Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton March 10, 2020

Functions of gender and numeral classifiers in Nepali

  • Marc Allassonnière-Tang and Marcin Kilarski EMAIL logo

Abstract

We examine the complex nominal classification system in Nepali (Indo-European, Indic), a language spoken at the intersection of the Indo-European and Sino-Tibetan language families, which are usually associated with prototypical examples of grammatical gender and numeral classifiers, respectively. In a typologically rare pattern, Nepali possesses two gender systems based on the human/non-human and masculine/feminine oppositions, in addition to which it has also developed an inventory of at least ten numeral classifiers as a result of contact with neighbouring Sino-Tibetan languages. Based on an analysis of the lexical and discourse functions of the three systems, we show that their functional contribution involves a largely complementary distribution of workload with respect to individual functions as well as the type of categorized nouns and referents. The study thus contributes to the ongoing discussions concerning the typology and functions of nominal classification as well as the effects of long-term language contact on language structure.


Marcin Kilarski Faculty of English Adam Mickiewicz University Collegium Heliodori Święcicki Grunwaldzka 6 60-780 Poznań Poland

7

7 Acknowledgements

We thank the three anonymous reviewers and the editors for their constructive comments, which led to significant improvements of the paper. We are also grateful for the fruitful discussion with the audience of the workshop “Genders and Classifiers: Diachronic and Synchronic Variation” at the Surrey Morphology Group in Guildford, Surrey, 28–29 January 2016. Special thanks to Pustak Ghimire for the insightful comments and suggestions on the grammatical structure of Nepali. Many thanks also to Devi ram Ghimire for his comments and good food. We are fully responsible for any remaining errors.

Abbreviations

2D

two-dimensional

CLF

sortal classifier

ERG

ergative

F, fem

feminine

HIGH.HON

high honorific

INTER.QUANT

interrogative quantifier

LOW.HON

low honorific

M, masc

masculine

MENS

mensural classifier

MID.HON

middle honorific

MOD

modifier particle

NEG

negative

neut

neuter

PAST

past

PL

plural

POSS

possessive

PROG

progressive

PRS

present

PRF

perfective

PROX

proximal

PRT

particle

SG

singular

Speech levels (LOW.HON MID.HON, HIGH.HON)

are only indicated in the glosses when relevant to the discussion

otherwise low honorific forms (LOW.HON)

are indicated.

References

Acharya, J. 1991. A descriptive grammar of Nepali and an analyzed corpus. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, A.Y. 2000a. Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/obo/9780199772810-0007Search in Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, A.Y. 2000b. “Unusual classifiers in Tariana. In G. Senft (ed.), S of nominal classification, 93–113. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, A.Y. 2003. A grammar of Tariana, from northwest Amazonia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107050952Search in Google Scholar

Audring, J. 2013. A pronominal view of gender agreement. Language Sciences 35. 32–46.10.1016/j.langsci.2012.10.001Search in Google Scholar

Bal, B.K. 2004–2007. Structure of Nepali grammar. PAN Localization Working Papers 2004–2007. 332–396.Search in Google Scholar

Barlow, M. 1991. The Agreement Hierarchy and grammatical theory. In L. Sutton, C. Johnson & R. Shields (eds.), Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on the Grammar of Event Structure, 30–40. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.10.3765/bls.v17i0.1629Search in Google Scholar

Barz, R.K. & A.V.N. Diller. 1985. Classifiers and standardisation: Some South and South-East Asian comparisons. In D. Bradley (ed.), Language policy, language planning and sociolinguistics in South-East Asia, 155–184. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Bertinetto, P.M. & L. Ciucci. 2014. Possessive classifiers in gender-marking Ayoreo and Chamacoco (Zamucoan), with an overview on the Chaco linguistic area. Paper presented at the Workshop Gender and Classifiers: Cross-linguistic Perspectives, Guildford, 17 January 2014.Search in Google Scholar

Burusphat, S. 2007. Animate classifiers in Tai languages. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 186. 109–124.10.1515/IJSL.2007.045Search in Google Scholar

Chaudhary, M. Kumar. 2013. Language of Saptariya Tharu. Researcher 1(2). 49–62.10.3126/researcher.v1i2.9885Search in Google Scholar

Ciucci, L. and Pier Marco Bertinetto. 2019. Possessive classifiers in Zamucoan. In A.Y. Aikhenvald and E. Mihas (eds.), Genders and classifiers: A cross-linguistic typology, 144–175. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198842019.003.0005Search in Google Scholar

Clark, T.W. 1977. Introduction to Nepali: A first year course. (2nd edition.) (Edited by J. Burton-Page.) London: School of Oriental and African Studies.Search in Google Scholar

Contini-Morava, E. & M. Kilarski. 2013. Functions of nominal classification. Language Sciences 40. 263–299.10.1016/j.langsci.2013.03.002Search in Google Scholar

Corbett, G.G. 1979. The Agreement Hierarchy. Journal of Linguistics 15. 203–224.10.1017/S0022226700016352Search in Google Scholar

Corbett, G.G. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139166119Search in Google Scholar

Corbett, G.G. 2006. Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Corbett, G.G. 2013. Number of genders. In M.S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <http://wals.info/chapter/30>.Search in Google Scholar

Corbett, G.G. & S. Fedden. 2016. Canonical gender. Journal of Linguistics 52(3). 495–531.10.1017/S0022226715000195Search in Google Scholar

Corbett, G.G., S. Fedden & R.A. Finkel. 2017. Single versus concurrent feature systems: Nominal classification in Mian. Linguistic Typology 21. 209–260.10.1515/lingty-2017-0006Search in Google Scholar

Craig, C. 1994. Classifier languages. In R.E. Asher & J.M.Y. Simpson (eds.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics. Vol. 2, 565–569. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dahl, Ö. 2004. The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.71Search in Google Scholar

Dediu, D. & M. Cysouw. 2013. Some structural aspects of language are more stable than others: A comparison of seven methods. PloS one 8(1).<http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0055009>.10.1371/journal.pone.0055009Search in Google Scholar

Dimmendaal, G.J. 1983. The Turkana language. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110869149Search in Google Scholar

Dixon, R.M.W. 1982. Noun classifiers and noun classes. In R.M.W. Dixon, Where have all the adjectives gone? And other essays in semantics and syntax, 211–233. Berlin: Mouton.10.1515/9783110822939.211Search in Google Scholar

Doornenbal, M. 2009. A grammar of Bantawa: Grammar, paradigm tables, glossary and texts of a Rai language of Eastern Nepal. (Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics PhD dissertation.)Search in Google Scholar

Emeneau, M.B. 1956. India as a linguistic area. Language 32(1). 3–16.10.2307/410649Search in Google Scholar

Erbaugh, M.S. 1986. Taking stock: The development of Chinese noun classifiers historically and in young children. In C. Craig (ed.), Noun classes and categorization, 399–436. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.7.25erbSearch in Google Scholar

Fedden, S. 2011. A grammar of Mian. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110264197Search in Google Scholar

Fedden, S. & G.G. Corbett. 2017. Gender and classifiers in concurrent systems: Refining the typology of nominal classification. Glossa: A journal of general linguistics 2(1), 34.Search in Google Scholar

Fu, J. 2015. The status of classifiers in Tibeto-Burman languages. In D. Xu & J. Fu (eds.), Space and quantification in languages of China, 37–54. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-10040-1_3Search in Google Scholar

Gil, D. 2013. Numeral classifiers. In M.S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <http://wals.info/chapter/55>.Search in Google Scholar

Green, I. 1997. Nominal classification in Marrithiyel. In M. Harvey & N. Reid (eds.), Nominal classification in Aboriginal Australia. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 229–253.10.1075/slcs.37.11greSearch in Google Scholar

Greenberg, J.H. 1972. Numeral classifiers and substantival number: Problems in the genesis of a linguistic type. Working Papers in Language Universals 9. 1–39.Search in Google Scholar

Grinevald, C. 2000. A morphosyntactic typology of classifiers. In G. Senft (ed.), Systems of nominal classification, 50–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Grinevald, C. 2004. Classifiers. In G.E. Booij, C. Lehmann, J. Mugdan & S. Skopeteas (eds.), Morphologie / Morphology; Ein internationales Handbuch zurFlexion und Wortbildung / An international handbook on inflection and word-formation. Vol. 2, 1016–1031. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110172782.2.13.1016Search in Google Scholar

Hammarström, H., R. Forkel & M. Haspelmath (eds.). 2018. Glottolog 3.3. Jena: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History. <http://glottolog.org>. (Last accessed 25 Jan 2017.)Search in Google Scholar

Hardie, A., R.R. Lohani, B.N. Regmi & Y.P. Yadava. 2009. A morphosyntactic categorisation scheme for the automated analysis of Nepali. In R. Singh (ed.), Annual review of South Asian languages and linguistics 2009, 171–195. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110225600.171Search in Google Scholar

Hawkins, J.A. 2004. Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199252695.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Her, O. 2012. Distinguishing classifiers and measure words: A mathematical perspective and implications. Lingua 122(14). 1668–1691.10.1016/j.lingua.2012.08.012Search in Google Scholar

Hildebrandt, K.A. 2004. A grammar and dictionary of the Manange language. In C. Genetti (ed.), Tibeto-Burman languages of Nepal: Manange and Sherpa, 2–189. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Hockett, C.F. 1958. A course in modern linguistics. New York: Macmillan.10.1111/j.1467-1770.1958.tb00870.xSearch in Google Scholar

Kilarski, M. 2013. Nominal classification: A history of its study from the classical period to the present. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/sihols.121Search in Google Scholar

Kilarski, M. & M. Tang. 2018. The coalescence of grammatical gender and numeral classifiers in the general classifier wota in Nepali. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America 3(56). 1–10.10.3765/plsa.v3i1.4352Search in Google Scholar

Kiryu, K. 2009. On the rise of the classifier system in Newar. In Y. Nagano (ed.), Issues in Tibeto-Burman historical linguistics, 51–69. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, S. 2011. Eastern Tamang grammar sketch. (Dallas: Graduate Institute of Applied Linguistics MA thesis.)Search in Google Scholar

Li, W. 2000. Pragmatic function of numeral-classifiers in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics 32(8). 1113–1133.10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00086-7Search in Google Scholar

Manders, C. Jay. 2007. A foundation in Nepali grammar. Bloomington, IN: Author-House.Search in Google Scholar

Matras, Y. 2009. Language contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511809873Search in Google Scholar

Matthews, D. 1998. A course in Nepali. (2nd edition.) London: School of Oriental and African Studies.Search in Google Scholar

Nakkeerar, R. 2009. Gurung. In D.P. Pattanayak (ed.), Sikkim, 456–498. New Delhi: Office of the Registrar General.Search in Google Scholar

Nichols, J. 1992. Linguistic diversity in space and time. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226580593.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Noonan, M. 2003. Recent language contact in the Nepal Himalaya. In D. Bradley, R.J. LaPolla, B. Michailovsky & G. Thurgood (eds.), Language variation: Papers on variation and change in the Sinosphere and in the Indosphere in honour of James A. Matisoff, 65–88. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Onishi, M. 2004. Instrumental subjects in Motuna. In P. Bhaskararao & K. Venkata Subbarao (eds.), Non-nominative subjects. Vol. 2, 83–101. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.61.06oniSearch in Google Scholar

Pitale, S. & V.M. Sarma. 2013. Marking plurals: The acquisition of nominal number inflection in Marathi. In H. Winskel & P. Padakannaya (eds.), South and Southeast Asian psycholinguistics, 99–109. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139084642.012Search in Google Scholar

Pokharel, M.P. 1997. Nepali Vakya Vyākaran [Grammar of Nepali syntax]. Kathmandu: Royal Nepal Academy.Search in Google Scholar

Pokharel, M.P. 2010. Noun class agreement in Nepali. Kobe Papers in Linguistics 7. 40–59.Search in Google Scholar

Poudel, K.P. 2010. Gender system in Nepali and Tamang. Circle of English Teachers Journal 2(2). 7–17.Search in Google Scholar

Priestly, T.M.S. 1983. On ‘drift’ in Indo-European gender systems. Journal of Indo-European Studies 11(3/4). 339–363.Search in Google Scholar

Reid, N. 1997. Class and classifier in Ngan’gityemerri. In M. Harvey & N. Reid (eds.), Nominal classification in Aboriginal Australia, 165–228. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.37.10reiSearch in Google Scholar

Riccardi, T. 2003. Nepali. In G. Cardona & D. Jain (eds.), The Indo-Aryan languages, 538–580. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Ring, H.R. 2015. A grammar of Pnar. (Singapore: Nanyang Technological University PhD dissertation.)10.32657/10356/62519Search in Google Scholar

Sanches, M. & L. Slobin. 1973. Numeral classifiers and plural marking: An implicational universal. Working Papers in Language Universals 11. 1–22.Search in Google Scholar

Sasse, H. 1993. Syntactic categories and subcategories. In J. Jacobs, A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld & T. Vennemann (eds.), Syntax: Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung, 646–686. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110095869.1.11.646Search in Google Scholar

Seifart, F. 2005. The structure and use of shape-based noun classes in Miraña (North West Amazon). (Nijmegen: Radboud University PhD dissertation.)Search in Google Scholar

Seiler, H. 1986. Apprehension: Language, object and order. Vol. 3: The universal dimension of apprehension. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Search in Google Scholar

Selkirk, E. 1977. Some remarks on noun phrase structure. In P.W. Culicover, Thomas Wasow & A. Akmajian (eds.), Formal syntax. New York: Academic Press, 285–316.Search in Google Scholar

Silverstein, M. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In R.M.W. Dixon (ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages, 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Search in Google Scholar

Simons, G.F. & C.D. Fennig (eds.). 2018. Ethnologue: Languages of the world. (21st edition.) Dallas, TX: SIL International. <http://www.ethnologue.com>.Search in Google Scholar

Singer, R. 2016. The dynamics of nominal classification: Productive and lexicalised uses of gender agreement in Mawng. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781614513698Search in Google Scholar

Sinnemäki, K. 2019. On the distribution and complexity of gender and numeral classifiers. In F. Di Garbo, B. Olsson and B. Wälchli (eds.), Grammatical gender and linguistic complexity. Vol. 2. World-wide comparative studies, 133–200. Berlin: Language Science Press.Search in Google Scholar

Smith-Stark, T.C. 1974. The plurality split. In M.W. La Galy, R.A. Fox & A. Bruck (eds.), Papers from the Tenth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, April 19–21, 1974, 657–671. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Search in Google Scholar

Toba, S., I. Toba & N. Kishor Rai. 2005. Diversity and endangerment of languages inNepal. UNESCO Kathmandu Series of Monographs and Working Papers 7. 1–66.Search in Google Scholar

Tobin, Y. 2001. Gender switch in Modern Hebrew. In M. Hellinger & H. Bußmann(eds.), Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men. Vol. 1, 177–198. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/impact.9.13tobSearch in Google Scholar

Trudgill, P. 2011. Sociolinguistic typology: Social determinants of linguistic complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Upadhyay, S.R. 2009. The sociolinguistic variation of grammatical gender agreement in Nepali. Journal of Pragmatics 41. 564–585.10.1016/j.pragma.2008.06.006Search in Google Scholar

Van Driem, G. 1987. A grammar of Limbu. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110846812Search in Google Scholar

Verma, M.K. 2007. Bhojpuri. In G. Cardona & D. Jain (eds.), The Indo-Aryan languages, 515–537. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Weidert, A.K. 1984. The classifier construction of Newari and its historical Southeast Asian background. Kailash: A Journal of Himalayan Studies 11(3–4). 185–210.Search in Google Scholar

Yadav, R. 1996. A reference grammar of Maithili. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110811698Search in Google Scholar

Zavala, R. 2000. Multiple classifier systems in Akatek (Mayan). In G. Senft (ed.), Systems of nominal classification, 114–146. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Zipf, G. Kingsley. 1949. Human behavior and the principle of least effort: An introduction to human ecology. New York: Hafner.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-03-10
Published in Print: 2020-03-26

© 2020 Faculty of English, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland

Downloaded on 6.2.2023 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/psicl-2020-0004/html
Scroll Up Arrow