Skip to content
Accessible Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published online by De Gruyter July 13, 2021

Magnetic field controlled behavior of magnetic gels studied using particle-based simulations

Rudolf Weeber, Patrick Kreissl and Christian Holm
From the journal Physical Sciences Reviews


This contribution provides an overview of the study of soft magnetic materials using particle-based simulation models. We focus in particular on systems where thermal fluctuations are important. As a basis for further discussion, we first describe two-dimensional models which demonstrate two deformation mechanisms of magnetic gels in a homogeneous field. One is based on the change of magnetic interactions between magnetic particles as a response to an external field; the other is the result of magnetically blocked particles acting as cross-linkers. Based on the qualitative behavior directly observable in the two-dimensional models, we extend our description to three-dimensions. We begin with particle-cross-linked gels, as for those, our three-dimensional model also includes explicitly resolved polymer chains. Here, the polymer chains are represented by entropic springs, and the deformation of the gel is the result of the interaction between magnetic particles. We use this model to examine the influence of the magnetic spatial configuration of magnetic particles (uniaxial or isotropic) on the gel’s magnetomechanical behavior. A further part of the article will be dedicated to scale-bridging approaches such as systematic coarse-graining and models located at the boundary between particle-based and continuum modeling. We will conclude our article with a discussion of recent results for modeling time-dependent phenomena in magnetic-polymer composites. The discussion will be focused on a simulation model suitable for obtaining AC-susceptibility spectra for dilute ferrofluids including hydrodynamic interactions. This model will be the basis for studying the signature of particle–polymer coupling in magnetic hybrid materials. In the long run, we aim to compare material properties probed locally via the AC-susceptibility spectra to elastic moduli obtained for the system at a global level.

Corresponding author: Rudolf Weeber, Institute for Computational Physics, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany, E-mail:

Funding source: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft10.13039/501100001659

Award Identifier / Grant number: HO 1108/23

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: This research was financially supported by the German Research Foundation through the priority program SPP 1681 under grant HO 1108/23.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.


1. Becker, TI, Böhm, V, Vega, JC, Odenbach, S, Raikher, YL, Zimmermann, K. Magnetic-field-controlled mechanical behavior of magneto-sensitive elastomers in applications for actuator and sensor systems. Arch Appl Mech 2019;89:133–52. in Google Scholar

2. Monz, S, Tschöpe, A, Birringer, R. Magnetic properties of isotropic and anisotropic CoFe2O4-based ferrogels and their application as torsional and rotational actuators. Phys Rev E 2008;78:021404. in Google Scholar

3. Schmauch, MM, Mishra, SR, Evans, BA, Velev, OD, Tracy, JB. Chained iron microparticles for directionally controlled actuation of soft robots. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2017;9:11895–901. in Google Scholar

4. Zimmermann, K, Böhm, V, Zeidis, I. Vibration-driven mobile robots based on magneto-sensitive elastomers. In: Advanced intelligent mechatronics (AIM), 2011 IEEE/ASME international conference. IEEE, Budapest, Hungary; 2011:730–5 pp. .Search in Google Scholar

5. Odenbach, S. Microstructure and rheology of magnetic hybrid materials. Arch Appl Mech 2016;86:269–79. in Google Scholar

6. Weeber, R, Hermes, M, Schmidt, AM, Holm, C. Polymer architecture of magnetic gels: a review. J Phys Condens Matter 2018;30:063002. in Google Scholar

7. Weeber, R, Kreissl, P, Holm, C. Studying the field-controlled change of shape and elasticity of magnetic gels using particle-based simulations. Arch Appl Mech 2019;89:3–16. in Google Scholar

8. Menzel, AM. Mesoscopic characterization of magnetoelastic hybrid materials: magnetic gels and elastomers, their particle-scale description, and scale-bridging links. Arch Appl Mech 2018;89:1–29. in Google Scholar

9. Holm, C, Weis, J-J. The structure of ferrofluids: a status report. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 2005;10:133–40. in Google Scholar

10. Odenbach, S, editor. Colloidal magnetic fluids: basic, development and application of ferrofluids. Springer; 2009, vol 763.Search in Google Scholar

11. Auernhammer, GK, Collin, D, Martinoty, P. Viscoelasticity of suspensions of magnetic particles in a polymer: effect of confinement and external field. J Chem Phys 2006;124:204907. in Google Scholar

12. Lyer, S, Schreiber, E, Tietze, R, Mann, J, Struffert, T, Engelhorn, T, et al.. Nanotechnology and cancer treatment: magnetic nanoparticles for a new and innovative drug delivery system. Anticancer Res 2011;31:1991–2.Search in Google Scholar

13. Qin, J, Asempah, I, Laurent, S, Fornara, A, Muller, RN, Muhammed, M. Injectable superparamagnetic ferrogels for controlled release of hydrophobic drugs. Adv Mater 2009;21:1354–7. in Google Scholar

14. Tietze, R, Zaloga, J, Unterweger, H, Lyer, S, Friedrich, RP, Janko, C, et al.. Magnetic nanoparticle-based drug delivery for cancer therapy. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2015;468:463–70. in Google Scholar

15. Janko, C, Ratschker, T, Nguyen, K, Zschiesche, L, Tietze, R, Lyer, S, et al.. Functionalized superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (spions) as platform for the targeted multimodal tumor therapy. Front Oncol 2019;9:59. in Google Scholar

16. George, B, Fink, M, Ermert, H, Rupitsch, SJ, Lyer, S, Alexiou, C. Guiding and accumulation of magnetic nanoparticles employing high intensity focused ultrasound for drug targeting applications. Curr Dir Biomed Eng 2019;5:589–92. in Google Scholar

17. Engelmann, UM, Roeth, AA, Eberbeck, D, Buhl, EM, Neumann, UP, Schmitz-Rode, T, et al.. Combining bulk temperature and nanoheating enables advanced magnetic fluid hyperthermia efficacy on pancreatic tumor cells. Sci Rep 2018;8:13210. in Google Scholar

18. Draack, S, Lucht, N, Remmer, H, Martens, M, Fischer, B, Schilling, M, et al.. Multiparametric magnetic particle spectroscopy of CoFe2O4 nanoparticles in viscous media. J Phys Chem C 2019;123:6787–801. in Google Scholar

19. Wiedenmann, A, Keiderling, U, Meissner, M, Wallacher, D, Gahler, R, May, RP, et al.. Low-temperature dynamics of magnetic colloids studied by time-resolved small-angle neutron scattering. Phys Rev B 2008;77:184417. in Google Scholar

20. Klokkenburg, M, Erné, BH, Wiedenmann, A, Petukhov, AV, Philipse, AP. Dipolar structures in magnetite ferrofluids studied with small-angle neutron scattering with and without applied magnetic field. Phys Rev E 2007;75:051408. in Google Scholar

21. Rosman, R, Janssen, JJM, Rekveldt, MT. Interparticle correlation in Fe3O4 ferrofluids, studied by the small-angle neutron-scattering technique. J Appl Phys 1990;67:3072. in Google Scholar

22. Nack, A, Seifert, J, Passow, C, Wagner, J. Hindered nematic alignment of hematite spindles in poly (n-isopropylacrylamide) hydrogels: a small-angle x-ray scattering and rheology study. J Appl Crystallogr 2018;51:87–96. in Google Scholar

23. Kruse, T, Krauthäuser, H-G, Spanoudaki, A, Pelster, R. Agglomeration and chain formation in ferrofluids: two-dimensional x-ray scattering. Phys Rev B 2003;67:094206. in Google Scholar

24. Butter, K, Bomans, PHH, Frederik, PM, Vroege, GJ, Philipse, AP. Direct observation of dipolar chains in iron ferrofluids by cryogenic electron microscopy. Nat Mater 2003;2:88–91. in Google Scholar

25. Tang, J, Tong, Z, Xia, Y, Liu, M, Lv, Z, Gao, Y, et al.. Super tough magnetic hydrogels for remotely triggered shape morphing. J Mater Chem B 2018;6:2713–22. in Google Scholar

26. Schümann, M, Odenbach, S. In-situ observation of the particle microstructure of magnetorheological elastomers in presence of mechanical strain and magnetic fields. J Magn Magn Mater 2017;441:88–92. in Google Scholar

27. Potisk, T, Svenšek, D, Pleiner, H, Brand, HR. Continuum model of magnetic field induced viscoelasticity in magnetorheological fluids. J Chem Phys 2019;150:174901. in Google Scholar

28. Puljiz, M, Huang, S, Kalina, KA, Nowak, J, Odenbach, S, Kästner, M, et al.. Reversible magnetomechanical collapse: virtual touching and detachment of rigid inclusions in a soft elastic matrix. Soft Matter 2018;14:6809–21. in Google Scholar

29. Stolbov, OV, Raikher, YL, Balasoiu, M. Modelling of magnetodipolar striction in soft magnetic elastomers. Soft Matter 2011;7:8484–7. in Google Scholar

30. Metsch, P, Kalina, KA, Spieler, C, Kästner, M. A numerical study on magnetostrictive phenomena in magnetorheological elastomers. Comput Mater Sci 2016;124:364–74. in Google Scholar

31. Cremer, P, Heinen, M, Menzel, A, Löwen, H. A density functional approach to ferrogels. J Phys Condens Matter 2017;29:275102. in Google Scholar

32. Zrínyi, M. Intelligent polymer gels controlled by magnetic fields. Colloid Polym Sci 2000;278:98–103. in Google Scholar

33. Raikher, YL, Stolbov, OV. Magnetodeformational effect in ferrogel samples. J Magn Magn Mater 2003;258/259:477. in Google Scholar

34. Gollwitzer, C, Turanov, A, Krekhova, M, Lattermann, G, Rehberg, I, Richter, R. Measuring the deformation of a ferrogel in a homogeneous magnetic field. J Chem Phys 2008;128:164709. in Google Scholar

35. Backes, S, Witt, MU, Roeben, E, Kuhrts, L, Aleed, S, Schmidt, AM, et al.. Loading of pnipam based microgels with cofe2o4 nanoparticles and their magnetic response in bulk and at surfaces. J Phys Chem B 2015;119:12129–37. in Google Scholar

36. Ivaneyko, D, Toshchevikov, V, Saphiannikova, M, Heinrich, G. Effects of particle distribution on mechanical properties of magneto-sensitive elastomers in a homogeneous magnetic field. Condens Matter Phys 2012;15:33601. in Google Scholar

37. Weeber, R, Kantorovich, S, Holm, C. Deformation mechanisms in 2D magnetic gels studied by computer simulations. Soft Matter 2012;8:9923–32. in Google Scholar

38. Weeber, R, Holm, C. Interplay between particle microstructure, network topology and sample shape in magnetic gels – a molecular dynamics simulation study. Arxiv preprint 1704.06578, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

39. Ilg, P. Stimuli-responsive hydrogels cross-linked by magnetic nanoparticles. Soft Matter 2013;9:3465–8. in Google Scholar

40. Messing, R, Frickel, N, Belkoura, L, Strey, R, Rahn, H, Odenbach, S, et al.. Cobalt ferrite nanoparticles as multifunctional cross-linkers in PAAm ferrohydrogels. Macromolecules 2011;44:2990–9. in Google Scholar

41. Roeder, L, Reckenthaler, M, Belkoura, L, Roitsch, S, Strey, R, Schmidt, A. Covalent ferrohydrogels based on elongated particulate cross-linkers. Macromolecules 2014;47:7200–7. in Google Scholar

42. Huang, S, Pessot, G, Cremer, P, Weeber, R, Holm, C, Nowak, J, et al.. Buckling of paramagnetic chains in soft gels. Soft Matter 2016;12:228–37. in Google Scholar

43. Puljiz, M, Huang, S, Auernhammer, GK, Menzel, AM. Forces on rigid inclusions in elastic media and resulting matrix-mediated interactions. Phys Rev Lett 2016;117:238003. in Google Scholar

44. Limbach, HJ, Arnold, A, Mann, BA, Holm, C. ESPResSo – an extensible simulation package for research on soft matter systems. Comput Phys Commun 2006;174:704–27. in Google Scholar

45. Arnold, A, Lenz, O, Kesselheim, S, Weeber, R, Fahrenberger, F, Röhm, D, et al.. ESPResSo 3.1 – molecular dynamics software for coarse-grained models. In: Griebel, M, Schweitzer, MA, editors. Meshfree methods for partial differential equations VI, volume 89 of lecture notes in computational science and engineering. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2013:1–23 pp.Search in Google Scholar

46. Weik, F, Weeber, R, Szuttor, K, Breitsprecher, K, de Graaf, J, Kuron, M, et al.. ESPResSo 4.0 – an extensible software package for simulating soft matter systems. Eur Phys J Spec Top 2019;227:1789–816. in Google Scholar

47. Biller, A, Stolbov, O, Raikher, YL. Modeling of particle interactions in magnetorheological elastomers. J Appl Phys 2014;116:114904. in Google Scholar

48. Kubo, R. The fluctuation-dissipation theorem. Rep Prog Phys 1966;29:255–84. in Google Scholar

49. Annunziata, MA, Menzel, AM, Löwen, H. Hardening transition in a one-dimensional model for ferrogels. J Chem Phys 2013;138:204906. in Google Scholar

50. Ivanov, AO, Kuznetsova, OB. Magnetogranulometric analysis of ferrocolloids: second-order modified mean field theory. Colloid J 2006;68:430–40. in Google Scholar

51. Minina, E, Sánchez, P, Likos, C, Kantorovich, S. The influence of the magnetic filler concentration on the properties of a microgel particle: zero-field case. J Magn Magn Mater 2017;459:226.Search in Google Scholar

52. Weeber, R, Klinkigt, M, Kantorovich, S, Holm, C. Microstructure and magnetic properties of magnetic fluids consisting of shifted dipole particles under the influence of an external magnetic field. J Chem Phys 2013;139:214901. in Google Scholar

53. Kantorovich, S, Pyanzina, E, Sciortino, F. The influence of shape anisotropy on the microstructure of magnetic dipolar particles. Soft Matter 2013;9:6594–603. in Google Scholar

54. Weeber, R, Kantorovich, S, Holm, C. Ferrogels cross-linked by magnetic nanoparticles – deformation mechanisms in two and three dimensions studied by means of computer simulations. J Magn Magn Mater 2015;383:262–6. in Google Scholar

55. Weeber, R, Kantorovich, S, Holm, C. Ferrogels cross-linked by magnetic particles: field-driven deformation and elasticity studied using computer simulations. J Chem Phys 2015;143:154901. in Google Scholar

56. Cremer, P, Löwen, H, Menzel, AM. Superelastic stress–strain behavior in ferrogels with different types of magneto-elastic coupling. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2016;18:26670–90. in Google Scholar

57. Pessot, G, Schümann, M, Gundermann, T, Odenbach, S, Lowen, H, Menzel, AM. Tunable dynamic moduli of magnetic elastomers: from characterization by x-ray micro-computed tomography to mesoscopic modeling. J Phys Condens Matter 2018;30:125101. in Google Scholar

58. Linke, JM, Borin, DY, Odenbach, S. First-order reversal curve analysis of magnetoactive elastomers. RSC Adv 2016;6:100407–16. in Google Scholar

59. Morozov, K, Shliomis, M, Yamaguchi, H. Magnetic deformation of ferrogel bodies: procrustes effect. Phys Rev E 2009;79:040801. in Google Scholar

60. Zubarev, AY. On the theory of the magnetic deformation of ferrogels. Soft Matter 2012;8:3174–9. in Google Scholar

61. Ilg, P, Kröger, M. Anisotropic self-diffusion in ferrofluids studied via brownian dynamics simulations. Phys Rev E – Stat Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys 2005;72:031504. in Google Scholar

62. Cerdà, JJ, Kantorovich, S, Holm, C. Aggregate formation in ferrofluid monolayers: simulations and theory. J Phys Condens Matter 2008;20:204125. in Google Scholar

63. Jager, S, Klapp, SHL. Pattern formation of dipolar colloids in rotating fields: layering and synchronization. Soft Matter 2011;7:6606–16. in Google Scholar

64. Weeber, R, Nestler, F, Weik, F, Pippig, M, Potts, D, Holm, C. Accelerating the calculation of dipolar interactions in particle based simulations with open boundary conditions by means of the P2NFFT method. J Comput Phys 2019;391:243–58. in Google Scholar

65. Collin, D, Auernhammer, G, Gavat, O, Martinoty, P, Brand, H. Frozen-in magnetic order in uniaxial magnetic gels: preparation and physical properties. Macromol Rapid Commun 2003;24:737. in Google Scholar

66. Bródka, A. Ewald summation method with electrostatic layer correction for interactions of point dipoles in slab geometry. Chem Phys Lett 2004;400:62–7. in Google Scholar

67. Cerdà, JJ, Ballenegger, V, Lenz, O, Holm, C. P3M algorithm for dipolar interactions. J Chem Phys 2008;129:234104. in Google Scholar

68. Nestler, F. An NFFT based approach to the efficient computation of dipole–dipole interactions under various periodic boundary conditions. Appl Numer Math 2016;105:25–46. in Google Scholar

69. Pessot, G, Löwen, H, Menzel, AM. Dynamic elastic moduli in magnetic gels: normal modes and linear response. J Chem Phys 2016;145:104904. in Google Scholar

70. Pessot, G, Weeber, R, Holm, C, Löwen, H, Menzel, AM. Towards a scale-bridging description of ferrogels and magnetic elastomers. J Phys Condens Matter 2015;27:325105. in Google Scholar

71. Attaran, A, Brummund, J, Wallmersperger, T. Development of a continuum model for ferrogels. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 2016;28:1358–75. in Google Scholar

72. Roeben, E, Roeder, L, Teusch, S, Effertz, M, Deiters, UK, Schmidt, AM. Magnetic particle nanorheology. Colloid Polym Sci 2014;292:2013–23. in Google Scholar

73. Gratz, M, Tschöpe, A. Optical transmission versus ac magnetization measurements for monitoring colloidal Ni nanorod rotational dynamics. J Phys Appl Phys 2017;50:015001. in Google Scholar

74. Remmer, H, Dieckhoff, J, Tschöpe, A, Roeben, E, Schmidt, AM, Ludwig, F. Dynamics of CoFe2O4 single-core nanoparticles in viscoelastic media. Phys Procedia 2015;75:1150–7. in Google Scholar

75. Remmer, H, Roeben, E, Schmidt, AM, Schilling, M, Ludwig, F. Dynamics of magnetic nanoparticles in viscoelastic media. J Magn Magn Mater 2017;427:331–5. in Google Scholar

76. Ludwig, F, Guillaume, A, Schilling, M, Frickel, N, Schmidt, A. Determination of core and hydrodynamic size distributions of CoFe2O4 nanoparticle suspensions using ac susceptibility measurements. J Appl Phys 2010;108:033918. in Google Scholar

77. Feyen, M, Heim, E, Ludwig, F, Schmidt, AM. Magnetic nanorotors with tailored field-induced dynamics. Chem Mater 2008;20:2942–8. in Google Scholar

78. DiMarzio, EA, Bishop, M. Connection between the macroscopic electric and mechanical susceptibilities. J Chem Phys 1974;60:3802–11. in Google Scholar

79. Niss, K, Jakobsen, B, Olsen, NB. Dielectric and shear mechanical relaxations in glass-forming liquids: a test of the gemant-dimarzio-bishop model. J Chem Phys 2005;123:234510. in Google Scholar

80. Raikher, YL, Rusakov, V, Coffey, W, Kalmykov, YP. Dynamic susceptibilities of an assembly of dipolar particles in an elastic environment. Phys Rev E 2001;63:031402. in Google Scholar

81. Ivanov, AO, Zverev, VS, Kantorovich, SS. Revealing the signature of dipolar interactions in dynamic spectra of polydisperse magnetic nanoparticles. Soft Matter 2016;12:3507–13. in Google Scholar

82. Kreissl, P, Holm, C, Weeber, R. Frequency-dependent magnetic susceptibility of magnetic nanoparticles in a polymer solution: a simulation study. Soft Matter 2021;17:174–83. in Google Scholar

83. Weeks, JD, Chandler, D, Andersen, HC. Role of repulsive forces in determining the equilibrium structure of simple liquids. J Chem Phys 1971;54:5237. in Google Scholar

84. McNamara, GR, Zanetti, G. Use of the Boltzmann-equation to simulate lattice-gas automata. Phys Rev Lett 1988;61:2332–5. in Google Scholar

85. Krüger, T, Kusumaatmaja, H, Kuzmin, A, Shardt, O, Silva, G, Viggen, EM. The lattice Boltzmann method: principles and practice. Cham: Springer; 2017.Search in Google Scholar

86. Lobaskin, V, Dünweg, B. A new model for simulating colloidal dynamics. New J Phys 2004;6:54. in Google Scholar

87. Fischer, LP, Peter, T, Holm, C, de Graaf, J. The raspberry model for hydrodynamic interactions revisited. I. Periodic arrays of spheres and dumbbells. J Chem Phys 2015;143:084107. in Google Scholar

88. Kubo, R. Statistical-mechanical theory of irreversible processes. I. general theory and simple applications to magnetic and conduction problems. J Phys Soc Jpn 1957;12:570–86. in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2021-07-13

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston