Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter November 6, 2013

Using the Hill viewpoints from 1965 for evaluating strengths of evidence of the risk for brain tumors associated with use of mobile and cordless phones1)

  • Lennart Hardell EMAIL logo and Michael Carlberg


Background: Wireless phones, i.e., mobile phones and cordless phones, emit radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) when used. An increased risk of brain tumors is a major concern. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) at the World Health Organization (WHO) evaluated the carcinogenic effect to humans from RF-EMF in May 2011. It was concluded that RF-EMF is a group 2B, i.e., a “possible”, human carcinogen. Bradford Hill gave a presidential address at the British Royal Society of Medicine in 1965 on the association or causation that provides a helpful framework for evaluation of the brain tumor risk from RF-EMF.

Methods: All nine issues on causation according to Hill were evaluated. Regarding wireless phones, only studies with long-term use were included. In addition, laboratory studies and data on the incidence of brain tumors were considered.

Results: The criteria on strength, consistency, specificity, temporality, and biologic gradient for evidence of increased risk for glioma and acoustic neuroma were fulfilled. Additional evidence came from plausibility and analogy based on laboratory studies. Regarding coherence, several studies show increasing incidence of brain tumors, especially in the most exposed area. Support for the experiment came from antioxidants that can alleviate the generation of reactive oxygen species involved in biologic effects, although a direct mechanism for brain tumor carcinogenesis has not been shown. In addition, the finding of no increased risk for brain tumors in subjects using the mobile phone only in a car with an external antenna is supportive evidence. Hill did not consider all the needed nine viewpoints to be essential requirements.

Conclusion: Based on the Hill criteria, glioma and acoustic neuroma should be considered to be caused by RF-EMF emissions from wireless phones and regarded as carcinogenic to humans, classifying it as group 1 according to the IARC classification. Current guidelines for exposure need to be urgently revised.

Corresponding author: Lennart Hardell, MD, PhD, Department of Oncology, University Hospital, SE-701 85 Örebro, Sweden, Phone: +46-19-6021000, Fax: +46-19-101768, E-mail:

  1. 1)

    Based on a presentation at the Corporate Interference with Science and Health: Fracking, Food and Wireless, Scandinavia House, New York City, March 13 and 14, 2013.

This work was supported by grants from Cancer-och Allergifonden, Cancerhjälpen, Pandora-Foundation for Independent Research, Berlin, Germany, and, Schweizerische Interessengemeinschaft Elektrosmog-Betroffener,


1. Post-och Telestyrelsen. Svensk Telemarknad första halvåret 2011. Available at: Accessed on May 31, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

2. International Telecommunication Union. The world in 2011 – ICT facts and figures. Available at: Accessed on May 31, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

3. Hardell L, Carlberg M, Hansson Mild K. Pooled analysis of two case-control studies on the use of cellular and cordless telephones and the risk of benign brain tumours diagnosed during 1997–2003. Int J Oncol 2006;28:509–18.10.3892/ijo.28.2.509Search in Google Scholar

4. Hardell L, Carlberg M, Hansson Mild K. Pooled analysis of two case-control studies on use of cellular and cordless telephones and the risk for malignant brain tumours diagnosed in 1997–2003. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2006;79:630–9.10.1007/s00420-006-0088-5Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Hardell L, Carlberg M. Mobile phones, cordless phones and the risk for brain tumours. Int J Oncol 2009;35:5–17.10.3892/ijo_00000307Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Hardell L, Carlberg M, Hansson Mild K. Pooled analysis of case-control studies on malignant brain tumours and the use of mobile and cordless phones including living and deceased subjects. Int J Oncol 2011;38:1465–74.10.3892/ijo.2011.947Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Hardell L, Carlberg M, Hansson Mild K. Re-analysis of risk for glioma in relation to mobile telephone use: comparison with the results of the Interphone international case-control study. Int J Epidemiol 2011;40:1126–8.10.1093/ije/dyq246Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Hardell L, Carlberg M, Hansson Mild K. Use of mobile phones and cordless phones is associated with increased risk for glioma and acoustic neuroma. Pathophysiology 2013;20:85–110.10.1016/j.pathophys.2012.11.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Cardis E, Deltour I, Mann S, Moissonnier M, Taki M, et al. Distribution of RF energy emitted by mobile phones in anatomical structures of the brain. Phys Med Biol 2008;53:2771–83.10.1088/0031-9155/53/11/001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Gandhi OP, Morgan LL, de Salles AA, Han YY, Herberman RB, et al. Exposure limits: the underestimation of absorbed cell phone radiation, especially in children. Electromagn Biol Med 2012;31:34–51.10.3109/15368378.2011.622827Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Interphone Study Group. Brain tumour risk in relation to mobile telephone use: results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study. Int J Epidemiol 2010;39:675–94.10.1093/ije/dyq079Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Interphone Study Group. Acoustic neuroma risk in relation to mobile telephone use: results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study. Cancer Epidemiol 2011; 35:453–64.10.1016/j.canep.2011.05.012Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Schüz J, Jacobsen R, Olsen JH, Boice JD Jr, McLaughlin JK, et al. Cellular telephone use and cancer risk: update of a nationwide Danish cohort. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006;98:1707–13.10.1093/jnci/djj464Search in Google Scholar

14. Baan R, Grosse Y, Lauby-Secretan B, El Ghissassi F, Bouvard V, et al. Carcinogenicity of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. Lancet Oncol 2011;12:624–6.10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70147-4Search in Google Scholar

15. Söderqvist F, Carlberg M, Hardell L. Review of four publications on the Danish cohort study on mobile phone subscribers and risk of brain tumours. Rev Environ Health 2012;27:51–8.10.1515/reveh-2012-0004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Non-ionizing radiation, Part 2: radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. Volume 102. Available at: Accessed on May 31, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

17. Hill AB. The environment and disease: association or causation? Proc R Soc Med 1965;58:295–300.10.1177/003591576505800503Search in Google Scholar

18. Rothman KJ. Causation and causal inference. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF, editors. Cancer epidemiology and prevention. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1982:15–22.Search in Google Scholar

19. Hardell L, Carlberg M, Gee D. Mobile phone use and brain tumour risk: early warnings, early actions? In: Late lessons from early warnings, part 2. Copenhagen, Denmark: European Environment Agency, 2013. Available at: Accessed on May 31, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

20. BioInitiative Working Group. The BioInitiative Report 2012. A rationale for biologically-based public exposure standards for electromagnetic fields (ELF and RF). Available at: Accessed on May 31, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

21. Hardell L, Carlberg M, Söderqvist F, Hansson Mild K. Case-control study of the association between malignant brain tumors diagnosed 2007–2009 and mobile and cordless phone use. Int J Oncol 2013 [in press].10.3892/ijo.2013.2111Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. Hardell L, Carlberg M, Söderqvist F, Hansson Mild K. Pooled analysis of case-control studies on acoustic neuroma diagnosed 1997–2003 and 2007–2009 and use of mobile and cordless phones. Int J Oncol 2013;43:1036–44.10.3892/ijo.2013.2025Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

23. Carlberg M, Söderqvist F, Hansson Mild K, Hardell L. Meningioma patients diagnosed 2007–2009 and the association with use of mobile and cordless phones. Environ Health 2013;12:60.10.1186/1476-069X-12-60Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

24. Redmayne M, Inyang I, Dimitriadis C, Benke G, Abramson MJ. Cordless telephone use: implications for mobile phone research. J Environ Monit 2010;12:809–12.10.1039/b920489jSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Ohgaki H, Kleihues P. Population-based studies on incidence, survival rates, and genetic alterations in astocytic and oligodendroglial gliomas. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2005;64:479–89.10.1093/jnen/64.6.479Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Sutherland GR, Florell R, Louw D, Choi NW, Sima AA. Epidemiology of primary intracranial neoplasms in Manitoba, Canada. Can J Neurol Sci 1987;14:586–92.Search in Google Scholar

27. Cardis E, Armstrong BK, Bowman JD, Giles GG, Hours M, et al. Risk of brain tumours in relation to estimated RF dose for mobile phones: results from five Interphone countries. Occup Environ Med 2011;68:631–40.10.1136/oemed-2011-100155Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

28. Yadav AS, Sharma MK. Increased frequency of micronucleated exfoliated cells among humans exposed in vivo to mobile telephone radiations. Mutat Res 2008;650:175–80.10.1016/j.mrgentox.2007.11.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Lai H, Singh NP. Acute low-intensity microwave exposure increases DNA single-strand breaks in rat brain cells. Bioelectromagnetics 1995;16:207–10.10.1002/bem.2250160309Search in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Lai H, Singh NP. Single- and double-strand DNA breaks in rat brain cells after acute exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation. Int J Radiat Biol 1996;69:513–21.10.1080/095530096145814Search in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Kesari KK, Behari J, Kumar S. Mutagenic response of 2.45 GHz radiation exposure on rat brain. Int J Radiat Biol 2010;86:334–43.10.3109/09553000903564059Search in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Diem E, Schwarz C, Adlkofer F, Jahn O, Rüdiger H. Non-thermal DNA breakage by mobile-phone radiation (1800 MHz) in human fibroblasts and in transformed GFSH-R17 rat granulosa cells in vitro. Mutat Res 2005;583:178–83.10.1016/j.mrgentox.2005.03.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

33. Paulraj R, Behari J. Single strand DNA breaks in rat brain cells exposed to microwave radiation. Mutat Res 2006;596:76–80.10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.12.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

34. Avci B, Akar A, Bilgici B, Tunçel ÖK. Oxidative stress induced by 1.8 GHz radio frequency electromagnetic radiation and effects of garlic extract in rats. Int J Radiat Biol 2012;88:799–805.10.3109/09553002.2012.711504Search in Google Scholar PubMed

35. Lu YS, Huang BT, Huang YX. Reactive oxygen species formation and apoptosis in human peripheral blood mononuclear cell induced by 900 MHz mobile phone radiation. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2012;2012:740280.Search in Google Scholar

36. Friedman J, Kraus S, Hauptman Y, Schiff Y, Seger R. Mechanism of short-term ERK activation by electromagnetic fields at mobile phone frequencies. Biochem J 2007;405:559–68.10.1042/BJ20061653Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

37. Liu C, Duan W, Xu S, Chen C, He M, et al. Exposure to 1800 MHz radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation induces oxidative DNA base damage in a mouse spermatocyte-derived cell line. Toxicol Lett 2013;218:2–9.10.1016/j.toxlet.2013.01.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

38. de Vocht F, Hannam K, Buchan I. Environmental risk factors for cancers of the brain and nervous system: the use of ecological data to generate hypotheses. Occup Environ Med 2013;70:349–56.10.1136/oemed-2012-100954Search in Google Scholar PubMed

39. Little MP, Rajaraman P, Curtis RE, Devesa SS, Inskip PD, et al. Mobile phone use and glioma risk: comparison of epidemiological study results with incidence trends in the United States. BMJ 2012;344:e1147.10.1136/bmj.e1147Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

40. Zada G, Bond AE, Wang YP, Giannotta SL, Deapen D. Incidence trends in the anatomic location of primary malignant brain tumors in the United States: 1992–2006. World Neurosurg 2012;77:518–24.10.1016/j.wneu.2011.05.051Search in Google Scholar PubMed

41. de Vocht F, Burstyn I, Cherrie JW. Time trends (1998–2007) in brain cancer incidence rates in relation to mobile phone use in England. Bioelectromagnetics 2011;32:334–9.10.1002/bem.20648Search in Google Scholar PubMed

42. Dobes M, Shadbolt B, Khurana VG, Jain S, Smith SF, et al. A multicenter study of primary brain tumor incidence in Australia (2000–2008). Neuro Oncol 2011;13:783–90.10.1093/neuonc/nor052Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

43. Oral B, Guney M, Ozguner F, Karahan N, Mungan T, et al. Endometrial apoptosis induced by a 900-MHz mobile phone: preventive effects of vitamins E and C. Adv Ther 2006;23:957–73.10.1007/BF02850217Search in Google Scholar PubMed

44. Ozguner F, Bardak Y, Comlekci S. Protective effects of melatonin and caffeic acid phenethyl ester against retinal oxidative stress in long-term use of mobile phone: a comparative study. Mol Cell Biochem 2006;282:83–8.10.1007/s11010-006-1267-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed

45. Hardell L, Hallquist A, Hansson Mild K, Carlberg M, Påhlson A, et al. Cellular and cordless telephones and the risk for brain tumours. Eur J Cancer Prev 2002;11:377–86.10.1097/00008469-200208000-00010Search in Google Scholar PubMed

46. Chou CK, Guy AW, Kunz LL, Johnson RB, Crowley JJ, et al. Long-term, low-level microwave irradiation of rats. Bioelectromagnetics 1992;13:469–96.10.1002/bem.2250130605Search in Google Scholar PubMed

47. Frei MR, Jauchem JR, Dusch SJ, Merritt JH, Berger RE, et al. Chronic, low-level (1.0 W/kg) exposure of mice prone to mammary cancer to 2450 MHz microwaves. Radiat Res 1998;150:568–76.10.2307/3579874Search in Google Scholar

48. Szmigielski S, Szudzinski A, Pietraszek A, Bielec M, Janiak M, et al. Accelerated development of spontaneous and benzopyrene-induced skin cancer in mice exposed to 2450-MHz microwave radiation. Bioelectromagnetics 1982;3:179–91.10.1002/bem.2250030202Search in Google Scholar PubMed

49. Repacholi MH, Basten A, Gebski V, Noonan D, Finnie J, et al. Lymphomas in E mu-Pim1 transgenic mice exposed to pulsed 900 MHZ electromagnetic fields. Radiat Res 1997;147:631–40.10.2307/3579630Search in Google Scholar

50. Kundi M. Causality and the interpretation of epidemiologic evidence. Environ Health Perspect 2006;114:969–74.10.1289/ehp.8297Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

51. Repacholi MH, Lerchl A, Röösli M, Sienkiewicz Z, Auvinen A, et al. Systematic review of wireless phone use and brain cancer and other head tumors. Bioelectromagnetics 2012;33:187–206.10.1002/bem.20716Search in Google Scholar PubMed

52. Hardell L, Carlberg M, Hansson Mild K. Methodological aspects of epidemiological studies on the use of mobile phones and their association with brain tumors. Open Environ Sci 2008;2:54–61.10.2174/1876325100802010054Search in Google Scholar

53. Holmberg B. The toxicology of monomers of the polyvinyl plastic series. Prog Clin Biol Res 1984;141:99–112.Search in Google Scholar

54. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Preamble. Lyon, France: WHO, IARC, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2013-5-31
Accepted: 2013-9-13
Published Online: 2013-11-06
Published in Print: 2013-11-01

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston

Downloaded on 9.6.2023 from
Scroll to top button