Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton August 17, 2019

Nominal coreference resolution for Polish

Maciej Ogrodniczuk

Abstract

The article presents current research on coreference resolution for Polish, from development of a sufficiently general model of reference relations to implementation of tools using this model to automatically detect coreference in written texts. The task is accomplished using corpus approach, with manual annotation of reference structures, verification of the proposed theory on the corpus data, implementation of automatic tools in different technical architectures and finally assessing their quality using standard evaluation methods.

References

Abadi, M., P. Barham, J. Chen, Z. Chen, A. Davis, J. Dean, M. Devin, et al. 2016. “TensorFlow: A system for large-scale machine learning”. 12th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI 16). 265–283. <https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/osdi16/osdi16-abadi.pdf>Search in Google Scholar

Abramowicz, W. A. Filipowska, J. Piskorski, K. Węcel and K. Wieloch. 2006. “Linguistic suite for Polish cadastral system”. Proceedings of the 5th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC 2006) Genova: European Language Resources Association. 2518–2523.Search in Google Scholar

Acedański, S. 2010. “A morphosyntactic Brill tagger for inflectional languages”. In: Loftsson, H., E. Rögnvaldsson and S. Helgadóttir (eds.), Advances in natural language processing Heidelberg: Springer. 3–14. <http://ripper.dasie.mimuw.edu.pl/~accek/homepage/wp-content/papercite-data/pdf/ace10dpdf>Search in Google Scholar

Aone, C. and S.W. Bennett. 1995. “Evaluating automated and manual acquisition of anaphora resolution strategies”. Proceedings of the 33rd annual meeting on association for computational linguistics (ACL 1995). Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics. 122–129.Search in Google Scholar

Bagga, A. and B. Baldwin. 1998. “Algorithms for scoring coreference chains”. Proceedings of the Workshop on Linguistic Coreference at the 1st International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 1998) Granada. 563–566.Search in Google Scholar

Bellert, I. 1971. “O pewnym warunku spójności tekstu” [On a certain condition on text coherence]. In: Mayenowa, M.R. (ed.), O spójności tekstu [On text coherence]. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich. 47–76.Search in Google Scholar

Bengtson, E. and Dan Roth. 2008. “Understanding the value of features for coreference resolution”. Proceedings of the conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP 2008). Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics. 294–303.Search in Google Scholar

Bennet, E.M., R. Alpert and A.C. Goldstein. 1954. “Communications through limited-response questioning”. Public Opinion Quarterly 18(3). 303–308.10.1086/266520Search in Google Scholar

Brennan, S.E., M.W. Friedman and C.J. Pollard. 1987. “A centering approach to pronouns”. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 1987) Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics. 155–162. doi:10.3115/981175.981197.10.3115/981175.981197Search in Google Scholar

Bresnan, J. 2001. Lexical-functional syntax Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Broda, B., M. Marcińczuk, M. Maziarz, A. Radziszewski and A. Wardyński. 2012. “KPWr: Towards a free corpus of Polish”. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2012) Istanbul: European Language Resources Association. 3218–3222.Search in Google Scholar

Cai, J. and M. Strube. 2010. “Evaluation metrics for end-to-end coreference resolution systems”. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue (SIGDIAL 2010) Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics. 28–36.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, C. and V. Ng. 2012. “Combining the best of two worlds: A hybrid approach to multilingual coreference resolution”. Joint Conference on EMNLP and CONLL: Proceedings of the Shared Task 56–63.Search in Google Scholar

Chollet, F. 2015. Keras. <https://keras.io>; GitHub.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1980. “On binding”. Linguistic Inquiry 11(1). U–46.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on government and binding Dordrecht: Foris.Search in Google Scholar

Clark, H.H. 1977. “Bridging”. In: Johnson-Laird, P. and P.C. Wason (eds.), Thinking: Readings in cognitive science Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 411–420.Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, W.W. 1995. “Fast effective rule induction”. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Machine Learning Morgan Kaufmann. 115–123.Search in Google Scholar

Connolly, D., J.D. Burger and D.S. Day. 1994. “A machine learning approach to anaphoric reference”. Proceedings of the International Conference on New Methods in Language Processing (NeMLaP) New Brunswick: ACL. 255–261.Search in Google Scholar

Denis, P. and J. Baldridge. 2008. “Specialized models and ranking for coreference resolution”. Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Honolulu: Association for Computational Linguistics. 660–669. <http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D08-1069>Search in Google Scholar

Dobrzyńska, T. 1996. “Tekst i jego odmiany: Zbiór studiów” [Text and its varieties: A collection of studies]. In: Dobrzyńska, T. (ed.), Tekst – w perspektywie stylistycznej [Text – in a stylistic perspective]. Warszawa: Instytut Badań Literackich PAN. 125–143.Search in Google Scholar

Dunin-Kęplicz, B. 1989. Formalna metoda rozwiązywania pewnej klasy polskiej anafory zaimkowej [A formal method of solving a Polish pronominal anaphora class]. (PhD dissertation, Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Kraków.)Search in Google Scholar

Duszak, A. 1986. “Niektóre uwarunkowania semantyczne szyku wyrazów w zdaniu polskim” [Some semantic conditions on the word order of Polish sentences]. Polonica XII(12). 59–74.Search in Google Scholar

Fall, J. 1988. O anaforze i logicznych metodach jej interpretacji [On anaphora and the logical methods of its interpretation]. (PhD dissertation, Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Kraków.)Search in Google Scholar

Fall, J. 2001. “Anafora – logiczne metody interpretacji” [Anaphora – logical methods of interpretation]. Studia Semiotyczne XXIII. 65–97.Search in Google Scholar

Filak, T. 2006. Zastosowanie metod automatycznego uczenia do rozstrzygania problemu anafory [Using machine learning methods to solve the problem of anaphora]. (Master’s thesis, Wrocław University of Science and Technology.)Search in Google Scholar

Fleiss, J.L. 1971. “Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters”. Psychological Bulletin 76(5). 378–382. doi:10.1037/h0031619.10.1037/h0031619Search in Google Scholar

Fontański, H. 1986. Anaforyczne przymiotniki wskazujące w języku polskim i rosyjskim: Problem użycia [Anaphoric indicative adjectives in Polish and Russian]. Katowice: Uniwersytet Śląski.Search in Google Scholar

Gajda, S. 1990. Współczesna polszczyzna naukowa: Język czy żargon? [Modern scientific Polish: A language or a jargon]. Opole: Instytut Śląski.Search in Google Scholar

Grochowski, M. 1976. “O pojęciu elipsy” [On the concept of ellipsis]. Pamiętnik Lite-racki LXVII(1). 121–136. <http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.47.9143>Search in Google Scholar

Grosz, B.J. 1977. The representation and use of focus in dialogue understanding. (PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.)Search in Google Scholar

Grosz, B.J., S. Weinstein and A.K. Joshi. 1995. “Centering: A framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse”. Computational Linguistics 21(2). 203–226. <http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.47.9143>Search in Google Scholar

Grzegorczykowa, R. 1996. “Polskie leksemy z wbudowaną informacją anaforyzacyjną” [Polish lexemes with built-in anaphorization information]. In: Grochowski, M. (ed.), Anafora w strukturze tekstu [Anaphora in text structure]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Energeia. 71–77.Search in Google Scholar

Gundel, J.K., N. Hedberg and R. Zacharski. 1993. “Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse”. Language 69(2). 274–307.10.2307/416535Search in Google Scholar

Głowińska, K. 2012. “Anotacja składniowa” [Syntactic annotation]. In: Przepiórkowski, A., M. Bańko, R.L. Górski and B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (eds.), Narodowy Korpus Języka Polskiego [The National Corpus of Polish]. Warszawa: Wydawnic-two Naukowe PWN. 107–127.Search in Google Scholar

Haghighi, A. and D. Klein. 2007. “Unsupervised coreference resolution in a nonparametric Bayesian model”. In: Carroll, J.A., A. van den Bosch and A. Zaenen (eds.), Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics The Association for Computational Linguistics. 848–855.Search in Google Scholar

Haghighi, A. and D. Klein. 2009. “Simple coreference resolution with rich syntactic and semantic features”. Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing Singapore: Association for Computational Linguistics. 1152–1161. <http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D/D09/D09-1120>Search in Google Scholar

Hahn, U., M. Strube and K. Markert. 1996. “Bridging textual ellipses”. Proceedings of the 16th conference on computational linguistics — volume 1 (COLING ’96). Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics. 496–501. doi:10.3115/992628.992714.10.3115/992628.992714Search in Google Scholar

Hajnicz, E., B. Nitoń, A. Patejuk, A. Przepiórkowski and M. Woliński. 2015. “Internetowy słownik walencyjny języka polskiego oparty na danych korpusowych” [An Internet valence dictionary of Polish based on corpus data]. Prace Filologiczne LXV. 95–110.Search in Google Scholar

Hendrickx, I., O. De Clercq and V. Hoste. 2011. “Analysis and reference resolution of bridge anaphora across different text genres”. Proceedings of the eighth international conference on anaphora processing and applications (DAARC 2011) Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. U–11. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-25917-3_U.10.1007/978-3-642-25917-3_USearch in Google Scholar

Hobbs, J.R. 1976. Pronoun resolution New York: Department of Computer Science, City College, City University of New York.Search in Google Scholar

Honowska, M. 1984. “Grzybnia zaimkowa. Przyczynek do zagadnień spójności tekstu” [Pronominal mycelium: A prolegomena to problems of text coherence]. Polonica X. 111–120.Search in Google Scholar

Ioffe, S. and C. Szegedy. 2015. “Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift”. ICML (JMLR Workshop and Conference Proceedings) vol. 37. JMLR.org 448–456.Search in Google Scholar

Irmer, M. 2010. Bridging inferences in discourse interpretation. (PhD dissertation, University of Leipzig.)Search in Google Scholar

Kaczmarek, A. and M. Marcińczuk. 2017. “A preliminary study in zero anaphora coreference resolution for Polish”. Cognitive Studies (17). U–13. doi:10.11649/cs.1316.10.11649/cs.1316Search in Google Scholar

Kardela, H. 1985. A grammar of English and Polish reflexives Lublin: Uniwersytet Marii Curie- Skłodowskiej.Search in Google Scholar

Kehler, A. 1997. “Probabilistic coreference in information extraction”. Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Empirical Methods in NLP (EMNLP-2) 163–173.Search in Google Scholar

Kingma, D.P. and J.L. Ba. 2015. “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization”. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference for Learning Representations (ICLR 2015)Search in Google Scholar

Klemensiewicz, Z. 1937. Składnia opisowa współczesnej polszczyzny kulturalnej [A descriptive syntax of modern cultural Polish]. Kraków: Polska Akademia Umiejętności.Search in Google Scholar

Klemensiewicz, Z. 1968. Zarys składni polskiej [An outline of Polish syntax]. (5th edn.) Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Search in Google Scholar

Kopeć, M. 2014a. “MMAX2 for coreference annotation”. Proceedings of the Demonstrations at the 14th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics Association for Computational Linguistics. 93–96. <http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/k14-2024>Search in Google Scholar

Kopeć, M. 2014b. “Zero subject detection for Polish”. Proceedings of the 14th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Volume 2: Short papers Gothenburg: Association for Computational Linguistics. 221–225. <http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/k14-4043>Search in Google Scholar

Kopeć, M. 2018. Summarization of Polish press articles using coreference. (PhD dissertaion, Instytut Podstaw Informatyki PAN, Warsaw.)Search in Google Scholar

Kopeć, M. and M. Ogrodniczuk. 2012. “Creating a coreference resolution system for Polish”. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2012) Istanbul: European Language Resources Association. 192–195.Search in Google Scholar

Kulików, S., J. Romaniuk and N. Suszczańska. 2004. “A syntactical analysis of anaphora in the Polsyn parser”. In: Kłopotek, M.A., S.T. Wierzchoń and K. Trojanowski (eds.), Intelligent information processing and web miningBerlinSpringer 444–448. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-39985-8_50.10.1007/978-3-540-39985-8_50Search in Google Scholar

Kunz, K.A. 2010. Variation in English and German nominal coreference: A study of political essays Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Kupść, A. and M. Marciniak. 1997. “Some notes on HPSG binding theory for Polish”. In: Junghanns, U. and G. Zybatow (eds.), Formale slavistik Frankfurt: Vervuert Verlag. 193–204.Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, R.W. 2008. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, H., A. Chang, Y. Peirsman, N. Chambers, M. Surdeanu and D. Jurafsky. 2013. “Deterministic coreference resolution based on entity-centric, precision-ranked rules”. Computational Linguistics 39(4). 885–916. doi:10.1162/COLI_a_00152.10.1162/COLI_a_00152Search in Google Scholar

Lee, H., Y. Peirsman, A. Chang, N. Chambers, M. Surdeanu and D. Jurafsky. 2011. “Stanford’s multi-pass sieve coreference resolution system at the CoNLL-2011 Shared Task”. Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning: Shared Task (CoNLL Shared Task 2011) Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics. 28–34. <http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2132936.2132938>Search in Google Scholar

Lee, K., L. He, M. Lewis and L. Zettlemoyer. 2017. “End-to-end neural coreference resolution”. Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing Copenhagen: Association for Computational Linguistics. 188–197. <https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D17-1018>Search in Google Scholar

Luo, X. 2005. “On coreference resolution performance metrics”. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (HLT 2005). Vancouver: Association for Computational Linguistics. 25–32. doi: 10.3115/1220575.1220579.10.3115/1220575.1220579Search in Google Scholar

Luo, X., A. Ittycheriah, H. Jing, N. Kambhatla and S. Roukos. 2004. “A mention-synchronous coreference resolution algorithm based on the bell tree”. Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2004) Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics. 135–142. doi:10.3115/1218955.1218973.10.3115/1218955.1218973Search in Google Scholar

Luo, X., S. Pradhan, M. Recasens and E. Hovy. 2014. “An extension of BLANC to system mentions”. Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Volume 2: Short papers. Baltimore: Association for Computational Linguistics. 24–29. <http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P14-2005>Search in Google Scholar

Marciniak, M. 2002. “Anaphor binding in Polish. Theory and implementation”. In: Branco, A., T. McEnery and R. Mitkov (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Discourse Anaphora and Anaphor Resolution Colloquium (DAARC 2002) Lisbon: Edições Colibri. 117–122.Search in Google Scholar

Marciniak, M. (ed.). 2010. Anotowany korpus dialogów telefonicznych [An annotated corpus of telephone conversations]. Warszawa: Akademicka Oficyna Wydawnicza EXIT.Search in Google Scholar

Marciszewski, W. 1983. “Spójność strukturalna a spójność semantyczna” [Structural coherence vs. semantic coherence]. In: Dobrzyńska, T. and E. Janus (eds.), Tekst i zdanie [Text and sentence]. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich. 183–189.Search in Google Scholar

Markert, K., M. Nissim and N.N. Modjeska. 2003. “Using the web for nominal anaphora resolution”. Proceedings of the EACL Workshop on the Computational Treatment of Anaphora Budapest. 39–46.Search in Google Scholar

McCarthy, J.F. and W.G. Lehnert. 1995. “Using decision trees for coreference resolution”. Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 1995) Montreal. 1050–1055.Search in Google Scholar

Mitkov, R., R. Evans, C. Orăsan, L.A. Ha and V. Pekar. 2007. “Anaphora resolution: To what extent does it help NLP applications?” In: Branco, A. (ed.), Anaphora: Analysis, algorithms and applications Berlin: Springer. 179–190.Search in Google Scholar

Mitkov, R. and M. Styś. 1997. “Robust reference resolution with limited knowledge: High precision genre-specific approach for English and Polish”. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP-97) 74–81.Search in Google Scholar

Moosavi, N.S. and M. Strube. 2016. “Which coreference evaluation metric do you trust? A proposal for a link-based entity aware metric”. Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. (Volume 1: Long papers) Berlin: Association for Computational Linguistics. 632–642. <http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P16-1060>Search in Google Scholar

Müller, C. and M. Strube. 2001. “MMAX: A tool for the annotation of multi-modal corpora”. Proceedings of the 2nd IJCAI Workshop on Knowledge and Reasoning in Practical Dialogue Systems 45–50.Search in Google Scholar

Nair, V. and G.E. Hinton. 2010. “Rectified linear units improve restricted Boltzmann machines”. In: Fürnkranz, J. and T. Joachims (eds.), Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-10) Haifa: Omnipress. 807–814. <http://www.icml2010.org/papers/432.pdf>Search in Google Scholar

Nedoluzhko, A., M. Novák and M. Ogrodniczuk. 2018. “PAWS: A multi-lingual parallel treebank with anaphoric relations”. Proceedings of the NAACL-HLT Workshop on Computational Models of Reference, Anaphora and Coreference (CRAC 2018) New Orleans: Association for Computational Linguistics. 68–76.Search in Google Scholar

Ng, V. and C. Cardie. 2002. “Improving machine learning approaches to coreference resolution”. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2002) Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics. 104–111.Search in Google Scholar

Nitoń, B. 2013. “Evaluation of Uryupina’s coreference resolution features for Polish”. Proceedings of the 6th Language and Technology Conference: Human Language Technologies as a Challenge for Computer Science and Linguistics (LTC 2013) Poznań: Wydawnictwo Poznańskie, Fundacja Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza. 122–126.Search in Google Scholar

Nitoń, B., P. Morawiecki and M. Ogrodniczuk. 2018. “Deep neural networks for coreference resolution for Polish”. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018) Miyazaki: European Language Resources Association. 395–400.Search in Google Scholar

Nitoń, B. and M. Ogrodniczuk. 2017. “Multi-pass sieve coreference resolution system for Polish”. Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Language, Data and Knowledge (LDK 2017) Springer Berlin Heidelberg. U–15. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-59888-8_20.10.1007/978-3-319-59888-8_20Search in Google Scholar

Ogrodniczuk, M. 2013. “Translation- and projection-based unsupervised coreference resolution for Polish”. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Intelligent Information Systems Berlin: Springer. 125–130.Search in Google Scholar

Ogrodniczuk, M., K. Głowińska, M. Kopeć, A. Savary and M. Zawisławska. 2013. “Interesting linguistic features in coreference annotation of an inflectional language”. 12th China National Conference on Computational Linguistics (CCL) and the 1st International Symposium on Natural Language Processing Based on Naturally Annotated Big Data (NLP-NABD). Berlin: Springer. 97–108.Search in Google Scholar

Ogrodniczuk, M., K. Głowińska, M. Kopeć, A. Savary and M. Zawisławska. 2015. Co-reference in Polish: Annotation, resolution and evaluation Berlin: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Ogrodniczuk, M. and M. Kopeć. 2011a. “End-to-end coreference resolution baseline system for Polish”. Proceedings of the 5th Language and Technology Conference: Human Language Technologies as a Challenge for Computer Science and Linguistics (LTC 2011) Poznań: Wydawnictwo Poznańskie, Fundacja Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza. 167–171.Search in Google Scholar

Ogrodniczuk, M. and M. Kopeć. 2011b. “Rule-based coreference resolution module for Polish”. Proceedings of the 8th Discourse Anaphora and Anaphor Resolution Colloquium (DAARC 2011) Faro. 191–200.Search in Google Scholar

Ogrodniczuk, M., A. Wójcicka, K. Głowińska and M. Kopeć. 2014. “Detection of nested mentions for coreference resolution in Polish”. Advances in Natural Language Processing: Proceedings of the Oth International Conference on NLP, PolTAL 2014 Warszawa: Springer International Publishing. 270–277.Search in Google Scholar

Ogrodniczuk, M. and M. Zawisławska. 2016. “Bridging relations in Polish: Adaptation of existing typologies”. Proceedings of the Workshop on Coreference Resolution Beyond OntoNotes (CORBON 2016) San Diego: Association for Computational Linguistics. 16–22. <http://aclweb.org/anthology/W/W16/W16-0703.pdf>Search in Google Scholar

Paduczewa, J. 1992. Wypowiedź i jej odniesienie do rzeczywistości. (Referencyjne aspekty znaczenia zaimków) [The utterance and its relation to reality. (Referential aspects of pronominal meanings.)]. Warszawa: PWN.Search in Google Scholar

Piasecki, M., S. Szpakowicz and B. Broda. 2009. A Wordnet from the ground up Wrocław: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej.Search in Google Scholar

Pisarek, J. 2012. Językowe mechanizmy nawiązania w tekstach publicystycznych na przykładzie felietonów ,, Tygodnika Powszechnego” [The linguistic mechanisms of reference in journalistic texts on the example of feature articles in the „Tygodnik Powszechny”]. Kraków: Wydział Polonistyki Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego Rozprawa doktorska.Search in Google Scholar

Pisarkowa, K. 1969. Funkcje składniowe polskich zaimków odmiennych [The syntactic functions of Polish declinable pronouns]. Kraków: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich. Polska Akademia Nauk, Oddział w Krakowie.Search in Google Scholar

Poesio, M., T. Ishikawa, S. Schulte im Walde and R. Vieira. 2002. “Acquiring lexical knowledge for anaphora resolution”. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2002) Las Palmas. 1220–1224. <http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2002/pdf/117.pdf>Search in Google Scholar

Poesio, M. and R. Vieira. 1998. “A corpus-based investigation of definite description use”. Computational Linguistics 24(2). 183–216.Search in Google Scholar

Poesio, M., R. Vieira and S. Teufel. 1997. “Resolving bridging references in unrestricted text”. Proceedings of a Workshop on Operational Factors in Practical, Robust Anaphora Resolution for Unrestricted Texts (ANARESOLUTION ’97) Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics. U–6.Search in Google Scholar

Pollard, C. and I.A. Sag. 1994. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pradhan, S., A. Moschitti, N. Xue, O. Uryupina and Y. Zhang. 2012. “CoNLL-2012 Shared Task: Modeling multilingual unrestricted coreference in OntoNotes”. Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL 2012) Jeju. U–40.Search in Google Scholar

Prasad, R., B. Webber and A. Joshi. 2014. “Reflections on the Penn Discourse Tree-bank, comparable corpora, and complementary annotation”. Computational Linguistics 40(4). 921–950. doi:10.1162/COLI\_a\_00204.10.1162/COLI_a_00204Search in Google Scholar

Presspublica. 2002. Rzeczpospolita Corpus. [electronic resource]. <http://www.cs.put.poznan.pl/dweiss/rzeczpospolita>Search in Google Scholar

Przepiórkowski, A., M. Bańko, R.L. Górski and B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (eds.). 2012. Narodowy Korpus Języka Polskiego [The National Corpus of Polish]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.Search in Google Scholar

Przepiórkowski, A. and A. Buczyński. 2007. “Spejd: Shallow parsing and disambiguation engine”. Proceedings of the 3rd Language and Technology Conference Poznań. 340–344.Search in Google Scholar

Przepiórkowski, A.,A. Kupść, M. Marciniak and A. Mykowiecka. 2002. Formalny opis języka polskiego: Teoria i implementacja [A formal description of Polish. Theory and implementation]. Warszawa: Akademicka Oficyna Wydawnicza EXIT. <http://nlp.ipipan.waw.pl/~adamp/Papers/2002-hpsg-book/>Search in Google Scholar

Raghunathan, K., H. Lee, S. Rangarajan, N. Chambers, M. Surdeanu, D. Jurafsky and C. Manning. 2010. “A multi-pass sieve for coreference resolution”. Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2010) Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics. 492–501. <http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1870658.1870706>Search in Google Scholar

Rahman, A. and V. Ng. 2009. “Supervised models for coreference resolution”. Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2009) Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics. 968–977.Search in Google Scholar

Rahman, A. and V. Ng. 2012. “Translation-based projection for multilingual coreference resolution”. Proceedings of the Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (HLT-NAACL 2012) Montreal: Association for Computational Linguistics. 720–730. <http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/N12-1090.>Search in Google Scholar

Ratinov, L. and D. Roth. 2012. “Learning-based multi-sieve co-reference resolution with knowledge”. Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics. 1234–1244.Search in Google Scholar

Recasens, M. 2010. Coreference: Theory, annotation, resolution and evaluation. (PhD dissertation, University of Barcelona PhD thesis.) <http://stel.ub.edu/cba2010/phd/phd.pdf>Search in Google Scholar

Recasens, M. and E. Hovy. 2011. “BLANC: Implementing the Rand Index for coreference evaluation”. Natural Language Engineering 17(4). 485–510. doi:10.1017/S135132491000029X.10.1017/S135132491000029XSearch in Google Scholar

Recasens, M., E. Hovy and M.A. Martı́. 2011. “Identity, non-identity, and near-identity: Addressing the complexity of coreference”. Lingua 121(6). 1138–1152.10.1016/j.lingua.2011.02.004Search in Google Scholar

Reinders-Machowska, E. 1991. “Binding in Polish”. In: Koster, J. and E. Reuland (eds.), Long distance anaphora Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 137–150.Search in Google Scholar

Ryant, N. and T. Scheffler. 2006. “Binding of anaphors in LTAG”. Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Tree Adjoining Grammar and Related Formalisms Sydney: Association for Computational Linguistics. 65–72.Search in Google Scholar

Sidner, C.L. 1979. Towards a computational theory of definite anaphora comprehension in English discourse Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Search in Google Scholar

Soon, W.M., H.T. Ng and C.Y. Lim. 1999. “Corpus-based learning for noun phrase coreference resolution”. 1999 Joint SIGDAT Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Very Large Corpora College Park: The Association for Computer Linguistics. 285–291. <http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W99-0634>Search in Google Scholar

Soon, W.M., H.T. Ng and C.Y. Lim. 2001. “A machine learning approach to coreference resolution of noun phrases”. Computational Linguistics 27(4). 521–544.10.1162/089120101753342653Search in Google Scholar

Srivastava, N., G. Hinton, A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever and R. Salakhutdinov. 2014. “Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting”. Journal of Machine Learning Research 15. 1929–1958. <http://jmlr.org/papers/v15/srivastava14a.html>Search in Google Scholar

Stoyanov, V., N. Gilbert, C. Cardie and E. Riloff. 2009. “Conundrums in noun phrase coreference resolution: Making sense of the state-of-the-art”. Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP Suntec, Singapore: Association for Computational Linguistics. 656–664. <http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P/P09/P09-1074>Search in Google Scholar

Stroińska, M. 1992. “Styl bezosobowy a spójność referencjalna w dyskursie” [The impersonal style and referential coherence in discourse]. In: Dobrzyńska, T. (ed.), Typy tekstów: Zbiór studiów [Text types: A collection of studies]. Warszawa: Instytut Badań Literackich Polskiej Akademii Nauk. 15–25.Search in Google Scholar

Stuckardt, R. 2001. “Design and enhanced evaluation of a robust anaphor resolution algorithm”. Computational Linguistics 27(4). 479–506. doi:10.1162/089120101753342635.10.1162/089120101753342635Search in Google Scholar

Studnicki, F. and B. Polanowska. 1983. “Zautomatyzowane rozwiązywanie odesłań występujących w tekstach prawnych” [Automated solution of reference in legal text]. Studia Semiotyczne 13. 65–90.Search in Google Scholar

Szkudlarek-Śmiechowska, E. 2003. Wskaźniki nawiązania we współczesnych tekstach polskich (na materiale współczesnej nowelistyki polskiej) [Indicators of reference in modern Polish texts]. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.Search in Google Scholar

Szwedek, A. 1975. “Coreference and sentence stress in English and Polish”. Papers and Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 3. 209–213.Search in Google Scholar

Topolińska, Z. 1984. “Składnia grupy imiennej” [The syntax of the noun phrase]. In: Grochowski, M., S. Karolak and Z. Topolińska (eds.), Składnia [Syntax]. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe. 301–389.Search in Google Scholar

Trawiński, B. 2007. “Referential relations in Polish”. Book of Abstracts of the 7th European Conference on Formal Description of Slavic Languages (FDSL-7) Leipzig: University of Leipzig. 109–111.Search in Google Scholar

Trofimiec, S. 2007. “Konstrukcje anaforyczne jako wskaźniki nawiązania w tekstach prasowych” [Anaphoric constructions as indicators of reference in press texts]. Język Polski LXXXVII(1). 24–28.Search in Google Scholar

Uryupina, O. 2007. Knowledge acquisition for coreference resolution. (PhD dissertation, Saarland University.). <http://scidok.sulb.uni-saarland.de/volltexte/2007/1255/pdf/olga_phd.pdf>Search in Google Scholar

Vater, H. 2009. Wstęp do lingwistyki tekstu. Struktura i rozumienie tekstów [An introduction to text linguistics]. Wrocław: Atut.Search in Google Scholar

Versley, Y., S.P. Ponzetto, M. Poesio, V. Eidelman, A. Jern, J. Smith, X. Yang and A. Moschitti. 2008. “BART: A modular toolkit for coreference resolution”. Proceedings of the ACL-08: HLT Demo Session (companion volume) Columbus: Association for Computational Linguistics. O–12.Search in Google Scholar

Vieira, R. and S. Teufel. 1997. “Towards resolution of bridging descriptions”. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics Madrid: Association for Computational Linguistics. 522–524. doi:10.3115/976909.979689.10.3115/976909.979689Search in Google Scholar

Vilain, M., J. Burger, J. Aberdeen, D. Connolly and L. Hirschman. 1995. “A model-theoretic coreference scoring scheme”. Proceedings of the 6th Message Understanding Conference (MUC-6) Columbia: Association for Computational Linguistics. 45–52.Search in Google Scholar

Wajszczuk, J. 1978. Syntaktyczny stosunek nawiązania (na materiale współczesnego języka rosyjskiego) [The syntactic relation of reference (on the material of modern Russian]. (PhD dissertation, Uniwersytet Warszawski.)Search in Google Scholar

Waszczuk, J., K. Głowińska, A. Savary, A. Przepiórkowski and M. Lenart. 2013. “Annotation tools for syntax and named entities in the National Corpus of Polish”. International Journal of Data Mining, Modelling and Management 5(2). 103–122.10.1504/IJDMMM.2013.053691Search in Google Scholar

Willim, E. 1995. “In defence of the subject: Evidence from Polish”. In: Gussmann, E. (ed.), Licensing in syntax and phonology Lublin: Folium. 147–164.Search in Google Scholar

Woliński, M. 2014. “Morfeusz reloaded”. Proceedings of the Oth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2014) Reykjavík: European Language Resources Association. 1106–1111.Search in Google Scholar

Zeyrek, D., A. Mendes, Y. Grishina, M. Kurfalı, S. Gibbon and M. Ogrodniczuk. 2018. “TED Multilingual Discourse Bank (TED-MDB): A parallel corpus annotated in the PDTB style”. Language Resources and EvaluationSearch in Google Scholar

Zhou, G. and J. Su. 2004. “A high-performance coreference resolution system using a constraint-based multi-agent strategy”. Proceedings of COLING 2004 Geneva: COLING. 522–528.Search in Google Scholar

Zikánová, S., E. Hajičová, B. Hladká, P. Jínová, J. Mírovský, A. Nedoluzhko, L. Poláková, K. Rysová, M. Rysová and J. Václ. 2015. Discourse and coherence. From the sentence structure to relations in text Prague: Charles University.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-08-17
Published in Print: 2019-06-26

© 2019 Faculty of English, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland