 161–182. Tübingen: Narr. Search in Google Scholar

Féry, Caroline. 2011. German sentence accents and embedded prosodic phrases. Lingua 121(13). 1906–1922. Search in Google Scholar

Féry, Caroline, Robin Hörnig & Serge Pahaut. 2011. Correlates of phrasing in French and German from an experiment with semi-spontaneous speech. In Christoph Gabriel & Conxita Lleó (eds.), Intonational phrasing in Romance and Germanic, 11–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Search in Google Scholar

Féry, Caroline & Fabian Schubö. 2011. Hierarchical prosodic structures in the intonation of center-embedded relative clauses. The Linguistic Review 27(3). 293–317. Search in Google Scholar

Frascarelli, Mara. 2000. The syntax-phonology interface in focus and topic constructions in Italian. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Search in Google Scholar

Frazier, Lyn, Katy Carlson & Charles Clifton, JR. 2006. Prosodic phrasing is central to language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Science 10(6). 244–249. Search in Google Scholar

Frota, Sónia. 2000. Prosody and focus in European Portuguese: Phonological phrasing and intonation. New York, NY: Garland. Search in Google Scholar

Frota, Sónia, Mariapaola D’Imperio, Gorka Elordieta, Pilar Prieto & Marina Vigário. 2007. The Phonetics and phonology of intonational phrasing in Romance. In Pilar Prieto, Joan Mascaró & Maria-Josep Solé (eds.), Segmental and prosodic issues in Romance phonology, 131–153. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Search in Google Scholar

Gili Fivela, Barbara. 1999. The prosody of left-dislocated topic constituents in Italian read speech. Proceedings of Eurospeech 6, Budapest, 531–534. Search in Google Scholar

Grabe, Esther. 2002. Variation adds to prosodic typology. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 1, Aix-en-Provence, 127–132. Search in Google Scholar

Gussenhoven, Carlos & Rietveld, Toni. 1992. Intonation contours, prosodic structure and preboundary lengthening. Journal of Phonetics 20(3). 283–303. Search in Google Scholar

Hellmuth, Sam. 2014. Disjunction at prosodic boundaries. Talk presented at Cambridge Linguistics Society, University of Cambridge, 30th October 2014. Search in Google Scholar

Hualde, José I. 2002. Intonation in Spanish and the other Ibero-Romance languages: Overview and status quaestionis. In Carolin Wiltshire & Joaquim Camps (eds.), Romance phonology and variation, 101–115. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Search in Google Scholar

Hualde, José I. 2005. The sounds of Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Hualde, José I. & Pilar Prieto. 2015. Intonational variation in Spanish: European and American varieties. In Sónia Frota & Pilar Prieto (eds.), Intonational variation in Romance, 350–391. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Search in Google Scholar

Jun, Sun-Ah (ed.). 2014. Prosodic typlogy II. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Kirchner, Robert. 2002. Preliminary thoughts on “phonologisation” within an exemplar-based speech processing model. UCLA Working Papers 6. Search in Google Scholar

Ladd, Robert. 1988. Declination ‘reset’ and the hierarchical organization of utterances. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 84(2). 530–544. Search in Google Scholar

Ladd, Robert. 2008. Intonational phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

López, Luis. 2009. A derivational syntax for information structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

López-Cortina, Jorge. 2007. The Spanish left periphery: Questions and answers. Washington, DC: Georgetown University dissertation. Search in Google Scholar

McCarthy, John & Alan Prince. 1993. Generalized alignment. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1993, 79–153. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Search in Google Scholar

Myrberg, Sara. 2013. Sisterhood in prosodic branching. Phonology 30(1). 73–124. Search in Google Scholar

Niebuhr, Oliver, Mariapaola D’Imperio, Barbara Gili Fivela & Francesco Cangemi. 2011. Are there “shapers” and “aligners”? Individual differences in signalling pitch accent category. Proceedings of the 17th ICPhS, Hong Kong, 120–123. Search in Google Scholar

Patin, Cédric, Ingo Feldhausen & Elisabeth Delais-Roussarie. Structure prosodique et dislocation à gauche dans les langues romanes et bantu: vers une approche typologique unifiée en OT. In Éva Buchi, Jean-Paul Chauveau & Jean-Marie Pierrel (eds.). Actes du XXVIIe Congrès international de linguistique et de philologie romanes. Strasbourg: Société de linguistique. https://www.academia.edu/5495293/Structure_prosodique_et_dislocation_%C3%A0_gauche_dans_les_langues_romanes_et_bantu_engl._Prosodic_Structure_and_Clitic_Left-Dislocations_in_Romance_and_Bantu_Languages_ Search in Google Scholar

