Abstract
This paper traces the development of so-called Exceptional Case Marking (ECM) under perception, permissive and causative verbs in Romance. Synchronically, we can observe various patterns in the distribution of ECM complements under these verbs. In Portuguese and Spanish, ECM is often possible under all permissive and causative verbs, whereas in French, Catalan and Italian it is usually restricted to perception and permissive verbs. A detail that has not been much discussed is the fact that, for many speakers, ECM with a given verb is often restricted to contexts in which the embedded ‘subject’ is a clitic. Some speakers of Modern French display this pattern with the verb faire ‘make’, for example (Abeillé, Anne, Danièle Godard & Philip Miller. 1997. Les causatives en français : Un cas de compétition syntaxique. Langue Française 115. 62–74. https://doi.org/10.3406/lfr.1997.6222). In this paper, I claim that laisser ‘let’ probably also displayed this pattern in Middle French. In Old French, however, what appears to be the opposite pattern is observed. Following (Pearce, Elizabeth. 1990. Parameters in Old French syntax: Infinitival complements. Dordrecht: Kluwer), I attribute this to the morphological variability of dative case in Old French. I propose a case-based analysis of the clitic ECM pattern, whereby ECM complements in Romance are phases unlike clause union complements (see Sheehan, Michelle & Sonia Cyrino. 2018. Why do some ECM verbs resist passivisation? A phase-based explanation. In Sherry Hucklebridge & Max Nelson (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 48 (vol 3), 81–90. University of Massachusetts). Where such complements are embedded under light verbs, the Phase Impenetrability Condition (Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) prevents accusative case from being assigned to the lower subject except in instances of cliticization. When the matrix verb is reanalysed as a full verb, however, v becomes the case-assigning head and so ECM becomes generally available, regardless of the clitic/non-clitic status of the causee.
References
Abeillé, Anne, Danièle Godard & Philip Miller. 1997. Les causatives en français : Un cas de compétition syntaxique. Langue Française 115. 62–74. https://doi.org/10.3406/lfr.1997.6222.Search in Google Scholar
Adger, David. 2003. Core syntax: A minimalist approach. Oxford: OUP.Search in Google Scholar
Aelbrecht, Lobke & William Harwood. 2015. To be or not to be elided: VP ellipsis revisited. Lingua 153. 66–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.10.006.Search in Google Scholar
Aissen, Judith & David Perlmutter. 1976. Clause reduction in Spanish. In Henry Thompson et al.. (eds.), Proceedings of the Second Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, 1–30. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley Linguistic Society.10.3765/bls.v2i0.2283Search in Google Scholar
Alsina, Alex. 1992. On the argument structure of causatives. Linguistic Inquiry 23. 517–555.Search in Google Scholar
Alsina, Àlex. 1996. The role of argument structure in grammar: Evidence from Romance. CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Alsina, Alex. 1997. A theory of complex predicates: Evidence from causatives in Bantu and romance. In Alex Alsina, Joan Bresnan & Peter Sells (eds.), Complex predicates, 203–246. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Alsina, Àlex. 2002. L’infinitiu. In Joan Solà et al.. (eds.), Gramàtica del català contemporani, vol. 3, 2389–2454. Barcelona: Empúries.Search in Google Scholar
Alsina, Alex. 2002/2008. L’infinitiu. In Joan Solà et al.. (eds.), Gramàtica del català contemporani. Barcelona: Empúries.Search in Google Scholar
Anagnostopoulou, Elena. 2003. The syntax of ditransitives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Anagnostopoulou, Elena. 2005. Strong and weak person restrictions: A feature checking analysis. In Lorie Heggie & Francisco Ordóñez (eds.), Clitic and affix combinations: Theoretical perspectives, 199–235. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.74.08anaSearch in Google Scholar
Authier, J.-Marc & Lisa Reed. 1991. Ergative predicates and dative cliticization in French causatives. Linguistic Inquiry 22. 197–205.Search in Google Scholar
Bailard, Joële. 1982. The interaction of semantic and syntactic functions and French clitic case marking in causative sentences. In Paul, J. Hopper et Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Syntax and semantics 15: Studies in transitivity, 49–69, New York, Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368903_005Search in Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana & Luigi Rizzi. 2012. Moving verbal chunks in the low functional field. In Laura Brugè, Anna Cardinaletti, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro & Cecilia Poletto (eds.), Cartography of syntactic structures, 7129–71137. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199746736.003.0010Search in Google Scholar
Bjorkman, Bronwyn. 2011. BE-ing default: The morphosyntax of auxiliaries. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Bonfim, Manoel & Heloisa Salles. 2015. Causativas ECM e controle reverso: Uma proposta para o português brasileiro. Estudos linguísticos 44. 110–125.Search in Google Scholar
Bonet, Eulalia. 1991. Morphology after syntax: Pronominal clitics in Romance. Ph.D. thesis, MIT.Search in Google Scholar
Bordelois, Ivonne. 1988. Causatives: From lexicon to syntax. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 6: 57–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01791592.Search in Google Scholar
Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian syntax. A Government-Binding approach. Dordrecht: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-4522-7Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step, 89–156. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero, & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262062787.003.0007Search in Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2003. The interaction of passive, causative, and “restructuring. In Christina Tortora (ed.), The syntax of Italian dialects, 50–66. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Ciutescu, Elena. 2013. Remarks on the infinitival subject of perception verb complements: Evidence for two syntactic configurations. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique no. LVIII(3). 299–312.Search in Google Scholar
Ciutescu, Elena. 2018. Defective causative and perception verb constructions in Romance. A minimalist approach to infinitival and subjunctive clauses. Barcelona: University of Barcelona dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Coon, Jessica & Stefan Keine. 2020. Feature gluttony. Available at: https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/004224.10.1162/ling_a_00386Search in Google Scholar
Cyrino, Sonia. 2010a. On Romance syntactic complex predicates: Why Brazilian Portuguese is different. Estudos da Língua(gem) 8. 187–222. https://doi.org/10.22481/el.v8i1.1120.Search in Google Scholar
Cyrino, Sonia. 2010b. On complex predicates in Brazilian Portuguese. Iberia: An International Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 2. 1–21.Search in Google Scholar
Danell, Karl Johan. 1979. Remarques sur la construction dite causative. Stockholm: Almqvist et Wiksell.Search in Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 1992. The diachronic evolution of causative constructions in Spanish and Portuguese. Austin: University of Texas dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 1995. The evolution of causative constructions in Spanish and Portuguese. In Jon Amastae, Grant Goodall, Mario Montalbetti & Marianne Phinney (eds.), Contemporary research in Romance linguistics, 105–122. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.123.10davSearch in Google Scholar
Folli, Raffaella & Heidi Harley. 2007. Causation, obligation, and argument structure: On the nature of little v. Linguistic Inquiry 38. 197–238. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2007.38.2.197.Search in Google Scholar
Gonçalves, Anabela. 1999. Predicados complexos verbais em contextos de infinitivo não preposicionado do Português Europeu. [Complex verbal predicates in the context of non prepositional infinitives in European Portuguese]. Lisbon: University of Lisbon dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Grevisse, Maurice. 1969. Le bon usage, 9th edn. Gembloux: J. Duculot.Search in Google Scholar
Guasti, Maria Teresa. 1993. Causative and perception verbs: A comparative study. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.Search in Google Scholar
Guasti, Maria Teresa. 1996. Semantic restrictions in Romance causatives and the incorporation approach. Linguistic Inquiry 27. 294–313.Search in Google Scholar
Guasti, Maria Teresa. 2017. Analytical causatives. In Martin Everaert & Henk C. van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to syntax, 2nd edn. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom038.Search in Google Scholar
Guillot-Barbance, Céline, Serge Heiden & Alexei Lavrentiev. 2017. Base de français médiéval : Une base de référence de sources médiévales ouverte et libre au service de la communauté scientifique. Diachroniques 7 :168–184. <halshs-01809581>.Search in Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi. 2013. External arguments and the Mirror Principle: On the distinctness of voice and v. Lingua 125. 34–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.09.010.Search in Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi. 2017. The “bundling” hypothesis and the disparate functions of little v. In Roberta D’Alessandro, Irene Franco & Angél J. Gallego (eds.), The verbal domain, 3–28. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/oso/9780198767886.003.0001Search in Google Scholar
Harwood, William. 2015. Being progressive is just a phase: Celebrating the uniqueness of progressive aspect under a phase-based analysis. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 33(2). 523–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-014-9267-3.Search in Google Scholar
Herslund, Michael. 1980. Problèmes de l’ancien français. Compléments datifs et génitifs. Revue Romane. Numero special 21.Search in Google Scholar
