Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton November 16, 2018

On left-peripheral particle to in Polish and Czech: A focus, a topic head, or neither?

Przemysław Tajsner

Abstract

The article offers a non-cartographic approach to the syntax of the left-peripheral particle to in Polish and Czech. It is claimed here that to is neither a topic nor a focus head. Instead, it has a status of a neutral Relator, a head of Relator Phrase, operative in the formation of the non-directional Structure of Predication. This structure serves the needs of Information Structure in providing a syntactic blueprint for segregating topics from foci, but these notions themselves are solely the interpretations of constituents and not independent syntactic categories. The analysis capitalizes on a clitic status of to in Czech, the lack of special clitics in Polish, and makes use of the ideas of the parametric directionality of Agreement and Labelling Algorithm allowing for merging heads to project.


Przemysław Tajsner Faculty of English Adam Mickiewicz University Collegium Novum al. Niepodległości 4 61-874 Poznań Poland

References

Anderson, S. 2005. Aspects of the theory of clitics New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199279906.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Baker, M. 2008. The syntax of agreement and concord Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511619830Search in Google Scholar

Baker, M. 2013. “Agreement and Case”. In: den Dikken, M. (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of generative syntax Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 601–654.10.1017/CBO9780511804571.022Search in Google Scholar

Bański, P. 1997. “Polish auxiliary clitics: Morphology or syntax?” ZAS Papers in Linguistics 6. Berlin: Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft. 17–27.Search in Google Scholar

Belletti, A. (ed.). 2004. Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures. Vol. 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Boeckx, C. 2008. Bare syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bondaruk, A. 2013. Copular clauses in English and Polish Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.Search in Google Scholar

Borsley, R. and M.-L. Rivero. 1994. “Clitic auxiliaries and incorporation in Polish”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12. 373–422.10.1007/BF01118135Search in Google Scholar

Bowers, J. 1993. “The syntax of predication”. Linguistic Inquiry 24. 591–656.Search in Google Scholar

Bury, D. 2003. Phrase structure and derived heads. (PhD dissertation, University College London.)Search in Google Scholar

Ćavar, D. and C. Wilder. 1994. “Long head movement? Verb movement and cliticization in Croatian”. Lingua 93. 1–58.10.1016/0024-3841(94)90352-2Search in Google Scholar

Ćavar, D. and M. Seiss 2011. “Clitic placement, syntactic discontinuity, and information structure”. In: Butt, M and T.H. King (eds.), Proceedings of LFG 2011 University of Hong Kong. 131–151.Search in Google Scholar

Cetnarowska, B. 2004. “The scale of pronominal strength in Polish”. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 39. 39–57.Search in Google Scholar

Chafe, W. 1976. “Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view”. In: Li, C.N. (ed.), Subject and topic New York: Academic Press. 27–55.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2013. “Problems of projection”. Lingua 130. 33–49.10.1075/la.223.01choSearch in Google Scholar

Citko, B. 2008. “Small clauses reconsidered: Not so small and not all alike”. Lingua 118. 261–295.10.1016/j.lingua.2007.05.009Search in Google Scholar

Citko, B. 2011. Symmetry in syntax: Merge, move and labels New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511794278Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, L. L-S. 1991. On the typology of wh-questions. (PhD Dissertation, MIT.)Search in Google Scholar

Craenenbroeck, J. van (ed.). 2009. Alternatives to cartography. Studies in generative grammar Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110217124Search in Google Scholar

Danes, F. 1970. “One instance of the Prague school methodology: Functional analysis of utterance and text”. In: Garvin, P. (ed.), Method and theory in linguistics The Hague: Mouton. 132–146.10.1515/9783110872521.132Search in Google Scholar

Den Dikken, M. 2006. Relators and linkers Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5873.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Diesing, M., D. Filipović-Durdević and D. Zec. 2009. “Clitic placement in Serbian: Corpus and experimental evidence”. In: Featherston, S. and S. Winkler (eds.), The fruits of empirical linguistics Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 61–75.10.1515/9783110216158.59Search in Google Scholar

Donati, C. 2006. “On wh-head movement”. In: Cheng, L. L-S. and N. Corver (eds.), Wh- movement: Moving on Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 21–46.Search in Google Scholar

É. Kiss, K. 1998. “Identificational focus versus information focus”. Language 74. 245–273.10.1353/lan.1998.0211Search in Google Scholar

É. Kiss, K. 2006. “Focusing as predication”. In: Molnár, V. and S. Winkler (eds.), The architecture of focus Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

É. Kiss, K. 2010. “Structural focus and exhaustivity”. In: Zimmermann, M. and C. Fery (eds.), Information structure. Theoretical, typological and experimental perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 64–88.Search in Google Scholar

Firbas, J. 1964. “On defining the theme in functional sentence analysis”. Traveaux Linguistique de Prague 1. 267–280.Search in Google Scholar

Franks, S. 1998/2010. “Clitics in Slavic”. Paper presented at the Comparative Slavic Morphosyntax Workshop, Spencer, IN, June, 1998. [Updated version published on-line in Glossos 10: Contemporary Issues in Slavic Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Franks, S. and P. Bański. 1999. “Approaches to ‘schizophrenic’ Polish person agreement”. In: Dziwirek, K., H. Coats and C. Vakareliyska (eds.), Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics: The Seattle meeting Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications. 123–143.Search in Google Scholar

Franks, S. and T. Holloway King. 2000. A handbook of Slavic clitics New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fanselow, G. and D. Lenertová. 2011. “Left peripheral focus: Mismatches between syntax and information structure”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29. 169–209.10.1007/s11049-010-9109-xSearch in Google Scholar

Fried, M. 1994. “Second-position clitics in Czech: Syntactic or phonological?”. Lingua 94. 155–175.10.1016/0024-3841(94)90024-8Search in Google Scholar

Green, M. 2007. Focus in Hausa Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Gundel, J.K. 1988. “Universals of topic-comment structure”. In: Hammond, M., E. Moravcsik and J. Wirth (eds.), Studies in syntactic typology Amsterdam: Benjamins. 209–239.10.1075/tsl.17.16gunSearch in Google Scholar

Halliday, M.A.K. 1970. A course in spoken English: Intonation Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Halpern, A. 1995. On the placement and morphology of clitics Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. (A republished PhD thesis.)Search in Google Scholar

Hana, J. 2007. Czech clitics in higher order grammar. (PhD Dissertation, The Ohio State University.)Search in Google Scholar

Hockett, C. 1958. Two models of grammatical description. Readings in linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Koeneman, O. 2000. The flexible nature of verb movement Utrecht: LOT Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Krifka, M. 2007. “Basic notions of information structure”. In: Féry, C., G. Fanselow and M. Krifka (eds.), Working Papers of the SFB632,Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure(ISIS) 6. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam. 13–56.Search in Google Scholar

Kraska-Szlenk, I. 1995. The phonology of stress in Polish. (PhD dissertation, University of Illinois.)Search in Google Scholar

Lambrecht, K. 1994. Information structure and sentence form. Topic, focus, and the mental representation of discourse referents Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620607Search in Google Scholar

Lenertová, D. 2004. “Czech pronominal clitics”. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 12(1–2). 135–171.Search in Google Scholar

Lenertová, D. and U. Junghanns. 2007. “Fronted focus exponents with maximal focus interpretation in Czech”. In: Schwabe, K and S. Winkler (eds.), On information structure, meaning and form: Generalizations across languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 347–363.10.1075/la.100.19lenSearch in Google Scholar

Migdalski, K. 2016. Second position effects in the syntax of Germanic and Slavic languages Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.Search in Google Scholar

Neeleman, A. and K. Szendröi 2004. “Superman sentences”. Linguistic Inquiry 35(1). 149–159.10.1162/ling.2004.35.1.149Search in Google Scholar

Ocelák, R. 2014. “Topic-focus articulation, word order, and prosody in Czech: Sketch of an optimality-theoretic account”. POST – Portál odborných studentských textů Available at <http://postnito.cz/?p=5095>Search in Google Scholar

O’Connor, R. 2002. “The placement of enclitics in Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian”. (Unpublished ms.)Search in Google Scholar

Progovac, L. 1996. “Clitics in Serbian/Croatian: Comp as the second position”. In: Halpern, A. and A. Zwicky (eds.), Approaching second: Second position clitics and related phenomena Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. 411–428.Search in Google Scholar

Radanović-Kocić, V. 1996. “The placement of Serbo-Croatian clitics: A prosodic approach”. In: Halpern, A. and A. Zwicky (eds.), Approaching second: Second position clitics and related phenomena Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 429–445.Search in Google Scholar

Reinhart, T. 1982. Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.10.21825/philosophica.82606Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, L. (ed.). 2004. The structure of CP and IP. The cartography of syntactic structures (vol. 2). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, I. 2011. “Head movement and the Minimalist Program”. In: Boeckx, C. (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic minimalism Oxford: Oxford University Press. 195–219.Search in Google Scholar

Rooth, M.E. 1985. Association with focus. (PhD dissertation. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.)Search in Google Scholar

Rooth, M.E. 1992. “A theory of focus interpretation”. Natural Language Semantics 1. 75–116.10.1007/BF02342617Search in Google Scholar

Rooth, M.E. 1996. “Focus”. In: Lappin, S. (ed.), The handbook of contemporary semantic theory London: Blackwell. 271–297.Search in Google Scholar

Schütze, C.T. 1994. “Serbo-Croatian second position clitic placement and the phonology–syntax interface”. In: Carnie, A. and H. Harley (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 21 Papers on phonology and morphology 373–473.Search in Google Scholar

Selkirk, E. 2005. “Comments on intonational phrasing in English”. In: Frota, S., M. Vigário and M.J. Freitas (eds.), Prosodies. With special reference to Iberian languages Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 11–58.Search in Google Scholar

Sgall, P., E. Hajicova and J. Panevova. 1987. The meaning of the sentence and its semantic and pragmatic aspects Dordrecht: Reidel.Search in Google Scholar

Šimík, R. 2009. “The syntax, semantics, and pragmatics of the focus particle to in Czech”. In: Zybatow, G., D. Lenertova, U. Junghanns and P. Biskup (eds.), Studies in formal Slavic phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics and information structure: Proceedings of FDSL 7, Leipzig 2007 Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. 327–340.Search in Google Scholar

Šimík, R. and M. Wierzba. 2015. “The role of givenness, presupposition, and prosody in Czech word order: An experimental study”. Semantics & Pragmatics 8. 1–103.10.3765/sp.8.3Search in Google Scholar

Spencer, A. and A.R. Luis. 2012. Clitics. An Introduction Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139033763Search in Google Scholar

Surányi, B. 2005. “Head movement and reprojection”. Annales Universitatis Scientiarum Budapestinensis de Rolando Eötvös Nominatae. Sectio Linguistica XXVI. 313–342.Search in Google Scholar

Szczegielniak, A. 2005. “Clitic positions within the Left Periphery: evidence for a phonological buffer”. In: Heggie, L. and F. Ordóñez (eds.), Clitic and affix combinations Amsterdam: Benjamins. 283–299.10.1075/la.74.11szcSearch in Google Scholar

Szendröi, K. 2003. “A stress-based approach to the syntax of Hungarian focus”. The Linguistic Review 20. 37–78.10.1515/tlir.2003.002Search in Google Scholar

Tajsner, P. 2008. Aspects of the grammar of focus. A minimalist view. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Tajsner, P. 2015a. “On specification predication and the derivation of copular to-clauses in Polish”. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 50. 25–66.10.1515/stap-2015-0032Search in Google Scholar

Tajsner P. 2015b. “On focus marking and predication. Evidence from Polish with some notes on Hausa”. Lingua Posnaniensis LVII(1). 113–138.10.1515/linpo-2015-0006Search in Google Scholar

Tajsner, P. 2017. “A derivational framework for focus as predication”. In: Stalmaszczyk, P. (ed.), Understanding predication Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. 205–240.Search in Google Scholar

Tajsner, P. and P. Cegłowski. 2006. “Topicalization and object fronting in Polish: A view from a minimalist perspective”. In: Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K. (ed.), IFAtuation: A life in IFA. A Festschrift for professor Jacek Fisiak on the occasion of His 70th birthday Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM. 99–131.Search in Google Scholar

Wedgwood, D. 2003. Predication and information structure. A dynamic account of the Hungarian pre-verbal system. (PhD dissertation, University of Edinburgh.)Search in Google Scholar

Walusiak, E. 2005. “Partykuła to jako operator struktury tematyczno-rematycznej zdania. Opis właściwości składniowych i szyku” [The particle to as an operator in thematic-rhematic sentence structure. A description of its syntactic properties and word order]. Polonica XXIV–XXV. 207–227.Search in Google Scholar

Williams, E. 1980. “Predication”. Linguistic Inquiry 11. 203–238.Search in Google Scholar

Zubizarreta, M.L. 1998. Prosody, focus and word order Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Zwicky, A. 1977. On clitics Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-11-16
Published in Print: 2018-11-27

© 2018 Faculty of English, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland

Scroll Up Arrow