Accessible Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter June 16, 2016

Polymeric membranes for produced water treatment: an overview of fouling behavior and its control

Subrata Mondal


Produced water (PW) from the oil/gas field is an important waste stream. Due to its highly pollutant nature and large volume of generation, the management of PW is a significant challenge for the petrochemical industry. The treatment of PW can improve the economic viability of oil and gas exploration, and the treated water can provide a new source of water in the water-scarce region for some beneficial uses. The reverse osmosis (RO) and selective nanofiltration (NF) membrane treatment of PW can reduce the salt and organic contents to acceptable levels for some beneficial uses, such as irrigation, and different industrial reuses. However, membrane fouling is a major obstacle for the membrane-based treatment of PW. In this review, the author discusses the polymeric membrane (mainly RO/NF) fouling during PW treatment. Membrane fouling mechanisms by various types of foulants, such as organic, inorganic, colloidal, and biological matters, are discussed. The review concludes with some of the measures to control fouling by membrane surface modification approaches.


Agarwal A, Ng WJ, Liu Y. Cleaning of biologically fouled membranes with self-collapsing microbubbles. Biofouling 2013; 29: 69–76.Search in Google Scholar

Ahmad AL, Chong MF, Bhatia S. Mathematical modeling and simulation of the multiple solutes system for nanofiltration process. J Membr Sci 2005; 253: 103–115.Search in Google Scholar

Ahmad AL, Yasin NHM, Derek CJC, Lim JK. Chemical cleaning of a cross-flow microfiltration membrane fouled by microalgal biomass. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 2014; 45: 233–241.Search in Google Scholar

Ahmadun FR, Pendashteh A, Abdullah LC, Biak DRA, Madaeni SS, Abidin ZZ. Review of technologies for oil and gas produced water treatment. J Hazardous Mater 2009; 170: 530–551.Search in Google Scholar

Al-Amoudi AS. Factors affecting natural organic matter (NOM) and scaling fouling in NF membranes: a review. Desalination 2010; 259: 1–10.Search in Google Scholar

Alzahrani S, Mohammad AW, Hilal N, Abdullah P, Jaafar O. Comparative study of NF and RO membranes in the treatment of produced water – Part I: assessing water quality. Desalination 2013a; 315: 18–26.Search in Google Scholar

Alzahrani S, Mohammad AW, Hilal N, Abdullah P, Jaafar O. Comparative study of NF and RO membranes in the treatment of produced water. II: toxicity removal efficiency. Desalination 2013b; 315: 27–32.Search in Google Scholar

Alzahrani S, Mohammad AW, Hilal N, Abdullah P, Jaafar O. Identification of foulants, fouling mechanisms and cleaning efficiency for NF and RO treatment of produced water. Separ Purif Technol 2013c; 118: 324–341.Search in Google Scholar

Andrade VT, Andrade BG, Costa BRS, Pereira Jr OA, Dezotti M. Toxicity assessment of oil field produced water treated by evaporative processes to produce water to irrigation. Water Sci Technol 2010; 62: 693–700.Search in Google Scholar

Ang WS, Yip NY, Tiraferri A, Elimelech M. Chemical cleaning of RO membranes fouled by wastewater effluent: achieving higher efficiency with dual-step cleaning. J Membr Sci 2011; 382: 100–106.Search in Google Scholar

Asatekin A, Mayes AM. Oil industry wastewater treatment with fouling resistant membranes containing amphiphilic comb copolymers. Environ Sci Technol 2009; 43: 4487–4492.Search in Google Scholar

Asatekin A, Olivetti EA, Mayes AM. Fouling resistant, high flux nanofiltration membranes from polyacrylonitrile-graft-poly(ethylene oxide). J Membr Sci 2009; 332: 6–12.Search in Google Scholar

Azari S, Zou LD. Fouling resistant zwitterionic surface modification of reverse osmosis membranes using amino acid L-cysteine. Desalination 2013; 324: 79–86.Search in Google Scholar

Bader MSH, Veenstra JN. Analysis of concentration polarization phenomenon in ultrafiltration under turbulent flow conditions. J Membr Sci 1996; 114: 139–148.Search in Google Scholar

Bakke T, Klungsoyr J, Sanni S. Environmental impacts of produced water and drilling waste discharges from the Norwegian offshore petroleum industry. Mar Environ Res 2013; 92: 154–169.Search in Google Scholar

Bixler GD, Bhushan B. Biofouling: lessons from nature. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 2012; 370: 2381–2417.Search in Google Scholar

Cakmakci M, Kayaalp N, Koyuncu I. Desalination of produced water from oil production fields by membrane processes. Desalination 2008; 222: 176–186.Search in Google Scholar

Campos JC, Borges RMH, Oliveira AM, Nobrega R, Sant’Anna GL. Oilfield wastewater treatment by combined microfiltration and biological processes. Water Res 2002; 36: 95–104.Search in Google Scholar

Carlsson G, Norrgren L, Hylland K, Tollefsen KE. Toxicity screening of produced water extracts in a zebrafish embryo assay. J Toxicol Environ Health Part A Curr Issues 2014; 77: 600–615.Search in Google Scholar

Chai GY, Cao B, Zhao GY, Greenberg AR, Krantz WB. Effects of concentration polarization, temperature and pressure on ultrasound detection of inorganic fouling and cleaning in a spiral-wound membrane module. Desalination Water Treat 2012; 50: 411–422.Search in Google Scholar

Chaudhary JP, Nataraj SK, Gogda A, Meena R. Bio-based superhydrophilic foam membranes for sustainable oil-water separation. Green Chem 2014; 16: 4552–4558.Search in Google Scholar

Chen X, He Y, Shi C, Fu W, Bi S, Wang Z, Chen L. Temperature- and pH-responsive membranes based on poly (vinylidene fluoride) functionalized with microgels. J Membr Sci 2014; 469: 447–457.Search in Google Scholar

Cheng L, Bi X, Ni Y. Oilfield produced water treatment by ozone-enhanced flocculation. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part A Energy Sci Res 2012; 29: 91–98.Search in Google Scholar

Coday BD, Cath TY. Forward osmosis: novel desalination of produced water and fracturing flowback. J Am Water Works Assoc 2014; 106: 37–38.Search in Google Scholar

Coday BD, Xu P, Beaudry EG, Herron J, Lampi K, Hancock NT, Cath TY. The sweet spot of forward osmosis: treatment of produced water, drilling wastewater, and other complex and difficult liquid streams. Desalination 2014; 333: 23–35.Search in Google Scholar

Corbaton-Baguena M-J, Alvarez-Blanco S, Vincent-Vela M-C. Cleaning of ultrafiltration membranes fouled with BSA by means of saline solutions. Separ Purif Technol 2014; 125: 1–10.Search in Google Scholar

Darvishmanesh S, Qian X, Wickramasinghe SR. Responsive membranes for advanced separations. Curr Opin Chem Eng 2015; 8: 98–104.Search in Google Scholar

Denisov GA. Theory of concentration polarization in cross-flow ultrafiltration: gel-layer model and osmotic-pressure model. J Membr Sci 1994; 91: 173–187.Search in Google Scholar

Drews A. Membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors – characterisation, contradictions, cause and cures. J Membr Sci 2010; 363: 1–28.Search in Google Scholar

Duan JL, Zhang HM, Wang CC, Li HY, Yang FL. Preparation and characterization of fouling-resistant composite membranes based on layer-by-layer self-assembly technique. Water Sci Technol 2011; 64: 2223–2229.Search in Google Scholar

Dudasova D, Sjoblom J, Oye G. Characterization and suspension stability of particles recovered from offshore produced water. Ind Eng Chem Res 2014; 53: 1431–1436.Search in Google Scholar

Duong HC, Chivas AR, Nelemans B, Duke M, Gray S, Cath TY, Nghiem LD. Treatment of RO brine from CSG produced water by spiral-wound air gap membrane distillation – a pilot study. Desalination 2015; 366: 121–129.Search in Google Scholar

Elimelech M, Phillip WA. The future of seawater desalination: energy, technology, and the environment. Science 2011; 333: 712–717.Search in Google Scholar

Fakhru’l-Razi A, Pendashteh A, Abidin ZZ, Abdullah LC, Biak DRA, Madaeni SS. Application of membrane-coupled sequencing batch reactor for oilfield produced water recycle and beneficial re-use. Bioresource Technol 2010; 101: 6942–6949.Search in Google Scholar

Gao W, Liang H, Ma J, Han M, Chen Z-l, Han Z-s, Li G-b. Membrane fouling control in ultrafiltration technology for drinking water production: a review. Desalination 2011; 272: 1–8.Search in Google Scholar

Goosen MFA, Sablani SS, Ai-Hinai H, Ai-Obeidani S, Al-Belushi R, Jackson D. Fouling of reverse osmosis and ultrafiltration membranes: a critical review. Separ Sci Technol 2004; 39: 2261–2297.Search in Google Scholar

Gorey C, Escobar IC. N-isopropylacrylamide (NIPAAM) modified cellulose acetate ultrafiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 2011; 383: 272–279.Search in Google Scholar

Guo W, Ngo H-H, Li J. A mini-review on membrane fouling. Bioresource Technol 2012; 122: 27–34.Search in Google Scholar

Hajibabania S, Antony A, Leslie G, Le-Clech P. Relative impact of fouling and cleaning on PVDF membrane hydraulic performances. Separ Purif Technol 2012; 90: 204–212.Search in Google Scholar

Heintz A, Stephan W. A generalized solution – diffusion model of the evaporation process through composite membranes, Part II. Concentration polarization, coupled diffusion and the influence of the porous support layer. J Membr Sci 1994; 89: 153–169.Search in Google Scholar

Hilal N, Ogunbiyi OO, Miles NJ, Nigmatullin R. Methods employed for control of fouling in MF and UF membranes: a comprehensive review. Separ Sci Technol 2005; 40: 1957–2005.Search in Google Scholar

Himstedt HH, Marshall KM, Wickramasinghe SR. pH-responsive nanofiltration membranes by surface modification. J Membr Sci 2011; 366: 373–381.Search in Google Scholar

Himstedt HH, Qian X, Weaver JR, Wickramasinghe SR. Responsive membranes for hydrophobic interaction chromatography. J Membr Sci 2013; 447: 335–344.Search in Google Scholar

Huang FYC, Natrajan P. Feasibility of using natural zeolites to remove sodium from coal bed methane-produced water. J Environ Eng 2006; 132: 1644–1650.Search in Google Scholar

Huang H, Spinett R, O’Melia CR. Direct-flow microfiltration of aquasols – I. Impacts of particle stabilities and size. J Membr Sci 2008; 314: 90–100.Search in Google Scholar

Huang W, Chu H, Dong B, Liu J. Evaluation of different algogenic organic matters on the fouling of microfiltration membranes. Desalination 2014; 344: 329–338.Search in Google Scholar

Huisman IH, Trägårdh G, Trägårdh C. Particle transport in crossflow microfiltration – II. Effects of particle-particle interactions. Chem Eng Sci 1999; 54: 281–289.Search in Google Scholar

Igunnu ET, Chen GZ. Produced water treatment technologies. Int J Low-Carbon Technol 2012; 1–21.Search in Google Scholar

Isa MHM, Frazier RA, Jauregi P. Cleaning potential of surfactin on fouled ultrafiltration (UF) membranes. Sains Malays 2012; 41: 1117–1124.Search in Google Scholar

Ismail ZZ, Ibrahim MA. Desalination of oilfield produced water associated with treatment of domestic wastewater and bioelectricity generation in microbial osmotic fuel cell. J Membr Sci 2015; 490: 247–255.Search in Google Scholar

Ivnitsky H, Katz I, Minz D, Shimoni E, Chen Y, Tarchitzky J, Semiat R, Dosoretz CG. Characterization of membrane biofouling in nanofiltration processes of wastewater treatment. Desalination 2005; 185: 255–268.Search in Google Scholar

Jain S, Gupta SK. Analysis of modified surface force pore flow model with concentration polarization and comparison with Spiegler-Kedem model in reverse osmosis systems. J Membr Sci 2004; 232: 45–62.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson BM, Kanagy LE, Rodgers JH Jr, Castle JW. Chemical, physical, and risk characterization of natural gas storage produced waters. Water Air Soil Pollut 2008; 191: 33–54.Search in Google Scholar

Jönsson A-S, Jönsson B. Ultrafiltration of colloidal dispersions – a theoretical model of the concentration polarization phenomena. J Colloid Interface Sci 1996; 180: 504–518.Search in Google Scholar

Ju H, McCloskey BD, Sagle AC, Kusuma VA, Freeman BD. Preparation and characterization of crosslinked poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate hydrogels as fouling-resistant membrane coating materials. J Membr Sci 2009; 330: 180–188.Search in Google Scholar

Kang G-D, Cao Y-M. Application and modification of poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) membranes – a review. J Membr Sci 2014; 463: 145–165.Search in Google Scholar

Kim S, Hoek EMV. Modeling concentration polarization in reverse osmosis processes. Desalination 2005; 186: 111–128.Search in Google Scholar

Kim IC, Lee KH. Dyeing process wastewater treatment using fouling resistant nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination 2006; 192: 246–251.Search in Google Scholar

Kim IC, Ka YH, Park JY, Lee KH. Preparation of fouling resistant nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes and their use for dyeing wastewater effluent. J Ind Eng Chem 2004; 10: 115–121.Search in Google Scholar

Kim Y, Elimelech M, Shon HK, Hong S. Combined organic and colloidal fouling in forward osmosis: fouling reversibility and the role of applied pressure. J Membr Sci 2014; 460: 206–212.Search in Google Scholar

Kimura K, Hane Y, Watanabe Y, Amy G, Ohkuma N. Irreversible membrane fouling during ultrafiltration of surface water. Water Res 2004; 38: 3431–3441.Search in Google Scholar

Knag AC, Taugbol A. Acute exposure to offshore produced water has an effect on stress- and secondary stress responses in three-spined stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol 2013; 158: 173–180.Search in Google Scholar

Kochkodan VM, Sharma VK. Graft polymerization and plasma treatment of polymer membranes for fouling reduction: a review. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng 2012; 47: 1713–1727.Search in Google Scholar

Kose B, Ozgun H, Ersahin ME, Dizge N, Koseoglu-Imer DY, Atay B, Kaya R, Altinbas M, Sayili S, Hoshan P, Atay D, Eren E, Kinaci C, Koyuncu I. Performance evaluation of a submerged membrane bioreactor for the treatment of brackish oil and natural gas field produced water. Desalination 2012; 285: 295–300.Search in Google Scholar

Kota AK, Kwon G, Choi W, Mabry JM, Tuteja A. Hygro-responsive membranes for effective oil-water separation. Nat Commun 2012; 3. Art No: 1025.Search in Google Scholar

Lau W-J, Ismail AF. Polymeric nanofiltration membranes for textile dye wastewater treatment: preparation, performance evaluation, transport modelling, and fouling control – a review. Desalination 2009; 245: 321–348.Search in Google Scholar

Li LX, Whitworth TM, Lee R. Separation of inorganic solutes from oil-field produced water using a compacted bentonite membrane. J Membr Sci 2003; 217: 215–225.Search in Google Scholar

Liikanen R, Yli-Kuivila J, Laukkanen R. Efficiency of various chemical cleanings for nanofiltration membrane fouled by conventionally-treated surface water. J Membr Sci 2002; 195: 265–276.Search in Google Scholar

Lin H, Zhang M, Wang F, Meng F, Liao B-Q, Hong H, Chen J, Gao W. A critical review of extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) in membrane bioreactors: characteristics, roles in membrane fouling and control strategies. J Membr Sci 2014; 460: 110–125.Search in Google Scholar

Linares RV, Yangali-Quintanilla V, Li Z, Amy G. NOM and TEP fouling of a forward osmosis (FO) membrane: foulant identification and cleaning. J Membr Sci 2012; 421: 217–224.Search in Google Scholar

Linares RV, Li Z, Yangali-Quintanilla V, Li Q, Amy G. Cleaning protocol for a FO membrane fouled in wastewater reuse. Desalination Water Treat 2013; 51: 4821–4824.Search in Google Scholar

Liu Z, Bai H, Lee J, Sun DD. A low-energy forward osmosis process to produce drinking water. Energy Environ Sci 2011; 4: 2582–2585.Search in Google Scholar

Liu Y, Su YL, Li YF, Zhao XT, Jiang ZY. Improved antifouling property of PVDF membranes by incorporating an amphiphilic block-like copolymer for oil/water emulsion separation. Rsc Adv 2015; 5: 21349–21359.Search in Google Scholar

Lujan-Facundo MJ, Mendoza-Roca JA, Cuartas-Uribe B, Alvarez-Blanco S. Ultrasonic cleaning of ultrafiltration membranes fouled with BSA solution. Separ Purif Technol 2013; 120: 275–281.Search in Google Scholar

Luo L, Han G, Chung TS, Weber M, Staudt C, Maletzko C. Oil/water separation via ultrafiltration by novel triangle-shape tri-bore hollow fiber membranes from sulfonated polyphenylenesulfone. J Membr Sci 2015; 476: 162–170.Search in Google Scholar

Macedonio F, Ali A, Poerio T, El-Sayed E, Drioli E, Abdel-Jawad M. Direct contact membrane distillation for treatment of oilfield produced water. Separ Purif Technol 2014; 126: 69–81.Search in Google Scholar

Maguire-Boyle SJ, Barron AR. Organic compounds in produced waters from shale gas wells. Environ Sci Processes Impacts 2014; 16: 2237–2248.Search in Google Scholar

McCloskey BD, Park HB, Ju H, Rowe BW, Miller DJ, Freeman BD. A bioinspired fouling-resistant surface modification for water purification membranes. J Membr Sci 2012; 413: 82–90.Search in Google Scholar

Miller DJ, Kasemset S, Wang L, Paul DR, Freeman BD. Constant flux crossflow filtration evaluation of surface-modified fouling-resistant membranes. J Membr Sci 2014; 452: 171–183.Search in Google Scholar

Mohan AM, Bibby KJ, Lipus D, Hammack RW, Gregory KB. The functional potential of microbial communities in hydraulic fracturing source water and produced water from natural gas extraction characterized by metagenomic sequencing. PLoS One 2014; 9: e107682.Search in Google Scholar

Mondal S. Stimuli responsive surfaces for fouling-resistant polymeric membranes. J Membr Sci Technol 2014; 4: e120.Search in Google Scholar

Mondal S. Polymer nanocomposite membranes. J Membr Sci Technol 2015; 5: 1–2.Search in Google Scholar

Mondal S, Wickramasinghe SR. Produced water treatment by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes. J Membr Sci 2008; 322: 162–170.Search in Google Scholar

Mondal S, Wickramasinghe SR. Photo-induced graft polymerization of N-isopropyl acrylamide on thin film composite membrane: produced water treatment and antifouling properties. Separ Purif Technol 2012; 90: 231–238.Search in Google Scholar

Mukherjee P, SenGupta AK. Some observations about electrolyte permeation mechanism through reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 2006; 278: 301–307.Search in Google Scholar

Murali Mohan A, Hartsock A, Bibby KJ, Hammack RW, Vidic RD, Gregory KB. Microbial community changes in hydraulic fracturing fluids and produced water from shale gas extraction. Environ Sci Technol 2013; 47: 13141–13150.Search in Google Scholar

Myung SW, Choi IH, Lee SH, Kim IC, Lee KH. Use of fouling resistant nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes for dyeing wastewater effluent treatment. Water Sci Technol 2005; 51: 159–164.Search in Google Scholar

Naim R, Levitsky I, Gitis V. Surfactant cleaning of UF membranes fouled by proteins. Separ Purif Technol 2012; 94: 39–43.Search in Google Scholar

Nam J-W, Hong S-H, Park J-Y, Park H-S, Kim H-S, Jang A. Evaluation of chemical cleaning efficiency of organic-fouled SWRO membrane by analyzing filtration resistance. Desalination Water Treat 2013; 51: 6172–6178.Search in Google Scholar

Nghiem LD, Coleman PJ, Espendiller C. Mechanisms underlying the effects of membrane fouling on the nanofiltration of trace organic contaminants. Desalination 2010; 250: 682–687.Search in Google Scholar

Norberg D, Hong S, Taylor J, Zhao Y. Surface characterization and performance evaluation of commercial fouling resistant low-pressure RO membranes. Desalination 2007; 202: 45–52.Search in Google Scholar

Pandey SR, Jegatheesan V, Baskaran K, Shu L. Fouling in reverse osmosis (RO) membrane in water recovery from secondary effluent: a review. Rev Environ Sci Bio-Technol 2012; 11: 125–145.Search in Google Scholar

Pena N, Gallego S, del Vigo F, Chesters SP. Evaluating impact of fouling on reverse osmosis membranes performance. Desalination Water Treat 2013; 51: 958–968.Search in Google Scholar

Peng JM, Su YL, Shi Q, Chen WJ, Jiang ZY. Protein fouling resistant membrane prepared by amphiphilic pegylated polyethersulfone. Bioresource Technol 2011; 102: 2289–2295.Search in Google Scholar

Piemonte V, Prisciandaro M, Mascis L, Di Paola L, Barba D. Reverse osmosis membranes for treatment of produced water: a process analysis. Desalination Water Treat 2015; 55: 565–574.Search in Google Scholar

Purkait MK, DasGupta S, De S. Resistance in series model for micellar enhanced ultrafiltration of eosin dye. J Colloid Interface Sci 2004; 270: 496–506.Search in Google Scholar

Ramon GZ, The-Vinh N, Hoek EMV. Osmosis-assisted cleaning of organic-fouled seawater RO membranes. Chem Eng J 2013; 218: 173–182.Search in Google Scholar

Reddy AVR, Trivedi JJ, Devmurari CV, Mohan DJ, Singh P, Rao AP, Joshi SV, Ghosh PK. Fouling resistant membranes in desalination and water recovery. Desalination 2005; 183: 301–306.Search in Google Scholar

Sablani SS, Goosen MFA, Al-Belushi R, Wilf M. Concentration polarization in ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis: a critical review. Desalination 2001; 141: 269–289.Search in Google Scholar

Shaffer DL, Chavez LHA, Ben-Sasson M, Castrillon SR-V, Yip NY, Elimelech M. Desalination and reuse of high-salinity shale gas produced water: drivers, technologies, and future directions. Environ Sci Technol 2013; 47: 9569–9583.Search in Google Scholar

Shahabadi SMS, Reyhani A. Optimization of operating conditions in ultrafiltration process for produced water treatment via the full factorial design methodology. Separ Purif Technol 2014; 132: 50–61.Search in Google Scholar

Shi Q, Su Y, Ning X, Chen W, Peng J, Jiang Z. Graft polymerization of methacrylic acid onto polyethersulfone for potential pH-responsive membrane materials. J Membr Sci 2010; 347: 62–68.Search in Google Scholar

Shi Q, Su Y, Chen W, Peng J, Nie L, Zhang L, Jiang Z. Grafting short-chain amino acids onto membrane surfaces to resist protein fouling. J Membr Sci 2011a; 366: 398–404.Search in Google Scholar

Shi X, Field R, Hankins N. Review of fouling by mixed feeds in membrane filtration applied to water purification. Desalination Water Treat 2011b; 35: 68–81.Search in Google Scholar

Shirazi S, Lin C-J, Chen D. Inorganic fouling of pressure-driven membrane processes – a critical review. Desalination 2010; 250: 236–248.Search in Google Scholar

Siavash Madaeni S, Mohamamdi T, Kazemi Moghadam M. Chemical cleaning of reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination 2001; 134: 77–82.Search in Google Scholar

Singh D, Sirkar KK. Desalination of brine and produced water by direct contact membrane distillation at high temperatures and pressures. J Membr Sci 2012; 389: 380–388.Search in Google Scholar

Singh N, Cui XF, Boland T, Husson SM. The role of independently variable grafting density and layer thickness of polymer nanolayers on peptide adsorption and cell adhesion. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 763–771.Search in Google Scholar

Singh D, Prakash P, Sirkar KK. Deoiled produced water treatment using direct-contact membrane distillation. Ind Eng Chem Res 2013; 52: 13439–13448.Search in Google Scholar