Pešková, Andrea. 2015. Sujetos pronominales en el español porteño: Implicaciones pragmáticas en la interfaz sintáctico-fonológica. Berlin: De Gruyter. Search in Google Scholar

Peters, Benno, Klaus Kohler & Thomas Wesener. 2005. Phonetische Merkmale prosodischer Phrasierung in deutscher Spontansprache. In Klaus Kohler, Felicitas Kleber & Benno Peters (eds.), Prosodic structures in German spontaneous speech, 143–184. Kiel: IPdS. Search in Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, Janet. 1980. The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation. Search in Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, Janet. 2001. Stochastic phonology. Glot International 5(6). 195–207. Search in Google Scholar

Pitrelli, John F. Mary E. Beckman & Julia Hirschberg. 1994. Evaluation of prosodic transcription labeling reliability in the ToBI framework. Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Yokohama, 123–126. Search in Google Scholar

Post, Brechtje. 2000. Tonal and phrasal structures in French intonation. The Hague: Thesus. Search in Google Scholar

Price, Patti, Mari Ostendorf, Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel & Cynthia Fong. 1991. The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 90(6). 2956–2970. Search in Google Scholar

Prieto, Pilar. 2006. Phonological phrasing in Spanish. In Sonia Colina & Fernando Martínez-Gil (eds.), Optimality-theoretic advances in Spanish phonology, 39–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Search in Google Scholar

Prieto, Pilar & Paolo Roseano (eds.). 2010. Transcription of intonation of the Spanish language. München: Lincom. Search in Google Scholar

Prieto, Pilar, Maria del Mar Vanrell, Lluїsa Astruc, Elinor Payne & Brechtje Post. 2012. Phonotactic and phrasal properties of speech rhythm. Speech Communication 54(6). 681–702. Search in Google Scholar

Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky. 1993/2004. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar (Technical Report Nr. 2). Rutgers University [Published 2004 by Blackwell, Oxford]. Search in Google Scholar

Rao, Rajiv. 2008. Observations on the roles of prosody and syntax in the phonological phrasing of Barcelona Spanish. The Linguistics Journal 3(3). 85–131. Search in Google Scholar

Rivero, María-Luisa. 1980. On left-dislocation and topicalization in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry 11(2). 363–393. Search in Google Scholar

Rossi, Mario. 1999. L‘Intonation, le Système du Français - Description et Modélisation. Paris: Ophrys. Search in Google Scholar

Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1995. The prosodic structure of function words. In James Morgan & Katherine Demuth (eds.), Signal to syntax, 187–214. Mahwah, NJ: L.E. Associates. Search in Google Scholar

Selkirk, Elisabeth. 2011. The syntax-phonology interface. In John Goldsmith, Jason Riggle & Alan Yu (eds.), The handbook of phonological theory, 2nd edn, 435–484. Oxford: Blackwell. Search in Google Scholar

Silva-Corvalán, Carmen. 1984. Topicalización y Pragmática en Español. Revista Española de Lingüística 14(1). 1–20. Search in Google Scholar

Suñer, Margarita. 2006. Left dislocations with and without epithets. Probus 18(1). 127–158. Search in Google Scholar

Trouvain, Jürgen. 2004. Tempo variation in speech production: Implications for speech synthesis. Saarbrücken: Universität des Saarlandes dissertation. Search in Google Scholar

Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 1999. On the relation between syntactic phrases and phonological phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 30(2). 219–255. Search in Google Scholar

Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 2002. Upstep and embedded register levels. Phonology 19(1). 77–120. Search in Google Scholar

Vaissière, Jacqueline. 1983. Language-independent prosodic features. In Anne Cutler & Robert D. Ladd (eds.), Prosody: Models and measurements, 53–65. Heidelberg: Springer. Search in Google Scholar

Villalba, Xavier. 2009. The syntax and semantics of dislocations in Catalan. Köln: Lambert Academic Publishing. Search in Google Scholar

Vizcaíno Ortega, Francisco, Mercedes Cabrera Abreu, Eva Estebas-Vilaplana & Lluїsa Astruc. 2008. The phonological representation of edge tones in Spanish alternative questions. Language Design 56(2). 31–38. Search in Google Scholar

Wightman, Colin, Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel, Mari Ostendorf & Patti Price. 1992. Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 91(3). 1707–1717. Search in Google Scholar

Yoon, Tae-Jin, Jennifer Cole & Mark Hasegawa-Johnson. 2007. On the edge: acoustic cues to layered prosodic domains. Proceedings of the 16th ICPhS, Saarbrücken, 1264–1267. Search in Google Scholar

Zubizarreta, Maria L. 1998. Prosody, focus, and word order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2016-8-24
Published in Print: 2016-9-1

©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton