Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton November 16, 2016

The same or different: A comparison of the rhythmic structure of Swedish and Albanian

Mechtild Tronnier and Elisabeth Zetterholm

Abstract

The purpose of this contribution is to give an account of the similarities or dissimilarities of the speech rhythm of Swedish and Albanian. In this study, temporal features were focused on to ascertain rhythmic differences between the two languages. The interest for this study arose when a clear rhythmic variation was observed in the accented Swedish L2 speech produced by L1-speakers of Albanian, namely the lack of attributes like reduction in unstressed syllables. It was thus hypothesised that speakers of L1-Swedish would produce larger variation in length of vocalic and/or consonantal intervals than L1-speakers of Albanian. The recorded material comprised read speech produced by seven L1-speakers of both languages. Various acoustic metrics were applied to analyse the rhythm. Results show differences between Swedish and Albanian speech for both non-normalised and normalised metrics only for the vocalic intervals, but with an unexpected outcome. In that way, larger length variation for vocalic intervals in the Albanian material than in the Swedish material was found. Therefore, the occurrence of reduction phenomena also in Albanian can be stated. These findings contradict the assumption that transfer from L1-Albanian was the reason for lack of reduction in L2-Swedish, as observed previously.


Department of Linguistics and Phonetics, Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University, P.O. Box 201, 221 00 Lund, Sweden

References

Abercrombie, D. 1967. Elements of general phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Alimemaj, Z.M. 2014. “English phonological problems encountered by Albanian learners”. European Scientific Journal 10. 1857–7431.Search in Google Scholar

Arvaniti, A. 2012. “The usefulness of metrics in the quantification of speech rhythm”. Journal of Phonetics 40. 351–373.10.1016/j.wocn.2012.02.003Search in Google Scholar

Barry, W.J. and B. Andreeva. 2001. “Cross-language similarities and differences in spontaneous speech patterns”. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 31(1). 51–66.10.1017/S0025100301001050Search in Google Scholar

Barry, W.J., B. Andreeva, M. Russo, S. Dimitrova and T Kostadinova. 2003. “Do rhythm measures tell us anything about language type?” In: Solé, M.J., D. Recasens and J. Romero (eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetics Sciences, Barcelona. 2693–2696.Search in Google Scholar

Bruce, G. 2012. Allmän och svensk prosodi [General and Swedish prosody]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Search in Google Scholar

Dauer, R.M. 1983. “Stress-timing and syllable-timing reanalyzed”. Journal of Phonetics 11. 51–62.10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30776-4Search in Google Scholar

Dellwo, V. 2006. “Rhythm and speech rate: A variation coefficient for delta C”. In: Karnowski, P. and I. Szigeti (eds.), Language and language processing: Proceedings of the 38th Linguistic Colloquium, Piliscsaba 2003. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. 231–241.Search in Google Scholar

Dellwo, V. 2009. “Choosing the right rate normalization method for measurements of speech rhythm”. In: Schmid, S., M. Schwarzenbach and D. Studer-Joho (eds.), La dimensione temporale del parlato. Torriana: EDK Editore. 13–32.Search in Google Scholar

Dellwo, V. and P. Wagner. 2003. “Relations between language rhythm and speech rate”. In: Solé, M.J., D. Recasens, and J. Romero (eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetics Sciences, Barcelona. 471–474.Search in Google Scholar

Engstrand, O. 2004. Fonetikens grunder [The basics of phonetics]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Search in Google Scholar

Eriksson, A. 1991. Aspects of Swedish speech rhythm. (Gothenburg Monographs in Linguistics 9.) Gothenburg University: Department of Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Garlén, C. 1988. Svenskans fonologi [The phonology of Swedish]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Search in Google Scholar

Grabe, E. and E.L. Low. 2002. “Durational variability in speech and the rhythm class hypothesis”. In: Warner, N. and C. Gussenhoven (eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology 7. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 515–546.Search in Google Scholar

Lloshi, X. 1999. “Albanian”. In: Hinrichs U. (ed.), Handbuch der Südost-Europa-Linguistik. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag. 277–299.Search in Google Scholar

Liss, J.M., L. White, S.L. Mattys, K. Lansford, S. Spitzer, A.J. Lotto and J.N. Caviness. 2009. “Quantifying speech rhythm abnormalities in the dysarthrias”. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 52(5). 1334–1352.10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0208)Search in Google Scholar

Low, E.L., E. Grabe and F. Nolan. 2000. “Quantitative characterizations of speech rhythm: ‘Syllable-timing’ in Singapore English”. Language and Speech 43. 377– 401.10.1177/00238309000430040301Search in Google Scholar

Moosmueller, S. and T. Granser. 2003. “The vowels of Standard Albanian”. In: Solé, M.J., D. Recasens, and J. Romero (eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetics Sciences, Barcelona. 659–662.Search in Google Scholar

Nishihara, T. and J.M. van de Weijer. 2012. “On syllable-timed rhythm and stress-timed rhythm in world Englishes: Revisited”. Bulletin of Miyagi University of Education 46. 155–163.Search in Google Scholar

Nolan, F. and E.L. Asu. 2009. “The Pairwise Variability Index and coexisting rhythms in language”. Phonetica 66. 64–77.10.1159/000208931Search in Google Scholar

Pike, K. 1945. The intonation of American English. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ramus, F. and J. Mehler. 1999. “Language identification based on suprasegmental cues: A study based on resynthesis”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 105(1). 512–521.10.1121/1.424522Search in Google Scholar

Ramus, F., M. Nespor and J. Mehler. 1999. “Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal”. Cognition 73. 265–292.10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00058-XSearch in Google Scholar

Strangert, E. 1985. Swedish speech rhythm in a cross-language perspective. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.Search in Google Scholar

Tronnier, M. and E. Zetterholm. 2013. “Observed pronunciation features in Swedish L2 produced by L1-speakers of Albanian”. In: Eklund, R. (ed.) Studies in Language and Culture 21. 85–88.Search in Google Scholar

Tronnier, M. and E. Zetterholm. 2015. “Rhythmic contrast between Swedish and Albanian as an explanation for L2-speech?” In: Babatsouli, E. and D Ingram (eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Monolingual and Bilingual Speech 2015, Institute of monolingual and bilingual speech, Chania, Greece. 396–402.Search in Google Scholar

White, L. and S.L. Mattys. 2007. “Calibrating rhythm: First language and second language studies”. Journal of Phonetics 35. 501–522.10.1016/j.wocn.2007.02.003Search in Google Scholar

Wiget, L., L. White, B. Schuppler, I. Grenon, O. Rauch and S.L. Mattys. 2010. “How stable are acoustic metrics of contrastive speech rhythm?” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 127. 1559–1569.10.1121/1.3293004Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2016-11-16
Published in Print: 2016-11-1

© Faculty of English, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland

Scroll Up Arrow