Accessible Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton September 22, 2020

DP-internal Inversion and Negative Polarity: Latin aliquis and its Romance Descendants

Chiara Gianollo
From the journal Probus

Abstract

I analyze the Romance descendants of Latin aliquis ‘some or other’, which are characterized by a complex pattern of variation in the contemporary Romance languages. I account for this variation in terms of diverging diachronic paths, tracing their determinants back to a process taking place between Classical and late Latin. Classical Latin only used aliquis as an epistemic indefinite, expressing ignorance about the identity of the referent. In late Latin a distributional extension is observed, and aliquis starts to be consistently found as an NPI in negative contexts. This multiplicity of uses is transmitted to medieval Romance and represents the prerequisite for contemporary variation. In their further history, some languages continue only one of the two uses. Other languages maintain both, but the meaning contrast comes to be related to a word-order difference. I analyze this difference as a syntactic DP-internal inversion operation, motivated by focus and connected to polarity sensitivity. Significantly, the diachronic path of the Romance descendants of aliquis contributes to our understanding of general mechanisms of semantic change, since it instantiates a cline of development that can be related to varying (hence, diachronically changing) constraints on quantificational domains.


Corresponding author: Chiara Gianollo, Department of Classical Philology and Italian Studies, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy, E-mail

References

Aboh, Enoch, Norbert Corver, Marina Dyakonova & Marjo van Koppen. 2010. DP-internal information structure: Some introductory remarks. Lingua 120. 782–801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2009.02.010. Search in Google Scholar

Alonso-Ovalle, Luis & Paula Menéndez-Benito. 2003. Some epistemic indefinites. Proceedings of NELS 33. 1–12. Search in Google Scholar

Alonso-Ovalle, Luis & Paula Menéndez-Benito. 2010. Modal indefinites. Natural Language Semantics 18. 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-009-9048-4. Search in Google Scholar

Alonso-Ovalle, Luis & Paula Menéndez-Benito. 2011. Domain restrictions, modal implicatures and plurality: Spanish algunos. Journal of Semantics 28. 211–240. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffq016. Search in Google Scholar

Alonso-Ovalle, Luis & Paula Menéndez-Benito (eds.). 2015. Epistemic indefinites. Exploring modality beyond the verbal domain. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Belletti, Adriana. 2001. ‘Inversion’ as focalization. In Aafke Hulk & Jean-Yves Pollock (eds.), Subject Inversion in Romance and the theory of Universal Grammar, 60–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Bergareche, Bruno Camus & Manuel Pérez Saldanya. 2011. From adjectives to quantifiers. Evidence from Old and Modern Catalan. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 10. 221–245. Search in Google Scholar

Bernstein, Judy. 2001. Focusing the ‘right’ way in Romance determiner phrases. Probus 13. 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.13.1.1. Search in Google Scholar

Biberauer, Theresa. 2019. Children always go beyond the input: The Maximise Minimal Means perspective. Theoretical Linguistics 45(3–4). 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2019-0013. Search in Google Scholar

Bortolussi, Bernard. 2015. Syntaxe des indéfinis latins. Quis, quisque, alius. Paris: Presses de l’Université Paris-Sorbonne. Search in Google Scholar

Chierchia, Gennaro. 2013. Logic in grammar: Polarity, free choice, and intervention. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Corblin, Francis. 1996. Multiple negation processing in natural language. Theoria 62(3). 214–259. Search in Google Scholar

Crisma, Paola. 2012. Quantifiers in Italian. In Edward Keenan & Denis Paperno (eds.), Handbook of quantifiers in natural language, 467–534. Berlin: Springer. Search in Google Scholar

Déprez, Viviane. 2000. Parallel (a)symmetries and the structure of negative expressions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18. 253–342. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006449808181. Search in Google Scholar

Déprez, Viviane. 2011. Atoms of negation: An outside-in micro-parametric approach to negative concord. In Richard Ingham & Pierre Larrivée (eds.), The evolution of negation. Beyond the Jespersen cycle, 221–272. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. Search in Google Scholar

Déprez, Viviane & France Martineau. 2004. Micro-parametric variation and Negative Concord. In Julie Auger, J. Clancy Clements & Barbara Vance (eds.), Contemporary approaches to Romance linguistics: Selected papers from the 33rd LSRL, 139–158. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Search in Google Scholar

Devine, Andrew M. & Laurence D. Stephens. 2013. Semantics for Latin. An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Etxeberria, Urtzi & Anastasia Giannakidou. 2017. A unified analysis of Spanish algún/algunos: anti- specificity, plurality, and NP-anaphora. Ms. Search in Google Scholar

Fălăuş, Anamaria. 2007. Le paradoxe de la double négation dans une langue à concordance négative stricte. In Franck, Floricic (ed.), La négation dans les langues romanes, 75–97. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Search in Google Scholar

Fălăuş, Anamaria. 2014. (Partially) free choice of alternatives. Linguistics and Philosophy 37. 121–173. Search in Google Scholar

Farkas, Donka. 2002. Extreme non-specificity in Romanian. In Claire Beyssade, Reineke Bok-Bennema, Frank Drijkoningen & Paola Monachesi (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2000. 127–151. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Search in Google Scholar

Foulet, Lucien. 1919. ‘Quelque’. Romania 45. 220–249. https://doi.org/10.3406/roma.1919.5158. Search in Google Scholar

Foulet, Lucien. 1970. Petite syntaxe de l'ancien français, 3rd revised edn. Paris: Champion. Search in Google Scholar

Giannakidou, Anastasia. 1998. Polarity sensitivity as (non)veridical dependency. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Search in Google Scholar

Giannakidou, Anastasia & Josep Quer. 2013. Exhaustive and non-exhaustive variation with free choice and referential vagueness: Evidence from Greek, Catalan, and Spanish. Lingua 126. 120–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.005. Search in Google Scholar

Giannakidou, Anastasia & Hedde Zeijlstra. 2017. The Landscape of Negative Dependencies: Negative Concord and N-Words. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, 2nd edn. London: Wiley Blackwell. Search in Google Scholar

Gianollo, Chiara. 2018. Indefinites between Latin and Romance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Giusti, Giuliana. 2006. Parallels in clausal and nominal periphery. In Mara Frascarelli (ed.), Phases of interpretation, 163–184. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Search in Google Scholar

Giusti, Giuliana. 2010. Le espressioni di quantità. In Giampaolo Salvi & Lorenzo Renzi (eds.), Grammatica dell’italiano antico. Bologna: Il Mulino. Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. Indefinite pronouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Ingham, Richard. 2011. Grammar change in Anglo-Norman and Continental French. The replacement of non-affirmative indefinite nul by aucun. Diachronica 28(4). 441–467. https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.28.4.01ing. Search in Google Scholar

Ingham, Richard & Amel Kallel. 2014. Evidence from a correspondence corpus for diachronic change in French indefinites 1450-1715. In Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen & Jacqueline Visconti (eds.), The diachrony of negation, 213–234. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Search in Google Scholar

Iordăchioaia, Gianina & Frank Richter. 2015. Negative concord with polyadic quantifiers. The case of Romanian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 33. 607–658. Search in Google Scholar

Israel, Michael. 2011. The grammar of polarity. Pragmatics, sensitivity, and the logic of scales. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Jayez, Jacques & Lucia Tovena. 2006. Epistemic determiners. Journal of Semantics 23(3). 217–250. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffl002. Search in Google Scholar

Jayez, Jacques & Lucia Tovena. 2011. The meaning and (a bit of) the history of quelque. In Lucia Tovena (ed.), French determiners in and across time, 111–139. London: College Publications. Search in Google Scholar

Jäger, Agnes. 2010. Anything is nothing is something. On the diachrony of polarity types of indefinites. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28(4). 787–822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-010-9113-1. Search in Google Scholar

Kadmon, Nirit & Fred Landman. 1993. Any. Linguistics and Philosophy 16(4). 353–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00985272. Search in Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul & Cleo Condoravdi. 2006. Tracking Jespersen’s Cycle. In Brian Joseph & Angela Ralli (eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference of Modern Greek dialects and linguistic theory, 172–197. Patras: University of Patras. Search in Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika & Junko Shimoyama. 2002. Indeterminate pronouns: The view from Japanese. Proceedings of the 3rd Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics, 1–25. Search in Google Scholar

Krifka, Manfred. 2007. Basic notions of information structure. Working Papers of the SFB632, Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure (ISIS) 6. 13–56. https://publishup.uni-potsdam.de/opus4-ubp/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/1430/file/ISIS06.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

König, Ekkehard. 1991. The meaning of focus particles: A comparative perspective. London: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Labelle, Marie & M. Teresa Espinal. 2014. Diachronic changes in negative expressions: The case of French. Lingua 145. 194–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.04.002. Search in Google Scholar

Ladusaw, William. 1992. Expressing negation. In Chris Barker & David Dowty (eds.), Proceedings of SALT, vol. 2, 237–259: Ohio State University: Ohio State Working Papers in Linguistics 40. Search in Google Scholar

Ladusaw, William. 1993. Negation, indefinites, and the Jespersen cycle. In Joshua S. Guenter, Barbara A. Kaiser & Cheryl C. Zoll (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 437–446. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. Search in Google Scholar

Lauer, Sven. 2012. Some news about irgend- and algún. Ms: Stanford University. Search in Google Scholar

Ledgeway, Adam. 2009. Grammatica diacronica del napoletano. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Search in Google Scholar

Leonetti, Manuel. 2004. Specificity and Differential Object Marking in Spanish. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 3. 75–114. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.106. Search in Google Scholar

López, Luis. 2012. Indefinite objects. Scrambling, choice functions, and differential marking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Search in Google Scholar

Marouzeau, Jules. 1922. L’ordre des mots dans la phrase latine, vol. 1 Les groupes nominaux. Paris: Champion. Search in Google Scholar

Martí, Luisa. 2008. The semantics of plural indefinite noun phrases in Spanish and Portuguese. Natural Language Semantics 16. 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-007-9023-x. Search in Google Scholar

Martins, Ana Maria. 2000. Polarity Items in Romance: Underspecification and Lexical Change. In Susan Pintzuk, George, Tsoulas & Anthony Warner (eds.), Diachronic syntax. Models and mechanisms, 191–219. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Martins, Ana Maria. 2015a. Ordem de palavras e polaridade. Inversão nominal negativa com algum / alguno e nenhum. Diacrítica 29(1). 399–426. http://www.scielo.mec.pt/pdf/dia/v29n1/v29n1a16.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Martins, Ana Maria. 2015b. Negation and NPI composition inside DP. In Theresa Biberauer & George Walkden (eds.), Syntax over time, 102–121. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Mauri, Caterina, Silvia Ballarè, Eugenio Goria, Massimo Cerruti & Francesco Suriano. 2019. KIParla corpus: A new resource for spoken Italian. In Raffaella Bernardi, Roberto Navigli & Giovanni Semeraro (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Italian conference on computational linguistics CLiC-it. Search in Google Scholar

Milner, Jean-Claude. 1979. Le système de la néǵtion en français et l'opacité du sujet. Langue française 44. 80–105. https://doi.org/10.3406/lfr.1979.6171. Search in Google Scholar

Par, Anfos. 1923. Sintaxi catalana segons los escrits en prosa de Bernat Metge. Halle: Niemeyer. Search in Google Scholar

Penka, Doris. 2011. Negative indefinites. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

REW = Wilhelm Meyer-Lübke. 1935. Romanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch 3. vollständig neubearbeitete Auflage. Available online urn:nbn:de:bvb:355-ubr07799–0. Heidelberg: Winter. Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou. 2003. Syntactic change. A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Roussou, Anna. 2007. Minimalism and diachronic syntax: The development of negative expressions. In Eleni Agathopoulou, Maria Dimitrakopoulou & Despina Papadopoulou (eds.), Selected papers on theoretical and applied linguistics: Festschrift for Prof. E. Panagopoulos, vol. 17 1, 11–27. Thessaloniki: Monochromia. Search in Google Scholar

Schwarzschild, Roger. 2002. Singleton Indefinites. Journal of Semantics 19. 289–314. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/19.3.289. Search in Google Scholar

Stark, Elisabeth. 2002. Indefiniteness and specificity in Old Italian texts. Journal of Semantics 19(3). 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/19.3.315. Search in Google Scholar

Stark, Elisabeth. 2006. Indefinitheit und Textkohärenz: Entstehung und Semantische Strukturierung Indefiniter Nominaldetermination im Altitalienischen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Search in Google Scholar

Traina, Alfonso & Tullio Bertotti. 1985. Sintassi normativa della lingua latina. 3rd edn. Bologna: Cappelli. Search in Google Scholar

Willis, David. 2011. Negative polarity and the Quantifier Cycle: comparative diachronic perspectives from European languages. In Pierre Larrivée & Richard Ingham (eds.), The evolution of negation. Beyond the Jespersen cycle, 285–323. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Search in Google Scholar

Willis, David, Christopher Lucas & Anne Breitbarth. 2013. Comparing diachronies of negation. In David Willis, Christopher Lucas & Anne Breitbarth (eds.), The history of negation in the languages of Europe and the Mediterranean, vol. 1: Case studies, 1–50. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Zamparelli, Roberto. 2007. On singular existential quantifiers in Italian. In Ileana Comorovski & Klaus von Heusinger (eds.), Existence: Semantics and syntax, 293–328. Berlin: Springer. Search in Google Scholar

Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2004. Sentential negation and negative concord. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam dissertation. Search in Google Scholar

Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2016. Negation and negative dependencies. Annual Review of Linguistics 2. 233–254. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-030514-125126. Search in Google Scholar

Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa. 1998. Prosody, focus, and word order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-09-22
Published in Print: 2020-11-18

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston