Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the first choice of treatment for rheumatic disorders and other degenerative inflammatory diseases. One of them, indomethacin (INDO), is highlighted in this study. With its analgesic, antipyretic, and anti-inflammatory properties, it is one of the most powerful drugs used in various clinical trials and therapies related to the mechanism of blocking prostaglandin synthesis, thus reducing and eliminating many inflammatory conditions in patients. To ensure the efficacy and safety of this drug in pharmaceutical and clinical use, precise product quality control is required. Such control is performed with routine pharmaceutical analysis using various chemical methods by which INDO is identified as a separate active ingredient in the multicomponent system of a complete pharmaceutical form. In addition, the determination of INDO is important in clinical practice, where its concentration is determined in different biological samples, ensuring better monitoring of a particular therapy. The most commonly used methods for the determination of INDO are high-performance liquid chromatography (37% of developed methods), voltammetry (16% of developed methods), and UV spectroscopy (11% of developed methods). However, each of these methods must provide precise validation parameters. A combination of analytical methods can lead to more precise results and safer application in practice.
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are a group of drugs with a similar mode of action but often without structural similarity . They have analgesic, antipyretic, and anti-inflammatory effects and are the first choice of treatment for rheumatic disorders and other degenerative inflammatory diseases. The term NSAID was used for the first time in 1949 . Classification is most commonly based on chemical structure and selectivity: salicylates, nonacetylated salicylates, propionic acids, acetic acids, enolic acids, anthranilic acids, naphthylalanine, and selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors . Their mechanism was described for the first time in 1971 [4,5,6], when it was shown that this type of drug inhibits the biosynthesis of prostaglandins by preventing binding of the substrate, arachidonic acid, to the active site of the enzyme cyclooxygenase (COX) .
Indomethacin (INDO) is an NSAID that belongs to a group of acetic acid derivatives. It possesses anti-inflammatory activity and chemopreventive properties and also inhibits the enzyme COX. As an NSAID, INDO may inhibit the expression of multidrug-resistant protein type 1, which leads to increased efficacies of some antineoplastic agents in treating multidrug resistant tumors . Also, INDO has gained great attention from different research groups as a potential treatment or adjunct therapy for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2/coronavirus disease 2019 (SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19) [9,10,11]. In April 2020, a phase II clinical study  was started with the aim of elucidating the efficacy and safety of oral INDO in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients with mild COVID-19 symptoms. Zeng et al.  reported INDO as a potential repurposable drug candidate for COVID-19. Generally, drug repurposing is a strategy that enables the identification of new uses for approved or investigational drugs . The authors proposed a knowledge-graph-based deep-learning methodology for drug repurposing in COVID-19 as an integrated artificial intelligence methodology. Using the proposed methodology, the authors identified 41 drugs, including INDO. The therapeutic associations of these drugs with COVID-19 were validated by transcriptomic and proteomics data in SARS-CoV-2-infected human cells and data from ongoing clinical trials. Although the new methodology represents a powerful tool to prioritize existing drugs for further investigation, all predicted drugs must be tested in clinical trials before using for COVID-19 treatment.
To safely use NSAIDs in the pharmaceutical industry and clinical therapies, it is necessary to develop accurate and reliable analytical methods for their determination in different types of samples. An important purpose of these methods is to provide qualitative and quantitative information about the drug of interest to determine its purity, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. As well known, drugs are subject to biotransformation. The resulting metabolites that can be more toxic than the initial drug can be found in the environment; therefore, environmental monitoring of drugs is also necessary.
Developed methods should be simple, inexpensive, and environmentally friendly. A large number of samples should be able to analyze in a short time, and sample preparation, as one of the most important steps of the analysis, should be simple and fast. The emphasis should also be on selectivity due to the complexity of the samples and the possible influence of the interferences.
This study presents a review of the characteristics and properties of INDO and, for the first time, highlights the analytical methods described in the literature for INDO determination between 2000 and 2020. Methods developed between 1965 and 1999 were also studied to present the overall statistics of the developed methods for INDO determination. To the best of our knowledge, there are no other review articles focused on analytical methods for the determination of INDO. The research for this review was based on the following databases: Scopus, Web of Science, and Pub Med, using INDO determination as the main keyword.
This review gives preliminary data about INDO characteristics and its determination, so it could be helpful as a first step in the development of new and improved analytical methods for INDO determination. Also, it could be very useful for researchers to realize the key concepts in INDO determination.
2.1 Structural form
INDO is an indole-acetic acid derivative present as [1-(4-chlorobenzoyl)-5-methoxy-2-methylindol-3-yl]acetic acid, which was patented in 1961 and approved for medical use in 1963 [14,15]. Its structure is shown in Scheme 1.
Magedov and coworkers in 2005 proposed a new procedure for INDO synthesis. As starting material, 4-methoxyaniline (1) was used, which was diazotized with the formation of 4-methoxybenzenediazonium chloride (2), which was converted into sodium 4-methoxybenzenediazosulfonate (3). In the next step of the reaction pathway, compound 3 was reduced with zinc dust, which resulted in the formation of sodium 2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1-hydrazosulfonate (4). Sulfonate 4 reacted with 4-chlorobenzoyl chloride, which led to the formation of sodium 2-(4-chlorobenzoyl)-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1-hydrazosulfonate (5). For the last step, which included indolization of hydrazine 5 into INDO, it was necessary to select an acid catalyst that should have two reaction roles. The first role was to remove sulfonate protection from the nitrogen atom, forming a hydrazone on reaction with levulinic acid, and the second role was catalysis of the Fisher reaction without deacylating the 4-chlorobenzoyl group that was achieved by using formic acid as a catalyst (Scheme 1) .
2.2 Physicochemical properties
INDO is a white or yellow crystalline powder, which is almost insoluble in water and sparingly soluble in alcohol. It shows polymorphism and can exist as several crystalline forms. α-forms and γ-forms of INDO (melting range 152–154°C and 160–161°C) can be obtained from an array of solvents under various conditions . γ-Form is stable, whereas α-form is metastable, INDO exists as a glassy amorphous form. Since they have different melting points, one way to identify the crystalline form of interest is to measure melting point. The more convenient way is single crystal X-ray diffraction and X-ray power diffraction. Also, one way to identify the different crystalline forms is to react with ammonia gas. Metastable α-form reacts with ammonia gas, but produces the corresponding microcrystalline ammonium salt, while the stable, γ-form is inert to ammonia gas. The glassy amorphous form reacts with ammonia gas to yield a corresponding amorphous ammonium salt .
2.3 Structural modifications
In 2004, Remmel et al.  reported that the methyl (CH3) group at the 2-position of the indole ring in INDO sits in hydrophobic pocket of COX enzyme. The replacement of the CH3 group of the indole ring in INDO with an H atom resulted in a decrease in its anti-inflammatory activity .
In 2013, a new fluorine INDO analog (compound 6, Figure 1a), bearing a trifluoromethyl (CF3) group at the 2-position was prepared . Replacement of the CH3 group of INDO with CF3 decreased its inhibitory activity toward COX-1, whereas its COX-2 activity was unchanged. Based on the results, further investigations were focused on examination of impact of introducing other fluorine-containing substituents at 2-position of the indole ring, such as a 3,3,3,-trifluorprop-1-enyl group. It was assumed that introducing the 3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-enyl group would enable hydrophobic interaction with the COX enzyme by increasing the surface area available to interact with its hydrophobic pocket. Also, the rigid unsaturated carbon framework of 3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-enyl group would result in increased thermodynamic stability . Fluorinated analog of INDO bearing a 3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-enyl group at its 2-position (compound 7, Figure 1b) was synthesized for purpose of evaluation its inhibitory activity toward the COX-1 and COX-2 enzymes in vitro. The results revealed that this fluorinated analog exhibited greater inhibitor activity and selectivity toward COX-2 than toward INDO. To the best of our knowledge, compounds 6 and 7 are not commercialized. Further investigations are focused on a deeper understanding of the differences between the COX-1 and COX-2 enzymes in terms of their pharmacological inhibition.
In the introduction part is mentioned potential anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity of INDO. The mechanism of antiviral action of INDO is unknown, but different hypotheses have been proposed. Amici et al. reported that INDO does not affect virus infectivity, binding or entry into host cells, but acts at an early stage of the coronavirus replication cycle, causing global repression of viral protein synthesis via ds-RNA-dependent protein kinase R-mediated pathway .
A recently published study on the SARS-CoV-2 interactome with human host proteins suggested that the anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity of INDO is related to its ability to inhibit prostaglandin E synthase type 2 (PGES-2) . Results reported by Gordon and coworkers indicated that COVID-19 patients treated with INDO were less likely to require hospitalization than those treated with other anti-inflammatory drugs that do not target PGES-2 .
Anti-SARS-CoV-2 potency of INDO is limited in infected cells [29,30]. In the last few years, PROteolysis Targeting Chimeras (PROTACs) have emerged as a novel therapeutic modality in drug discovery. PROTACs are hetero-bifunctional molecules composed of a ligand for a protein of interest, a ligand binding to E3 ubiquitin ligase, and a linker that binds these two ligands . Desantis and coworkers  decided to utilize INDO for designing PROTAC derivatives with the aim of investigation of this technology as a valid approach, also in the search for anticoronavirus agents. INDO inhibited the replication of SARS-CoV-2 with an EC50 (half maximal effective concentration) = 94.9 μM. Despite INDO showing only a weak antiviral activity (EC50 = 94.4 μM), INDO-based PROTACs 8 (bearing a 6-methylene units linker) and 9 (bearing a piperazine-based linker) demonstrated an improved ability in inhibiting viral replication. Compounds 8 and 9 (Figure 2) resulted in the most potent compounds showing EC50 values of 18.1 and 21.5 μM, respectively.
2.4 Mechanism of action
COX is an enzyme that catalyzes the first two steps of prostaglandin biosynthesis . Prostaglandins are autacoids derived from arachidonic acid that are involved in the maintenance of homeostasis and have a key role in the generation of an inflammatory response: fever, inflammation, promotion of pain, etc. . The activity of INDO and other NSAIDs is based on the inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis. The key role of INDO in its mechanism of action includes blocking the synthesis of prostaglandins by influencing the activity of COX enzyme. COX has two isoforms: constitutive COX-1 and induced COX-2. The first one participates in the conversion of arachidonic acid to prostaglandin E2 and I2 and thromboxane A2. Based on that, COX-1 is characterized by cytoprotective activity toward the digestive system. Also, it has a positive effect on blood flow in the kidneys and regulates the activity of platelets. COX-2 is important for prostaglandin formation during pathophysiologic states, such as inflammation and tumorigenesis . Besides that COX-2 has a role in forming prostaglandins that induce an increase in vascular permeability, edema, and pain (Scheme 2) . The main mechanism of action of INDO is the reversible inhibition of COX-1 and COX-2 . The hydrophobic pocket of the COX enzyme consists of Ala527, Val349, Ser530, and Leu531 residues in which the methyl group at the 2-position of INDO fits. This hydrophobic interaction has an important role in the binding of INDO to the COX enzyme [23,25]. INDO binds to the active site of COX, which prevents the interaction of the enzyme and molecules of arachidonic acid . However, the precise mechanism of action and all of the INDO effects are not completely understood [25,35,36,37].
The pharmacokinetics of INDO include its absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion from the body. It follows linear pharmacokinetics, which means that its concentration in plasma is dose proportional. INDO is rapidly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract. Following oral administration, the bioavailability of INDO is almost 100% . INDO is a weak organic acid; thus, it is 90% bound to proteins in plasma [39,40,41]. It can rapidly cross the blood–brain barrier and the placenta . The metabolism of INDO occurs in the liver by conjugation with glucuronic acid, O-desmethylation, and N-deacylation. The resulting metabolites have no inflammatory activity. INDO and its metabolites are excreted in urine (approximately 60%), bile, and feces (approximately 34.5%) [1,43].
2.6 Application, adverse effects, and drug interactions
INDO is an NSAID with antipyretic and analgesic properties. Its pharmacodynamic effects involve inhibiting the synthesis of factors that are important for inflammation, fever, and pain, and it can be used effectively for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, osteoarthritis, acute painful shoulder, Alzheimer’s disease, etc. [21,44]. Regardless of its benefits, INDO has several serious adverse effects, such as cardiovascular disorders (heart attack, stroke, arrhythmia, etc.), negative gastrointestinal effects (nausea, bleeding, ulceration, etc.), effects on the nervous system (headache, dizziness, insomnia, etc.), and other adverse effects that occur in less than 1% of patients. Also, INDO can cause allergic reactions with symptoms such as itching, rashes, sensitivity to sunlight, loss of hair, swollen face, lips, tongue, and throat. Other side effects can include neurological problems such as depression and tiredness. In addition, problems with the digestive system, including loss of appetite, vomiting, and diarrhea are reported. INDO consumption also can cause liver disorders, heart and kidney disorders, blood disorders, eye disorders, and problems with the ear including ringing in the ear and other hearing disturbances . Myoclonus has been described as an adverse effect of many drugs but never with INDO. Hang Chen and coworkers described a case of INDO-induced myoclonus in a patient with hemicrania continua .
Taking certain antidepressants with an NSAID may cause patients to bruise or bleed easily . Cyclosporine is an immunosuppressive drug, and when combined with INDO, they interact to increase renal toxicity and lethality . Prednisolone is a corticosteroid used to treat allergies, blood disorders, infections, skin diseases, and prevent organ rejection after a transplant. The study of Kataoka and coworkers revealed that the ulcerogenic potential of INDO administered in combination with prednisolone might be related to the induction of physiological changes, such as endogenous prostaglandin deficiency, an increase in neutrophil activation, and gastric hypermotility .