Higginbotham, James. 1983. The logic of perceptual reports: An extensional alternative to situation semantics. Journal of Philosophy 80(2). 100–127. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil198380289.Search in Google Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert, Jairo Nunes & Ana Maria Martins. 2010. Perception and causative structures in English and European Portuguese. Syntax 11(2). 205–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2008.00105.x.Search in Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry & Christian Zimmer. 1976. Embedded topics in French. In C. Li (ed.), Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 1975. French syntax: The transformational cycle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 1981. On certain differences between French and English. Linguistic Inquiry 12(3). 349–371.Search in Google Scholar
Labelle, Marie. 1996. Remarques sur les verbes de perception et la sous-categorisation. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 25. 83–106.Search in Google Scholar
Legate, Julie Anne. 2003. Some interface properties of the phase. Linguistic Inquiry 34. 506–16. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2003.34.3.506.Search in Google Scholar
Martineau, France. 1990. La construction « accusatif avec infinitif » avec les verbes causatifs et de perception en moyen français. Revue Quebecoise de Linguistique 19 (1). 77–100.10.7202/602666arSearch in Google Scholar
Martins, Ana Maria 2004. Ambiguidade estrutural e mudança linguística: A emergência do infinitivo flexionado nas orações complemento de verbos causativos e perceptivos. [Structural ambiguity and language change: The emergence of the inflected infinitive in the complements of causative and perception verbs]. In Ana-Maria Brito, Olívia Figueiredo & Clara Barros (eds.), Linguística histórica e história da língua Portuguesa: Actas do encontro de homenagem a Maria Helena Paiva, 197–225. Porto: Universidade do Porto.Search in Google Scholar
Martins, Ana Maria. 2018. Infinitival complements of causative/perception verbs in a diachronic perspective. In Anabela Gonçalves & Ana Lúcia Santos (eds.), Complement clauses in Portuguese: Syntax and acquisition, 101–128. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/ihll.17.04marSearch in Google Scholar
McGinnis, Martha. 2004. Lethal ambiguity. Linguistic Inquiry 35. 47–95. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438904322793347.Search in Google Scholar
Merchant, Jason. 2013. Voice and ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 44(1). 77–108. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00120.Search in Google Scholar
Morin, Yves-Charles & Marielle St-Amour. 1977. Description historique des constructions infinitives du français, Recherches Linguistiques a Montreal 9. 113–152.Search in Google Scholar
Nevins, Andrew Ira. 2007. The representation of third person and its consequences for Person-Case effects. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 25. 273–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-006-9017-2.Search in Google Scholar
Pearce, Elizabeth. 1990. Parameters in Old French syntax: Infinitival complements. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-009-1884-9Search in Google Scholar
Pineda, Anna & Michelle Sheehan. 2020. A cyclic agree account of the romance faire-infinitive: New evidence from Catalan. Ms. Sorbonne & Anglia Ruskin University.Search in Google Scholar
Postal, Paul M. 1981. A failed analysis of the French cohesive infinitive construction. Linguistic Analysis 8. 281–323.Search in Google Scholar
Postal, Paul M. 1989. Masked inversion in French. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina. 2008. Introducing arguments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262162548.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Quicoli, A. Carlos. 1984. Remarks on French clitic systems. Linguistic Analysis 14. 55–95.Search in Google Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian & Peter Svenonius. 2014. Deriving the functional hierarchy. Language Sciences 46. 152–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.06.013.Search in Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 1996. Syntactic effects of lexical operations: Reflexives and unaccusatives. UiL OTS Working Papers in Linguistics. Utrecht: Utrecht Institute of Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya & Tal Siloni. 1999. Against the unaccusative analysis of reflexives. In Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou, & Martin Everaert (eds.), The unaccusativity puzzle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0007Search in Google Scholar
Rezac, Milan. 2008. The syntax of eccentric agreement: The Person Case constraint and absolutive displacement in Basque. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 26(1). 61–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-008-9032-6.Search in Google Scholar
Rezac, Milan. 2009. On the unifiability of repairs for the Person Case constraint: French, Basque, Georgian and Chinook. Hasiera. 1–2 https://www.ehu.eus/ojs/index.php/ASJU/article/view/1756.Search in Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1986. On chain formation. In Borer, Hagit (ed.), Syntax and semantics 19: The syntax of pronominal clitics. New York: Academic Press.10.4324/9780203461785-10Search in Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 2010. Agreement and head movement. MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262014304.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Rooryck, Johan. 2000. Configurations of sentential complementation: Perspectives from Romance. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Rosen, Sara. 1992. The case of subjects in the Romance causative. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics 17(1). 79–114. https://doi.org/10.17161/kwpl.1808.638.Search in Google Scholar
Ross, Haj. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. MIT dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Sailor, Craig. 2014. The variables of VP ellipsis. Los Angeles: UCLA dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Santorini, Beatrice & Caroline Heycock. 1988. Remarks on causatives and passives. Ms., University of Pennsylvania.Search in Google Scholar
Schäfer, Florian. 2017. Romance and Greek medio-passives and the typology of Voice. In Roberta D’Alessandro, Irene Franco, & Ángel J. Gallego (eds.), The verbal domain. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/oso/9780198767886.003.0006Search in Google Scholar
Schifano, Norma & Michelle Sheehan. 2017. Italian faire-infinitives: The special case of volere. In Mirko Grimaldi, Rosangela Lai, Ludovico Franco & Benedetta Baldi (eds.), Structuring variation in romance linguistics and beyond, 161–175. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.252.11schSearch in Google Scholar
Schifano, Norma & Michelle Sheehan. 2018. Italian faire-infinitives: The special case of volere. In Mirko Grimaldi, Rosangela Lai, Ludovico Franco & Benedetta Baldi (eds.), Structuring variation in Romance linguistics and beyond, 161–175. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.252.11schSearch in Google Scholar
Sheehan, Michelle. 2020. The Romance Person Case Constraint is not about clitic clusters. In A. Pineda, J. Mateu & R. Etxepare (eds.), Dative structures in Romance and beyond (Open Generative Syntax), 139–170. Berlin: Language Science Press.Search in Google Scholar
Sheehan, Michelle & Sonia Cyrino. 2016. Variation and change in the faire-par causative. In Ernestinha Carrilho, Alexandra Fieis, Maria Lobo & Sandra Pereira (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory, 279–304. John Benjamins.10.1075/rllt.10.14sheSearch in Google Scholar
Sheehan, Michelle & Sonia Cyrino. 2018. Why do some ECM verbs resist passivisation? A phase-based explanation. In Sherry Hucklebridge & Max Nelson (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 48 (vol 3), 81–90. University of Massachusetts.Search in Google Scholar
Solà, Joan. 1994. Sintaxi normativa: Estat de la qüestió. Barcelona: Empúries.Search in Google Scholar
Sportiche, Dominique. 1996. Clitic constructions. In Johan Rooryck, & Laurie Zaring (eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon. Studies in natural language and linguistic theory, vol. 33, 213–276. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_9Search in Google Scholar
St-Amour, Marielle. 1983. Les compléments verbaux du latin classique à l’ancien franc'ais. Montréal : Université de Montréal dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Strozer, Judith. 1976. Clitics in Spanish. Los Angeles: UCLA dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Torrego, Esther. 1998. The dependencies of objects. London; Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/2337.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Torrego, Esther. 2010. Variability in the case patterns of causative formation in romance and its implications. Linguistic Inquiry 41. 445–470. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00004.Search in Google Scholar
Treviño, Esthela. 1994. Las causativas del español con complemento de infinitivo. Mexico City: Colegio de México dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Tubino Blanco, Mercedes. 2010. Contrasting causatives: A minimalist approach. Tucson: University of Arizona dissertation.10.1075/la.179Search in Google Scholar
Villalba, Xavier. 1992. Case, incorporation, and economy: An approach to causative constructions. Calalan Working Papers in Linguistics 1. 345–389.Search in Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, Susi. 2012. The syntax of valuation in auxiliary–participle constructions. In Jaehoon Choi, E. Alan Hogue, Jeffrey Punske, Deniz Tat, Jessamyn Schertz, & Alex Trueman (eds.), Proceedings of the 29th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 29), 154–162. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Search in Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, María Luisa. 1985. The relation between morphophonology and morphosyntax: The case of romance causatives. Linguistic Inquiry 16. 247–289.Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
