Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton November 16, 2016

Entropy as a measure of mixedupness of realizations in child speech

  • Elena Babatsouli EMAIL logo , David Ingram and Dimitrios A. Sotiropoulos


Typical morpho-phonological measures of children’s speech realizations used in the literature depend linearly on their components. Examples are the proportion of consonants correct, the mean length of utterance and the phonological mean length of utterance. Because of their linear dependence on their components, these measures change in proportion to their component changes between speech realizations. However, there are instances in which variable speech realizations need to be differentiated better. Therefore, a measure which is more sensitive to its components than linear measures is needed. Here, entropy is proposed as such a measure. The sensitivity of entropy is compared analytically to that of linear measures, deriving ranges in component values inside which entropy is guaranteed to be more sensitive than the linear measures. The analysis is complemented by computing the entropy in two children’s English speech for different categories of word complexity and comparing its sensitivity to that of linear measures. One of the children is a bilingual typically developing child at age 3;0 and the other child is a monolingual child with speech sound disorders at age 5;11. The analysis and applications demonstrate the usefulness of the measure for evaluating speech realizations and its relative advantages over linear measures.

Institute of Monolingual and Bilingual Speech, Kalathas Akrotiriou, Chania, 73100, Greece


Babatsouli, E. 2016. “Added syllable complexity in a child’s developmental speech and clinical implications”. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 1464–5076. (doi:f10.3109/02699206.2016.1162200).Search in Google Scholar

Babatsouli, E. 2015. “Technologies for the study of speech: Review and an application” [Special Issue on Language Disorders and ICT]. Themes in Science and Technology Education 8(1). 17–32.Search in Google Scholar

Babatsouli, E., D. Ingram and D. Sotiropoulos. 2014. “Phonological word proximity in child speech development”. Chaotic Modeling and Simulation. 4(3). 295–313.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, R. 1973. A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674732469Search in Google Scholar

Bunta, F., L. Fabiano-Smith, B.A. Goldstein and D. Ingram. 2009. “Phonological whole-word measures in three-year-old bilingual children and their age-matched monolingual peers”. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics. 23. 156–175.10.1080/02699200802603058Search in Google Scholar

Burrows, L. and B.A. Goldstein. 2010. “Whole word measures in bilingual children with speech sound disorders”. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics. 24. 357–368.10.3109/02699200903581067Search in Google Scholar

Goldsmith, J. 2000. “On information theory, entropy, and phonology in the 20th century”. Folia Linguistica XXXIV(1–2). 85–100.10.1515/flin.2000.34.1-2.85Search in Google Scholar

Ingram, D. 1981. Procedures for the phonological analysis of children’s language. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ingram, D. 2002. “The measurement of whole-word production”. Journal of Child Language. 29. 713–733.10.1017/S0305000902005275Search in Google Scholar

Ingram, D. 2015. “Whole-word measures: Using the pCC-PWP intersect to distinguish speech delay from speech disorder”. In: Bowen, C. (ed.), Children’s speech sound disorders (2nd edition). Oxford, UK: John Willey & Sons. 100– 104.Search in Google Scholar

Ingram, D. and K. Ingram. 2001. “A whole-word approach to phonological analysis and intervention”. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools. 32. 271– 283.10.1044/0161-1461(2001/024)Search in Google Scholar

Ingram, D., L. Williams and N. J. Scherer. 2015. “Are speech sound disorders phonological or articulatory? A spectrum approach”. In E. Babatsouli and D. Ingram (eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Monolingual and Bilingual Speech 2015. ISBN 978-618-82351-0-6. Retrieved at 98–104.Search in Google Scholar

Macleod, A.A., K. Laukys and S. Rvachew. 2011. “The impact of bilingual language learning on whole-word complexity and segmental accuracy among children aged 18 and 36 months”. International Journal of Speech and Language Pathology. 13. 490–499.10.3109/17549507.2011.578658Search in Google Scholar

MacWhinney, B. 2000. The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Nespor, M., M. Peña and J. Mehler. 2003. “On the different roles of vowels and consonants in speech processing and language acquisition”. Lingue e Linguaggio. 2. 203–229.Search in Google Scholar

Nice, M. M. 1925. “Length of sentences as a criterion of a child’s progress in speech”. Journal of Educational Psychology. 16. 370–379.10.1037/h0073259Search in Google Scholar

Parker, M.D. and K. Brorson. 2005. “A comparative study between mean length of utterance in morphemes (MLUm) and mean length of utterance in words (MLUw)”. First Language. 25. 365–376.10.1177/0142723705059114Search in Google Scholar

Schmitt, L.S., B.H. Howard and J.F Schmitt. 1983. “Conversational speech sampling in the assessment of articulation proficiency”. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools. 14. 210–214.10.1044/0161-1461.1404.210Search in Google Scholar

Shriberg, L., D. Austin, B. Lewis, J. McSweeney and D. Wilson. 1997. “The percentage of consonants correct (PCC) metric: Extensions and reliability data”. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 3. 708–722.10.1044/jslhr.4004.708Search in Google Scholar

Shannon, C.E. 1948a. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal. 27(3). 379–423.10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.xSearch in Google Scholar

Shannon, C.E. 1948b. “A mathematical theory of communication”. Bell System Technical Journal. 27(4). 623–656.10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb00917.xSearch in Google Scholar

Taelman, H., G. Durieux and S. Gillis. 2005. “Notes on Ingram’s whole-word measures for phonological development”. Journal of Child Language. 32. 391– 400.10.1017/S0305000904006774Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2016-11-16
Published in Print: 2016-11-1

© Faculty of English, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland

Downloaded on 25.2.2024 from
Scroll to top button