3 Analytical methods for the determination of INDO
The determination of INDO is very important in industries and laboratories for the quality control of pharmaceuticals, bioavailability studies, and also for drug therapy monitoring. Accuracy, selectivity, repeatability, low limit of detection (LOD), and wide measuring concentration range are some of the parameters that are required, and environmental safety is also now one of the most significant characteristics. Toxic and carcinogenic solvents and high concentrations of solvents should be avoided. Miniaturization is also the trend because it involves reduced amounts of sample and reagents, which results in a lower cost of analysis. Reducing the pretreatment of samples and decreasing the process steps leads to simpler methods with shorter analysis time. In addition to all the above, if the method does not require expensive instrumentation, it can be considered suitable, reliable, and desirable for analyte determination.
According to the analyzed literature published between 1965 and 2020, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is the most commonly used method for INDO determination, but UV-Vis spectroscopy, voltammetry, fluorimetry, immunochemical methods (IMs), chemiluminescence, liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS), potentiometry, gas chromatography (GC), colorimetry, sequential injection analysis (SIA), micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC), and phosphorimetry are also used. The beginnings of development of each method for INDO determination are chronologically listed in Figure 3. It can be seen that fluorimetry was the first method developed and used for INDO determination. Considering the requirements of the modern analytical methods, methods developed for INDO determination between 2000 and 2020 are presented in Table 1.
|Method||Sample||Conditions and characteristic method parameters||Measuring range (μg·mL−1)||Correlation coefficient||LOD (μg·mL−1)||Recovery (%)||Reference|
|Colorimetry||INDO capsules||Max. absorption: 470 nm; temperature: 30°C (5 min), 50°C (20 min); and solvent: glacial acetic acid||3.30–11.00||0.9974||0.90||94.0–102.1|||
|UV-Vis spectroscopy||Pharm. prep.||Max. absorption: 510 nm; temperature: 30°C; and solvent: NaOH (1 M)||0.20–10.00||0.9965||0.16||99.5–100.3|||
|UV-Vis spectroscopy||Pharm. prep.||Max. absorption: 284.65 nm; solvent: methanol||11.88–35.64||0.9995||6.00||80.0–120.0|||
|UV-Vis spectroscopy||Pharm. prep.||Max. absorption: 320 nm; solvent: methanol; and hydrotropic agent: niacinamide (2 M)||10.00–50.00||0.9990||0.02||99.3–101.0|||
|UV-Vis spectroscopy||Pharm. prep.||Max. absorption: 228 nm and solvent: KOH (0.1 M)||1.00–10.00||0.9949||0.13||99.8–100.2|||
|UV-Vis spectroscopy||Pharm. prep.||Max. absorption: 235 nm and solvent: NaOH (0.1 M)||5.00–25.00||0.9990||0.38||99.8–100.5|||
|UV-Vis spectroscopy1||Pharm. prep.||Max. absorption: 320 nm and hydrotropic mixture: sodium caprylate (10%), sodium benzoate (10%), and niacinamide (10%)||10.00–50.00||0.9990||0.21||101.5–101.0|||
|UV-Vis spectroscopy||Pharm. prep.||Max. absorption: 320 nm and hydrotropic mixture: sodium acetate (5%), sodium citrate (5%), and urea (10%)||10.00–50.00||0.9980||0.34||—|||
|UV-Vis spectroscopy1||Pharm. prep.||Max. absorption: 266 nm and solvent: ethanol (50%)||1.00–6.00||0.9990||0.17||80.0–120.0|||
|UV-Vis spectroscopy||Pharm. prep.||Max. absorption: 319 nm and solvent: NaOH (0.5 M)||10.00–60.00||0.9999||—||99.7–100.2|||
|Fluorimetry combined with SIA||Pharm. prep.||Solvent: NaOH (0.1 M) and hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (20 mM); FR: 0.8 mL·min−1; and Ex: 278 nm, Em: 358 nm||Up to 3.58||—||5.72 × 10−3||—|||
|Fluorimetry combined with SIA||Human urine, Pharm. prep.||Solvent: methanol (40%); FR: 1.5 mL·min−1; and Ex: 283 nm, Em: 371 nm||5.50 × 10−4 to 6.50 × 10−3||0.9986||1.50 × 10−4||94.0–107.0|||
|Fluorimetry combined with SIA||Pharm. prep.||Solvent: methanol and phosphate buffer (pH 7.2); FR: 1.0 mL·min−1; Ex: 278 nm, Em: 378 nm||1.47–32.20||—||0.44||—|||
|Fluorimetry combined with FIA||Pharm. prep.||Solvent: NaOH (0.1 M); FR: 1.7 mL·min−1; Ex: 184.9 nm, Em: 253.7 nm||3.58–1788.94||0.9952||1.79||—|||
|Phosphorimetry||Pure INDO solution||Solvent: NaOH (0.05 M); Ex: 297 nm, Em: 450 nm||0.04–357.79||—||0.04||99.1|||
|Chemiluminescence||Human urine||Solvent: HCl (0.1 M); MIP column: 15 mm × 4 mm; monomer: methacrylic acid; adsorption time: 50 s, FR: 1.5 mL·min−1, washing time: 80 s with formaldehyde; reaction time: 30 s||0.10–10.00||0.9940||0.04||97.5–103.0|||
|Chemiluminescence combined with SIA||Pharm. prep.||Solvent: ethanol (50%); FR: 100 μL·s−1 (detection), 60 μL·s−1 (aspiration); aspirated solution: Ce(iv) (15 mM) in H2SO4 (50 mM), tris(2,2′-bipyridyl)ruthenium(ii) (0.5 mM), and sodium acetate (0.4 mM), INDO||0.04–17.89||0.9997||0.02||97.3–99.6|||
|Chemiluminescence||Water samples, human plasma||Solution: sulfur and nitrogen codoped carbon quantum dots, H3PO4 (4 M), INDO, and KMnO4 (5 × 10−5 M)||0.10–1.50||0.9982||0.06||97.8–107.0|||
|GC–MS||Human serum and plasma||Solvent: methanol; MP: nitrogen; column pressure: 34473.79 Pa; column: zebron ZB-1 (15 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm); t R: 8.8 min; vaporization temperature: 40°C; and electron impact mode, 280°C||0.25–10.00||>0.9900||0.25||80–120|||
|HPLC||Equine serum||Solvent: methanol; MP: acetonitrile–water (51:49); FR: 1 mL·min−1; column: C18, Beckman (250 mm × 4.6 mm) with 5 µm particles; t R: 13.4 min; room temperature; and UV detection (254 nm)||0–5.00||0.9900||0.25||78.1|||
|HPLC1||Pharm. prep.||Solvent: methanol; MP: acetonitrile–phosphoric acid (50:50); FR: 0.6, 1.2 mL·min−1; columns: Zorbax SB-Phenyl (75 mm × 4.6 mm) with 3.5 µm particles and Zorbax SB-CN (150 mm × 4.6 mm) with 5 µm particles; t R: 3.6 min; temperature: 25°C; and UV detection (237 nm)||100.00–500.00||0.9999||—||95.1–100.4|||
|HPLC||Porcine plasma||Solvent: methanol; MP: 60% acetonitrile in 0.02 M sodium acetate buffer, adjusted to pH 3.6 using orthophosphoric acid; FR: 1 mL·min−1; column: C18 Res Elut reversed-phase column (150 mm × 4.6 mm) with 5 µm particles; t R: 3.6 min; room temperature; and UV detection (320 nm)||0.05–3.00||>0.9800||0.01||<97.0|||
|HPLC||Plasma of premature neonates||Solvent: methanol; MP: methanol–water–orthophosphoric acid (70:29.5:0.5); FR: 1.5 mL·min−1; column: Hypersil ODS C18 column (125 mm × 4 mm) with 5 µm particles; t R: 2.9 min; temperature: 20°C; and UV detection (270 nm)||0.025–2.500||>0.9990||0.005||113.3|||
|HPLC||Human urine, Pharm. prep.||Solvent: methanol; MP: methanol–water–acetic acid (67:33:0.1); FR: 1 mL·min−1; column: nucleosil RP-C18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm) with 5 µm particles; t R: 7.2 min; temperature: 20°C; chemiluminescence detection||0.01–10.00||0.9991||0.008||97.5|||
|HPLC||Human plasma||Solvent: ethanol (96%); MP: acetonitrile–water (63:37), adjusted to pH 2 with orthophosphoric acid; FR: 0.8 mL·min−1; and column: silica gel column Prodigy RP C18 (150 mm × 4.6 mm) with 5 µm particles, equipped with 0.5 mm prefilter and a guard column ODS C18; t R: 6.27 min; temperature: 20°C; UV detection (270 nm)||0.01–5.00 (total INDO), 0.01–0.20 (free INDO)||0.9995||0.003||99.6|||
|HPLC||Pharm. prep.||Solvent: MP; MP: orthophosphoric acid–methanol–acetonitrile (40:20:40); FR: 2 mL·min−1; column: LiChrosorb C18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm) with 5 µm particles; t R: 7.42 min; room temperature; and UV detection (240 nm)||25.00–200.00||0.9999||0.05||99.7|||
|HPLC1||Pharm. prep.||Solvent: methanol; MP: sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0 and acetonitrile (35:75); FR: 1 mL·min−1; column: LiChrosorb C8 (250 mm × 4.6 mm) with 5 µm particles; t R: 6.96 min; room temperature; and UV detection (230 nm)||2.50–20.00||0.9998||0.10||99.5|||
|HPLC1||Rabbit blood plasma||Solvent: methanol; MP: 0.8 mL phosphoric acid mixed with 600 mL methanol and volume made up to 1,000 mL with water; FR: 1.5 mL·min−1; column: Hypersil BDS C18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm) with 5 µm particles; t R: 13.83 min; temperature: 24°C; and UV detection (240 nm)||0.25–5.00||0.9998||0.06||93.4|||
|HPLC1||Pharm. prep.||MP: ethyl acetate; FR: 1 mL·min−1; column: Lichrosphere RP C8 (250 mm × 4 mm) with 5 µm particles; t R: 2.44 min; room temperature; and UV detection (318 nm)||0.60–100.00||0.9990||0.05||98.1–101.8|||
|HPLC1||Pharm. prep.||Solvent: MP; MP: methanol–orthophosphoric acid (70:30); FR: 1.5 mL·min−1; column: luna C18 (2) 100 R (250 mm × 4.6 mm) with 5 µm particles; t R: 11.29 min; and room temperature; UV detection (254 nm)||1.00–500.00||0.9997||2.10 × 10−3||99.2–100.7|||
|HPLC||Rabbit plasma||Solvent: MP; MP: acetonitrile–phosphate buffer, pH 4.6 (35:65); FR: 1 mL·min−1; column: kromosil C18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm) with 5 µm particles; t R: 3.31 min; temperature: 30°C; UV detection (260 nm)||20.00–200.00||0.9970||—||51.0|||
|HPLC||Human serum and plasma||Solvent: methanol; MP: methanol–water (gradient), pH 4.5; FR: 1 mL·min−1; column: C18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm) with 5 μm particles; t R: <3.5 min; temperature: 25°C; UV detection (254 nm)||5.00 × 10−3 to 0.50||—||2.18 × 10−3||92.0–99.0|||
|HPLC||Pure mixture of drugs||Solvent: methanol; MP: acetonitrile-phosphate buffer (65:35); FR: 1 mL·min−1; column: gemini RP-C18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm) with 5 µm particles equipped with gemini C18 precolumn; room temperature; UV detection (320 nm)||—||—||—||—|||
|HPLC1||Pharm. prep.||Solvent: methanol; MP: methanol–acetonitrile–sodium acetate buffer pH 3 (10:50:40); FR: 1 mL·min−1; column: Zorbax Eclipse Plus C18 (100 mm × 4.6 mm) with 3.5 µm particles; t R: 3.767 min; room temperature; UV photo diode array detection (254 nm)||25.00–70.00||0.9992||1.04||80.0–120.0|||
|HPLC1||Pharm. prep.||Solvent: methanol; MP: acetonitrile-sodium acetate buffer, pH 5 (60:40); FR: 1.4 mL·min−1; column: XTERRA® MS C18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm) with 5 µm particles; t R: 7.751 min; temperature: 25°C; UV detection (275 nm)||10.00–100.00||0.9969–0.9983||1.07 × 10−6||100.0|||
|LC–MS||Pharm. prep.||Solvent: methanol; MP: acetonitrile and 20 mM ammonium acetate solution (5:1), pH 7.4; FR: 1 mL·min−1; column: Shimpack GLC-CN (150 mm × 4 mm) with 5 µm particles; t R: <5 min; vaporization temperature: 200°C; detection: m/z 355.8; APCI; negative ion mode; 430–450°C||0.10–0.50||>0.9993||0.004||101.3|||
|LC–MS/MS2||Rabbit plasma and uterine tissue||Solvent: methanol; MP: methanol–acetonitrile–water–formic acid (45:45:10:0.5); FR: 0.5 mL·min−1; column: diamonsil C18 (150 mm × 4.6 mm) with a Phenomenax C18 guard cartridge (4 mm × 3 mm), both with 5 µm particles; temperature: 20°C; detection: m/z 358 111; APCI; positive ion mode; 450°C||2.00 × 10−3 to 0.40 (plasma), 4.00 × 10−3 to 0.80 (uterine tissue)||0.9925||0.002||90.8|||
|LC–MS/MS2||Rat plasma||Solvent: methanol; MP: formic acid–acetonitrile (25:75); FR: 0.6 mL·min−1; column: atlantis dC18 column (50 mm × 4.6 mm) with 3 µm particles; t R: 1.79 min; room temperature; detection: m/z 357.7 139.1; ESI; positive ion mode; 400°C||5.10 × 10−4 to 0.03||0.9900||5.10 × 10−4||94.2|||
|LC–MS2||Human plasma and urine||Solvent: methanol; MP: formic acid–acetonitrile (47:53); FR:1 mL·min−1; column: waters symmetry C18 column (150 mm × 4.6 mm) with 5 µm particles fitted with a Phenomenex C18 guard column (4 mm × 3 mm); t R: 8.6 min; detection: m/z 358 139; ESI; positive ion mode; 200°C||0.02–2.97 (plasma), 0.01–4.21 (urine)||>0.9900 (plasma), >0.9800 (urine)||3.71 × 10−3 (plasma), 2.63 × 10−3 (urine)||94.0–104.0|||
|MEKC||Human plasma||carrier: tris buffer, pH 8 with sodium octanesulfonate; uncoated fused-silica capillary (312 mm × 0.075 mm); separation voltage: 10 kV; temperature: 25°C; UV detection (254 nm, cathode at the detection side), µ E: −1.76 × 10−4 cm2·V−1·s−1; migration time: 5.94 min||0.30–10.00||0.9990||0.10||96.8–103.3|||
|DPV||Pharm. prep.||Solvent: acetonitrile; working HMDE (0.4 mm2); reference electrode: Ag/AgCl; auxiliary electrode: platinum wire; potential range: −0.903 to −1.6 V; scan rate: 10 mV·s−1; pulse amplitude: −50 mV; pulse time: 40 ms||0.44–3.50||—||—||—|||
|DPV||Pharm. prep. and human plasma||Solvent: water; working MWCNT–IL modified carbon ceramic electrode, reference electrode: saturated calomel; auxiliary electrode: platinum wire; potential range: 0–0.9 V; scan rate: 50 mV·s−1||0.36–17.89||0.9900||0.09||96.0–98.0 (pharm. prep.), 97.0–99.6 (human plasma)|||
|DPV||Pharm. prep. and human plasma||Solvent: water; working MWCNT–IL modified carbon ceramic electrode, reference electrode: saturated calomel; auxiliary electrode: platinum wire; potential range: 0–0.9 V; scan rate: 50 mV·s−1||0.36–17.89||0.9980||0.09||97.8–101.6 (pharm. prep.), 97.9–101.0 (human plasma)|||
|SWV||Pharm. prep., human urine and blood plasma||Solvent: water; working GCE modified with gold nanorods-graphene oxide nanocomposite incorporated carbon nanotube paste; reference electrode: Ag/AgCl; auxiliary electrode: platinum wire; potential range: 0.2–0.9 V; scan rate: 100 mV·s−1; pulse amplitude: −50 mV; pulse time: 40 ms||0.07–0.32||0.9890||6.08 × 10−3||98.2–103.5 (humane urine and blood plasma)|||
|DPV||Pharm. prep., human urine and blood serum||Solvent: water with alkali; working GCE modified with MWCNTs; reference electrode: Ag/AgCl; auxiliary electrode: platinum wire; potential range: 0.2–1.4 V; scan rate: 50 mV·s−1||0.07–2.15||0.9870||4.72 × 10−3||99.3–103.4 (pharm. prep.), 97.5–102.6 (human urine), 99.5–100.5 (blood serum)|||
|DPV||Human urine and blood serum||Solvent: phosphate buffer (0.1 M); working GCE modified with MWCNTs, NHNPs, and MCM-41 molecular sieve; reference electrode: Ag/AgCl; auxiliary electrode: platinum wire; potential range: −0.1–0.9 V; scan rate: 10–100 mV·s−1||0.29–14.31||0.9930||0.11||94.6–106.2 (human urine), 93.7–104.0 (blood serum)|||
|DPV||Human urine and blood serum||Solvent: phosphate buffer (0.1 M); working gold electrode modified with CdSNPs and MWCNTs; reference electrode: Ag/AgCl; auxiliary electrode: —; potential range: 0–0.8 V; scan rate: 180–600 mV·s−1||0.72–28.62||0.9980||0.17||98.2–108.2 (urine), 97.6–105.6 (blood serum)|||
|DPV||Pharm. prep.||Solvent: water; working GCE modified with Gr-NiO; reference electrode: saturated calomel; auxiliary electrode: platinum wire; potential range: 0.6–1.1 V; scan rate: 100 mV·s−1; amplitude: 0.05 V; pulse width: 0.05 s; pulse period: 0.5 s||0.07–25.05||0.9961–0.9995||0.02||99.1–100.7|||
|Differential pulse polarography2||rat plasma||Solvent: methanol and dimethyl formamide; working HMDE (9 mm2); reference electrode: Ag/AgCl; auxiliary electrode: platinum wire; potential range: from 0 to −1.6 V; scan rate: 59.5 mV·s−1; pulse amplitude: 0.1 V; pulse time: 0.01 s||0.20–1.20||0.9986||—||91.5–115.2|||
|DPV||Human plasma||Solvent: water with alkali; working carbon ionic liquid electrode modified with TiO2 nanoparticles; reference electrode: Ag/AgCl; auxiliary electrode: platinum wire; potential range: 0–1 V; scan rate: 100 mV·s−1||0.04–35.78||0.9911||7.50 × 10−3||95.5–100.8|||
|DPV||Pharm. prep.||Solvent: methanol; working boron-doped diamond electrode; reference electrode: Ag/AgCl; auxiliary electrode: platinum plate; potential range: −0.5–1.3 V; scan rate: 10 mV·s−1; pulse amplitude: 50 mV; pulse time: 20 ms; potential step: 5 mV||0.18–35.78||0.9850–0.9980||0.04||95.0–103.2|||
|Potentiometry||Pure mixture of drugs||Solvent: acetonitrile; ISE: glass electrode; reference electrode: Ag/AgCl||—||0.9944||—||—|||
|Potentiometry||Pharm. prep.||Solvent: ethanol; ISE: liquid membrane (ion-pair: rhodamine B-INDO; plasticizer: dibutyl phthalate; PVC; solvent: cyclohexanone); reference electrode: Ag/AgCl; slope: 60 mV·decade−1; response time: 3–5 s||35.78–17889.40||—||10.73||97.2–99.7|||
|Potentiometry||Pharm. prep.||ISE: liquid membrane (ion-pair: tetraoctylammonium 1-(p-chlorobenzoyl)5-methoxy-2-methyl-3-indolylacetate; plasticizer: dibutyl phthalate; PVC; solvent: tetrahydrofuran); reference electrode: Ag/AgCl; slope: 59.8 mV·decade−1; response time: 12 s||3.58–3577.88||0.9980||1.13||—|||
|ELISA||Water||Solvent: methanol; conjugate preparation: anhydride ester method; conjugate: goat anti-rabbit IgG-horseradish peroxidase; absorption: 450 nm||1.00 × 10−5 to 0.01||0.9980||1.00 × 10−5||98.0–106.0|||
|ELISA||Human serum||Conjugates: INDO-keyhole limpet hemocyanin; INDO-ovalbumin, INDO-horseradish peroxidase; conjugate preparation: N-hydroxysuccinimide active ester procedure; absorption: 450 nm||0.01–2.00||—||0.02 (ovalbumin format); 0.01 (horseradish peroxidase format)||82.0|||
Pharm. prep., pharmaceutical preparations; Em, emission; Ex, excitation; FR, flow rate; MP, mobile phase; t R, retention time; and µ E, electrophoretic mobility.
Colorimetry is a simple instrumental quantitative technique used in various chemical analyses to determine the particular compound concentration in colored solution based on measuring color intensity. Although it is not very popular in scientific papers based on INDO determination, it was used to determine INDO for a short period of time between 1990 and 2006 [50,51,52].
Adegoke et al.  in 2006 applied colorimetry to determine INDO based on the diazo coupling reaction between INDO and the highly reactive diazonium ion, 4-carboxyl-2,6-dinitrobenzene. After dissolving INDO in glacial acetic acid, the solution was mixed with diazonium ion, used as a chromogenic derivatizing reagent. The incubation was performed at 30°C (5 min) and 50°C (20 min). The resulting orange azo compound, extracted with ethyl acetate, was stable for 3 h, with a maximum absorption at 470 nm.
Although colorimetry is a fast, simple, low-cost, and portable system that can easily be transported, it has a few very important disadvantages, such as the impossibility of determination of colorless compounds and low sensitivity. Also, the accuracy of the method can easily be affected with the same color interferences and matrix interferences in uncontrolled conditions. Considering these limitations, other analytical methods are more convenient for INDO determination.
3.2 UV-Vis spectroscopy
UV-Vis spectroscopy is an analytical method for qualitative and quantitative determination of compounds containing chromophores that absorb characteristic wavelengths of ultraviolet (UV) or visible light. According to the Beer–Lambert law, absorption is related to the concentration of the sample. Also, this method is frequently used as a starting point of various research, which gives preliminary data about the absorption characteristics of a target analyte. UV-Vis spectroscopy is one of the simplest methods used in the determination of INDO. In addition to simplicity, it is characterized by simple sample preparation, low cost, and relatively short analysis time. Sample preparation for INDO determination using UV-Vis spectroscopy includes dissolving in an alkali-based solvent, methanol, ethanol, or hydrotropic solution, at room temperature, and filtration. UV-Vis spectroscopy used for INDO determination appeared in 2003, and it is still used today.
Determination of INDO using UV-Vis spectroscopy began when Nagaraja et al.  developed a sensitive method for the determination of this drug from a capsule formulation. The basis of the method is the coupling reaction of INDO with a diazotized p-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride in sulfuric acid medium, giving a red product with a maximum absorption at 510 nm that was stable for 20 h.
A year later, a new study described the direct analysis of INDO and its degradation product (impurity) 5-methoxy-2-methyl-3-indoleacetic acid, using derivative spectroscopy . A zero-order spectrum was recorded at a wavelength range between 200 and 400 nm and converted to the corresponding derivatives. The value of the first derivative for INDO was determined by using the zero-crossing method and read at 284.65 nm. The LOD indicated that the developed method was sufficiently sensitive and, as such, could detect impurities at levels of about 0.2%, which corresponds to pharmacopoeial requirements.
A slightly different method emerged in 2011 when Maheshwari et al.  developed a more environmentally friendly spectroscopy using a hydrotropic solubilization procedure to dissolve the sparingly soluble INDO with the addition of niacinamide as a hydrotropic agent. It had no effect on the overall analysis or on environmental pollution, and there was a fivefold increase in the solubility of INDO compared to its solubility in water.
Ali et al.  developed a very simple, fast, and precise method for the UV-Vis spectroscopic determination of INDO that can be applied in routine pharmaceutical analyses. KOH was used for the decomposition of INDO to p-chlorobenzoic acid and 5-methoxy-2-methyl-3-indoleacetic acid. It was concluded that this method could be applied directly for the estimation of p-chlorobenzoic acid and indirectly to estimate the INDO content in pharmaceutical formulations.
Rathod et al.  developed a simple UV spectrophotometric method for INDO determination in bulk drug and capsule formulation, with the maximum absorbance of INDO at 235 nm. NaOH (0.1 M) was used for solubilization of INDO and the method was validated.
In the same year, Jain et al.  developed a sensitive, simple, and nontoxic UV spectroscopic method for the determination of INDO in pharmaceutical formulations. As in previous research, the importance was on choosing an environmentally friendly solvent, so they developed a mixed solvency concept using sodium caprylate, sodium benzoate, and niacinamide. By applying this type of concept, an innumerable solvent system could be developed to prevent the use of organic solvents that are major pollutants.
In 2018, Rathod et al.  developed another precise, accurate, and fast UV-Vis spectroscopy method for the determination of INDO in pure form and in pharmaceutical formulations. The principle was almost the same as in previous research, but they used a different mixed hydrotropic solution (sodium acetate, sodium citrate, and urea), which had an important effect on the final measurement results. The solvent used did not have any negative impact on the environment.
In 2019, another study was published for the simple determination of INDO in pharmaceutical formulations using UV spectroscopy and ethanol as a solvent . The absorbance was measured at 266 nm.
According to the latest research (2020), it can be seen that spectroscopic methods are still used for INDO determination, using the same principles but with numerous method modifications. Abed et al.  proposed a very simple, accurate, and precise green analytical chemical method to measure INDO as a copper complex using UV-Vis spectroscopy. The absorbance of the complex was measured at 319 nm. The copper was used because it is a trace metal that has a very important role in the creation of drug complexes that are easily recognizable in in vitro/vivo studies . This method represents a new application of synthesized complexes of copper and INDO, so the major innovations from this research could be used as a guide for scientists to continue this type of study.
Due to its accuracy and availability in laboratories, UV-Vis spectroscopy was frequently used for INDO determination, considering its low cost. All the analyzed samples were pharmaceutical, and unlike the colorimetry, all reactions were performed at room temperature. One of the main problems during the method development is the insolubility of INDO, which can be overcome using hydrotropic solutions. Over the years, the effort was to develop an environmentally friendly method. The method can be affected by temperature, pH, interferences, and impurities, but these limitations can be overcome by optimizing the working conditions. Considering the above, it is expected that UV-Vis spectroscopy will continue to develop and remain one of the most commonly used methods for INDO determination.
Fluorimetry is a quantitative method that has a wide range of applications. It measures the fluorescence at a characteristic emission wavelength that occurs after excitation with a photon, during relaxing back to the ground state. The development of this method for INDO determination started from early 1965 [41,63,64]. Following each other’s ideas, scientists have perfected this method to the point that it can be applied in routine pharmaceutical analyses, as well as in clinical practice to monitor and determine patient therapy. Although INDO does not exhibit native fluorescence, it can easily be hydrolyzed in an alkaline medium, which leads to the possibility of fluorometric determination of formed fluorescent product. A major step forward in fluorometric determination occurred when this method was combined with other methods to obtain the most reproducible results. For example, coupling fluorimetry with SIA or flow injection analysis (FIA) leads to reduced solvent consumption and better reproducibility and accuracy, due to the minimized intervention of the operator.
In 2005, Pinto et al.  developed a pulsed flow SIA based on pulse-generating solenoid micropumps, instead of the conventional solution propelling units commonly used in SIA, combined with fluorometric detection. The developed method made it possible to reduce reagent consumption and waste, as well as increasing sample flow.
In 2010, Molina-García et al.  developed a fluorometric SIA optosensor for the determination of INDO in urine and pharmaceuticals. The authors used a solid support into the flow cell, which allowed the required selectivity and high sensitivity.
As the SIA method had proven to be very successful in previous research, Passos et al.  developed a method combining fluorimetry and SIA in 2011, with some modifications. A novelty was the use of UV light in a photoreactor, which stimulated an increase of INDO fluorescence and increased the sensitivity of the method.
In 2018, a new method was developed for INDO determination using FIA and fluorometric detection . The specificity of the method was the application of a homemade fluorimeter with a low-pressure mercury lamp.
Considering high sensitivity, specificity, and precision as well as very low detection limits, fluorimetry, and fluorometric detectors combined with other analytical methods are attractive for INDO determination. Most of the authors used pharmaceutical preparations as analytes. Sample preparation was simple. NaOH was the most commonly used for hydrolysis of INDO. The novelty was the introduction of cationic surfactant, which catalyzes the alkaline hydrolysis and leads to increased fluorescence intensity. The difference in biological sample preparation is the addition of acetonitrile as a typical chaotropic reagent. During the method development, attention should be paid to pH, temperature, oxygen, and heavy metals that can affect the fluorescence. Also, colored compounds present in solutions that contain fluorescence compounds, can absorb fluorescence, thus acting as internal filters. As fluorimetry was the first method for INDO determination and has been used for more than 50 years, it is significant for INDO determination and should undoubtedly continue to develop.
Phosphorimetry is a quantitative analytical method based on the same principles as fluorimetry. The difference is a change in electron spin, in energy transitions, that occurs in phosphorimetry but not in fluorimetry. Consequently, the emission process is much slower in phosphorimetry than in fluorimetry. However, phosphorimetry was not very popular for INDO determination. Only two studies using room-temperature phosphorimetry were reported, of which the first was published in 1997 .
Another study was reported 5 years later, in 2002 . In that article, authors used room-temperature phosphorimetry on a poly(vinyl alcohol) substrate for INDO determination via its indole hydrolysis products 5-methoxy-2-methylindole-3-acetic acid and p-chlorobenzoic acid. INDO was easily hydrolyzed using NaOH whereby its concentration had to be as low as possible because NaOH caused background emissions. The authors tested the effect of heavy atoms on method characteristics using three inorganic salts, and they concluded that potassium iodide (KI) significantly enhanced the phosphorescence signal for 5-methoxy-2-methylindole-3-acetic acid. Also, they used sodium dodecyl sulfate for the improvement of the efficiency of the heavy atom on the poly(vinyl alcohol) substrate. It was concluded that the method using poly(vinyl alcohol) substrate is more sensitive and simple than the method using a paper substrate.
Although phosphorimetry is very sensitive method for pharmaceutical analysis, in most cases, it demands using of degassed and purified solutions and low temperatures to prevent quenching the analyte emission. The room-temperature phosphorimetry, which does not require liquid nitrogen and cryogenic equipment, could overcome some of these limitations, but still phosphorimetry is not widely used for INDO determination.
Chemiluminescence is an analytical method based on radiation emitted during the returning of excited species to the ground state. The source of excitation is the energy obtained from chemical reactions, unlike phosphorescence and fluorescence where the source is absorbed light energy. Although chemiluminescence has wide application, it was used for INDO determination for the first time in 2005.
In 2005, Nie et al.  successfully developed the first chemiluminescent system for the determination of INDO in urine. The basis for their research was the reaction between INDO and soluble Mn(iv), which can produce chemiluminescence, with the use of formaldehyde to enhance this reaction. However, this method cannot be used directly for INDO determination in complex systems because of poor selectivity. Therefore, a molecular imprinted polymer (MIP) column was used as an INDO recognition element, which had the ability to separate it from the interfering substances. The INDO MIP system was combined with the chemiluminescent reaction described above, enabling greatly improved selectivity and direct analyte determination.
Two years after this research, scientists started to combine chemiluminescence with other analytical methods to obtain more reproducible results. Mervartová et al.  used the combination of chemiluminescence and SIA for the determination of INDO in semisolid forms (ointments and gels). SIA was acceptable because of its many advantages, such as the on-line preparation of unstable reagents and waste reduction, as well as a reduction in sample and reagent consumption. The chemiluminescent radiation was based on the reaction of INDO with tris(2,2′-bipyridyl)ruthenium(iii), which was generated online in the SIA system.
The latest research came in 2017, when Hallaj et al.  brought this method to a new and highest level by developing a novel chemiluminescence sensor for the simple and sensitive determination of INDO in environmental water and in biological samples, based on a sulfur and nitrogen codoped carbon quantum dot–KMnO4 reaction. Sulfur and nitrogen codoped carbon quantum dots were prepared by a simple hydrothermal method and characterized by fluorescence spectrum, transmission electron microscopy, and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. The study showed that the intensity of chemiluminescence decreased in the presence of INDO because of competition for KMnO4 between the sulfur and nitrogen codoped carbon quantum dots and the INDO.
Chemiluminescence is a highly sensitive method due to its low background signal. Considering its high selectivity, chemiluminescence does not require complicated pretreatment of the samples. In studies previously described, pharmaceutical formulations were dissolved in ethanol (50%) or HCl (0.1 M) while biological samples were prepared using trichloroacetic acid (10%), Ba(OH)2 (0.1 M), and ZnSO4 (0.1 M) for protein precipitation. Despite its high selectivity and low detection limits, chemiluminescence has a few disadvantages that can limit its application, such as the influence of interferences, nonlinearity, sensitivity to environmental conditions, and weak chemiluminescence. The main drawback is that chemiluminescence is applicable only for chemical reactions that produce energy in the form of photons. All of these limitations make this method less attractive for INDO determination. However, considering the only few scientific papers describing chemiluminescence as the method for INDO determination, the method has the potential to develop.
Chromatographic methods are qualitative and quantitative analytical techniques based on the separation of mixture components according to differences in the rates at which they are carried through the stationary phase by a gaseous or liquid mobile phase. These methods can be used for separation, purification, and identification of the mixture components.
GC is a chromatographic method where chemically inert gas is used as a mobile phase. It was used extensively to determine INDO in the 1970s and 1980s [74,75,76,77]. The improvement of the method was its combination with MS [78,79]. In the last article, authors reported using GC–MS for INDO determination in serum and plasma . Before analysis, INDO was extracted using methylene chloride and phosphate buffer (pH 6) and derivatized using bis-(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide with 1% trimethylchlorosilane.
GC was the first chromatographic method used for INDO determination. Although it requires a small amount of sample and can be used for the separation of very complicated mixtures, its application has gradually decreased. The main reason is the long-term extraction of solvents, the use of explosive esterification reagents, and the often incomplete separation from various components of body fluids. Considering these drawbacks, GC was replaced by HPLC, as the main chromatographic method for INDO determination.
LC is a chromatographic method with the liquid solvent used as a mobile phase. In European Pharmacopoeia , British Pharmacopoeia , and United States Pharmacopeia , LC with UV detection was described as a method for INDO determination. In European and British Pharmacopoeia, acetic acid (10 g·L−1) and acetic acid (10 g·L−1) in acetonitrile, in gradient mode, were used as a mobile phase. The absorbance was measured at 254 nm, at a temperature of 50°C, and flow rate 0.8 mL·min−1, using a column (100 mm × 4.6 mm) with octadecylsilyl silica (2.6 µm particle size). In United States Pharmacopeia, formic acid (0.1%) and acetonitrile (55:45) were used as a mobile phase. The absorbance was measured at 240 nm, at a temperature of 30°C, and flow rate 1.5 mL·min−1, using a column (250 mm × 4.6 mm) with octadecyl silane (5 µm particle size). Although the LC methods for INDO determination, described in pharmacopeias, are reference methods for quality control due to its high sensitivity, they are characterized with large consumption of organic solvent (acetonitrile) and use of expensive equipment. Maybe the pharmacopeial methods for INDO determination should be revised and replaced with less complicated and less demanding but equally sensitive methods.
During LC method development, it was concluded that better efficiency of chromatographic separation could be obtained using chromatographic columns with a reduced particle size of packing. For that reason, HPLC, with particle diameters as small as 3–10 µm, was developed. To ensure reasonable flow rates in such systems, pressures of several million Pascal are necessary. Today, HPLC is one of the most versatile chromatographic methods that is widely used. Also, it is one of the most commonly used methods for INDO determination. The determination of INDO using HPLC began in 1980 . The method continued to develop until today [81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109]. Numerous modifications and improvements have been made over the long period in which this method has been used. As a result, HPLC is now one of the most accurate methods in clinical and pharmaceutical practice. Its specificity, the small amount of sample required, and the short analysis time are the main advantages, making this method attractive, especially when a large number of samples are analyzed daily. All HPLC methods developed for the INDO determination were reverse-phase HPLC.
In 2000, Grippa et al.  determined INDO, as well as other anti-inflammatory drugs, in equine serum using an HPLC method. The choice of extraction solvent (ethyl acetate) showed high selectivity and nontoxic properties, and it was concluded that the developed method was suitable for the antidoping control of racehorses. It was also the first reported HPLC method that enabled the simultaneous determination of multiple different drugs in equine serum.
In 2005, Nováková et al.  developed a fast, simple, and accurate HPLC method to determine INDO and its degradation products (impurities), 4-chlorobenzoic acid and 5-methoxy-2-methylindoleacetic acid. Separation of the compounds was performed simultaneously and automated in one step. Different stationary phases were studied, with an emphasis on newer types of columns (Zorbax), which allowed faster separation of INDO and its impurities. The method was suitable for the analysis of INDO-based gels and for the study of degradation and stability of various pharmaceutical formulations.
In addition to detecting INDO in human plasma, Boon et al.  developed an HPLC method for INDO determination in porcine plasma. By checking the validity of the method, they concluded that the same method could be used for the determination of INDO in human plasma. Plasma proteins were precipitated and extracted using acetonitrile, and an autosampler was used for direct injection into the HPLC system. In addition to being precise, this method was fast, taking less than 3 h to extract and analyze 20 samples. The method could have wide clinical application, especially in pediatric samples.
In 2006, Al Za’abi et al.  made progress in clinical practice, with the aim of developing a precise microscale HPLC method that would enable the determination of INDO from the plasma of premature neonates with patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). The developed method used a very small sample volume, minimal sample processing, and a shortened overall analysis time. It was concluded that the method was suitable for pharmacokinetic studies of INDO and the monitoring of therapy in infants with PDA.
In 2007, HPLC moved to a new level, with scientists starting to combine it with chemiluminescence and electrolytic methods to obtain more reproducible results. Zhang et al.  determined INDO in urine and pharmaceutical preparation using HPLC with in situ electrogenerated Mn(iii) chemiluminescence. The basis for this method was the direct reaction of INDO and Mn(iii).
In 2009, Dawidowicz et al.  developed a sensitive and accurate HPLC method for the determination of total and free INDO in human plasma. They emphasized the clinical importance of the method because of the possibility of determining the effectiveness of INDO during therapy, especially in neonates with PDA. However, there were some positive modifications. Sample preparation for the determination of total INDO was performed using liquid–liquid extraction, and the authors introduced separation with an ultrafiltration method on Amicon micropartition system (MPS) units to determine free INDO. This procedure allowed much better purification of samples compared to classical protein precipitation.
Tsvetkova et al.  developed a HPLC method for the determination of INDO and related substances in raw materials and pharmaceutical compositions. In addition to the detection of INDO, the researchers investigated the kinetics of the drug, that is, its alkaline hydrolysis, and concluded that INDO follows first-order kinetics.
As the HPLC method proved to be very successful for INDO determination in pharmaceutical applications, Ivanov et al.  applied it in 2013, in a similar way to previous research, to determine the concentration of INDO and paracetamol in tablet dosage forms, concluding that the method was suitable for routine pharmaceutical analyses.
In the same year, Nandy et al.  applied an accurate, precise, and selective HPLC method for INDO determination in animal samples (rabbit blood plasma). Liquid–liquid extraction was used for sample preparation, and the method was applicable for INDO detection in blood plasma serum.
Haq et al.  developed an accurate and precise HPLC method for the determination of INDO in pharmaceutical formulations, using an ecological approach and thus ensuring the health of scientists during the experimental research. The approach was based on the use of an environmentally friendly eluent, ethyl acetate; therefore, the new method was called the green HPLC method. There were no long-lasting extraction procedures, and a very low retention time was observed. The method was applicable for routine pharmaceutical analyses.
A year later, Lariya and Agrawal  developed a fast, reproducible, accurate, and precise isocratic HPLC method for the determination of INDO, methotrexate, and dexamethasone. This method is very practical in clinical practice because it allows the simultaneous determination of several different drugs used in combination therapy.
In 2016, Babu et al.  developed and validated a bioanalytical HPLC method for the simultaneous estimation of INDO and omeprazole in rabbit plasma, with INDO being extracted by a liquid–liquid extraction method using acetonitrile. This method could also be used for pharmacokinetic studies.
The beginning of 2017 was marked by the development of a rapid and simple HPLC method for INDO determination. Chamkouri et al.  used ultrasound-assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction for the isolation of INDO from human plasma and serum samples. One of the most important advantages of this method was the low consumption of organic solvents.
Elshorbagy et al.  proposed an analytical assay for INDO determination in the presence of quercetin. INDO has a high ulcerogenic potential, while quercetin can prevent gastric damage and INDO-induced ulcers; thus, they are commonly combined in therapies. Although INDO and quercetin could be determined separately using a UV assay, it had not been possible to quantify them simultaneously: the solution to this problem was the application of the HPLC method.
Pai and Sawant  developed and validated a simple, accurate, and precise method for the determination of INDO in pharmaceutical formulations using HPLC with a UV-VIS photo diode array detector. The two degradation impurities of INDO, 5-methoxy-2-methyl-indoleacetic acid and 4-chlorobenzoic acid, were determined in addition to INDO, with an emphasis on shortening the overall analytical analysis, considering that all the compounds eluted within 5 min. The method can also be used in routine pharmaceutical analyses.
The last study involving a HPLC method for INDO determination was reported in 2020 when Assali et al.  synthesized a codrug of INDO and paracetamol and combined it with famotidine, which is used to reduce gastric side effects. This precise, accurate, selective, and robust method was validated and used to simultaneously quantifying INDO, paracetamol, famotidine, and the codrug.
Due to the low analyte concentration in the sample and possible interferences, pretreatment of the sample is crucial and differs for each sample. In described studies, biological samples were more commonly analyzed and in most of them methanol or mobile phase, used in the chromatographic system, was used as the solvent for INDO. Acetonitrile and trichloroacetic acid (1%) were most commonly used for protein precipitation. In a few articles, the organic solvent was added to a biological sample, and after the separation of the organic phase, it was evaporated to dryness in a stream of nitrogen or argon. The remaining residue was then dissolved in the mobile phase. To protect HPLC columns, samples were filtered before the analysis. Separation was mainly carried out in the C18 column with 150 mm × 4.6 mm or 250 × 4.6 inner diameter and 5 µm particles. The mobile phase in most cases included acetonitrile or methanol. LOD was the lowest in separation system with acetonitrile-based mobile phase. In the studies described, UV detection was predominant. Although, HPLC is a highly precise, reproducible, and widely applicable method, it uses large amounts of organic, cancerogenic solvents. Also, HPLC systems are expensive and complex, and long-term reproducibility could be a problem due to the reduction of column performance. For that reason, the development of less complicated, less expensive and more environmentally friendly methods for INDO determination should be continued.
LC–MS is a powerful analytical method based on LC or HPLC with their advanced physical separation properties and MS as a highly specific mass analysis detector. This method provides good efficiency of drug detection; thus, it can be used in clinical and pharmaceutical analyses. Despite its complexity, LC–MS permits smooth utility and application. Generally, a low LOD and limit of quantitation of drugs can be achieved using LC–MS, with a high degree of specificity in a relatively short analysis time, without a need for complete chromatographic resolution of analytes.
The first article relating to the determination of INDO by the LC–MS method was published in 2001, when Abdel-Hamid et al.  applied this method to determine several NSAIDs, both in a mixture and separately. Diclofenac sodium, flufenamic acid, INDO, and ketoprofen were determined. The mass spectrometer, operated in the single ion monitoring mode, was programmed to admit the negative ions [M–H]− at m/z 355.8, and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) was used for ionization. This fast, highly specific, and sensitive method could be used for the routine determination of NSAIDs in biological fluids.
In 2012, Liu et al.  developed and validated a rapid and sensitive LC–MS/MS method for INDO determination in biological samples. Acetonitrile was used for the extraction of INDO from rabbit plasma and uterine tissue by simple protein precipitation. The authors applied an APCI in positive ionization mode, and quantitation was performed using selected reaction monitoring of precursor-production transitions at m/z 358 → 111.
In 2013, Suresh et al.  developed and validated a specific, rapid, and simple bioanalytical method for the determination of INDO in rat plasma. The authors applied LC coupled to tandem MS with electrospray ionization (ESI) in the positive-ion mode. The mass spectrum for INDO revealed a peak at m/z 357.7, as protonated molecular ions, [M + H]+. For quantification of INDO in the multiple reaction monitoring mode, transition of the m/z 357.7 precursor ion to the m/z 139.1 product ion was used. The sample was prepared using liquid–liquid extraction with acetonitrile, and the developed method could be used for pharmacokinetic research in rats.
In the same year, the last study concerning the determination of INDO by LC–MS was published. Wang et al.  determined INDO in the maternal plasma and urine of pregnant patients under treatment using the deuterium-labeled isotope of INDO as an internal standard because it minimized the impact of the matrix. The sample was prepared by liquid–liquid extraction. Ionization of INDO with the ESI interface in positive and negative ion modes was also investigated. Due to its higher sensitivity, the positive ion mode was selected for the overall INDO analysis, targeting ions at m/z 139. The validated method was accurate and precise and was suitable for determining the pharmacokinetic parameters of INDO during pregnancy.
As in HPLC, preparation of the sample is necessary before the analysis. INDO detection included adding of acetonitrile or chloroform, centrifugation, evaporation of organic phase in a stream of nitrogen, and dissolving the residue in the mobile phase. The mobile phase, in all papers described, included acetonitrile. Separation was mostly carried out in the C18 column with 150 mm × 4.6 mm inner diameter and 5 µm particles. With the reduction of column size to 50 mm × 4.6 mm and particles size to 3 µm, the lowest detection limit was achieved. Most of the analyzed samples were biological and INDO was always dissolved in methanol.
In MS detection, special attention should be paid to the choice of ionization method. For INDO determination, “soft” ionization methods such as ESI and APCI, which result in fewer fragments, are preferable. The molecular ion at m/z 358 proves the presence of INDO. This value can be lower because of hydrogen loss due to the ionization method. The ions at m/z 139 and 111 are the major fragmentation ions. Zhou and Gilpin  developed rapid ESI-MS method for examining the thermal decomposition of three pharmaceuticals including INDO. The major ions observed were a single thermal decomposition fragment (m/z 139), the MH+ ion (m/z 358), additional parent-adduct ions (m/z 375), MNa+ (m/z 380), MK+ (m/z 396), and dimeric products M2H+ (m/z 715), (m/z 732), M2Na+ (m/z 737), and M2K+ (m/z 753). The main dissociation ion of the precursor m/z 358 ion was the m/z 139 ion that results from cleavage of the amide bond. The product ion of the m/z 139 ion is the m/z 111 ion.
Besides significant advantages of LC–MS method, such as exceptional sensitivity and specificity, LC–MS is characterized by a high cost of instrumentation and maintenance. This drawback makes LC–MS unaffordable for many laboratories, which directly affects the further development of the method.
Although HPLC is the most commonly used method in the pharmaceutical determination of NSAID drugs, it uses too much organic solvent. The alternative could be MEKC, as a combination of electrophoretic and chromatographic basis, due to the lower cost of instrumentation and nonuse of organic cancerogenic solvents. The MEKC is a separation method based on partitioning of the analyte between the mobile phase (background electrolyte) and pseudo stationary phase (micelles of a surfactant). Micelles with the analyte migrate through the system due to the electroosmotic flow, under the electric field.
Lin et al.  proposed a new method in 2006, MEKC, for INDO determination in the plasma of premature infants with PDA. The analytical procedure began with the processing of plasma samples by the precipitation of proteins with acetonitrile. It was followed with centrifugation and evaporation of supernatant to dryness and dissolving in tris buffer (pH 8) containing internal standard. Although sodium dodecyl sulfate is the most commonly used surfactant in MEKC, the authors applied sodium octanesulfonate as a micellar source with tris buffer to differentiate INDO from endogenous components. The results obtained using this method were found to give satisfactory agreement compared with those obtained using HPLC.
MEKC can separate both neutral and ionic analytes, which makes it attractive for the separation of pharmaceutical substances that are commonly neutral. However, it is not a popular method for INDO determination due to low sensitivity in the low concentration range.
Voltammetry is an electroanalytical method based on measuring the current as a function of applied potential. The measurements are performed in an electrochemical cell containing three electrodes: working, reference, and auxiliary. The main advantages of this method compared to chromatography are the elimination of time-consuming solvent extraction steps, elimination of toxic organic solvents, shorter analysis time, reduced costs, and simplicity. Voltammetry is one of the most applicable methods for determination of INDO and similar drugs. The first scientific articles that described using of voltammetry for INDO determination were published in 1998 and 1999 [116,117]. The following series of articles show the progress of this method in the period from 2002 to 2020. Although each study had a roughly similar principle, there was still a very important difference. The specificity of each study was determined by a working electrode that was modified from year to year and ultimately achieved very positive changes, thus making this method very sensitive, precise, and accurate. Most of the research used cyclic voltammetry (CV) for electrode characterization and differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) for INDO quantification.
In 2002, Reguera et al.  proposed method where they applied the partial least squares calibration method to determine several anti-inflammatory drugs, including INDO. The method was very advanced because it enabled the separation of analytes from a complex mixture, even where analyte signals overlap and the classical voltammetric approach does not allow a single-drug analysis. A hanging mercury drop electrode (HMDE) was used as a working electrode.
Sarhangzadeh et al.  returned to a more classical voltammetric determination of INDO. They applied DPV to identify INDO in pharmaceutical preparations and human plasma. The specificity of the method relates to the application of a carbon ceramic working electrode modified with a multiwalled carbon nanotube and ionic liquid (MWCNT–IL). Carbon nanotubes have specific properties, such as high stability and good electrical conductivity. Furthermore, ionic liquids are characterized by high thermal and chemical stability, negligible vapor pressure, and high ionic conductivity. By combining these materials, an increase in the electrochemical response of electroactive substrates was obtained. Sarhangzadeh et al.  also reported very similar research with very similar results using the same electrode, with the simultaneous determination of INDO and diclofenac.
Arvand and Gholizadeh  developed square wave voltammetry (SWV) for the determination of INDO in human blood serum, urine, and pharmaceutical preparations. The drug was determined on a glassy carbon electrode (GCE) modified with a gold nanorods-graphene oxide nanocomposite incorporated carbon nanotube paste. This type of electrode showed excellent electrochemical catalytic activity toward INDO oxidation, more reactive sites, and a high effective surface area.
In 2014, Sataraddi et al.  applied CV and DPV for INDO determination using GCE modified with MWCNTs. The scientists applied CV to define the electrochemical behavior of INDO and to find peaks. They chose this type of working electrode to improve the oxidation of INDO in a slightly acidic solution, which led to increased current intensity and the formation of two anode peaks and one cathode peak. The concentration of INDO in pharmaceutical preparations, human blood serum, and urine was then determined by DPV.
In 2015, Babaei et al.  developed a sensitive method for determining three drugs, including INDO. As a working electrode, they used GCE modified with MWCNTs, nickel(ii) hydroxide nanoparticles (NHNPs), and a mobil composition of matter No. 41 (MCM-41) molecular sieve. CV was applied to test the effect of the composition of MWCNTs, NHNPs, and MCM-41 as a GCE modificators, whereas DPV was used for the simultaneous determination of the INDO, dopamine, and acetaminophen concentrations in urine and serum samples. The applied modification of the GCE led to excellent electrocatalytic performance for the simultaneous determination of the tested drugs. In addition, the fabrication procedure of the electrode was simple, and no sample pretreatments or time-consuming extractions were necessary. The developed method was very successful and was relevant for practical applications. Babaei and Yousefi  continued their work in 2020, when they proposed a gold electrode modified with cadmium sulfide nanoparticles (CdSNPs) and MWCNTs for the simultaneous determination of INDO, uric acid, and norepinephrine in human urine and blood serum. Again, they used a combination of methods: CV, DPV, and chronoamprometery, whereas the electrochemical behavior of the mixture and the analyte concentrations were determined using DPV.
Similar principles of determination were used in 2018 when Liu et al.  described a sensitive voltammetric method for the determination of INDO in pharmaceutical preparations. The determination was based on a graphene-loaded nickel oxide nanoparticle (Gr-NiO) film obtained by one-step electrodeposition on a GCE. The authors used CV and DPV. As DPV showed a sharper peak at lower concentrations, it was used to determine INDO. The electrode showed a good storage stability, and there were no significant interferences; thus, the method is suitable for routine pharmaceutical analysis.
In the same year, Ragab et al.  developed DPV for simultaneous INDO and dantrolene determination in rat plasma. A much simpler HMDE was used as the working electrode, compared to previous research. This simple method showed high selectivity and sensitivity and could be applied in human plasma analyses.
In 2020, another successful voltammetric determination of INDO in plasma samples was described by Baezzat et al. . They used a carbon ionic liquid electrode modified with TiO2 nanoparticles as a working electrode. CV was used to determine the electrochemical parameters of INDO, and DPV was used for submicromolar quantification of the drug.
The last research on this topic was also published in 2020 when Petković et al.  developed a very sensitive, rapid, selective, and environmentally friendly method for the determination of mefenamic acid and INDO in pharmaceutical formulations. A special sensing platform, a boron-doped diamond electrode, was used to quantify the drugs without any time-consuming electrode modifications. The analytical procedure was based on the electrooxidation of the drug using DPV. This research showed that commercial electrode material can be successfully applied for the analysis of bioactive compounds and drugs.
The voltammetry is a very attractive method for various analyses, as well as for INDO determination. One of the most significant advantages of this method is the simple preparation of samples. In most of the studies previously described, INDO was dissolved in water. Few authors dissolved it in phosphate buffer, methanol, or acetonitrile. Real samples were usually deprotonated using acetonitrile or trichloroacetic acid followed by filtration and dissolving in appropriate buffer solution. Voltammetry was equally used for the analysis of biological samples and pharmaceutical preparations. In most cases, Ag/AgCl was used as a reference electrode and platinum wire as an auxiliary electrode. The working electrodes were modified with different nanomaterials to get the best analytical performance. The main disadvantage of the voltammetry is decreased selectivity, which can be improved by adjusting solution conditions. It is the most commonly used electroanalytical method for INDO determination, which continued to develop until today.
Potentiometry is an also electroanalytical method, but unlike amperometry, it measures potential in the system without drawing appreciable current. The potentiometric cell contains two electrodes: working and reference. Potentiometry is one of the simpler methods for INDO determination, although there are not many studies in this area. It is important to note that it is suitable for determining the release kinetics of INDO because it does not require complex sample preparation, and is sufficiently precise, selective, and fast for kinetic measurements. The sensors used in potentiometric measurements are ion-selective electrodes (ISEs), which selectively recognize the analyte. Their membrane is the most important part, which usually consists of an ionophore, as a sensing component, a plasticizer, and polyvinyl chloride (PVC). The components of the membrane and their proportions can be varied to develop an electrode with better properties (selectivity, sensitivity, LOD, working range, response time, accuracy, lifetime, etc.). Considering their advantages, such as simple preparation, low price, and short analysis time, these electrodes represent a successful alternative to standard methods. Attention should be paid to the solution conditions such as pH and ionic strength because it is known that they can affect the accuracy of the potentiometric determination.
The first ISE for INDO determination was developed in 1991 . After a long pause, Aktaş and Ertokuş  continued with the potentiometric determination of INDO on a new level in 2008. The authors coupled classical potentiometric titrations with modern neural networks, using a glass-silver chloride electrode system, tetrabutyl-ammonium hydroxide as a titrant, and an artificial neural network (ANN) as a multivariate calibration tool in the potentiometric titration. The ANN was used to model the complex nonlinear relationship among ibuprofen, INDO, and naproxen concentrations and the potential of the solutions measured after the addition of different volumes of the titrant. The optimized ANN could predict the concentrations of drugs in synthetic mixtures.
In 2009, Kormosh et al.  returned to the original INDO determination model by designing a potentiometric sensor with a polymeric membrane. They used the ion pair of INDO (anion) and rhodamine B (cation) as the sensing material. The INDO was determined in pharmaceutical preparations using direct potentiometric measurements. The developed sensor was selective, fast, stable, and simple.
In 2012, Lenik and Wardak  described a similar way of determining INDO with a potentiometric sensor. The ion-exchange polymeric membrane of the ISE was based on an ion pair, tetraoctylammonium 1-(p-chlorobenzoyl)-5-methoxy-2-methyl-3-indolylacetate. This research included the determination of basic sensor parameters and the determination of INDO in pharmaceutical preparation using direct potentiometric measurements. A lower LOD was obtained using this sensor, compared with other potentiometric sensors for INDO determination.
As like as voltammetry, potentiometric determination of INDO is characterized with simple preparation of samples (dissolving in water or acetonitrile, filtration, and addition of buffer solution). In all the studies described, INDO was determined in pharmaceutical samples. Although, few scientific studies describe potentiometry as an analytical method for INDO determination, it has great potential for further development and electrode modifications considering its significant advantages.
IMs are simple, fast, and sensitive methods based on specific antigen–antibody reaction. Extensive sample preparation or expensive instrumentation are not required for these methods, so they can be a good alternative to long-term chromatographic methods and can be used for routine pharmaceutical and clinical analyses. Two types of quantitative IMs are most commonly used to determine drugs, including INDO: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) where antigens or antibodies are labeled using enzyme, and radioimmunoassay (RIA) where antigens or antibodies are labeled using radioisotope.
After a long pause, scientists returned to IMs, but this time with a whole new approach. Huo et al.  applied a sensitive and specific indirect competitive ELISA method to determine the concentration of pharmaceutical INDO in different water samples. The sample preparation was simple and included filtration or filtration and dilution for surface water and wastewater, respectively. They covalently linked INDO to bovine serum albumin and ovalbumin by an anhydride ester method to prepare an immunogen and coating antigen. The authors immunized rabbits by standard immunization processes. The ELISA method began with the addition of antigen to the wells, after which samples and diluted antiserum were added. After incubation, substrate was added to develop color, and sulfuric acid to stop the enzymatic reaction. Measurements were performed spectrophotometrically. The results of the ELISA method were compared with those obtained using HPLC, with good correlation.
In 2011, IMs went a step further, when Skalka et al.  proposed an indirect competitive chemiluminescent ELISA method combined with an immunochemical sol-gel-based immunoaffinity purification (IAP) method, which was used for clean-up and concentration of INDO. IAP included application of serum to column doped with anti-INDO antiserum, elution with acetonitrile, evaporation under nitrogen, and dissolving in a mixture of phosphate buffer and methanol. The authors generated a polyclonal antibody for INDO and compared two microplate assays (ovalbumin and horseradish peroxidase formats) based on the ELISA method. This method, developed for INDO determination in human serum, can also be applied to monitor INDO concentrations in water samples.
Using RIA, picogram amounts of analyte can be measured considering the high specificity and sensitivity of this method. However, RIA includes handling and disposal of radioactive reagents, so in most of laboratories it is replaced by nonisotopic immunoassays such as ELISA. ELISA also is highly selective, sensitive, and efficient for the analysis of a large number of analytes. This sophisticated method has a few significant disadvantages, such as reagent instability and high cost, which makes it less popular compared to electroanalytical methods.
Among the methods developed for INDO determination, in the period between 1965 and 2020, HPLC is the most frequently used (35% of the methods published in the literature) despite use of organic solvents and expensive instrumentation. Other commonly used methods are voltammetry (15% of published methods) and UV-Vis spectroscopy (10% of published methods), which is expected because these methods are simple, sensitive, easy to modify and optimize, and available in most laboratories. Although represented with 7% of all methods used for INDO determination, GC is rarely used today due to its drawbacks. Surprisingly, MEKC, as simple and environmentally friendly method, is the rarest method used, represented with only one research article (1% of all methods used for INDO determination). A graphical presentation of the percentage of methods used for INDO determination can be seen in Figure 4.
Different types of samples (biological and pharmaceutical) were analyzed with different analytical methods (Figure 5) due to the fact that complex systems, such as real biological samples, require more selective analytical methods. Voltammetry was used equally for both types of samples, thus confirming its good properties and wide application. Although UV-Vis spectroscopy is one of the most commonly used methods for INDO determination, all analyzed samples were pharmaceutical, indicating possible problems for INDO determination in complex matrices. However, chromatographic methods were mostly used to analyze biological samples due to good selectivity and specificity, which allows INDO determination in complex matrices. IMs were used only for INDO determination in biological samples due to the high specificity, and potentiometry was used only in pure pharmaceutical samples due to strong possible interferences of matrix compounds.
In addition, all methods presented in this review were checked if they are validated in accordance to the European Pharmacopoeia , British Pharmacopoeia , United States Pharmacopeia , ICH guideline Bioanalytical method validation M10 , and Bioanalytical method validation guidance for industry . Methods validated according to the ICH guideline Bioanalytical method validation M10 and Bioanalytical method validation guidance for industry are marked in Table 1. As the methods in pharmacopeias are revised regularly, none of the methods described in this review have been validated according to current pharmacopeias.
INDO is a widely used NSAID because of its analgesic, antipyretic, and anti-inflammatory properties. It is necessary to develop reliable, accurate, and efficient analytical methods for its determination to ensure the quality, safety, and efficiency of INDO drugs and to monitor INDO therapy. Also, it is important to monitor INDO and its metabolites in the environment.
This review describes the structural form of INDO, its structural modifications, physicochemical properties, mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, application, adverse effects, and drug interactions, with emphasis on analytical methods for the determination of INDO. Chromatographic methods are the most commonly used for INDO determination (almost 50% of all analytical methods used for INDO determination) due to good analytical performances despite the fact that these methods are not environmentally friendly, they generate toxic and carcinogenic waste, and commonly includes complicated sample preparation. However, modifications of mobile phase, used solvents, column length and particle size could lead to better results, so there is potential for future development.
Good alternative for chromatographic methods could be electrochemical techniques, especially because they do not require complicated sample preparation and expensive instrumentation. Voltammetry, as the second most commonly used method, proved to be appropriate for INDO determination, both in pure and real systems. Potentiometry was rarely used for INDO determination in spite of the fact that both methods could be easily improved using different types of electrodes, and functionalized nanomaterials for electrode modifications.
Optical methods were very popular for INDO determination, but lately, only UV-Vis spectroscopy has been used due to its simplicity. Great potential in optical methods development could be the introduction of nanomaterials with their unique properties and novel signal transduction approaches.
Among all the methods used for INDO determination, HPLC was the most sensitive technique with the lowest LOD (1.07 × 10−6 µg·mL−1), but LC–MS and voltammetry also showed high sensitivity. According to all data collected and analyzed, HPLC, voltammetry and UV-Vis spectroscopy are methods that are still being developed, so in the future we can expect a further increase in sensitivity and even lower LOD.
This review presents 12 different analytical methods for INDO determination and 86 scientific investigations, including different strategies and their mostly successful applications. However, it is necessary to continue the research in this field to develop and validate new innovative analytical methods for INDO determination using green chemistry principles, as well as simple and fast sample preparation and analysis, which could be used for routine analysis.
This study is supported by the European Structural and Investment Funds grant for the Croatian National Scientific Center of Excellence for Personalized Health Care, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek.
Funding information: European Structural and Investment Funds grant for the Croatian National Scientific Center of Excellence for Personalized Health Care, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek (grant #KK.01.1.1.01.0010).
Author contributions: Andrea Dandić: data curation, methodology, writing – original draft, and writing – review and editing; Katarina Rajkovača: data curation and investigation; Marija Jozanović: visualization; Iva Pukleš: visualization; Aleksandar Széchenyi: funding acquisition; Mateja Budetić: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, methodology, supervision, writing – original draft, and writing – review and editing; Mirela Samardžić: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, methodology, supervision, writing – original draft, and writing – review and editing.
Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.
 Ghlichloo I, Gerriets V. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing; 2021.Search in Google Scholar
 NCI Thesaurus. [cited 2021 Sep 20]. Available from: https://ncit.nci.nih.gov/ncitbrowser/ConceptReport.jsp?dictionary=NCI_Thesaurus&ns=NCI_Thesaurus&code=C576.Search in Google Scholar
 Zeng X, Song X, Ma T, Pan X, Zhou Y, Hou Y, et al. Repurpose open data to discover therapeutics for COVID-19 using deep learning. J Proteome Res. 2020;19(11):4624–36. 10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00316.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
 Xu T, Gao X, Wu Z, Selinger DW, Zhou Z Indomethacin has a potent antiviral activity against SARS CoV-2 in vitro and canine coronavirus in vivo. BioRxiv 017624 [Preprint]; 2020 [cited 2021 Oct 22]. Available from: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.01.017624v1.10.1101/2020.04.01.017624Search in Google Scholar
 Marinella MA. Indomethacin and resveratrol as potential treatment adjuncts for SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19. Int J Clin Pract. 2020;74(9):e13535. 10.1111/ijcp.13535.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
 Evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral hydroxychloroquine, indomethacin and zithromax in subjects with mild symptoms of COVID-19 – Full text view – ClinicalTrials.gov. [cited 2021 Oct 21]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT04344457.Search in Google Scholar
 Pushpakom S, Iorio F, Eyers PA, Escott KJ, Hopper S, Wells A, et al. Drug repurposing: progress, challenges and recommendations. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2018;18(1):41–58. 10.1038/nrd.2018.168.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
 Chen X, Morris KR, Griesser UJ, Byrn SR, Stowell JG. Reactivity differences of indomethacin solid forms with ammonia gas. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124(50):15012–19. 10.1021/ja017662o.Search in Google Scholar
 European Pharmacopoeia. 10th edn. Strasbourg: European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines; 2019.Search in Google Scholar
 British Pharmacopoeia. 10.0. London: The stationery office; 2020.Search in Google Scholar
 U.S. Pharmacopeia. 43-NF 38. Rockville: United States Pharmacopoeial Convention; 2020.Search in Google Scholar
 Remmel RP, Crews BC, Kozak KR, Algutkar AS, Marnett LJ. Studies on the metabolism of the novel, selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor indomethacin phenethylamide in rat, mouse, and human liver microsomes: identification of active metabolites. Drug Metab Dispos. 2004;32(1):113–22. 10.1124/dmd.32.1.113.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
 Kurumbail RG, Stevens AM, Gierse JK, McDonald JJ, Stegeman RA, Pak JY, et al. Structural basis for selective inhibition of cyciooxygenase-2 by anti-inflammatory agents. Nature. 1996;384(6610):644–8. 10.1038/384644a0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
 Blobaum AL, Uddin MJ, Felts AS, Crews BC, Rouzer CA. Marnett LJ. The 2′-trifluoromethyl analogue of indomethacin is a potent and selective COX-2 inhibitor. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2013;4(5):486–90. 10.1021/ml400066a.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
 Ikeda A, Funakoshi E, Araki M, Ma B, Karuo Y, Tarui A, et al. Structural modification of indomethacin toward selective inhibition of COX-2 with a significant increase in van der Waals contributions. Bioorganic Med Chem. 2019;27(9):1789–94. 10.1016/j.bmc.2019.03.021.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
 Amici C, Di Caro A, Ciucci A, Chiappa L, Castilletti C, Martell V, et al. Indomethacin has a potent antiviral activity against SARS coronavirus. Antivir Ther. 2006;11(8):1021–30. pmid: 17302372.10.1177/135965350601100803Search in Google Scholar
 Gordon DE, Jang GM, Bouhaddou M, Xu J, Obernier K, White KM, et al. A SARS-CoV-2 protein interaction map reveals targets for drug repurposing. Nature. 2020;583(7816):459–68. 10.1038/s41586-020-2286-9.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
 Gordon DE, Hiatt J, Bouhaddou M, Rezelj VV, Ulferts S, Braberg H, et al. Comparative host-coronavirus protein interaction networks reveal pan-viral disease mechanisms. Science. 2020;370(6521):eabe9403. 10.1126/science.abe9403.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
 Kiani P, Scholey A, Dahl TA, McMann L, Iversen JM, Verster JC. In vitro assessment of the antiviral activity of ketotifen, indomethacin and naproxen, alone and in combination, against Sars-Cov-2. Viruses. 2021;13(4):558. 10.3390/v13040558.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
 Desantis J, Mercorelli B, Celegato M, Croci F, Bazzacco A, Baroni M, et al. Indomethacin-based PROTACs as pan-coronavirus antiviral agents. Eur J Med Chem. 2021;226(4):113814. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2021.113814.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
 Gliszczyńska A, Nowaczyk M. Lipid formulations and bioconjugation strategies for indomethacin therapeutic advances. Molecules. MDPI AG; 2021;26:1576. 10.3390/molecules26061576.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
 Dihlmann S, Siermann A, Von Knebel Doeberitz M. The nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs aspirin and indomethacin attenuate β-catenin/TCF-4 signaling. Oncogene. 2001;20(5):645–53. 10.1038/sj.onc.1204123.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
 Rasmussen M. Treatment of elevated intracranial pressure with indomethacin: friend or foe? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005;49(3):341–50. 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00647.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
 Turakka H, Airaksinen MM. Biopharmaceutical assessment of phenylbutazone and indomethacin preparations. Ann Clin Res. 1974;6(sup 11):34–43. pmid:4855463.Search in Google Scholar
 Emori HW, Champion GD, Bluestone R, Paulus HE. Simultaneous pharmacokinetics of indomethacin in serum and synovial fluid. Ann Rheum Dis. 1973;32(5):433–5. 10.1136/ard.32.5.433.Search in Google Scholar
 Upton RN, Rasmussen M, Grant C, Martinez AM, Cold GE, Ludbrook GL. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of indomethacin: effects on cerebral blood flow in anaesthetized sheep. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2008;35(3):317–23. 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2007.04818.x.Search in Google Scholar
 Duggan DE, Hogans AF, Kwan KC, McMahon FG. The metabolism of indomethacin in man. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1972;181(3):563–75. pmid:4555898.Search in Google Scholar
 Rogers J, Kirby LC, Hempelman SR, Berry DL, McGeer PL, Kaszniak AW, et al. Clinical trial of indomethacin in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology. 1993;43(8):1609–11. 10.1212/wnl.43.8.1609.Search in Google Scholar
 Package leaflet: information for the user. [cited 2021 Sep 23]. Available from: https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/files/pil.2946.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
 Indomethacin, University of Michigan healt, Michigan medicine. [cited 2021 Sep 23]. Available from: https://www.uofmhealth.org/health-library/d00039a1.Search in Google Scholar
 Williamson HE. Interaction of cyclosporine and indomethacin in the rat. Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol. 1988;61(1):141–4. pmid:3262905.Search in Google Scholar
 Kataoka H, Horie Y, Koyama R, Nakatsugi S, Furukawa M. Interaction between NSAIDs and steroid in rat stomach: safety of nimesulide as a preferential COX-2 inhibitor in the stomach. Dig Dis Sci. 2000;45(7):1366–75. 10.1023/A:1005560104847.Search in Google Scholar
 Abdel-Hay MH, Korany MA, Bedair MM, Gazy AA. Colorimetric determination of seven nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs using 2-nitrophenylhydrazlne hydrochloride. Anal Lett. 1990;23(2):281–94. 10.1080/00032719008052444.Search in Google Scholar
 Bourinbaiar AS, Lee-Huang S. The non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, indomethacin, as an inhibitor of HIV replication. FEBS Lett. 1995;360(1):85–8. 10.1016/0014-5793(95)00057-G.Search in Google Scholar
 Adegoke OA, Idowu OS, Olaniyi AA. Novel colorimetric assay of indomethacin using 4-carboxyl-2,6-dinitrobenzene diazonium ion. Acta Pharm. 2006;56(2):189–202.Search in Google Scholar
 Nagaraja P, Vasantha RA, Yathirajan HS. Sensitive spectrophotometric method for the determination of indomethacin in capsules. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2003;31(3):563–9. 10.1016/S0731-7085(02)00465-X.Search in Google Scholar
 Stolarczyk M, Krzek J, Rzeszutko W. Application of derivative spectrophotometry to simultaneous determination of indomethacin and 5-methoxy-2-methyl-3-indoleacetic acid in metindol injections. J AOAC Int. 2004;87(3):592–5. 10.1093/jaoac/87.3.592.Search in Google Scholar
 Maheshwari RK, Rathore A, Agrawal A, Gupta MA. New spectrophotometric estimation of indomethacin capsules with niacinamide as hydrotropic solubilizing agent. Pharm Methods. 2011;2(3):184–8. 10.4103/2229-4708.90359.Search in Google Scholar
 Ali K, Albakaa ARM, Ali ZHA. New assay method UV spectroscopy for determination of indomethacin in pharmaceutical formulation. J Chem Pharm Res. 2015;7(4):1591–6.Search in Google Scholar
 Rathod SB, Salunke PB, Kulkarni VC, Chavhan BR, Barhate SD. Spectroscopic quantitation and analytical validation of indomethacin in bulk drug and capsule formulation. J Pharm Res. 2017;11(2):124–7. 10.1080/10408347.2013.876354.Search in Google Scholar
 Jain S, Maheshwari R, Nema RK, Singhvi I. Development and validation of simple UV-spectrophotometric method of quantization of indomethacin in solid dosage formulation using mixed solvency concept. Pharma Innov J. 2017;6(12):453–6.Search in Google Scholar
 Rathod SB, Salunke PA, Kulkarni VC, Chavhan BR, Barhate SD. Method development and validation of indomethacin in bulk drug and capsule formulation by using mix hydrotrophy. Res J Pharm Dos Forms Technol. 2018;10(3):175. 10.5958/0975-4377.2018.00027.7.Search in Google Scholar
 Thejomoorthy K, Padma A, Snehith B, Raghu S, Siddhartha KS. A validated UV spectroscopic method development for estimation of indomethacin in bulk and its formulation. Glob J Res Anal. 2019;8(1):238–40. 10.36106/gjra.Search in Google Scholar
 Abed NK, Albakaa ARM, Ameen DSM, Jabbar ZA, Younis AS. Development of a novel method for quantitative determination of indomethacin. Int J Drug Deliv Technol. 2020;10(1):46–51. 10.25258/ijddt.10.1.8.Search in Google Scholar
 Weder JE, Dillon CT, Hambley TW, Kennedy BJ, Lay PA, Biffin JR, et al. Copper complexes of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: an opportunity yet to be realized. Coord Chem Rev. 2002;232(1–2):95–126. 10.1016/S0010-8545(02)00086-3.Search in Google Scholar
 Sastry CSP, Mangala DS, Ekambareswara Rao K. Spectrophotometric and fluorimetric methods for the determination of indomethacin. Analyst. 1986;111(3):323–5. 10.1039/an9861100323.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
 Pinto PCAG, Saraiva MLMFS, Santos JLM, Lima JLFC. A pulsed sequential injection analysis flow system for the fluorimetric determination of indomethacin in pharmaceutical preparations. Anal Chim Acta. 2005;539(1–2):173–9. 10.1016/j.aca.2005.03.037.Search in Google Scholar
 Molina-García L, Fernández-De Córdova ML, Ruiz-Medina A. Sensitive determination of indomethacin in pharmaceuticals and urine by sequential injection analysis and optosensing. J AOAC Int. 2010;93(5):1443–9. 10.1093/jaoac/93.5.1443.Search in Google Scholar
 Passos MLC, Saraiva MLMFS, Santos JLM, Reis S, Lúcio M, Lima JLFC. A reagent-free method based on a photo-induced fluorimetry in a sequential injection system. Talanta. 2011;84(5):1309–13. 10.1016/j.talanta.2011.02.037.Search in Google Scholar
 Turkie PNS, Alrazack HFA. Newly developed method for determination indomethacin using phosphotungstic acid by continue flow injection analysis via homemade ISNAG-fluorimeter. IOSR. J Appl Chem. 2018;11(2):25–39. 10.9790/5736-1102012539.Search in Google Scholar
 Kitade T, Kitamura K, Takegami S, Yoshinaga R, Sasakawa M, Tokuhira A. Determination of indomethacin by room-temperature phosphorimetry on a poly(vinyl alcohol) substrate. Anal Sci. 2002;18(7):835–8. 10.2116/analsci.18.835.Search in Google Scholar
 Nie F, Lu J, He Y, Du J. Determination of indomethacin in urine using molecule imprinting- chemiluminescence method. Talanta. 2005;66(3):728–33. 10.1016/j.talanta.2004.12.023.Search in Google Scholar
 Mervartová K, Polášek M, Calatayud JM. Sequential injection analysis (SIA)-chemiluminescence determination of indomethacin using tris[(2,2′-bipyridyl)]ruthenium(III) as reagent and its application to semisolid pharmaceutical dosage forms. Anal Chim Acta. 2007;600(1–2 SPEC. ISS.):114–21. 10.1016/j.aca.2007.01.057.Search in Google Scholar
 Hallaj T, Amjadi M, Manzoori JL, Azizi N. A novel chemiluminescence sensor for the determination of indomethacin based on sulfur and nitrogen co-doped carbon quantum dot–KMnO4 reaction. Luminescence. 2017;32(7):1174–9. 10.1002/bio.3306.Search in Google Scholar
 Jensen KM. Determination of indomethacin in serum by an extractive alkylation technique and gas-liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A. 1978;153(1):195–202. 10.1016/S0021-9673(00)89872-6.Search in Google Scholar
 Sibeon RG, Baty JD, Baber N, Chan K, Orme MLE. Quantitative gas-liquid chromatographic method for the determination of indomethacin in biolgical fluids. J Chromatogr A. 1978;153(1):189–94. 10.1016/S0021-9673(00)89871-4.Search in Google Scholar
 Guissou P, Cuisinaud G, Sassard J. Gas chromatographic determination of indomethacin and its O-desmethylated metabolite in human plasma and urine. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl. 1983;277(C):368–73. 10.1016/S0378-4347(00)84860-4.Search in Google Scholar
 Nishioka R, Harimoto T, Umeda I, Yamamoto S, Oi N. Improved procedure for determination of indomethacin in plasma by capillary gas chromatography after solid-phase extraction. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl. 1990;526(C):210–4. 10.1016/S0378-4347(00)82500-1.Search in Google Scholar
 Dawson M, Smith MD, McGee CM. Gas chromatography/negative ion chemical ionization/tandem mass spectrometric quantification of indomethacin in plasma and synovial fluid. Biol Mass Spectrom. 1990;19(8):453–8. 10.1002/bms.1200190802.Search in Google Scholar
 Thomas S, Sutton A, Garg U. Quantitation of indomethacin in serum and plasma using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Methods Mol Biol. 2010;603:297–305. 10.1007/978-1-60761-459-3_28.Search in Google Scholar
 Terweij-Groen CP, Heemstra S, Kraak JC. Rapid determination of indomethacin and salicylic acid in serum by means of reversed-phase liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl. 1980;181(3–4):385–97. 10.1016/S0378-4347(00)81141-X.Search in Google Scholar
 Plakogiannis FM, Ali A, Kazmi S. High-pressure liquid chromatographic determination of indomethacin in capsules. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1981;7(2):215–21. 10.3109/03639048109057712.Search in Google Scholar
 Bernstein MS, Evans MA. High-performance liquid chromatography-fluorescence analysis for indomethacin and metabolites in biological fluids. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl. 1982;229(1):179–87. 10.1016/S0378-4347(00)86049-1.Search in Google Scholar
 Astier A, Renat B. Sensitive high-performance liquid chromatographic determination of indomethacin in human plasma. Pharmacokinetic studies after single oral dose. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl. 1982;233(1):279–88. 10.1016/S0378-4347(00)81754-5.Search in Google Scholar
 Smith PC, Benet LZ. High-performance liquid chromatographic method for the determination of indomethacin and its two primary metabolites in urine. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl. 1984;306(C):315–21. 10.1016/S0378-4347(00)80893-2.Search in Google Scholar
 De Zeeuw D, Leinfelder JL, Craig Brater D. Highly sensitive measurement of indomethacin using a high-performance liquid chromatographic technique combined with post-column in-line hydrolysis. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl. 1986;380(C):157–62. 10.1016/S0378-4347(00)83637-3.Search in Google Scholar
 Mawatari KI, Iinuma F, Watanabe M. Fluorimetric determination of indomethacin in human serum by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with post-column photochemical reaction with hydrogen peroxide. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl. 1989;491(C):389–96. 10.1016/S0378-4347(00)82856-X.Search in Google Scholar
 Hubert P, Crommen J. Automatic determination of indomethacin in human plasma using liquid-solid extraction on disposable cartridges in combination with HPLC. J Liq Chromatogr. 1990;13(19):3891–907. 10.1080/01483919008049576.Search in Google Scholar
 Kubo H, Umiguchi Y, Kinoshita T. Fluorometric determination of indomethacin in serum by high performance liquid chromatography with in-line alkaline hydrolysis. Chromatographia. 1992;33(7–8):321–4. 10.1007/BF02275910.Search in Google Scholar
 Johnson AG, Ray JE. Improved high–performance liquid chromatographic method for the determination of indomethacin in plasma. Ther Drug Monit. 1992;14(1):61–5. 10.1097/00007691-199202000-00010.Search in Google Scholar
 Vree TB, van den Biggelaar-Martea M, Verwey-van Wissen CPWGM. Determination of indomethacin, its metabolites and their glucuronides in human plasma and urine by means of direct gradient high-performance liquid chromatographic analysis. Preliminary pharmacokinetics and effect of probenecid. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl. 1993;616(2):271–82. 10.1016/0378-4347(93)80395-K.Search in Google Scholar
 Niopas I, Mamzoridi K. Determination of indomethacin and mefenamic acid in plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl. 1994;656(2):447–50. 10.1016/0378-4347(94)00116-2.Search in Google Scholar
 Sato J, Amizuka T, Niida Y, Umetsu M, Ito K. Simple, rapid and sensitive method for the determination of indomethacin in plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection. J Chromatogr B Biomed Appl. 1997;692(1):241–4. 10.1016/S0378-4347(96)00463-X.Search in Google Scholar
 Cristòfol C, Pérez B, Pons M, Valladares JE, Martí G, Arboix M. Determination of indomethacin residues in poultry by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr B Biomed Appl. 1998;709(2):310–4. 10.1016/S0378-4347(98)00083-8.Search in Google Scholar
 Grippa E, Santini L, Castellano G, Gatto MT, Leone MG, Saso L. Simultaneous determination of hydrocortisone, dexamethasone, indomethacin, phenylbutazone and oxyphenbutazone in equine serum by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl. 2000;738(1):17–25. 10.1016/S0378-4347(99)00478-8.Search in Google Scholar
 Nováková L, Matysová L, Havlíková L, Solich P. Development and validation of HPLC method for determination of indomethacin and its two degradation products in topical gel. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2005;37(5):899–905. 10.1016/j.jpba.2004.09.012.Search in Google Scholar
 Boon V, Glass B, Nimmo A. High-performance liquid chromatographic assay of indomethacin in porcine plasma with applicability to human levels. J Chromatogr Sci. 2006;44(1):41–4. 10.1093/chromsci/44.1.41.Search in Google Scholar
 Al Za’abi MA, Dehghanzadeh GH, Norris RLG, Charles BG. A rapid and sensitive microscale HPLC method for the determination of indomethacin in plasma of premature neonates with patent ductus arteriousus. J Chromatogr B Anal Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2006;830(2):364–7. 10.1016/j.jchromb.2005.11.025.Search in Google Scholar
 Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Qi G, Sun Y, Wei Y, Ma H. Detection of indomethacin by high-performance liquid chromatography with in situ electrogenerated Mn(III) chemiluminescence detection. Anal Chim Acta. 2007;582(2):229–34. 10.1016/j.aca.2006.09.028.Search in Google Scholar
 Dawidowicz AL, Kondziola K, Kobielski M. Determination of free indomethacin in human plasma using HPLC with UV detection. J Liq Chromatogr Relat Technol. 2009;32(18):2686–98. 10.1080/10826070903245748.Search in Google Scholar
 Tsvetkova B, Pencheva I, Zlatkov A, Peikov P. High performance liquid chromatographic assay of indomethacin and its related substances in tablet dosage forms. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2012;4(3):549–52.Search in Google Scholar
 Ivanov KV, Lukanov LK, Petrov G. Simultaneous HPLC determination of paracetamol and indomethacin in tablet dosage forms. Der Pharm Sin. 2013;4(1):102–5.Search in Google Scholar
 Nandy BC, Gupta AK, Mazumder B. Development and validation of analytical methods of indomethacin in rabbit blood plasma by RP-HPLC technique. J Biomed Pharm Res. 2013;2(5):1–6.Search in Google Scholar
 Haq N, Shakeel F, Ali M, Elbadry M, Alanazi FK, Alsarra IA. An environmentally benign approach for rapid analysis of indomethacin using a stability-indicating RP-HPLC method. J Liq Chromatogr Relat Technol. 2014;37(6):878–92. 10.1080/10826076.2012.758150.Search in Google Scholar
 Lariya NK, Agrawal GP. Development and validation of RP-HPLC method for simultaneous determination of methotrexate, dexamethasone and indomethacin. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2014;7(3):443–6.Search in Google Scholar
 Babu GR, Rao AL, Rao JV. Bioanalytical method development and validation for the simultaneous estimation of indomethacin and omeprazole in rabbit plasma by using HPLC. Int J Chem Sci. 2016;14(2):585–94.Search in Google Scholar
 Chamkouri N, Zare-Shahabadi V, Niazi A. Ultrasound-assisted dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction with HPLC-UV for the simultaneous determination of diclofenac potassium and indomethacin in serum and plasma samples: experimental design and optimization. Bulg Chem Commun. 2017;49(4):994–1000.Search in Google Scholar
 Elshorbagy NH, Ali K, Farghaly U, Ali F, Elgarhy O. Analytical assay of indomethacin in presence of quercetin for indomethacin induced peptic ulcer prevention. Malaysian J Med Res. 2017;28(2):267–71.Search in Google Scholar
 Pai S, Sawant N. Applications of new validated RP-HPLC method for determination of indomethacin and its hydrolytic degradants using sodium acetate buffer. Indian J Pharm Educ Res. 2017;51(3):388–92. 10.5530/ijper.51.3.65.Search in Google Scholar
 Assali M, Abualhasan M, Zohud N, Ghazal N. RP-HPLC method development and validation of synthesized codrug in combination with indomethacin, paracetamol, and famotidine. Int J Anal Chem. 2020;2020:1894907. 10.1155/2020/1894907.Search in Google Scholar
 Abdel-Hamid ME, Novotny L, Hamza H. Determination of diclofenac sodium, flufenamic acid, indomethacin and ketoprofen by LC-APCI-MS. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2001;24(4):587–94. 10.1016/S0731-7085(00)00444-1.Search in Google Scholar
 Liu Y, Guan F, Wang X, Zhang X, Di X. Development of a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for measuring plasma and uterine tissue levels of indomethacin in rabbits treated with indomethacin-medicated Cu-IUDs. Contraception. 2012;85(4):419–24. 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.08.018.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
 Suresh PS, Dixit A, Giri S, Rajagopal S, Mullangi R. Development and validation of a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for quantitation of indomethacin in rat plasma and its application to a pharmacokinetic study in rats. Biomed Chromatogr. 2013;27(4):496–501. 10.1002/bmc.2818.Search in Google Scholar
 Wang X, Vernikovskaya DI, Nanovskaya TN, Rytting E, Hankins GDV, Ahmed MS. A liquid chromatography method with single quadrupole mass spectrometry for quantitative determination of indomethacin in maternal plasma and urine of pregnant patients. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2013;78–79:123–8. 10.1016/j.jpba.2013.02.006.Search in Google Scholar
 Lin SJ, Chen YR, Su YH, Tseng HI, Chen SH. Determination of indomethacin in plasma by micellar electrokinetic chromatography with UV detection for premature infants with patent ducts arteriosus. J Chromatogr B Anal Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2006;830(2):306–13. 10.1016/j.jchromb.2005.11.007.Search in Google Scholar
 Radi A. Preconcentration and voltammetric determination of indomethacin at carbon paste electrodes. Electroanalysis. 1998;10(2):103–6. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4109(199802)10:2<103:AID-ELAN103>3.0.CO;2-R.Search in Google Scholar
 Ali AMM. Cathodic adsorptive stripping voltammetric determination of the anti-inflammatory drug indomethacin. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 1999;18(6):1005–12. 10.1016/S0731-7085(98)00111-3.Search in Google Scholar
 Reguera C, Ortiz MC, Arcos MJ. Differential pulse voltammetric simultaneous determination of four anti-inflammatory drugs by using soft modelling. Electroanalysis. 2002;14(24):1699–706. 10.1002/elan.200290013.Search in Google Scholar
 Sarhangzadeh K, Mmohamma-Rezaei R, Jabbri M. Room-temperature ionic liquid and multi-walled carbon nanotube composite modified carbon-ceramic electrode as a sensitive voltammetric sensor for indomethacin. Anal Lett. 2014;47(1):134–45. 10.1080/00032719.2013.832267.Search in Google Scholar
 Sarhangzadeh K, Khatami AA, Jabbari M, Bahari S. Simultaneous determination of diclofenac and indomethacin using a sensitive electrochemical sensor based on multiwalled carbon nanotube and ionic liquid nanocomposite. J Appl Electrochem. 2013;43(12):1217–24. 10.1007/s10800-013-0609-3.Search in Google Scholar
 Arvand M, Gholizadeh TM. Gold nanorods-graphene oxide nanocomposite incorporated carbon nanotube paste modified glassy carbon electrode for voltammetric determination of indomethacin. Sens Actuators, B Chem. 2013;186:622–32. 10.1016/j.snb.2013.06.059.Search in Google Scholar
 Sataraddi SR, Patil SM, Bagoji AM, Pattar VP, Nandibewoor ST. Electrooxidation of indomethacin at multiwalled carbon nanotubes-modified GCE and its determination in pharmaceutical dosage form and human biological fluids. ISRN Anal Chem. 2014;2014:1–9. 10.1155/2014/816012.Search in Google Scholar
 Babaei A, Yousefi A, Afrasiabi M, Shabanian M. A sensitive simultaneous determination of dopamine, acetaminophen and indomethacin on a glassy carbon electrode coated with a new composite of MCM-41 molecular sieve/nickel hydroxide nanoparticles/multiwalled carbon nanotubes. J Electroanal Chem. 2015;740:28–36. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2014.12.042.Search in Google Scholar
 Babaei A, Yousefi A. A Sensitive simultaneous determination of uric acid, norepinephrine and indomethacin using a cadmium sulfide nanoparticles/multi-walled carbon nanotubes modified gold electrode. Anal Bioanal Electrochem. 2020;12(4):486–501.Search in Google Scholar
 Liu Y, Huang Q, Zhang C, Liang C, Wei L, Peng J. A novel method for indomethacin determination based on graphene loaded nickel oxides nanoparticles film. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2018;13(2):1484–94. 10.20964/2018.02.39.Search in Google Scholar
 Ragab MAA, Korany MA, Galal SM, Ahmed AR. Voltammetric analysis of dantrolene and its active metabolite with indomethacin in rat plasma. Bioanalysis. 2019;11(2):73–84. 10.4155/bio-2018-0165.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
 Baezzat MR, Banavand F, Kamran Hakkani S. Sensitive voltammetric detection of indomethacin using TiO2 nanoparticle modified carbon ionic liquid electrode. Anal Bioanal Chem Res. 2020;7(1):89–98. 10.22036/ABCR.2019.171887.1317.Search in Google Scholar
 Petković BB, Ognjanović M, Krstić M, Stanković V, Babincev L, Pergal M, et al. Boron-doped diamond electrode as efficient sensing platform for simultaneous quantification of mefenamic acid and indomethacin. Diam Relat Mater. 2020;105:107785. 10.1016/j.diamond.2020.107785.Search in Google Scholar
 Aubeck R, Bräuchle C, Hampp N. Indomethacin ion-selective electrode based on a bis(triphenylphosphoranylidene)ammonium-indomethacin complex. Analyst. 1991;116(8):811–4. 10.1039/AN9911600811.Search in Google Scholar
 Aktaş AH, Ertokuş GP. Potentiometric determination of ibuprofen, indomethacin and naproxen using an artificial neural network calibration. J Serbian Chem Soc. 2008;73(1):87–95. 10.2298/JSC0801087A.Search in Google Scholar
 Alam I, Levine L, Langone JJ. Immunoassay of indomethacin: the use of [125I] protein A to detect specific serologic binding. Prostaglandines Med. 1979;2(3):167–75. 10.1016/0161-4630(79)90034-X.Search in Google Scholar
 Huo SM, Yang H, Deng AP. Development and validation of a highly sensitive ELISA for the determination of pharmaceutical indomethacin in water samples. Talanta. 2007;73(2):380–6. 10.1016/j.talanta.2007.03.055.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
 Skalka N, Krol A, Schlesinger H, Altstein M. Monitoring of the non-steroid anti-inflammatory drug indomethacin: development of immunochemical methods for its purification and detection. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2011;400(10):3491–504. 10.1007/s00216-011-5027-y.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
 Bioanalytical Method Validation M10. London: European Medicines Agency; 2018 [cited 2021 Sep 23]. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/ich-m10-bioanalytical-method-validation.Search in Google Scholar
 Bioanalytical Method Validation Guidance for Industry. Rockville: Food and Drug Administration; 2018 [cited 2021 Sep 23]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/bioanalytical-method-validation-guidance-industry.Search in Google Scholar
© 2022 Andrea Dandić et al., published by De Gruyter
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.