Abstract
The goal of this article is to introduce to the field a particular subtype of valency-reducing strategies, referred to as oblique anticausativization below. This subtype differs from more common and better known dependent-marking types, such as, for instance, the canonical anticausative. Instead, oblique anticausatives are characterized by the preservation of the object case of the transitive-causative alternant, hence the term oblique. This object case marker shows up with the subject of the corresponding intransitive construction. We document the existence of this alternation in seven branches of Indo-European, particularly in the North-Central region, but also sporadically in the South-Eastern parts of the Indo-European area. Ruling out alternative accounts of the relevant geographical distribution, such as borrowing and shared innovation, we argue for a morphosyntactic isogloss common for Germanic, Baltic, Slavic and Italic. This is paralleled by isolated enclaves found in other branches of Indo-European, such as Ancient Greek, Anatolian and Indo-Aryan. Altogether, the evidence speaks for the existence of oblique anticausativization in the proto-language, thus motivating a reconstruction of this alternation for the grammar of Proto-Indo-European.
References
Alexiadou, A., E. Anagnostopoulou and F. Schäfer. 2006. “The properties of anticausatives crosslinguistically”. In: Frascarelli, M. (ed.), Phases of interpretation. Berlin: Mouton. 187–211.10.1515/9783110197723.4.187Search in Google Scholar
Arutjunova, N.D. 1999. Jazyk i mir čeloveka [Language and human world]. Moskva: Jazyki russkoj kul’tury.Search in Google Scholar
Baker, C.F., C.J. Fillmore and B. Cronin. 2003. “The structure of the FrameNet database”. International Journal of Lexicography 16(3). 281–296.10.1093/ijl/16.3.281Search in Google Scholar
Baker, C.F., C.J. Fillmore and J.B. Lowe. 1998. “The Berkeley FrameNet project”. COLING-ACL ’98: Proceedings of the Conference, held at the University of Montreal. Association for Computational Linguistics. 86–90.Search in Google Scholar
Barðdal, J. 2000. “Oblique subjects in Old Scandinavian”. NOWELE: North-Western European Language Evolution 37. 25–51.10.1075/nowele.37.02barSearch in Google Scholar
Barðdal, J. 2006. “Construction-specific properties of syntactic subjects in Icelandic and German”. Cognitive Linguistics 17(1). 39–106.10.1515/COG.2006.002Search in Google Scholar
Barðdal, J. 2014. “Syntax and syntactic reconstruction”. In: Bowern, C. and B. Evans (eds.), The Routledge handbook of historical linguistics. London: Routledge. 343– 373.Search in Google Scholar
Barðdal, J. 2015. “Valency classes in Icelandic: Oblique subjects, oblique ambitransitives and the actional passive”. In: Malchukov, A.L. and B. Comrie (eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 367–416.Search in Google Scholar
Barðdal, J., E. Cattafi, L. Bruno and S. Danesi. 2019. “Non-nominative subjects in Latin and Ancient Greek: Applying the subject tests on early Indo-European Languages. Submitted.Search in Google Scholar
Barðdal, J. and S. Gildea. 2015. “Diachronic construction grammar: Epistemological context, basic assumptions and historical implications”. In: Barðdal, J., E. Smirnova, L. Sommerer and S. Gildea (eds.), Diachronic construction grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1–50.10.1075/cal.18Search in Google Scholar
Barðdal, J. and Th. Eythórsson. 2003. “The change that never happened: The story of oblique subjects”. Journal of Linguistics 39(3). 439–472.10.1017/S002222670300207XSearch in Google Scholar
Barðdal, J. and Th. Eythórsson. 2012. “‘Hungering and lusting for women and fleshly delicacies’: Reconstructing grammatical relations for Proto-Germanic”. Transactions of the Philological Society 110(3). 363–393.10.1111/j.1467-968X.2012.01318.xSearch in Google Scholar
Barðdal, J. and Th. Eythórsson. 2018. “What is a subject? The nature and validity of subject tests”. In: Barðdal, J., N. Pat-El and S.M. Carey (eds.), Non-canonically case-marked subjects: The Reykjavík–Eyjafjallajökull papers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 257–273.10.1075/slcs.200.11barSearch in Google Scholar
Barðdal, J., Th. Eythórsson and T.K. Dewey. 2019. “The alternating predicate puzzle: Dat-Nom vs. Nom-Dat in Icelandic and German”. Constructions and Frames 11(1). 107–170.10.1075/cf.00025.barSearch in Google Scholar
Barðdal, J., K.E. Kristoffersen and A. Sveen. 2011. “West Scandinavian ditransitives as a family of constructions: With a special attention to the Norwegian V-REFL-NP construction”. Linguistics 49(1). 53–104.10.1515/ling.2011.002Search in Google Scholar
Bjarnadóttir, V. 2014. “Oblique anticausative in Lithuanian: A comparative approach”. Baltistica 49(1). 25–39.10.15388/Baltistica.49.1.2211Search in Google Scholar
Borkovskij, V.I. and P.S. Kuznecov. 1963. Istoričeskaja grammatika russkogo jazyka [A historical grammar of Russian]. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR.Search in Google Scholar
Cennamo, M., T. Eythórsson and J. Barðdal. 2015. “Semantic and (morpho)syntactic constraints on anticausativization: Evidence from Latin and Old Norse-Icelandic”. Linguistics 53(4). 677–729.10.1515/ling-2015-0015Search in Google Scholar
Comrie, B. 1985. “Causative verb-formation and other verb-deriving morphology”. In: Shopen, T. (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description (vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 301–348.Search in Google Scholar
Croft, W. 1998. “Event structure in argument linking”. In: Butt, M. and W. Geuder (eds.), The projection of arguments: lexical and compositional factors. Stanford: CSLI Publications. 1–43.Search in Google Scholar
Croft, W. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Croft, W. 2012. Verbs: Aspect and clausal structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199248582.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Danesi, S. 2014. “Accusative subjects in Avestan: ‘Errors’ or non-canonically marked arguments?” Indo-Iranian Journal 57(3). 223–260.10.1163/15728536-05703017Search in Google Scholar
Danesi, S., C.A. Johnson and J. Barðdal. 2018. “Where does the modality of Ancient Greek modal verbs come from? The relation between modality and oblique case marking”. Journal of Greek Linguistics 18(1). 45–92.10.1163/15699846-01801005Search in Google Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511611896Search in Google Scholar
Eythórsson, Th. and J. Barðdal. 2005. “Oblique subjects: A common germanic inheritance”. Language 81(4). 824–881.10.1353/lan.2005.0173Search in Google Scholar
Eichner, H. 1982. “Zur hethitischen Etymologie (1. ištark- und ištarnink- 2. ark- 3. šešd-”. In: Neu., E. (ed.), Investigationes philologicae et comparativae: Gedenkschrift für Heinz Kronasser. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. 16–28.Search in Google Scholar
Faarlund, J.T. 2001. “The notion of oblique subject and its status in the history of Icelandic”. In: Faarlund, J.T. (ed.), Grammatical relations in change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 99–135.10.1075/slcs.56.05faaSearch in Google Scholar
Fillmore, C.J. and C. Baker. 2010. “A frames approach to semantic analysis”. In: Heine, B. and H. Narrog (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 313–339.Search in Google Scholar
Fried, M. 2004. “Predicate semantics and event construal in Czech case marking”. In: Fried, M. and J-O. Östman (eds.), Construction grammar in a cross-language perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 87–120.10.1075/cal.2.03friSearch in Google Scholar
Georgieva, V.L. 1978. “Bezličnye predloženija” [Impersonal sentences]. In: Borkovskij, V.I. (ed.), Istoričeskaja grammatika russkogo jazyka: Sintaksis. Prostoe predloženie [Historical grammar of Russian: Syntax. Simple clauses]. Moskva: Nauka.Search in Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. 1987. Transitivity alternations of the anticausative type. (Arbeitspapier Nr. 5 (Neue Folge).) Köln: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft, Universität zu Köln.Search in Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. 1993. “More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations”. In: Comrie, B. and M. Polinsky (eds.), Causatives and transitivity. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 87–120.10.1075/slcs.23.05hasSearch in Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. 2016 [2018]. “Universals of causative and anticausative verb formations and the spontaneity scale”. Lingua Posnaniensis 58(2). 33–63.10.1515/linpo-2016-0009Search in Google Scholar
Hock, H.H. 1990. “Oblique subjects in Sanskrit?” In: Verma, M.K. and K.P. Mohanan (eds.), Experiencer subjects in South Asian languages. Stanford: CSLI Publications. 119–139.Search in Google Scholar
Holvoet, A. 1985. “O pewnym typie zdań bezpodmiotowych w języku polskim” [On a certain type of subjectless sentences in Polish]. Język polski 65. 328–332.Search in Google Scholar
Jónsson, J.G. 2018. “Word order as a subject test in Old Icelandic”. In: Barðdal, J., N. Pat-El and S.M. Carey (eds.), Non-canonically case-marked subjects: The Reykjavík–Eyjafjallajökull papers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 135–154.10.1075/slcs.200.06jonSearch in Google Scholar
Kainhofer, J.M. 2002. Monadische Akkusativ-Subjekt-Konstruktionen im Isländischen. (MA thesis, University of Salzburg.)Search in Google Scholar
Kleyner, S. 2018. “What does not kill us, tears us apart: Russian accusatives and the verbs that take them”. A paper delivered at the 10th International Conference on Construction Grammar, Paris.Search in Google Scholar
Kloekhorst, A. 2008: Etymological dictionary of the Hittite inherited lexicon. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. 2002. Metaphor: A practical introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kronasser, H. 1952. Handbuch der Semasiologie. Kurze Einführung in die Geschichte, Problematik und Terminologie der Bedeutungslehre. Heidelberg: Winter.Search in Google Scholar
Kroonen, G. 2013. Etymological dictionary of Proto-Germanic. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar
Kulikov, L. 2001. “Causatives”. In: Haspelmath, M., E. König, W. Oesterreicher and W. Raible (eds.), Language typology and language universals: An international handbook (vol. 2). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 886–898.Search in Google Scholar
Le Mair, E., C.A. Johnson, M. Frotscher, Th. Eythórsson and J. Barðdal. 2017. “Position as a behavioral property of subjects: The case of Old Irish”. Indogermanische Forschungen 122. 111–142.10.1515/if-2017-0006Search in Google Scholar
Lenerz, J. 1977. Zur Abfolge nominaler Satzglieder im Deutschen. Tübingen: Narr.Search in Google Scholar
Letuchiy, A. 2009. “Towards a typology of labile verbs: Lability vs. derivation”. In: Arkhipov, A.V. and P. Epps (eds.), New challenges in typology. Berlin: de Gruyter. 247–268.Search in Google Scholar
LIV = Rix, H., M. Kümmel, T. Zehnder, R. Lipp and B. Schirmer. 2001. Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben. (Zweite, erweiterte und verbesserte Auflage bearbeitet von M. Kümmel und H. Rix.) Wiesbaden: Reichert.Search in Google Scholar
Luraghi, S. 2010. “Experiencer predicates in Hittite”. In: Kim, R.I., E. Riecken, N. Oettinger and M.J. Weiss (eds.), Ex Anatolia lux. Ann Arbor: Beech Stave Press. 294–264.Search in Google Scholar
Malchukov, A. 2006. “Transitivity parameters and transitivity alternations: Constraining co-variation”. In: Kulikov, L., A. Malchukov and P. de Swart (eds.), Case, valency and transitivityStudies in Language Companion Series 77). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 329–357.10.1075/slcs.77.21malSearch in Google Scholar
Malchukov, A. 2008. “Split intransitives, experiencer objects and ‘transimpersonal’ constructions: (Re-)establishing the connection”. In: Donohue, M. and S. Wichmann (eds.), Typology of languages with semantic alignment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 76–10.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199238385.003.0003Search in Google Scholar
Matasović, R. 2013. “Latin maenitet me, miseret me, pudet me and active clause alignment in PIE”. Indogermanische Forschungen 118. 93–110.Search in Google Scholar
Michaelis, L.A. 2010. “Sign-Based Construction Grammar”. In: Heine, B. and H. Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 155–176.Search in Google Scholar
Michaelis, L.A. 2012. “Making the case for Construction Grammar”. In: Boas, H.C. and I.A. Sag (eds.), Sign-Based Construction Grammar. Stanford: CSLI Publications. 31–68.Search in Google Scholar
Mrázek, R. 1990. Sravnitel’nyj sintaksis slavjanskix literaturnyx jazykov: isxodnye struktury prostogo predloženija [Comparative syntax of the Slavic literary languages: Basic structures of the simple sentence] Opera Universitatis Purkynianae Brunensis, Facultas philosophica = Spisy Univerzity J.E. Purkyně v Brně, Filozofická fakulta 289). Brno: Univerzita J.E. Purkyně.Search in Google Scholar
Müller, D. 1984. “Jeszcze raz o tzw. konstrukcjach nieosobowych w języku polskim” [Impersonal constructions in Polish revisited]. Poradnik Językowy 7. 433–441.Search in Google Scholar
Mustajoki, A. and M. Kopotev. 2005. “Lodku uneslo vetrom uslovija i konteksty upotreblenija russkoj ‘stixijnoj’ konstrukcii” The boat got carried away by the wind The conditions and contexts of the use of the Russian ‘natural force’ construction]. Russian Linguistics 29(1). 1–38.10.1007/s11185-004-5205-zSearch in Google Scholar
Oertel, H. 1902. Lectures on the study of language. New York: Scribners.Search in Google Scholar
Ottósson, KG. 1991. “Icelandic double objects as small clauses”. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 48. 77–97.Search in Google Scholar
Ottósson, K.G. 2013. “The anticausative and related categories in the Old Germanic languages”. In: Josephson, F. and I. Söhrman (eds.), Diachronic and typological perspectives on verbs. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 329–382.10.1075/slcs.134.12ottSearch in Google Scholar
Paducheva, E.V. 2003. “Is there an ‘ANTICAUSATIVE’ component in the semantics of decausatives?” Journal of Slavic Linguistics 11(1). 173–198.Search in Google Scholar
Poljakov, D. 2010. “‘Ustranenie’ sub’’ekta v slavjanskix jazykax v sravnitel’noistoričeskom i areal’nom aspektax” [The ‘deletion’ of subject in Slavic languages in comparative-historical and areal perspectives]. In: Fischer, K.B., G. Krumbholz, M. Lazar and J. Rabiega-Wiśniewska (eds.), Beiträge der Europäischen Slavistischen LinguistikPOLYSLAV 13 Die Welt der Slaven Sammelband 40). München: Sagner. 186–193.Search in Google Scholar
Pooth, R., P.A. Kerkhof, L. Kulikov and J. Barðdal. 2019. “The origin of non-canonical case marking of subjects in Proto-Indo-European: Accusative, ergative, or semantic alignment”. Indogermanische Forschungen 123. 245–263.10.1515/if-2019-0009Search in Google Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, E. 1991. “Quirky subjects in Old Icelandic”. In: Sigurðsson, H.Á. (ed.), Papers from the Twelfth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics. Reykjavík: Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland. 369–387.Search in Google Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, E. 1995. “Old Icelandic: A non-configurational language?” NOWELE: North-Western European Language Evolution 26. 3–29.10.1075/nowele.26.01rogSearch in Google Scholar
Sag, I. 2012. “Sign-Based Construction Grammar: An informal synopsis”. In: Boas, H.C. and I.A. Sag (eds.), Sign-Based Construction Grammar. Stanford: CSLI Publications. 69–202.Search in Google Scholar
Sandal, C. 2011. Akkusative subject og antikausativitet i norrønt [Accusative subjects and anticausativity in Old Norse-Icelandic]. (MA thesis, University of Bergen.)Search in Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, H.Á. 1989. Verbal syntax and case in Icelandic. (PhD Dissertation, Lund University.)Search in Google Scholar
Švedova, N.Ju. 1964. “Izmenenija v sisteme prostogo predloženija v russkom lit. jazyke XIX v.” [Changes in the system of the simple sentence in the Russian literary language of the 19th century]. In: Vinogradov, V.V. and N.Ju. Švedova (eds.), Očerki po istorii grammatiki russkogo literaturnogo jazyka XIX v. [Essays in the history of grammar of the Russian literary language of the 19th century]. Moskva: Nauka. 20– 368.Search in Google Scholar
Sweetser, E. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620904Search in Google Scholar
Zaenen, A. and J. Maling. 1984. “Unaccusative, passive, and quirky case”. In: Cobler, M., S. MacKaye and M.T. Wescoat (eds.), Proceedings of the Third West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Stanford: Linguistics Association. 317–329.Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Faculty of English, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
