Governance mittelständischer Innovations-tätigkeit – Implikationen des Doing-Using-Interacting-Modus

Literaturverzeichnis

Alhusen, H. et al. (2021), A new measurement conception for the ‘Doing-Using-Interacting’ mode of innovation, Research Policy 50(4), 104214. 10.1016/j.respol.2021.104214Search in Google Scholar

Alhusen, H. (2020), Experience-based know-how, learning and innovation in German SMEs: An explorative analysis of the role of know-how in different modes of innovation, ifh Working Paper 27/2020.Search in Google Scholar

Alhusen, H. und T. Bennat (2021), Combinatorial innovation modes in SMEs: Mechanisms integrating STI processes into DUI mode learning and the role of regional innovation policy, European Planning Studies 29(4), S. 779–805.Search in Google Scholar

Amin, A. und J. Roberts (2008), Knowing in action: Beyond communities of practice, Research Policy 37(2), S. 353–69.Search in Google Scholar

Andries, P. und D. Czarnitzki (2014), Small firm innovation performance and employee involvement, Small Business Economics 43(1), S. 21–38.Search in Google Scholar

Apanasovich, N. (2016), Modes of innovation. A grounded meta-analysis, Journal of the Knowledge Economy 7(3), S. 720–37.Search in Google Scholar

Arrow, K. J. (1962a), The economic implications of learning by doing, Review of Economic Studies 29(3), S. 155–73.10.2307/2295952Search in Google Scholar

Arrow, K. J. (1962b), Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention, in: R. R. Nelson (Hrsg.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, New York, Princeton University Press, S. 609–25.10.1515/9781400879762-024Search in Google Scholar

Asheim, B. T. und M. S. Gertler (2005), The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems, in: J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery und R. R. Nelson (Hrsg.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford University Press, S. 291–317.Search in Google Scholar

Asheim, B. T., R. Boschma und P. Cooke (2011), Constructing regio-nal advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases, Regional Studies 45(7), S. 893–904.Search in Google Scholar

Asheim, B. T. und M. D. Parrilli (2012), Introduction: Learning and interaction – drivers for innovation in current competitive markets, in: B. T. Asheim und M. D. Parrilli (Hrsg.), Interactive Learning for Innovation. A Key Driver within Clusters and Innovation Systems, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, S. 1–29.10.1057/9780230362420_1Search in Google Scholar

Astor, M., C. Rammer, C. Klaus und G. Klose (2016), Innovativer Mittelstand 2025 – Herausforderungen, Trends und Handlungsempfehlungen für Wirtschaft und Politik, Berlin, Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie.Search in Google Scholar

Becker, L. und K. Bizer (2015), Wirkung föderaler Strukturen auf die staatliche Innovationsförderung, Wirtschaftsdienst 95(6), S. 411–16.Search in Google Scholar

Bennat, T. (2020), Innovation Modes in Small and Medium-Sized Firms: Organization of Learning Processes and Regional Innovation Policy Implications, Universität Hannover, Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Bennat, T. und R. Sternberg (2020), Knowledge bases in German regions: What hinders combinatorial knowledge dynamics and how regional innovation policies may help, European Planning Studies 28(2), S. 319–39.Search in Google Scholar

Bleda, M. und P. del Río (2013), The market failure and the systemic failure rationales in technological innovation systems, Research Policy 42(5), S. 1039–52.Search in Google Scholar

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF)(2018), Forschung und Innovation für die Menschen. Die Hightech-Strategie 2025, Berlin.Search in Google Scholar

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF)(2019), Fortschrittsbericht zur Hightech-Strategie 2025, Berlin.Search in Google Scholar

Borrás, S. und C. Edquist (2013), The choice of innovation policy instruments, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 80(8), S. 1513–22.Search in Google Scholar

Büchter, K. (2018), Berufsschulen in der dualen Ausbildung und regionalen Wirtschaft. Gleichberechtigte Partnerschaft durch Reformen?, Wiso Diskurs 05/2018.Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, W. M. und D. A. Levinthal (1990), Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly 35(1), S. 128–52. Search in Google Scholar

Costa, P. T. und R. R. McCrae (1995), Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the revised NEO personality inventory, Journal of Personality Assessment 64(1), S. 21–50.Search in Google Scholar

D’Este, P., S. Iammarino, M. Savona und N. v. Tunzelmann (2012), What hampers innovation? Revealed barriers versus deterring barriers, Research Policy 41(2), S. 482–88.Search in Google Scholar

De Massis, A., D. Audretsch, L. Uhlaner und N. Kammerlander (2018), Innovation with limited resources: Management lessons from the German Mittelstand, Journal of Product Innovation Management 35(1), S. 125–46.Search in Google Scholar

Digman, J. M. (1990), Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model, Annual Review of Psychology 41, S. 417–40.Search in Google Scholar

Edler, J. und J. Fagerberg (2017), Innovation policy: What, why, and how, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 33(1), S. 2–23.Search in Google Scholar

Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI)(2014), Gutachten zu Forschung, Innovation und technologischer Leistungsfähigkeit Deutschlands 2014, Berlin.Search in Google Scholar

Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI)(2016), Gutachten zu Forschung, Innovation und technologischer Leistungsfähigkeit Deutschlands 2016, Berlin.Search in Google Scholar

Europäische Kommission (2020), Innovation and Digitalisation. A Report of the ET 2020 Working Group on Vocational Education and Training (VET) on Behalf of the European Commission, Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union.Search in Google Scholar

Fitjar, R. D. und A. Rodríguez-Pose (2013), Firm collaboration and modes of innovation in Norway, Research Policy 42(1), S. 128–38.Search in Google Scholar

Frietsch, R., C. Rammer, T. Schubert, O. Som, M. Beise-Zee und A. Spielkamp (2015), Innovationsindikator 2015. Gutachten für die Acatech – Deutsche Akademie der Technikwissenschaften e.V. und den Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie, Berlin.Search in Google Scholar

Gault, F. (2013), Innovation indicators and measurement: Challenges, in: F. Gault (Hrsg.), Handbook of Innovation Indicators and Measurement, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, S. 441–64.10.4337/9780857933652.00032Search in Google Scholar

Harabi, N. (1997), Channels of R&D spillovers: An empirical investigation of Swiss firms, Technovation 17(11–12), S. 627–35.Search in Google Scholar

Herstad, S. J., T. Sandven und B. Ebersberger (2015), Recruitment, knowledge integration and modes of innovation, Research Policy 44(1), S. 138–53.Search in Google Scholar

Høyrup, S. (Hrsg.)(2012), Employee Driven Innovation. A New Approach, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137014764Search in Google Scholar

Isaksen, A. und J. Karlsen (2011), Organisational learning, supportive innovation systems and implications for policy formulation, Journal of the Knowledge Economy 2(4), S. 453–62.Search in Google Scholar

Isaksen, A. und M. Nilsson (2013), Combined innovation policy: Linking scientific and practical knowledge in innovation systems, European Planning Studies 21(12), S. 1919–36.Search in Google Scholar

Jensen, M. B., B. Johnson, E. Lorenz und B.-Å. Lundvall (2007), Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation, Research Policy 36(5), S. 680–93.Search in Google Scholar

Kesting, P. und J. P. Ulhøi (2010), Employee‐driven innovation: Extending the license to foster innovation, Management Decision 48(1), S. 65–84.Search in Google Scholar

Kirner, E., S. Kinkel und A. Jaeger (2009), Innovation paths and the innovation performance of low-technology firms – An empirical analysis of German industry, Research Policy 38(3), S. 447–58.Search in Google Scholar

Krieger, B., G. Licht und M. Pellens (2018), Neue Perspektiven in der europäischen Innovationspolitik, ZEW Policy Brief Nr. 18-07. Search in Google Scholar

Lave, J. und E. Wenger (1991), Situated Learning, Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815355Search in Google Scholar

Lay, G. und O. Som (2015), Policy implications and future challenges, in: O. Som und E. Kirner (Hrsg.), Low-tech Innovation. Competitiveness of the German Manufacturing Sector, Cham, Springer International Publishing, S. 199–218.10.1007/978-3-319-09973-6_11Search in Google Scholar

Lorenz, E. (2011), Regional learning dynamics and systems of education and training: A European comparison, Journal of the Knowledge Economy 2(4), S. 481–506.Search in Google Scholar

Lorenz, E. und J. Potter (2019), Workplace organisation and innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises, OECD SME and Entrepreneurship Papers Nr. 17.Search in Google Scholar

Lundvall, B.-Å. und E. Lorenz (2012), Innovation and competence building in the learning economy: Implications for innovation policy, in: B. T. Asheim und M. D. Parrilli (Hrsg.), Interactive Learning for Innovation. A Key Driver within Clusters and Innovation Systems, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, S. 33–71.10.1057/9780230362420_2Search in Google Scholar

Lund, H. B. und A. Karlsen (2019), The importance of vocational education institutions in manufacturing regions: Adding content to a broad definition of regional innovation systems, Industry and Innovation 27(6), S. 660–79. Search in Google Scholar

Matthies, E., K. Haverkamp, J. Thomä und K. Bizer (2021), Does initial vocational training foster innovativeness at the company level? Evidence from German establishment data, ifh Working Papers 30.Search in Google Scholar

McMurray, A. J., N. Muenjohn und D. Scott (2021), Measuring workplace innovation: Scale development, Journal of Small Business Management 10(1), S. 1–20.Search in Google Scholar

Moilanen, M., S. Østbye und K. Woll (2014), Non-R&D SMEs. External knowledge, absorptive capacity and product innovation, Small Business Economics 43(2), S. 447–62.Search in Google Scholar

Nooteboom, B. (1994), Innovation and diffusion in small firms. Theory and evidence, Small Business Economics 6(5), S. 327–47.10.1007/BF01065137Search in Google Scholar

Nunes, S. und R. Lopes (2015), Firm performance, innovation modes and territorial embeddedness, European Planning Studies 23(9), S. 1796–826.Search in Google Scholar

Pahnke, A. und F. Welter (2019), The German Mittelstand: Antithesis to Silicon Valley entrepreneurship? Small Business Economics 52(2), 345–58.10.1007/s11187-018-0095-4Search in Google Scholar

Parrilli, M. D. und H. A. Heras (2016), STI and DUI innovation modes: Scientific-technological and context-specific nuances, Research Policy 45(4), S. 747–56.Search in Google Scholar

Parrilli, M. D., R. D. Fitjar und A. Rodríguez-Pose (2016), Business innovation modes: A review from a country perspective, in: M. D. Parrilli, R. D. Fitjar und A. Rodríguez-Pose (Hrsg.), Innovation Drivers and Regional Innovation Strategies, New York, Routledge, S. 197–218.10.4324/9781315671475Search in Google Scholar

Peters, B., M. Hud, C. Köhler und G. Licht (2012), Ökonomische Bewertung von staatlichen Investitionen in Forschung und Innovation, Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 15-2012, Berlin.Search in Google Scholar

Porter, M. E. (1991), Nationale Wettbewerbsvorteile. Erfolgreich konkurrieren auf dem Weltmarkt, München, Droemer Knaur.Search in Google Scholar

Porto Gómez, I., J. M. Zabala-Iturriagagoitia und U. Aguirre Larrakoetxea (2018), Old wine in old bottles: The neglected role of vocational training centres in innovation, Vocations and Learning 11, S. 205–21.Search in Google Scholar

Proeger, T. (2020), Knowledge spillovers and absorptive capacity – institutional evidence from the ‘German Mittelstand’, Journal of the Knowledge Economy 11(1), S. 211–38.Search in Google Scholar

Rammer, C., C. Köhler, M. Murmann, A. Pesau, F. Schwiebacher, S. Kinkel, E. Kirner, T. Schubert und O. Som (2011), Innovationen ohne Forschung und Entwicklung: Eine Untersuchung zu Unternehmen, die ohne eigene FuE-Tätigkeit neue Produkte und Prozes-se einführen, Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem Nr. 15-2011.Search in Google Scholar

Rammer, C., D. Czarnitzki und A. Spielkamp (2009), Innovation success of non-R&D-performers. Substituting technology by management in SMEs, Small Business Economics 33(1), S. 35–58.Search in Google Scholar

Rammer, C., S. Gottschalk, B. Peters, J. Bersch und D. Erdsick (2016), Die Rolle von KMU für Forschung und Innovation in Deutschland, Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 10-2016.Search in Google Scholar

Rammer, C. und T. Schubert (2018), Concentration on the few: Mechanisms behind a falling share of innovative firms in Germany, Research Policy 47(2), S. 379–89.Search in Google Scholar

Roper, S., P. Vahter und J. H. Love (2013), Externalities of openness in innovation, Research Policy 42(9), S. 1544–54.Search in Google Scholar

Runst, P. und J. Thomä (2021), Does personality matter? Small business owners and modes of innovation, Small Business Economics, online verfügbar unter https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11187-021-00509-1.Search in Google Scholar

Rupietta, C. und U. Backes-Gellner (2019), How firms’ participation in apprenticeship training fosters knowledge diffusion and innovation, Journal of Business Economics 89(5), S. 569–97.Search in Google Scholar

Rupietta, C., J. Meuer und U. Backes-Gellner (2021), How do apprentices moderate the influence of organizational innovation on the technological innovation process? Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training 13(1), online verfügbar unter https://ervet-journal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40461-020-00107-7.Search in Google Scholar

Som, O. et al. (Hrsg.) (2010), Zukunftspotenziale und Strategien nichtforschungsintensiver Industrien in Deutschland – Auswirkungen auf Wettbewerbsfähigkeit und Beschäftigung, Berlin, TAB-Büro für Technikfolgen-Abschätzung beim Deutschen Bundestag. Search in Google Scholar

Som, O. und E. Kirner (Hrsg.) (2015), Low-tech Innovation. Competitiveness of the German Manufacturing Sector, Cham, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-09973-6Search in Google Scholar

Som, O., E. Kirner und A. Jäger (2015), The absorptive capacity of non-R&D-intensive firms, in: O. Som und E. Kirner (Hrsg.), Low-tech Innovation. Competitiveness of the German Manufacturing Sector, Cham, Springer International Publishing, S. 145–64.10.1007/978-3-319-09973-6_9Search in Google Scholar

Spielkamp, A. und C. Rammer (2006), Balanceakt Innovation – Erfolgsfaktoren im Innovationsmanagement kleiner und mittlerer Unternehmen, ZEW-Dokumentation Nr. 06-04.Search in Google Scholar

Storey, D. J. (2005), Entrepreneurship, small and medium sized enterprises and public policies, in: Z. J. Acs und D. B. Audretsch (Hrsg.), Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research. An Inter-disciplinary Survey and Introduction, New York, Springer, S. 473–511.10.1007/0-387-24519-7_18Search in Google Scholar

Thomä, J. (2013), Ökonomische Argumente für die duale Ausbildung, Göttinger Handwerkswirtschaftliche Studien (Band 91), Duderstadt, Mecke.Search in Google Scholar

Thomä, J. (2017), DUI mode learning and barriers to innovation – A case from Germany, Research Policy 46(7), S. 1327–39.Search in Google Scholar

Thomä, J. (2019). Ende des Erfahrungswissens? Akademisierung und Innovationsfähigkeit von KMU, Göttinger Beiträge zur Handwerksforschung 26.Search in Google Scholar

Thomä, J. und V. Zimmermann (2020), Interactive learning — The key to innovation in non-R&D-intensive SMEs? A cluster analysis approach, Journal of Small Business Management 58(4), S. 747–76.Search in Google Scholar

Uhly A., K. Troltsch und G. Walden (2006), Challenges to the German Dual System, in: U. Schmoch, C. Rammer und H. Legler (Hrsg.) National Systems of Innovation in Comparison, Dordrecht, Springer, S. 205–25. 10.1007/1-4020-4949-1_12Search in Google Scholar

Weber, K. M. et al. (2021), Agilität in der F&I-Politik: Konzept, Definition, Operationalisierung, Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 8-2021, Berlin, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI).Search in Google Scholar

Zimmermann, V. und J. Thomä (2016), SMEs face a wide range of barriers to innovation – support policy needs to be broad-based, KfW Research, Focus on Economics 130.Search in Google Scholar

Zimmermann, V. (2020), KfW-Innovationsbericht Mittelstand 2019, Frankfurt, KfW Bankengruppe.Search in Google Scholar