Spiegler KS, Kedem O. Thermodynamics of hyperfiltration (reverse osmosis): criteria for efficient membranes. Desalination 1966; 1: 311–326.Search in Google Scholar

Subramani A, Schlicher R, Long J, Yu J, Lehman S, Jacangelo JG. Recovery optimization of membrane processes for treatment of produced water with high silica content. Desalination Water Treat 2011; 36: 297–309.Search in Google Scholar

Sy Thuy N, Roddick FA. Chemical cleaning of ultrafiltration membrane fouled by an activated sludge effluent. Desalination Water Treat 2011; 34: 94–99.Search in Google Scholar

Tang CY, Chong TH, Fane AG. Colloidal interactions and fouling of NF and RO membranes: a review. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 2011; 164: 126–143.Search in Google Scholar

Thiel GP, Tow EW, Banchik LD, Chung HW, Lienhard JH. Energy consumption in desalinating produced water from shale oil and gas extraction. Desalination 2015; 366: 94–112.Search in Google Scholar

Tomer N, Mondal S, Wandera D, Wickramasinghe SR, Husson SM. Modification of nanofiltration membranes by surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization for produced water filtration. Separ Sci Technol 2009; 44: 3346–3368.Search in Google Scholar

van der Sman RGM, Vollebregt HM, Mepschen A, Noordman TR. Review of hypotheses for fouling during beer clarification using membranes. J Membr Sci 2012; 396: 22–31.Search in Google Scholar

Wan M-W, Reguyal F, Futalan C, Yang H-L, Kan C-C. Ultrasound irradiation combined with hydraulic cleaning on fouled polyethersulfone and polyvinylidene fluoride membranes. Environ Technol 2013; 34: 2929–2937.Search in Google Scholar

Wandera D, Husson SM. Assessment of fouling-resistant membranes for additive-free treatment of high-strength wastewaters. Desalination 2013; 309: 222–230.Search in Google Scholar

Wandera D, Wickramasinghe SR, Husson SM. Stimuli-responsive membranes. J Membr Sci 2010; 357: 6–35.Search in Google Scholar

Wandera D, Wickramasinghe SR, Husson SM. Modification and characterization of ultrafiltration membranes for treatment of produced water. J Membr Sci 2011; 373: 178–188.Search in Google Scholar

Wandera D, Himstedt HH, Marroquin M, Wickramasinghe SR, Husson SM. Modification of ultrafiltration membranes with block copolymer nanolayers for produced water treatment: the roles of polymer chain density and polymerization time on performance. J Membr Sci 2012; 403: 250–260.Search in Google Scholar

Wang Z, Wu Z. A review of membrane fouling in MBRs: characteristics and role of sludge cake formed on membrane surfaces. Separ Sci Technol 2009; 44: 3571–3596.Search in Google Scholar

Wang S, Liu C, Li Q. Fouling of microfiltration membranes by organic polymer coagulants and flocculants: Controlling factors and mechanisms. Water Res 2011; 45: 357–365.Search in Google Scholar

Wang L, Wang Q, Li Y, Lin H. Ultrasound-assisted chemical cleaning of polyvinylidene fluoride membrane fouled by lactic acid fermentation broth. Desalination 2013; 326: 103–108.Search in Google Scholar

Wang Z, Meng F, He X, Zhou Z, Huang L-N, Liang S. Optimisation and performance of NaClO-assisted maintenance cleaning for fouling control in membrane bioreactors. Water Res 2014; 53: 1–11.Search in Google Scholar

Weschenfelder SE, Louvisse AMT, Borges CP, Meabe E, Izquierdo J, Campos JC. Evaluation of ceramic membranes for oilfield produced water treatment aiming reinjection in offshore units. J Petroleum Eng 2015; 131: 51–57.Search in Google Scholar

Woo YC, Lee JJ, Oh JS, Jang HJ, Kim HS. Effect of chemical cleaning conditions on the flux recovery of fouled membrane. Desalination Water Treat 2013; 51: 5268–5274.Search in Google Scholar

Woo YC, Lee JK, Kim H-S. Fouling characteristics of microfiltration membranes by organic and inorganic matter and evaluation of flux recovery by chemical cleaning. Desalination Water Treat 2014; 52: 6920–6929.Search in Google Scholar

Xiao F, Xiao P, Zhang WJ, Wang DS. Identification of key factors affecting the organic fouling on low-pressure ultrafiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 2013; 447: 144–152.Search in Google Scholar

Xie R, Chu LY, Chen WM, Xiao W, Wang HD, Qu JB. Characterization of microstructure of poly (N-isopropylacrylamide)-grafted polycarbonate track-etched membranes prepared by plasma-graft pore-filling polymerization. J Membr Sci 2005; 258: 157–166.Search in Google Scholar

Xu P, Drewes JE. Viability of nanofiltration and ultra-low pressure reverse osmosis membranes for multi-beneficial use of methane produced water. Separ Purif Technol 2006; 52: 67–76.Search in Google Scholar

Xu K, Ren H, Ding L, Geng J, Zhang T. A review of membrane fouling in municipal secondary effluent reclamation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2013; 20: 771–777.Search in Google Scholar

Yamamura H, Okimoto K, Kimura K, Watanabe Y. Hydrophilic fraction of natural organic matter causing irreversible fouling of microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes. Water Res 2014; 54: 123–136.Search in Google Scholar

Yang Q, Himstedt HH, Ulbricht M, Qian X, Wickramasinghe SR. Designing magnetic field responsive nanofiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 2013; 430: 70–78.Search in Google Scholar

Yangali-Quintanilla V, Sadmani A, McConville M, Kennedy M, Amy G. Rejection of pharmaceutically active compounds and endocrine disrupting compounds by clean and fouled nanofiltration membranes. Water Res 2009; 43: 2349–2362.Search in Google Scholar

Yan-jun Z, Kai-fen W, Zheng-jun W, Liang Z, Shu-shen L. Fouling and cleaning of membrane – a literature review. J Environ Sci 2000; 12: 241–251.Search in Google Scholar

Yi ZA, Zhu LP, Xu YY, Zhao YF, Ma XT, Zhu BK. Polysulfone-based amphiphilic polymer for hydrophilicity and fouling-resistant modification of polyethersulfone membranes. J Membr Sci 2010; 365: 25–33.Search in Google Scholar

Younker JM, Walsh ME. Impact of salinity on coagulation and dissolved air flotation treatment for oil and gas produced water. Water Qual Res J Canada 2014; 49: 135–143.Search in Google Scholar

Yu SC, Chen ZH, Liu JQ, Yao GH, Liu MH, Gao CJ. Intensified cleaning of organic-fouled reverse osmosis membranes by thermo-responsive polymer (TRP). J Membr Sci 2012; 392: 181–191.Search in Google Scholar

Yune PS, Kilduff JE, Belfort G. Fouling-resistant properties of a surface-modified poly(ether sulfone) ultrafiltration membrane grafted with poly(ethylene glycol)-amide binary monomers. J Membr Sci 2011; 377: 159–166.Search in Google Scholar

Zaib Q, Aina OD, Ahmad F. Using multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) for oilfield produced water treatment with environmentally acceptable endpoints. Environ Sci Processes Impacts 2014; 16: 2039–2047.Search in Google Scholar

Zhao L, Chang PCY, Yen C, Ho WSW. High-flux and fouling-resistant membranes for brackish water desalination. J Membr Sci 2013; 425: 1–10.Search in Google Scholar

Zhao S, Huang GH, Cheng GH, Wang YF, Fu HY. Hardness, COD and turbidity removals from produced water by electrocoagulation pretreatment prior to reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination 2014; 344: 454–462.Search in Google Scholar

Zhu LP, Xu L, Zhu BK, Feng YX, Xu YY. Preparation and characterization of improved fouling-resistant PPESK ultrafiltration membranes with amphiphilic PPESK-graft-PEG copolymers as additives. J Membr Sci 2007; 294: 196–206.Search in Google Scholar

Zhu XY, Tu WT, Wee KH, Bai RB. Effective and low fouling oil/water separation by a novel hollow fiber membrane with both hydrophilic and oleophobic surface properties. J Membr Sci 2014; 466: 36–44.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-5-13
Accepted: 2016-4-1
Published Online: 2016-6-16
Published in Print: 2016-12-1

©2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston