Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter November 6, 2013

The impact of air pollution on low birth weight and infant mortality

Zoheir Ezziane

Abstract

This article discusses the impact of environmental factors on birth outcomes during the last two decades. It reiterates the correlation between air pollutants and adverse pregnancy including low birth weight (LBW) and infant mortality. Data sets are assembled for many OECD countries consisting of yearly air pollutants emissions including sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, and volatile organic compounds. Various health data are illustrated to suggest that countries with high emission levels of air pollutants seemed to increase with LBW and infant mortality. This article reports the association of pollutants, including particles and gases, on mortality in general and infant mortality in particular. To assess air pollution impact on infant mortality, Spearman’s correlation is used to summarize and interpret data. This statistical method is used to assess the relationship between air pollution and infant mortality in many OECD countries between 2000 and 2009 using a monotonic function. The results illustrate a positive correlation between air pollution and infant mortality, and in some cases, Spearman’s ρ-value is >0.9 and the p-value is <0.001. This article also backs up the association between some air pollutants and LBW and proposes the importance to design novel models for monitoring, controlling, and reducing air pollutants especially within cities and ultimately improving the well-being of communities worldwide.


Corresponding author: Zoheir Ezziane, The Wharton Entrepreneurship and Family Business Research Centre, University of Pennsylvania, CERT Technology Park, P.O. Box 5464, Abu Dhabi, UAE; World Health Organization, The Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland; and Higher Colleges of Technology, P.O. Box 17258, Al Ain, UAE, E-mail:

This work was supported by a Wharton grant funded by the Wharton Entrepreneurship and Family Business Research Centre at CERT in Abu Dhabi, UAE.

References

1. Perera FP, Jedrychowski W, Rauh V, Whyatt RM. Molecular epidemiologic research on the effects of environmental pollutants on the fetus. Environ Health Perspect 1999;107:451–60.Search in Google Scholar

2. Triche EW, Hossain N. Environ factors implicated in the causation of adverse pregnancy outcome. Semin Perinatol 2007;31:240–42.Search in Google Scholar

3. Jedrychowski W, Perera F, Maugeri U, Spengler JD, Mroz E, et al. Effect of prenatal exposure to fine particles and postnatal indoor air quality on the occurrence of respiratory symptoms in the first two years of life. Int J Environ Health 2008;2:314–29.Search in Google Scholar

4. Bosetti C, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Gallus S, Cipriani S, La Vecchia C, et al. Ambient particulate matter and preterm birth or birth weight: a review of the literature. Arch Toxicol 2010;84:447–60.Search in Google Scholar

5. Zabiegala B, Partyka M, Gawronska A, Wasilewska A, Namiesnik J. Screening of volatile organic compounds as a source for indoor pollution. Int J Environ Health 2007;1:13–28.Search in Google Scholar

6. Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet 2008;371:75–84.Search in Google Scholar

7. Haram K, Softeland E, Bukowski R. Intrauterine growth restriction. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2006;93:5–12.Search in Google Scholar

8. Le HQ, Batterman SA, Wirth JJ, Wahl RL, Hoggatt KJ, et al. Air pollutant exposure and preterm and term small-for-gestational-age births in Detroit, Michigan: long-term trends and associations. Environ Int 2012;44:7–17.Search in Google Scholar

9. Maisonet M, Correa A, Misra D, Jaakkola JJK. A review of the literature on the effects of ambient air pollution on fetal growth. Environ Res 2004;95:106–15.Search in Google Scholar

10. Yang J, Ou CQ, Ding Y, Zhou YX, Chen PY. Daily temperature and mortality: a study of distributed lag non-linear effect and effect modification in Guangzhou. Environ Health 2012;11:63.Search in Google Scholar

11. Yang J, Liu HZ, Ou CQ, Lin GZ, Zhou Q, et al. Global climate change: impact of diurnal temperature range on mortality in Guangzhou, China. Environ Pollut 2013;175:131–6.Search in Google Scholar

12. Brunek-reef B, Holgate ST. Air pollution and health. Lancet 2002;360:1233–42.Search in Google Scholar

13. Samet JM. Air pollution and epidemiology: “déjà-vu all over again?” Epidemiology 2002;13:118–21.Search in Google Scholar

14. Fischer PH, Ameling CB, Marra M. Air pollution and daily mortality in the Netherlands over the period 1992–2002, 2005. Available at: http://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/630400002.pdf. Accessed on 10 March 2013.Search in Google Scholar

15. Fischer PH, Ameling CB, Marra M, Janssen N, Cassee FR. Trends in relative risk estimates for the association between air pollution and mortality in the Netherlands, 1992–2006. Environ Res 2011;111:94–100.Search in Google Scholar

16. Green Facts: facts on health and environment. Air Pollution Nitrogen Dioxide. Available at: http://www.greenfacts.org/en/nitrogen-dioxide-no2/index.htm#3. Accessed on 25 January 2013.Search in Google Scholar

17. Tunnicliffe WS, Burge PS, Ayres JG. Effect of domestic concentrations of nitrogen dioxide on airway responses to inhaled allergen in asthmatic patients. Lancet 1994;344:1733–6.Search in Google Scholar

18. Strand V, Svartengren M, Rak S, Barck C, Bylin G. Repeated exposure to an ambient level of NO2 enhances asthmatic response to a nonsymptomatic allergen dose. Eur Respir J 1998;12:6–12.Search in Google Scholar

19. Barck C, Sandstrom T, Lundahl J, Hallden G, Svartengren M, et al. Ambient level of NO2 augments the inflammatory response to inhaled allergen in asthmatics. Respir Med 2002;96:907–17.Search in Google Scholar

20. Carreras G, Chellini E, Blangiardo M. A Bayesian model for studying urban air pollution and respiratory symptoms in children. Int J Environ Health 2012;6:125–40.Search in Google Scholar

21. Holland M, Pye, S. Assessing the air pollution benefits of further climate measures in the EU up to 2020, 2006. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/archives/cafe/general/pdf/benefits_measures_2020.pdf. Accessed on 25 March 2013.Search in Google Scholar

22. Indices definition, 2013. Available at: http://www.airqualitynow.eu. Accessed on 2 February 2013.Search in Google Scholar

23. Air quality index, 2013. Available at: http://www.clarecoco.ie/water-waste-environment/pollution-investigation-and-control/air-pollution/air-quality-index/. Accessed on 9 December 2012.Search in Google Scholar

24. Bobak, M. Outdoor air pollution, low birth weight, and prematurity. Environ Health Perspect 2000;108:173–6.Search in Google Scholar

25. Dejmek J, Selevan SG, Benes I, Solansky I, Sram RJ. Fetal growth and maternal exposure to particulate matter during pregnancy. Environ Health Perspect 1999;107:475–80.Search in Google Scholar

26. Ha EH, Hong YC, Lee BE, Woo BH, Schwartz J, et al. Is air pollution a risk factor for low birth weight in Seoul? Epidemiology 2001;12:643–8.Search in Google Scholar

27. Maisonet M, Bush TJ, Correa A, Jaakkola JK. Relation between ambient air pollution and low birth weight in the northeastern United States. Environ Health Perspect 2001;109:351–6.Search in Google Scholar

28. Ritz B, Yu F. The effect of ambient carbon monoxide on low birth weight among children born in Southern California between 1989 and 1993. Environ Health Perspect 1999;107:17–25.Search in Google Scholar

29. Ritz B, Yu F, Chapa G, Fruin S. Effect of air pollution on preterm birth among children born in southern California between 1989 and 1993. Epidemiology 2000;11:502–11.Search in Google Scholar

30. Wang MQ, Saricks CL, Wu MM. Fuel-cycle fossil energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of fuel ethanol produced from U.S. Midwest corn, 1997. Available at: http://www.transportation.anl.gov/pdfs/TA/141.pdf. Accessed on 25 October 2012.Search in Google Scholar

31. Xu X, Ding H, Wang X. Acute effects of total suspended particles and sulfur dioxides on preterm delivery: a community based cohort study. Arch Environ Health 1995;50:407–15.Search in Google Scholar

32. Veras MM, Caldini EG, Dolhnikoff M, Saldiva PHN. Air pollution and effects on reproductive-system functions globally with particular emphasis on the Brazilian population. J Toxicol Environ Health 2010;13:1–15.Search in Google Scholar

33. Bignami G, Musi B, Dell’Omo G, Laviola G, Alleva E. Limited effects of ozone exposure during pregnancy on physical and neurobehavioral development of CD-1 mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1994;129:264–71.Search in Google Scholar

34. Glinianaia S, Rankin J, Bell R, Pless-Mulloli T, Howel D. Particulate air pollution and fetal health – a systematic review of the epidemiologic evidence. Epidemiology 2004;15:36–45.Search in Google Scholar

35. Kavlock R, Daston G, Grabowski CT. Studies on the developmental toxicity of ozone: prenatal effects. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1979;48:19–28.Search in Google Scholar

36. Shah PS, Balkhair T. Air pollution and birth outcomes: a systematic review. Environ Int 2011;37:498–516.Search in Google Scholar

37. Sram RJ, Binkova B, Dejmek J, Bobak M. Ambient air pollution and pregnancy outcomes: a review of the literature. Environ Health Perspect 2005;113:375–82.Search in Google Scholar

38. Huynh M, Woodruff TJ, Parker JD, Schoendorf KC. Relationships between air pollution and preterm birth in California. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2006;20:454–61.Search in Google Scholar

39. Parker JD, Woodruff TJ, Basu R, Schoendorf KC. Air pollution and birth weight among term infants in California. Pediatrics 2005;115:121–8.Search in Google Scholar

40. Ritz B, Wilhelm M, Hoggatt KJ, Ghosh JKC. Ambient air pollution and preterm birth in the environment and pregnancy outcomes study at the University of California, Los Angeles. Am J Epidemiol 2007;166:1045–52.Search in Google Scholar

41. Salam MT, Millstein J, Li Y-F, Lurmann FW, Margolis HG, et al. Birth outcomes and prenatal exposure to ozone, carbon monoxide, and particulate matter: results from the Children’s Health Study. Environ Health Perspect 2005;113:1638–44.Search in Google Scholar

42. Wilhelm M, Ritz B. Local variations in CO and particulate air pollution and adverse birth outcomes in Los Angeles County, California, USA. Environ Health Perspect 2005;113:1212–21.Search in Google Scholar

43. Demerjian KL. A review of national monitoring networks in North America. Atmos Environ 2000;34:1861–84.Search in Google Scholar

44. Liu S, Krewski D, Shi Y, Chen Y, Burnett RT. Association between gaseous ambient air pollutants and adverse pregnancy outcomes in Vancouver, Canada. Environ Health Perspect 2003;111:1773–8.Search in Google Scholar

45. Misra D, Nguyen RHN. Environ tobacco smoke and low birth weight: a hazard in the workplace? Environ Health Perspect 1999;107:897–904.Search in Google Scholar

46. Di Cera E, Doyle ML, Morgan MS., De Cristofaro R, Landolfi R, et al. Carbon monoxide and oxygen binding to human hemoglobin F0. Biochemistry 1989;28:2631–8.Search in Google Scholar

47. Sangalli MR, McLean AJ, Peek MJ, Rivory LP, Le Couteur DG. Carbon monoxide disposition and permeability-surface area product in the foetal circulation of the perfused term human placenta. Placenta 2003;24:8–11.Search in Google Scholar

48. Perera FP, Whyatt RM, Jedrychowski W, Rauh V, Manchester D, et al. Recent developments in molecular epidemiology: a study of the effects of environmental polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on birth outcomes in Poland. Am J Epidemiol 1998;147:309–14.Search in Google Scholar

49. Sram RJ, Binkova B, Rossner P, Rubes J, Topinka J, et al. Adverse reproductive outcomes from exposure to environmental mutagens. Mutat Res 1999;428:203–15.Search in Google Scholar

50. Sapkota A, Chelikowsky AP, Nachman KE, Cohen AJ, Ritz B. Exposure to particulate matter and adverse birth outcomes: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Air Qual Atmos Health 2010;5:369–81.Search in Google Scholar

51. Pope DP, Mishra V, Thompson L, Siddiqui AR, Rehfuess EA, et al. Risk of low birth weight and stillbirth associated with indoor air pollution from solid fuel use in developing countries. Epidemiol Rev 2010;32:71–80.Search in Google Scholar

52. Tabacova S, Baird DD, Balabaeva L. Exposure to oxidized nitrogen: lipid erozidation and neonatal health risk. Arch Environ Health 1998;53:214–21.Search in Google Scholar

53. Ponce NA, Hoggatt KJ, Wilhelm M, Ritz B. Preterm birth: the interaction of traffic-related air pollution with economic hardship in Los Angeles neighborhoods. Am J Epidemiol 2005;162:140–8.Search in Google Scholar

54. Ricciardi C. Induced harmful lifestyles and healthy choices. Int J Environ Health 2005;5:262–73.Search in Google Scholar

55. Zimmer-Gembeck MJ, Helfand M. Low birth weight in a public prenatal care program: behavioral and psychosocial risk factors and psychosocial intervention. Soc Sci Med 1996;43:187–97.Search in Google Scholar

56. Geronimus AT. Black/White differences in the relationship of maternal age to birth weight: a population-based test of the Weathering hypothesis. Soc Sci Med 1996;42:5 89–97.Search in Google Scholar

57. Reime B, Ratner PA, Tomaselli-Reime SN, Kelly A, Schuecking BA, et al. The role of mediating factors in the association between social deprivation and low birth weight in Germany. Soc Sci Med 2006;62:1731–44.Search in Google Scholar

58. Tack T, Waldmann RJ. Infant mortality, relative income and public policy. Appl Econ 2012;45:3240–54.Search in Google Scholar

59. OECD health data, 2010. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/health/healthdata. Accessed on 27 January 2013.Search in Google Scholar

60. OECD income distribution and poverty database, 2012. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/els/social/inequality. Accessed on 12 December 2012Search in Google Scholar

61. OECD statistics, 2012. Available at: http://stats.oecd.org/OECDStat_Metadata/ShowMetadata.ashx?Dataset=AIR_GHG&ShowOnWeb=true&Lang=en. Accessed on 29 January 2013.Search in Google Scholar

62. The Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution, 2012. UNECE-EMEP emissions database, WebDab, 2012. Available at: http://www.ceip.at/webdab-emission-database/officially-reported-emission-data/. Accessed on 31 January 2013.Search in Google Scholar

63. National inventory submissions, 2012. Available at: http://unfccc.int/national_reports/annex_i_ghg_inventories/national_inventories_submissions/items/6598.php.Search in Google Scholar

64. Bradley EH, Elkins BR, Herrin J, Elbel B. Health and social services expenditures: associations with health outcomes. BMJ Qual Saf 2011;20:826–31.Search in Google Scholar

65. Paneth KA. The problem of low birthweight. Future Child 1995;5:19–34.Search in Google Scholar

66. Padula AM, Mortimer K, Hubbard A, Lurmann F, Jerrett M, et al. Exposure to traffic-related air pollution during pregnancy and term low birth weight: estimation of causal associations in a semiparametric. Am J Epidemiol 2012; 176:815–24.Search in Google Scholar

67. Rogers JF, Thompson SJ, Addy CL, McKeown RE, Cowen DJ, et al. Association of very low birth weight with exposures to environmental sulfur dioxide and total suspended particulates. Am J Epidemiol 2000;151:602–13.Search in Google Scholar

68. Wang X, Ding H, Ryan L, Xu X. Association between air pollution and low birth weight: a community-based study. Environ Health Perspect 1997;105:514–20.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2013-7-7
Accepted: 2013-9-8
Published Online: 2013-11-06
Published in Print: 2013-11-01

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston